Download Nursing Interventions to Prevent Secondary

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Psychiatric and mental health nursing wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Evidence-Based Review of Nursing Interventions to Prevent
Secondary Disabilities in Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder
Linda M. Caley; Nancy Shipkey; Theresa Winkelman; Christine Dunlap; Sara Rivera
Pediatr Nurs. 2006;32(2):155-162. ©2006 Jannetti Publications, Inc. Posted 07/06/2006
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), an umbrella term used to describe the constellation of effects
that occur because of prenatal alcohol exposure, is a serious and widespread problem. First described in
1973 as fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), a great deal is now known about prenatal alcohol exposure and its
prevalence. Children with FAS represent only a portion of children exposed prenatally to alcohol.
Research has documented a spectrum of effects of prenatal alcohol exposure, and multiple terms have
been developed to cover the different effects. Recently, governmental and advocacy organizations in the
United States and Canada developed a consensus definition to cover the multiple terms previously used
including fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS), alcohol related neurodevelopmental disabilities (ARND), fetal
alcohol effects (FAE), alcohol related birth defects (ARBD), and partial fetal alcohol syndrome (PFAS).
The Consensus Statement is as follows:
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) is an umbrella term describing the range of effects that can occur
in an individual whose mother drank alcohol during pregnancy. These effects may include physical,
mental, behavioral, and/or learning disabilities with possible lifelong implications. The term FASD is not
intended for use as a clinical diagnosis (Bertrand et al., 2004, p. iv).
Guidelines (Bertrand et al., 2004) giving specific criteria for referral and diagnosis of FAS versus other
problems due to prenatal alcohol exposure can be found at the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) Web site: www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/fas/faspub.htm.
Significance of the Problem
FASD is the leading known preventable cause of mental retardation in western civilization and one
common reason a child's development and learning is affected. The need to address the prevention of
secondary disabilities caused by prenatal alcohol exposure has become a national priority (CDC, 2002).
Secondary disabilities are those not present at birth but that occur because of the primary disability.
Research has demonstrated that secondary disabilities associated with FASD can be prevented or
lessened by a better understanding and appropriate interventions (Streissguth, Barr, Kogan, & Bookstein,
1996).
Nurses encounter children and families throughout all parts of their lifespan who are at risk for or who
have FASD, and nursing interventions are key to the prevention and treatment of this problem. Secondary
and tertiary nursing interventions have proven to prevent secondary disabilities and enhance outcomes
for high-risk children in multiple research studies (see Alexander, Younger, Cohen, & Crawford, 1988;
Brooten et al., 1988; Brooten et al., 1986; Brooten et al., 1994; Lipman, 1988; Melnyk et al., 2001; Olds,
Henderson, Chamberlin, & Tatelbaum, 1986; Weisman, 1992). While many of the interventions in these
studies apply to children and families with FASD, we only included those strategies specifically aimed at
children and families with FASD in this review.
The Clinical Question
We undertook this review to answer the question, "What is the state of the evidence for nursing
interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in children and families affected by FASD?" This was a
necessary first step prior to developing effective interventions in this area. According to van Meijel,
Gamel, van Swieten-Duijfjes, and Grypodonck (2004), identification of existing intervention practices is an
extremely valuable and necessary aspect of developing evidence-based interventions.
Search Strategy
This review followed the method described by Garrard (1999) in Health Sciences Literature Review Made
Easy: The Matrix Method. Garrard's method describes steps for planning and managing the search of the
literature, selecting and organizing documents for review, abstracting and synthesizing the findings. Some
common terms used to conduct such a review are shown in Table 1 .
A preliminary search identified no previous review of nursing interventions for preventing secondary
disabilities in FASD. Therefore, a wide net was cast in undertaking this search to identify articles or
research studies written by nurses or in the nursing literature about FASD. Three of the authors, the
reference librarian at the University at Buffalo, and staff from the SAMHSA Center for Excellence on
FASD all conducted searches for articles between 1980 through 2004 using Journals at Ovid, CINAHL,
Medline, PsychInfo, Cochrane Reviews, the metasearch engine Dogpile, and Digital Dissertations. The
search terms included fetal alcohol syndrome, fetal alcohol effects, alcohol related neurological disorders,
FASD, nursing interventions, prevention, secondary disabilities, foster care, questionnaires, and surveys.
The search yielded 1,090 references. Endnote Reference Manager Software was used to capture the
article information.
Selection and Organization of Articles for Abstraction
References were exported to Microsoft Excel and abstracted in two rounds. Three of the authors
reviewed the articles separately. All members of the team were pediatric or school nurse practitioners
(PNP/SNP) or PNP students enrolled in a graduate nursing program who had successfully completed the
research course requirements for their respective graduate program.
In round one, the articles were coded for the profession they were written by or aimed at by reading the
abstract. The codes were: 1.1 nursing, 1.2 health professionals, 1.3 social workers, 1.4 juvenile justice,
1.5 foster care, 1.6 other, and 1.7 non human studies. If at least two of the three coders agreed that an
article was written by or was specifically aimed at nurses, contained nursing interventions for FASD, or
addressed health professionals in general, it was included in the next round for abstraction. If there was
any doubt the article met the criteria, it was included for abstraction. This resulted in 110 references
chosen for abstracting.
In round two, the remaining 110 references were read completely for abstraction. During this process, 46
were further excluded due to inability to obtain the full article, inability to translate the article from the
language in which it was written, or the fact that there was no actual information in the article about
FASD. Articles written before 1990 were eliminated since many contained information no longer
considered relevant given the latest research or were not consistent with recent guidelines (Bertrand et
al., 2004). Sixty-four references remained for abstraction.
Data Extraction Strategy
To abstract the data from the remaining articles, a review matrix was set up in Microsoft Excel. The matrix
included a summary of the article; whether it was research and, if so, what type of research; if it included
nursing interventions; if those interventions were aimed at preventing secondary disabilities; and the type
of intervention recommended.
The type of nursing intervention recommended was identified using a model developed by Keller,
Strohschein, Lia-Hoagberg, and Schaffer (1998). In Public Health Interventions - Applications for Public
Health Nursing (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001), Keller et al. describe three levels of nursing
intervention: community-focused, systems-focused, and individual/family-focused.
2
Community-focused practice changes community norms, community attitudes, community awareness,
community practices, and community behaviors and is directed toward entire populations within the
community or occasionally toward target groups within those populations. Systems-focused practice
changes organizations, policies, laws, and power structures. The focus is not directly on individuals and
communities but on the systems that impact health. Individual-focused practice changes knowledge,
attitudes, beliefs, practices, and behaviors of individuals. This practice level is directed at individuals,
alone or as part of a family, class, or group. (p. 4-5)
At each of those levels, the authors identify 17 possible types of interventions grouped together by those
interventions frequently implemented together. For example, health teaching and counseling often occur
together in consultation with other professionals. Figure 1, adapted from their model, shows the levels of
intervention as well as the types of interventions.
Figure 1.
Population-Based Pubic Health Interventions. Note: Adapted with permission, by Caley Design (2005),
from the Public Health Nursing Section: Public Health Interventions-Applications for Public Health Nursing
Practice (2001).
3
Methods of Data Synthesis and Key Results
Once abstracted, the data was analyzed by type of reference and type of intervention to identify themes
that emerged about nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD.
Of the 64 references, 28 contained recommendations for nursing interventions to prevent secondary
disabilities. Four of these references were research based (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Free, Russell, Mills, &
Hathaway, 1990; Gardner, 2000; Hess, 1996) and could be considered level VI evidence, that is evidence
from a single descriptive or qualitative study (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005). The research studies are
summarized in Table 2 .
Twenty-four references were Level VII evidence, opinion of authorities. There were no systematic reviews
or meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or evidence-based clinical practice guidelines
(Level I). There were no RCTs (Level II), well-designed controlled trials without randomization (Level III),
or well-designed case-control and cohort studies (Level IV) (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2005).
The findings from the literature are synthesized below by categories and type of intervention.
Referral and Follow-up, Case Management, and Delegated Functions
Referral and Follow-up. Referral and follow-up interventions assist individuals, families, groups,
organizations, and communities to utilize necessary resources to prevent or resolve problems or
concerns. Referral and follow-up most often follow the implementation of another intervention, such as
health teaching, counseling, delegated functions, consultation, screening, and case-finding. It also is an
important component of case management. On occasion, it is implemented in conjunction with advocacy
(Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 80).
Referral was the most recommended nursing intervention, mentioned in 24 of the articles (Applebaum,
1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; D'Apolito, 1998; Dempster, 1996; Dychkowski,
2000; Eliason & Williams, 1990; Eustace, Kang, & Coombs, 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Free et al., 1990;
Gardner, 2000; Hess, 1996; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Hogan, 1992; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997; Kenner,
Dreyer, & Amlung, 2000; Oklahoma State Nurses Association, 1997; Redding, 1992; Redding & Selleck,
1993; Remkes, 1993; Robinson, 1999; Savage et al., 2003; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman, Spiering,
Hetteberg, Kenner, & Flandermeyer, 1995). References mentioned 12 different types of referrals
necessary: (a) early intervention services (12 articles), (b) referral of mother to alcohol treatment
programs (8 articles), (c) counseling and support groups (6 articles), (d) interdisciplinary teams or
specialist in FAS (7 articles), (e) follow-up care for developmental delay (4 articles), and (f) respite care (3
articles). Additional recommendations included referral to community services, crisis management, child
welfare, public health nurses, therapeutic childcare, and agencies that monitor the home environment.
Case Management. Case management interventions optimize self-care capabilities of individuals and
families and the capacity of systems and communities to coordinate and provide services (Public Health
Nursing Section, 2001 p. 93).
Ten references recommended case management (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999;
Dempster, 1996; Eliason & Williams, 1990; Fitzgerald, 1999; Hawke, 2002; Hess & Kenner, 1998;
Redding, 1992; Remkes, 1993; Wekselman et al., 1995), although the exact recommendations were
different in each one. The recommendations fell into two categories: general recommendations and
nursing specific recommendations. General recommendations included case management for financial
assistance, resources available, medical, educational services, physical therapy, speech, behavioral care,
and social needs. Nursing specific recommendations included the nurses' responsibility for coordination
of services, discharge planning, and assuring access to care and continuity of services.
4
Delegated Functions. Delegated functions are direct care tasks that a registered professional nurse
carries out under the authority of a health care practitioner, as allowed by law. Delegated functions also
include any direct care tasks a registered professional nurse entrusts to other appropriate personnel to
perform (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001 p. 113). There were no recommendations related to
delegated functions.
Screening, Case-finding, Outreach, Disease and Health Event Investigation, and
Surveillance
Screening, case-finding, outreach, surveillance, and disease and other health event investigations often
are implemented together. Case-finding is closely linked with screening of individuals and families and the
two terms are sometimes used interchangeably (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 56).
Screening. Screening interventions identify individuals with unrecognized health risk factors or
asymptomatic disease conditions in populations. The Public Health Nursing Section (2001) identifies
three types of screening described in the literature: mass, targeted, and periodic. The recommendations
for screening in this review fall mainly into the category of targeted screening at the individual level.
Twenty references mentioned screening as an intervention to prevent secondary disabilities (Applebaum,
1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; D'Apolito, 1998; Dempster, 1996; Dychkowski, 2000; Eliason & Williams,
1990; Eustace, 2000; Fitzgerald, 1999; Gardner, 2000; Hawke, 2002; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Hogan,
1992; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997; Oklahoma State Nurses Association, 1997; Redding, 1992; Redding &
Selleck, 1993; Remkes, 1993; Savage et al., 2003; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman et al., 1995). The
majority of articles (14) suggested screening of women, especially alcoholic mothers, as a first step
toward identifying an infant at risk for FASD. One article specifically suggested screening in homeless
shelters. Three articles recommended screening infants for delay/neurodevelopmental delay, growth
retardation, or physical abnormalities. Other recommendations included the use of developmental
evaluations, specifically the Denver Developmental Test and the use of physical and laboratory data such
as urine drug screens and meconium testing.
Case-finding. Case-finding interventions locate individuals and families with identified risk factors and
connect them to resources. It often leads to referral and follow-up.
Eleven references recommended case-finding (Applebaum, 1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001; D'Apolito,
1998; Dempster, 1996; Eustace et al., 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Gardner, 2000; Hess & Kenner, 1998;
Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman et al., 1995). Specific recommendations
included case-finding in homeless centers and in families who adopted children or are providing foster
care and keeping a high level of suspicion for FAS in adolescents and adults with developmental
disabilities, attention deficits, or conduct disorders.
Outreach. Outreach interventions locate populations-of-interest or populations-at-risk and provide
information about the nature of the concern, what can be done about it, and how services can be
obtained (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 41).
Six references contained recommendations for outreach (Applebaum, 1995; Clement-Murphy, 2001;
Eustace et al., 2003; Fitzgerald, 1999; Hawke, 2002; Kenner & D'Apolito, 1997). Recommendations fell
into two categories. The first was outreach to the community at large through education, and to
teenagers, those in homeless shelters, and women with drinking problems. The second was outreach to
professionals, specifically obstetrical and pediatric physicians, and to clinics.
Disease and Other Health Event Investigation. Disease and other health event investigation
interventions systematically gather and analyze data regarding threats to the health of populations,
ascertains the source of the threat, identifies cases and others at risk, and determines control measures.
The threats may be actual or potential. The investigative process consists of identifying and verifying the
5
source of the threat; identifying cases, their contacts, and others at risk; determining control measures;
and communicating with the public, as needed (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 29). There were
no recommendations in this area.
Surveillance. Surveillance activities describe and monitor health events through ongoing and systematic
collection, analysis, and interpretation of health data for the purpose of planning, implementing, and
evaluating public health interventions (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 13). There were no
recommendations in this area.
Health Teaching, Counseling, and Consultation
Health Teaching. Health teaching interventions communicate facts, ideas, and skills that change
knowledge, attitudes, values, beliefs, behaviors, and practices and skills of individuals, families, systems,
and/or communities (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 121).
Eleven references recommended specific types of health teaching for parents who have a child with
FASD as a means of preventing secondary disabilities (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer & Davidhizar,
1999; Fitzgerald, 1999; Free et al., 1990; Gardner, 2000; Hess & Kenner, 1998; Kenner & D'Apolito,
1997; Kenner et al., 2000; Redding & Selleck, 1993; Robinson, 1999; Wekselman et al., 1995).
The most frequently mentioned example of teaching was teaching parents strategies that work with
children with FASD. Examples mentioned more than once were the need to teach parents: (a) how to
provide a safe environment, (b) behavior management strategies, (c) growth and development, (d) how to
recognize the infants behavioral cues to promote parent-infant interaction, (e) how to provide sensory
integration, and (f) ways to build on the child's strengths by rewarding even the smallest steps taken.
Several references recommended teaching the following related to understanding the diagnosis: (a)
FASD is brain damage, (b) realistic expectations, and (c) that getting a diagnosis of FASD may help the
family get needed services to prevent secondary disabilities. One author mentioned that helping the
family see that they were going to have to change their lifestyle was the key to living successfully with this
diagnosis.
The second type of recommendation for health teaching relates to helping parents learn strategies to help
the child maintain control and regain it again when necessary. The recommendations included (a)
developing routines, (b) alerting the child to changes in routines before they happen, (c) calming
techniques such as providing physical comfort through a back rub and time out, (d) verbally redirecting
the child and any negative behavior, (e) attaining eye contact, and (f) giving the child a neutral place to
work through anger such as a bean bag or large cushion. Additional recommendations included helping
parents learn how to deal with sleep disturbances and what community resources were available.
Counseling. Counseling interventions establish an interpersonal relationship with a community, system,
family, or individual intended to increase or enhance their capacity for self-care and coping (Public Health
Nursing Section, 2001, p. 151).
Six references recommended counseling (Applebaum, 1995; Cramer & Davidhizar, 1999; Fitzgerald,
1999; Free et al., 1990; Smitherman, 1994; Wekselman et al., 1995). Recommendations for families
included crisis management and group sessions. For children, counseling was recommended to help
them deal with feelings and fears and to strengthen coping strategies.
Consultation. Consultation seeks information and generates optional solutions to perceived problems or
issues through interactive problem-solving with a community, system, family, or individual. The
community, system, family, or individual selects and acts on the option best meeting the circumstances.
(Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, pp. 165).
6
Three references recommended consultation (Dempster, 1996; Free et al., 1990; Kenner & D'Apolito,
1997). Recommendations included consultations with experts and specialists and consultations for
referral to daycare and transportation.
Advocacy, Social Marketing, and Policy Development and Enforcement
Advocacy. Advocacy interventions plead someone's cause or act on someone's behalf with a focus on
developing the community, system, individual, or family's capacity to plead their own cause or act on their
own behalf. Advocacy is frequently used with other interventions, such as referral and follow-up,
community organizing, and policy development and enforcement. Advocacy is often discussed in relation
to case management (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, pp. 263-264).
Seven references recommended advocacy as a nursing intervention (Clement-Murphy, 2001; Cramer &
Davidhizar, 1999; Dychkowski, 2000; Eustace et al., 2003; Redding & Selleck, 1993; Robinson, 1999;
Wekselman et al., 1995). Two articles made specific recommendations: (a) nurses should advocate for
individual patients and families to find information and services; and (b) at the system level, nurses should
advocate for more treatment facilities for pregnant women who have alcohol problems and for
comprehensive services for families. One reference specifically recommends advocating to eliminate the
stigma of FAS.
Social Marketing. Social marketing, a relatively new intervention first introduced in 1971, utilizes
commercial marketing principles and technologies for programs designed to influence the knowledge,
attitudes, values, beliefs, behaviors, and practices of the population of interest (Public Health Nursing
Section, 2001, p. 285). No recommendations were made relating to social marketing.
Policy Development and Enforcement. Policy development and enforcement interventions help place
health issues on decision makers' agendas, acquire a plan of resolution, and determine needed
resources. Policy development results in laws, rules and regulations, ordinances, and policies. Policy
enforcement compels others to comply with the laws, rules, regulations, ordinances, and policies created
in conjunction with policy development (Public Health Nursing Section, 2001, p. 313).
While many articles reviewed made recommendations for nurses to become involved in policy
development and enforcement to prevent FASD, one article made a specific recommendation that nurses
need to be visibly involved on the legislative level to lobby for FAS education and services for families
affected by it (Robinson, 1999).
Key Conclusions
The majority of the evidence for nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in children and
families affected by FASD is Level VII evidence, opinion of authorities. The literature review revealed no
evidence-based nursing interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD but did show an
increasing interest in this area. By far, the most frequently mentioned interventions, even in those
references with recommendations for preventing secondary disabilities, were nursing interventions to
prevent the occurrence of FASD.
Implications for Clinical Practice
The majority of recommendations for preventing secondary disabilities were in the areas of referral and
follow-up, screening, case-finding, health teaching, and case management. Nurses working with children
and families affected by FASD can review the suggestions made in those areas and compare them with
their practice. For example, nurses need to have readily available a referral list of agencies and
practitioners who have an interest and expertise in dealing with the problems associated with FASD. They
should familiarize themselves with the latest recommendations on identifying and screening for FASD in
7
order to identify populations in their communities at high risk for FASD. By reviewing the suggestions
under health teaching, nurses can identify the type of content that should be included in teaching parents
strategies that work with children with FASD, including those that help the child maintain control and
regain it again when necessary. Finally, recommendations related to case management highlight the
need for this intervention and suggest activities that nurses can undertake or refer their clients to another
professional who can.
Research
The analysis and synthesis of this literature does suggest many examples of interventions that nurses
believe are necessary. This information will be instrumental in moving toward evidence-based nursing
interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD. Studying current intervention practices is one part
of the model proposed by van Meijel et al. (2004) for developing and testing complex nursing
interventions, especially those in which the clients play an important role. According to van Meijel et al.:
The primary goals of studying intervention practices are to identify the different types of interventions that
nurses are using, to describe how the different types of interventions are used in practice, and to gain
insight into the experiences of providers and clients with available interventions (p. 88).
The analysis of current practices related to nursing interventions identified here can be further developed
and refined using scientific methods (van Meijel et al., 2004). They can then be combined with a review of
the literature on the nature of the problem (problem analysis) as experienced by children and families
affected by FASD as well as a review of the literature on the client's expressed needs and requests for
care. The studies by Clement-Murphy (2001), Free et al. (1990), Gardner (2000), and Hess (1996)
provide a starting point for understanding the problems and needs as expressed by those affected by
FASD. When combined with the findings from other studies of problems and needs and this evidencebased review of nursing interventions, the building blocks necessary to develop and test nursing
interventions to prevent secondary disabilities in FASD are in place.
The Evidence-Based Practice section focuses on: the search for and critical appraisal of the "best
evidence" to answer challenging clinical questions; single studies with strong clinical practice applications;
or evidence-based strategies to improve practice so that the highest quality, up-to-date care can be
provided to children and their families. To obtain author guidelines or submit manuscripts, please contact
Bernadette Melnyk, PhD, RN, CPNP/NPP, FAAN, FNAP or Leigh Small, PhD, RN-CS, PNP; Section
Editors; Arizona State University College of Nursing; PO Box 872602; Tempe, Arizona 85287-2602; 480965-6431; [email protected] or [email protected]
8
Table 1. Glossary of Terms
Table 2. Level VI Evidence - Single Descriptive or Qualitative Study
(next page)
9
10
References



















Alexander, J.S., Younger, R.E., Cohen, R.M., & Crawford, L.V. (1988). Effectiveness of a nursemanaged program for children with chronic asthma. Journal of Pediatric Nursing: Nursing Care of
Children and Families, 3(5), 312-317.
Applebaum, N.G. (1995). Fetal alcohol syndrome: Diagnosis, management, and prevention.
Nurse Practitioner, 20(10), 24.
Bertrand, J., Weber, M., O'Connor, M.J., Riley, E., Johnson, K., & Cohen, D. (2004). Fetal alcohol
syndrome. Guidelines for referral and diagnosis (pp. 50). Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Brooten, D., Brown, L.P., Munro, B.H., York, R., Cohen, S.M., Roncoli, M., et al. (1988). Early
discharge and specialist transitional care. Image - The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 20(2), 6468.
Brooten, D., Kumar, S., Brown, L.P., Butts, P., Finkler, S.A., Bakewell-Sachs, S., et al. (1986). A
randomized clinical trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of very-low-birth-weight
infants. New England Journal of Medicine, 315(15), 934-939.
Brooten, D., Roncoli, M., Finkler, S., Arnold, L., Cohen, A., & Mennuti, M. (1994). A randomized
trial of early hospital discharge and home follow-up of women having cesarean birth. Obstetrics &
Gynecology, 84(5), 832-838.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2002). Records of the Meeting of the
National Task Force on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and Fetal Alcohol Effect. National Center for
Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD): CDC.
Clement-Murphy, K. (2001). The experience of caring for a child with prenatal exposure to
alcohol: A parent's perspective. Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 1407428).
Cramer, C., & Davidhizar, R. (1999). FAS/FAE: Impact on children... fetal alcohol syndrome...
fetal alcohol effects. Journal of Child Health Care, 3(3), 31-34.
D'Apolito, K. (1998). Substance abuse: Infant and childhood outcomes. Journal of Pediatric
Nursing, 13(5), 307-316.
Dempster, J.S. (1996). Continuing education forum. Fetal alcohol syndrome: The nurse
practitioner perspective. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners, 8(7), 343-352.
Dychkowski, L. (2000). Beginning life with fetal alcohol syndrome. Nursing Spectrum (New
York/New Jersey Metro Edition), 12A(7), 16-17.
Eliason, M.J., & Williams, J.K. (1990). Fetal alcohol syndrome and the neonate. Journal of
Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 3(4), 64-72.
Eustace, L.W. (2000). Fetal alcohol syndrome prevention: Affecting maternal alcohol
consumption behavior through nurse supportive-educative intervention. Unpublished Dissertation,
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Eustace, L.W., Kang, D., & Coombs, D. (2003). Fetal alcohol syndrome: A growing concern for
health care professionals. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 32(2), 215-221.
Fitzgerald, E.M. (1999). Advanced practice. Assisting caregivers of young children exposed en
utero to alcohol, crack/cocaine and other drugs: A model for intervention. Kentucky Nurse, 47(4),
26.
Free, T., Russell, F., Mills, B., & Hathaway, D. (1990). A descriptive study of infants and toddlers
exposed prenatally to substance abuse. American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing, 15(4), 245249.
Gardner, J. (2000). Living with a child with fetal alcohol syndrome. American Journal of Maternal
Child Nursing, 25(5), 252-257.
Garrard, J. (1999). Health science literature review made easy: The matrix method. Gaithersburg:
Aspen Publication.
11























Hawke, M. (2002). FAS: An ounce of prevention. Nursing Spectrum (Greater Philadelphia/TriState Edition), 11(24), 10-11.
Hess, D.J. (1996). Fetal alcohol syndrome: How diagnosis affects families and services.
Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Hess, D.J., & Kenner, C. (1998). Families caring for children with fetal alcohol syndrome: The
nurse's role in early identification and intervention. Holistic Nursing Practice, 12(3), 47-54.
Hogan, M. (1992). Recognition and prevention of fetal alcohol syndrome. AARN News Letter,
48(5), 14- 16.
Keller, L., Strohschein, S., Lia-Hoagberg, B., & Schaffer, M. (1998). Population-based public
health nursing interventions: A model from practice. Public Health Nursing, 15(3), 207-215.
Kenner, C., & D'Apolito, K. (1997). Outcomes for children exposed to drugs in utero. Journal of
Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 26(5), 595-603.
Kenner, C., Dreyer, L., & Amlung, S. (2000). Identification and care of substance-dependent
neonates. Journal of Intravenous Nursing, 23(2), 105-111.
Lipman, T.H. (1988). Length of hospitalization of children with diabetes: Effect of a clinical nurse
specialist. Diabetes Educator, 14(1), 41-43.
Melnyk, B., Alpert-Gillis, L., Feinstein, N., Fairbanks, E., Schultz-Czarniak, J., Hust, D., et al.
(2001). Improving cognitive development of low-birth-weight premature infants with the COPE
program: A pilot study of the benefit of early NICU intervention with mothers. Research in Nursing
& Health, 24(5), 373- 389.
Melnyk, B., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2005). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A
guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.
Oklahoma State Nurses Association. (1997). Fetal alcohol syndrome. The Oklahoma Nurse,
42(3), 14-15.
Olds, D.L., Henderson, C.R., Chamberlin, R., & Tatelbaum, R. (1986). Preventing child abuse
and neglect: A randomized trial of nurse home visitation. Pediatrics, 78(1), 65-78.
Public Health Nursing Section. (2001). Public health Interventions - Applications for public health
nursing practice. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Health.
Redding, B. (1992). Maternal alcohol abuse and its effect on the child. Florida Nurse, 40(4), 7.
Redding, B., & Selleck, C. (1993). Perinatal substance abuse: Assessment and management of
the pregnant woman and her children. Nurse Practitioner Forum, 4(4), 216-223.
Remkes, T. (1993). Saying no - completely. Canadian Nurse, 89(6), 25-28.
Robinson, T.M.S. (1999). Education in the NICU. Perinatal substance abuse: Working with
neonates and families. Neonatal Network - Journal of Neonatal Nursing, 18(2), 68-70.
Savage, C., Wray, J., Ritchey, P., Sommers, M., Dyehouse, J., & Fulmer, M. (2003). Current
screening instruments related to alcohol consumption in pregnancy and a proposed alternative
method. Journal of Obstetrical, Gynecological and Neonatal Nursing, 32(4), 437-446.
Smitherman, C.H. (1994). The lasting impact of fetal alcohol syndrome and fetal alcohol effect on
children and adolescents. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 8(3), 121-126.
Streissguth, A., Barr, H.M., Kogan, J., & Bookstein, F.L. (1996). Understanding the Occurrence of
Secondary Disabilities in Clients with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (FAS) and Fetal Alcohol Effects
(FAE), Final Report to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (Tech. Rep. No. 9606). Seattle: University of Washington, Fetal Alcohol & Drug Unit.
van Meijel, B., Gamel, C., van Swieten-Duijfjes, B., & Grypodonck, M. (2004). The development
of evidence-based nursing interventions: Methodological consideration. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 48(1), 84-92.
Weisman, S.C. (1992). Nursing practice models: Research on patient outcomes. In Patient
outcomes research: Examining the effectiveness of nursing practice (DHHS publication No. 933411) (pp. 112-120). Bethesda, MD: DHHS.
Wekselman, K., Spiering, K., Hetteberg, C., Kenner, C., & Flandermeyer, A. (1995). Fetal alcohol
syndrome from infancy through childhood: A review of the literature. Journal of Pediatric Nursing,
10(5), 296-303.
12
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge Sarah Judkiewicz; MS, PNP;, Sharon Murphy, Associate
Librarian, University at Buffalo; and the staff at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services
Administration (SAMHSA) Center for Excellence on Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) for their
assistance with the initial literature search.
Linda M. Caley, PhD, RN, PNP, NNP, is Assistant Professor, School of Nursing, University at Buffalo,
Buffalo, NY.
Nancy Shipkey, MS, RN, PNP, is Doctoral Student and Research Assistant, School of Nursing,
University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Theresa Winkelman, MS, RN, SNP, is Clinical Faculty, School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo,
NY.
Christine Dunlap, MS, CPNP, RN, graduated from School of Nursing, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
Sara Rivera, MS, CPNP, RN, is Doctoral Student and Research Assistant, School of Nursing, University
at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
NOTE: To view the article with Web enhancements, go to:
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/534041
13