Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
3. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 Nitrogen emission data, as well as the model results presented here have been approved by the 36th Session of the Steering Body of EMEP in Geneva in September 2012. The version rv4.0 of the EMEP/MSC-W Eulerian model has been used for all nitrogen computations presented in this Chapter. Compared to the model version rv3.6, used in 2011 for computing 2009 deposition, many changes have been introduced into the present model. The most important are: new vertical distribution of emissions, integration of SOA model into the EMEP/MSC-W model system, explicit calculation of H+ and pH in cloud water, change in mass median diameter for coarse nitrate and about 10 other changes/improvements (EMEP Status Report 1/2012). All 2010 deposition calculations were performed for the EMEP extended domain introduced in 2007 which includes countries in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Meteorological input data necessary for 2010 EMEP model calculations were provided by ECMWF Numerical Weather Prediction model (ECMWF-IFS). Most of Europe experienced more precipitation in 2010 than in 2009. It was also true for the Baltic Sea basin with much higher precipitation in 2010 than in 2009. The surface temperature of the Baltic Sea basin was higher in 2009 than in 2010. Emission input data for 2010 were prepared by the EMEP Centre on Emission Inventories and Projections (CEIP). The EMEP Parties reported emission inventory data using standard formats in accordance with the EMEP Reporting guidelines. For the EMEP models, reported by Parties sectoral (NFR09) emissions were aggregated into 10 SNAP sectors. To fill in the missing gaps in sectoral emissions, CEIP applied different methods including Expert estimates. For shipping emissions, the NOx, SOx and PM data were computed by linear interpolation with recent calculations from IIASA for the years 2005 and 2010. Between 2010 and 2009, emissions of NOx and NH3 in the entire extended EMEP area decreased by 6% and 0.8%, respectively. The sum of nitrogen oxides emissions from all HELCOM contracting parties decreased 15% between 2009 and 2010, mainly because of the large (31%) reduction of NOx emissions in Russia. Nitrogen oxides emissions from the international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea increased 1.8% between 2009 and 2010. The sum of ammonia emissions from all HELCOM contracting parties increased 0.9% from 2009 to 2010. Calculated annual deposition of total nitrogen to the Baltic Sea basin in 2010 was 219 kt, approximately 12% higher than in 2009. Deposition of oxidized nitrogen was 20% higher and deposition of reduced nitrogen was 3% higher in 2010 compared to 2009. Deposition of oxidized nitrogen accounted for 57% of total nitrogen deposition in 2010. EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 20 3.1 Nitrogen emissions Table 3.1. Annual total 2010 emissions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia from the HELCOM Contracting Parties and Baltic See ship traffic. Sum of HELCOM emissions is also included. Units: kt N per year. Pollutant Emission source NOx NH3 Denmark 39 61 Estonia 11 8 Finland 51 31 403 451 Latvia 10 14 Lithuania 18 25 Poland 264 223 Russian Federation 996 975 49 43 HELCOM 1840 1832 Baltic Sea 101 Germany Sweden Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 21 Figure 3.1. Percent of annual emissions of total (oxidized + reduced) nitrogen that is deposited on the Baltic Sea basin in 2010, for HELCOM Parties and international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea (BAS). 22 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM Figure 3.2. Map of annual emission of oxidized nitrogen (including emissions from the ship traffic) in the Baltic Sea region in 2010. Units: Mg (tonnes) of NO2 per year and per 50×50 km grid cell. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 23 Figure 3.3. Map of annual emission of ammonia in the Baltic Sea region in 2010. Units: Mg of NH3 per year and per 50×50 km grid cell. EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 24 Table 3.2. The list of 11 SNAP emission sectors as specified in the EMEP-CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook. Sector 1 Sector 2 Sector 3 Sector 4 Sector 5 Sector 6 Sector 7 Sector 8 Sector 9 Sector 10 Sector 11 Combustion in energy and transformation industry Non-industrial combustion plants Combustion in manufacturing industry Production processes Extraction and distribution of fossil fuels and geothermal energy Solvent and other product use Road transport Other mobile sources and machinery (including ship traffic) Waste treatment and disposal Agriculture Other sources and sinks Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 25 DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND GERMANY LATVIA LITHUANIA POLAND RUSSIA SWEDEN Figure 3.4. Annual 2010 nitrogen oxides emissions from the HELCOM Parties split into the SNAP sectors. EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 26 DENMARK ESTONIA FINLAND GERMANY LATVIA LITHUANIA POLAND RUSSIA SWEDEN Figure 3.5. Annual 2010 ammonia emissions from the HELCOM Parties split into the SNAP sectors. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 27 Figure 3.7 Map of annual emissions of nitrogen oxides from the international ship traffic on the Baltic Sea in 2010 used in the EMEP model calculations. Units: Mg of NO2 per year and per 50×50 km grid cell. Emission input data for 2010 were prepared by the CEIP. For shipping emissions, the NOx, SOx and PM data were computed by linear interpolation with recent calculations from IIASA for the years 2005 and 2010. 28 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 3.2 Annual deposition of nitrogen Figure 3.8. Map of annual deposition flux of oxidized nitrogen (dry + wet) in 2010. Units: mg N m-2 yr-1. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 29 Figure 3.9. Map of annual deposition flux of reduced nitrogen (dry + wet) in 2010. Units: mg N m-2 yr-1. 30 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM Figure 3.10. Map of annual deposition flux of total (oxidized + reduced) nitrogen in 2010. Units: mg N m-2 yr-1. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 Figure 3.11. Map of annual precipitation in 2010. Units: mm yr-1. 31 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 32 3.3 Monthly deposition of nitrogen Figure 3.12. Monthly depositions of oxidized, reduced and total (oxidized +reduced) nitrogen to the entire Baltic Sea basin in 2010. Units: ktonnes N month-1. Table 3.3. Values of monthly depositions of oxidized, reduced and total (oxidized +reduced) nitrogen to the entire Baltic Sea basin in 2010. Units: ktonnes N month-1. Month January February Oxidized Reduced Total 10.1 6.7 16.8 12.5 9.8 22.3 9.6 8.0 10.1 8.2 19.7 16.2 May June 9.4 5.7 15.1 7.8 4.7 12.5 July 12.0 13.8 8.3 9.0 20.3 22.8 September October 10.9 7.8 18.7 9.0 9.3 18.3 November 8.9 6.9 15.8 December 12.1 8.0 20.1 March April August Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 33 3.4 Source allocation of nitrogen deposition Figure 3.13. Top twenty countries with highest contributions of nitrogen emissions to annual deposition of oxidized nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. Units: kt N year-1. Contributions from HELCOM countries and Baltic Sea are marked with green. 34 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM Figure 3.14. Contributions of nitrogen emissions from the HELCOM Parties, ship traffic on the Baltic Sea and remaining sources in the EMEP area to annual deposition of oxidized nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. REST denotes emission sources in the EMEP domain excluding HELCOM Parties and ship emissions from the Baltic Sea. Units: % of total deposition of oxidized nitrogen. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 35 Figure 3.15. Top twenty countries with highest contributions of nitrogen emissions to annual deposition of reduced nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. Units: kt N year-1. Contributions from HELCOM countries and Baltic Sea are marked with green color. 36 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM Figure 3.16. Contributions of nitrogen emissions from the HELCOM Parties, ship traffic on the Baltic Sea and remaining sources in the EMEP area to annual deposition of reduced nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. REST denotes emission sources in the EMEP domain excluding HELCOM Parties and ship emissions from the Baltic Sea. Units: % of total deposition of reduced nitrogen. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 37 Figure 3.17. Top twenty countries with highest contributions of nitrogen emissions to annual deposition of total nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. Units: kt N year-1. Contributions from HELCOM countries and Baltic Sea are marked with green color. 38 EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM Figure 3.18. Contributions of nitrogen emissions from the HELCOM Parties, ship traffic on the Baltic Sea and remaining sources in the EMEP area to annual deposition of total nitrogen into the Baltic Sea basin in the year 2010. REST denotes emission sources in the EMEP domain excluding HELCOM Parties and ship emissions from the Baltic Sea. Units: % of total nitrogen deposition. Atmospheric Supply of Nitrogen to the Baltic Sea in 2010 39 3.5 Conclusions for Chapter 3 • Calculated annual deposition of total nitrogen to the Baltic Sea basin in 2010 was 219 kt, approximately 12% higher than in 2009. Deposition of oxidised nitrogen accounted for 56% of total nitrogen deposition in 2010. • Compared to 2010 nitrogen oxides emissions are higher (0.2-18.9%) in seven out of nine HELCOM Contracting Parties. Emission reductions took place in Denmark (-2.3%) and a large one in Russian Federation (-30.8%). Ship emissions from the Baltic Sea were 1.8% higher in 2010 than in 2009. • Annual 2010 ammonia emissions remain on the same level as 2009 ammonia emissions in four out of nine HELCOM countries: Denmark, Estonia, Finland and Latvia. The 2010 emissions are higher than 209 emissions in three CPs: Lithuania, (6.7%), Rusian Federeation (5.2%) and Sweden (3.8%). They are lower in Germany (-5.1%) and Poland (-0.7 %). • Among the HELCOM Contracting Parties, the largest percent of 2010 nitrogen emissions deposited to the Baltic Sea basin can be noticed for Denmark (14.9%) and the lowest for Russia (0.7%). • Spatial distributions of nitrogen oxides and ammonia emissions in 2010 are very similar to the distributions in 2009. • Spatial distributions of oxidized and reduced nitrogen deposition in 2010 are also very similar to the distributions of nitrogen deposition in 2009. • No clear seasonal pattern can be found in monthly nitrogen depositions in 2010, with maximum of the deposition in February and August. • Germany, Poland, ship traffic on the Baltic Sea and Russia are the main emission sources contributing to oxidized nitrogen deposition into the Baltic Sea basin in 2010. There is not much difference compared to 2009 ranking. • As in 2008 and in 2009, Germany, Poland and Denmark are top three sources contributing to reduced nitrogen deposition into the Baltic Sea basin in 2010. • The main sources contributing to total nitrogen deposition to the Baltic Sea basin are: Germany, Poland, Denmark, Russian Federation and Sweden. EMEP Centres Joint Report for HELCOM 40 • As in previous years, also in 2010 some distant sources like United Kingdom, France and ship traffic on the North Sea contribute significantly to nitrogen deposition into the Baltic Sea basin. Contribution from boundary and initial conditions (BIC) is slightly lower in 2010 than in 2009.