Survey							
                            
		                
		                * Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
ADMINISTRATION http://cerf.un.org Goals of this session Understanding of the administrative process for the funding of a CERF project  Ability to identify administrative issues which cause the delay of funds disbursement  Ability to identify an acceptable budget from an unacceptable budget  Successful completion of the Budget Challenge  The Administrative Structure The CERF is a sub-account of the UN General Trust Fund and is subject to the UN Financial Rules and Regulations, and all internal policies, which govern trust funds  The Controller has oversight of the financial administration of the CERF  CERF disbursements are actually advances, and are not included as expenditures in reports to donors (the SecretaryGeneral report to the General Assembly) until financial reports are received for the funds  The Administrative Process Application arrives in CERF (budget reviewed) Project/budget approved by CERF/CRD Approval letter and blank LOU sent to agency Package to the Office of Programme Planning, Budgets, and Accounts (Controller’s Office) http://cerf.un.org Project packet to the Controller’s Office The project packet which goes for funding includes:  The project application with budget  The LOU signed by OCHA and the agency  A copy of the project approval letter to the agency  An interoffice memo from OCHA to PPBD requesting the advance of funds to the agency Why an administrative process for project funding? General Assembly resolution 60/124 of 8 March 2006: “Calls upon the Secretary-General…..to make the necessary managerial and administrative arrangements to facilitate the implementation of the grant element and set up appropriate reporting and accountability mechanisms to ensure that the funds allocated through the Fund are used in the most efficient, effective, and transparent manner possible” http://cerf.un.org Main areas of administrative delay  Budget - needs to be mathematically sound and transparent (itemization, linked to the narrative, appropriate amount of costs, individual disbursements)  Letter of Understanding (LOU)- should address the basics of the project and the legal agreement concerning the use of the funds http://cerf.un.org Budget Most Common Problems Added incorrectly  Financial requirements don’t match text  Non-transparent/unclear cost line descriptions  Miscalculated Programme Support Costs (PSC)  http://cerf.un.org Programme Support Costs Project amount $500,000.00 Indirect support costs (maximum 7%) $ 35,000.00 TOTAL $535,000.00 NOT *Please note that 7% of $497,550 is $34,828.50, not $37,450.00 Project amount $ 497,550.00 Indirect support costs (maximum 7%) $ 37,450.00* TOTAL $535,000.00 http://cerf.un.org Letter of Understanding http://cerf.un.org Most Common Problems Changed clauses (deleted, added, altered)  Financial amounts do not match amount in approval letter from the ERC to the agency  Implementation period too long  Long time for receipt of LOU from agency and for correspondence for corrections  Exercises http://cerf.un.org What is wrong with this budget? Cost breakdown Amount (USD) A. Staff costs (salaries and other entitlements) (drivers to deliver food) $50,000 B. Travel - C. Contractual Services - D. Operations (please itemize below; add rows if necessary) Transport of food and water containers $50,000 - E. Acquisitions F. Other Subtotal project requirements $200,000 G. Indirect programe support costs (not to exceed 7% of subtotal project costs) PSC amount (none needed) Total cost 0 $200,000 What is wrong with this budget? Cost breakdown Amount (USD) A. Staff costs (salaries and other entitlements) (drivers to deliver food) B. Travel C. Contractual Services D. Operations (please itemize below; add rows if necessary) Transport of food and water containers E. Acquisitions F. Other Subtotal project requirements G. Indirect programe support costs (not to exceed 7% of subtotal project costs) PSC amount (none needed) $4,000,000 Total cost http://cerf.un.org A Challenge Fix the project proposal budget Cost breakdown Amount (USD) A. Staff costs (salaries and other entitlements) B. Travel C. Contractual Services D. Operations (please itemize below; add rows if necessary) Direct costs $500,000 Food (and other non-food items) $1,000,000 E. Acquisitions $2,000,000 (4 motorcycles) F. Other Subtotal project requirements $2,000,000 G. Indirect programe support costs (not to exceed 7% of subtotal project costs) PSC amount (7%) $500,000 Total cost $2,500,000 Is this budget acceptable? Cost breakdown Amount (USD) A. Staff costs (salaries and other entitlements) B. Travel C. Contractual Services $500,000 D. Operations (please itemize below; add rows if necessary) Food transport and storage costs (storage $150,000 for 3 months, handling $150,000 for 3 months; transport by sea $200,000) Food (rice, corn, oil, high energy biscuits) $500,000 $2,000,000 E. Acquisitions F. Other Subtotal project requirements $3,000,000 G. Indirect programe support costs (not to exceed 7% of subtotal project costs) PSC amount (none needed) 0% Total cost 0 $3,000,000 The End http://cerf.un.org