* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Processes
Berkeley Software Distribution wikipedia , lookup
Plan 9 from Bell Labs wikipedia , lookup
Mobile operating system wikipedia , lookup
Spring (operating system) wikipedia , lookup
Copland (operating system) wikipedia , lookup
Unix security wikipedia , lookup
Burroughs MCP wikipedia , lookup
Security-focused operating system wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 5: Processes
Process Concept
Chapter 5: Processes &
Threads
Process Scheduling
Operations on Processes
Interprocess Communication
Communication in Client-Server Systems
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition,
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Objectives
5.2
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process Concept
An operating system executes a variety of programs:
To introduce the notion of a process -- a program in
execution which forms the basis of all computation
execution,
To describe the various features of processes, including
scheduling, creation and termination, and communication
To describe communication in client-server systems
z
Batch system – jobs
z
Time-shared systems – user programs or tasks
Textbook uses the terms job and process almost interchangeably
Process – a program in execution; process execution must
progress in sequential fashion
A process includes:
z
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.3
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
z
program counter
stack
z
data section
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.4
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process State
Diagram of Process State
As a process executes, it changes state
z
new: The process is being created
z
running: Instructions are being executed
z
waiting: The process is waiting for some event to occur
z
ready: The process is waiting to be assigned to a processor
z
terminated: The process has finished execution
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.5
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process Control Block (PCB)
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.6
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process Control Block (PCB)
Information associated with each process
Process state
Program counter
CPU registers
CPU scheduling information
Memory-management information
Accounting information
I/O status information
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.7
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.8
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
CPU Switch From Process to Process
Process Scheduling Queues
Job queue – set of all processes in the system
Ready queue – set of all processes residing in main memory,
ready and waiting to execute
Device queues – set of processes waiting for an I/O device
Processes migrate among the various queues
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.9
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Ready Queue And Various I/O Device Queues
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.11
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.10
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Representation of Process Scheduling
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.12
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Schedulers
Addition of Medium Term Scheduling
Long
Long-term
term scheduler (or job scheduler) – selects which
processes should be brought into the ready queue
Short-term scheduler (or CPU scheduler) – selects which
process should be executed next and allocates CPU
5.13
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Schedulers (Cont)
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Context Switch
Short-term scheduler is invoked very frequently (milliseconds) ⇒
(must be fast)
Long-term scheduler is invoked very infrequently (seconds,
minutes) ⇒ (may be slow)
When CPU switches to another process, the system must save the state of
the old process and load the saved state for the new process via a context
switch
Context of a process represented in the PCB
The long-term scheduler controls the degree of multiprogramming
z
I/O bound process – spends more time doing I/O than
I/O-bound
computations, many short CPU bursts
z
CPU-bound process – spends more time doing computations;
f
few
very long CPU
C
bursts
5.15
Context-switch time is overhead; the system does no useful work while
switching
Processes can be described as either:
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.14
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Time dependent on hardware support
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.16
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process Creation
Process Creation (Cont)
Parent process create children processes, which, in turn create other
processes forming a tree of processes
processes,
Generally, process identified and managed via a process identifier (pid)
Resource sharing
Address space
z
Child d
duplicate
li t off parentt
z
Child has a program loaded into it
UNIX examples
z
Parent and children share all resources
z
fork system call creates new process
z
Children share subset of parent’s resources
z
z
Parent and child share no resources
exec system call used after a fork to replace the process’ memory
space with a new program
Execution
z
Parent and children execute concurrently
z
Parent waits until children terminate
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.17
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Process Creation
5.18
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Process Termination
Process executes last statement and asks the operating system to
delete it (exit)
z
Output data from child to parent (via wait)
z
Process’ resources are deallocated by operating system
Parent may terminate execution of children processes (abort)
z
Child has exceeded allocated resources
z
Task assigned to child is no longer required
z
If parent is exiting
Some operating system do not allow child to continue if its
parent terminates
–
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.19
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
All children terminated - cascading termination
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.20
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Interprocess Communication
Communications Models
Processes within a system may be independent or cooperating
Cooperating
C
ti process can affect
ff t or be
b affected
ff t d by
b other
th processes,
including sharing data
Reasons for cooperating processes:
z
Information sharing
z
Computation speedup
z
Modularity
z
Convenience
Cooperating processes need interprocess communication (IPC)
Two models of IPC
z
Shared memory
y
z
Message passing
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.21
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Cooperating Processes
Independent process cannot affect or be affected by the execution of
another process
Cooperating process can affect or be affected by the execution of another
process
Advantages of process cooperation
z
Information sharing
z
Computation speed
speed-up
up
z
Modularity
z
Convenience
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.23
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
5.22
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Producer-Consumer Problem
Paradigm
g for cooperating
p
gp
processes, p
producer p
process
produces information that is consumed by a consumer
process
z
unbounded-buffer
unbounded
buffer places no practical limit on the size of
the buffer
z
bounded-buffer assumes that there is a fixed buffer size
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.24
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Bounded-Buffer – Producer
Bounded-Buffer – Shared-Memory Solution
Shared data
while (true) {
/* Produce an item */
#define BUFFER_SIZE 10
typedef struct {
while (((in = (in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE count) == out)
...
; /* do nothing -- no free buffers */
} item;;
buffer[in] = item;
in = (in + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;
item buffer[BUFFER_SIZE];
[
_
]
}
int in = 0;
int out = 0;
Solution is correct, but can only use BUFFER_SIZE-1 elements
5.25
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Bounded Buffer – Consumer
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.26
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Interprocess Communication – Message Passing
Mechanism for processes to communicate and to synchronize their actions
while (true) {
Message system – processes communicate with each other without
resorting to shared variables
while (in == out)
IPC facility provides two operations:
; // do nothing -- nothing to consume
z
send(message) – message size fixed or variable
receive(message)
If P and Q wish to communicate, they need to:
z establish a communication link between them
z exchange messages via send/receive
Implementation of communication link
z physical (e.g., shared memory, hardware bus)
z logical (e.g., logical properties)
z
// remove an item from the buffer
item = buffer[out];
out = (out + 1) % BUFFER SIZE;
return item;
}
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.27
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.28
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Implementation Questions
How are links established?
Direct Communication
Processes must name each other explicitly:
Can
C a lilink
kb
be associated
i t d with
ith more th
than ttwo processes?
?
z
send
d (P,
(P message)) – send
d a message tto process P
How many links can there be between every pair of communicating
z
receive(Q, message) – receive a message from process Q
processes?
Properties of communication link
What is the capacity of a link?
z
Links are established automatically
Is the size of a message that the link can accommodate fixed or variable?
z
A link is associated with exactly one pair of communicating processes
Is a link unidirectional or bi-directional?
z
Between each pair there exists exactly one link
z
The link may be unidirectional, but is usually bi-directional
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.29
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Indirect Communication
Messages are directed and received from mailboxes (also referred to as
ports)
5.30
Indirect Communication
Operations
z
create a new mailbox
z
Each mailbox has a unique id
z
send and receive messages through mailbox
z
Processes can communicate only
y if theyy share a mailbox
z
destroy a mailbox
Properties of communication link
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Primitives are defined as:
z
Link established only if processes share a common mailbox
send(A, message) – send a message to mailbox A
z
A link may be associated with many processes
receive(A, message) – receive a message from mailbox A
z
Each pair of processes may share several communication links
z
Link may be unidirectional or bi
bi-directional
directional
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.31
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.32
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Indirect Communication
Mailbox sharing
z
P1, P2, and
d P3 share
h
mailbox
ilb A
z
P1, sends; P2 and P3 receive
z
Who gets the message?
Synchronization
Message passing may be either blocking or non-blocking
Bl ki is
Blocking
i considered
id d synchronous
h
Solutions
z
Allow a link to be associated with at most two processes
z
Allow only one process at a time to execute a receive operation
z
Allow the system to select arbitrarily the receiver. Sender is notified
who the receiver was
was.
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.33
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Buffering
z
Blocking send has the sender block until the message is
received
z
Blocking receive has the receiver block until a message is
available
Non blocking is considered asynchronous
Non-blocking
z
Non-blocking send has the sender send the message and
continue
z
Non-blocking receive has the receiver receive a valid message
or null
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.34
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Communications in Client-Server Systems
Queue of messages attached to the link; implemented in one of three
ways
Sockets
Remote
R
t P
Procedure
d
Calls
C ll
1. Zero capacity – 0 messages
Sender must wait for receiver (rendezvous)
Remote Method Invocation (Java)
2. Bounded capacity – finite length of n messages
Sender must wait if link full
3. Unbounded capacity – infinite length
Sender never waits
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.35
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.36
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Sockets
Socket Communication
A socket is defined as an endpoint for communication
Concatenation
C
t
ti off IP address
dd
and
d portt
The socket 161.25.19.8:1625 refers to port 1625 on host
161.25.19.8
Communication consists between a pair of sockets
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.37
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Remote Procedure Calls
5.38
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Execution of RPC
Remote procedure call (RPC) abstracts procedure calls between processes
on networked systems
Stubs – client-side proxy for the actual procedure on the server
The client-side stub locates the server and marshalls the parameters
The server-side stub receives this message, unpacks the marshalled
parameters, and peforms the procedure on the server
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.39
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.40
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Remote Method Invocation
Marshalling Parameters
Remote Method Invocation (RMI) is a Java mechanism similar to RPCs
RMI allows
ll
a JJava program on one machine
hi tto iinvoke
k a method
th d on a
remote object
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.41
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.42
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Content
Overview
Multithreading
M ltith di M
Models
d l
Thread Libraries
Threads
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition,
Threading Issues
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.44
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Objectives
Single and Multithreaded Processes
To introduce the notion of a thread — a fundamental unit of CPU utilization
that forms the basis of multithreaded computer systems
To examine issues related to multithreaded programming
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.45
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Benefits
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Multicore Programming
Responsiveness
Multicore systems putting pressure on programmers, challenges include
Resource Sharing
Economy
Scalability
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.46
5.47
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
z
Di idi activities
Dividing
ti iti
z
Balance
z
Data splitting
z
Data dependency
z
Testing and debugging
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.48
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Multithreaded Server Architecture
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.49
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Concurrent Execution on a Single-core System
5.50
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
User Threads
Parallel Execution on a Multicore System
Thread management done by user-level threads library
Three primary thread libraries:
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.51
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
z
POSIX Pthreads
z
Win32 threads
z
Java threads
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.52
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Kernel Threads
Multithreading Models
Supported by the Kernel
Many-to-One
Examples
One-to-One
z
Windows XP/2000
z
Solaris
z
Linux
z
Tru64 UNIX
z
Mac OS X
Many-to-Many
5.53
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Many-to-One
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.54
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Many-to-One Model
Many user-level threads mapped to single kernel thread
Examples:
E
l
z
Solaris Green Threads
z
GNU Portable Threads
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.55
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.56
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
One-to-One
One-to-one Model
Each user-level thread maps to kernel thread
Examples
E
l
z
Windows NT/XP/2000
z
Linux
z
Solaris 9 and later
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.57
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Many-to-Many Model
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.58
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Many-to-Many Model
Allows
All
many user llevell th
threads
d tto b
be mapped
d tto many kkernell
threads
Allows the operating system to create a sufficient number of
kernel threads
Solaris prior to version 9
Windows NT/2000 with the ThreadFiber package
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.59
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.60
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Two-level Model
Two-level Model
Similar to M:M, except that it allows a user thread to be
bound to kernel thread
Examples
z
IRIX
z
HP-UX
z
Tru64 UNIX
z
Solaris 8 and earlier
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.61
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Thread Cancellation
Terminating
g a thread before it has finished
Two general approaches:
z
Asynchronous cancellation terminates the target
th d immediately
thread
i
di t l
z
Deferred cancellation allows the target thread to
periodically check if it should be cancelled
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.63
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009
Operating System Concepts – 8th Edition
5.62
Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne ©2009