Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Orientability wikipedia , lookup
Surface (topology) wikipedia , lookup
Sheaf (mathematics) wikipedia , lookup
Geometrization conjecture wikipedia , lookup
Michael Atiyah wikipedia , lookup
Covering space wikipedia , lookup
Fundamental group wikipedia , lookup
Continuous function wikipedia , lookup
Brouwer fixed-point theorem wikipedia , lookup
la r CHAPTER (VI) IMPORTANT RESULT OF THE te FUZZY TYCHONOFF THEOREM AND INITIAL AND FINAL Es TOPOLOGIES CHAPTER-VI IMPORTANT RESULTS OF THE FUZZY TYCHONOFF THEOREM AND INITIAL AND FINAL TOPOLOGIES Much of topology can be done in a setting where open sets have “fuzzy boundaries.” To render this precise; the la r paper first describes cl ∞ -monoids; which are used to measure the degree of membership of points in sets. Then L - or “fuzzy” sets are defined; and suitable collections of these are called LTopological spaces. A number of examples and result for such space are given. te Perhaps most interesting is a version of the Tychonoff theorem which given necessary and sufficient conditions on L for all collection with given cardinality of compact L- spaces to have compact product. Es We know Tychonoff Theorem;- “Arbitrary products of compact spaces are compact.” 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Definition of Fuzzy Tychonoff Theorem 6.3 Theorems of Fuzzy Tychonoff Theorem 6.4 Initial and Final Topologies 6.5 Theorems of Initial Topologies 6.6 Final Fuzzy Topologies 6.7 Conclusions A part of this chapter has appeared in International Journal of Engineering Research and Application (IJERA) ISSN:2248-9622, Vol.2, Issue 4, July-August 2012, pp.2251-2255. 6.1. Introduction-There seems to be use in certain infinite valued logics [85] in constructive analysis [55]; and in mathematical psychology [161] for notions of proximity less restrictive than those found in ordinary topology This chapter develops some basic theory for spaces in which open sets are fuzzy. First we need sufficiently general la r sets of truth values with which to measure degree of membership. The main thing is no get enough algebraic structure. 6.2 Definition of Fuzzy Tychonoff Theorem- we define the fuzzy te Tychonoff theorem as follows- 6.2.1 Definition- A cl ∞ - monoid is a complete lattice L with an additional associative binary operation ∗ such that the lattice zero 0 is a zero for ∗. The lattice infinity 1 is a identity for ∗ Es and the complete distributive laws a∗ and V bi i ∈I V bi i∈I = V i∈I ∗a= ( a ∗ bi) V ( b i ∗ a) i∈I Hold for all a i b i ∈ L; and all index sets I. 6.2.2 Definition- An Let A on a set X is a function A:X→ L. X is called the carrier of A : L is called the truth set of A; and for x∈X; A(x) is called the degree of membership of x in A. 6.2.3 Definition- An L-topological (or just L-) space is a pair <X; œ > such that X is a set ; ⊆ﻉ (1) œ ⇒ œ (2) A: B ∈ (3) OX ; 1X ∈ R R R R ⊆ LX and ∨∈ﻉœ ⇒A∗B∈ œ œ œ . 6.2.4 Definition- The purpose of this paper is to prove a Tychonoff la r theorem in the so-called “intuitionistic fuzzy topological spaces.” After giving the fundamental definitions, such as the definitions of intuitionistic fuzzy set, intuitionistic fuzzy topology, intuitionistic fuzzy topological space fuzzy continuity, fuzzy compactness, and fuzzy dicompactness, we several preservation properties and some te ciharacterizations concerning fuzzy compactness. Lastly we give a Tychonoff-like theorems. Let X be a nonempty fixed set. An IFS A is an object having the form Es A = {<X,µ A (x),ɣ A (X)>: X∈X}, R R R R (2.1) Where the functions µ A : X→ I and ɣ A :X→ I denote the degree of R R R R membership namely, µ A (X)) and the degree of nonmember ship R R (namely, ɣ A (X)) of each element X R R and 0 ≤ µ A (X) + ɣ A (X) ≤ 1 for each X R R R R ∈X to the set A, respectively, ∈ X. 6.2.5 Definition- Let {A i : i∈J} be an arbitrary family of IFSs in X. R R Then (a) ∩A i = {<X, ∧µ A i(X), ∨ ɣ i (X)> : X∈X}; (b) ∪A i = {<X, ∨µ A i(X), ∧ ɣ i (X)> : X∈X}. R R R R R R R R R R R R The ordinary complement of A= <X,µA,ɣ > is defined by AC =<X,1-ɣ , 1-µ A A >. 6.3 Theorem of Fuzzy Tychonoff Theorem- For solving fuzzy Tychonoff theorem we firstly define the following lemma. 6.3.1 Lemma- For a:b elements of a cl ∞ - monoid L; la r a ∗ b ≤ a ∧ b. a ≤ 1 , so 1 ∗ b = (a ∨1 ) ∗ b Proof- = a ∗ b ∨1 ∗ b That is b = (a∗b) ∨b; and therefore similarly te a ∗ b ≤ b. a ∗ b ≤ a. 6.3.2 Theorem- Every product of α -compact L- spaces is compact iff Es 1 is α-isolated in L.” Proof – with the help of theorem if φ is a sub-base for <x: œ > and every cover of X by sets in φ has a finite sub-cover; then < X. œ > is compact. Now we have to proof fuzzy-Tychonoff theorem :We have < X i œ i > compact for i ∈ I; |I| ≤ α and œ > = π i∈I . <X i : œ i >. < x: Where œ has the sub-base. φ = {p1 i (A i )| A i ∈ P PR R R R R R œ i; i ∈ I } So by the above theorem it suffices to show that no ⊆ φ with F UP (finite union property) is a cover. Let ⊆ φ with F U P be given: and for i∈I let i = { A∈ 1 œi | Pi- (A) ∈ }. Then each i has FUP; For if ∨n j=1 A j = 1xi; Where P i -1 (A j ) ∈ Then n la r V j=1 P-1 i (A j ) = 1x Since P i -1 (1xi) = 1x and P-1 i preserves Therefore i is a non-cover for each i ∈ I and there exits x i ∈ X i such that (V i ) (x i ) = a i <1 te Now let x = < x i > ∈ X and I ’ = { P-1 i (A)| A ∈ œi } ∩ Then Es ⊆ φ implies = ∪ I I ’ and ( V i ) (xi) = a i implies ( V i ) (x) = a i Since ( V I ’ ) (x) = V { (P i -1 (A)) (x) | A ∈ œ and P i -1 (A) ∈ } = V { A (P i (x))| P i -1 (A) ∈ and A∈œ i } = (V i )a (xi). Therefore (V ) (x) = V ((V’ I ) (x)) i∈I P = V ai < | i PR R i since I is α- isolated in I; each a i < 1 and |I| ≤ α . 6.3.3 Theorem- if 1 is not α –isolated in L; then there is a collection <xi: œ i > for i ∈ I and |I| = α of compact L-spaces such that the product <x:œ > is non-compact. such that V i a i = 1 . Let X i = ℕ for i∈I and Let la r Proof- non α- isolation given I with |I|= α and ai <1 for i ∈ I te œ i = { 0, (ai) [n] . 1 }*; where As ; for a ∈ L and S ⊆ Xi; denote the function equal to a on S and O or X i -S; where [n] = { 0,1 ……………. N-1} and where φ ∗ Es indicates the L- topology generated by φ as a sub-basis. Then < ℕ, œ i > is a compact. As every A ∈ œ i except 1 is contained in (a i ) N ; and (a i ) N <1; that ⊆ œ i is a cover iff 1 ∈ therefore every cover has {1} as a sub-cover. But <x : œ > = π i ∈I <X i : œ i > is non compact. Let A in denote the open L-set P i -1 ((ai) [n]) ∈ œ : for i ∈ I at is given for x ∈ X by the formula A in (x) = a i if x i <n; and A in (x) = O otherwise { A in } i ∈ I; n ∈ ℕ } is an open cover with no finite sub-cover. First V n A in = (a i ) x . since V n (ai) [N] = (ai) ℕ in <xi:œ i ;> and P i -1 preserves suprema so that V in A in = Vi (V n A in ) = Vi (a i ) x = l Second no finite sub-collection la r {A in | < i;n>∈ J } ; |J| < ω can Cover; since V<i,n> ∈ J A in (x) = O For any x with X i ≥ V {n| <i; n> ∈ J } For any i te and infinitely many such x always exist. 6.4 Initial and Final Topologies- In this sections we introduce the notations of initial and final topologies. For this firstly we defined initial and final topologies then their theorems. We Es show that from a categorical point of view they are the right concept of generalize the topological ones. We also show that the Tychonoff theorem is safeguarded. We show that with our notion of fuzzy compactness the Tychonoff product theorem is safeguarded. We also show that this is not the case for weak fuzzy compactness. 6.4.1 Initial Fuzzy Topologiesif we consider a set E; a fuzzy topological space (f:y) and a function ƒ : E → F then we can define ƒ-1 (Y) = { ƒ-1 ( )ג: ∈ גY } P P P P It is easily seen that ƒ-1 (Y) is the smallest fuzzy topology P P making ƒ fuzzy continuous. More generally: consider a family of fuzzy topological space (F j : Y j ) j∈J and for each j∈ J a function R R R R ƒj : E → fj R R R R la r then it is easily seen that the union ∪ ƒ-1j(Y j ) P P R R j∈ J is a sub-base for a fuzzy topology on E making every ƒ i fuzzy continues . we denote it by ∪ ƒ-1 j (Y j ) PR RP P R R R or sup ƒ-1 j (Y j ) j∈J P PR R R R te P R j∈ J 6.4.2 Definition- The initial fuzzy topology on E for the family of Es fuzzy topological space (Fj: Yj) j ∈ J and the family of functions ƒ j : E → (F j : y j ) R R R R R R is the smallest fuzzy topology on E making each function ƒ j R R fuzzy continuous. Within the notations of the definition let (G:δ) be a fuzzy topological space and let ƒ be a function from G to E then ƒ will be fuzzy continuous iff all the compositions ƒ j oƒ are fuzzy R R continues. Moreover the initial fuzzy topology on E is the finest one possessing this property; it is equally clear that the transitivity property for initial topologies holds for initial fuzzy topologies. 6.4.3 Definition- If (E j , δ j ) j ∈ J is a family of fuzzy topological space; then the fuzzy product topology on π j∈J E j is defined as the initial fuzzy topology on π j∈J E j for the family of spaces (E j . Where la r δ j ) j ∈ J and function ƒi: π j∈J E j → Ei ∀i∈J ƒ i = P ri , the protection on the ith coordinate. 6.4.4 Definition- if (E j , δ j ) j∈J is a family of fuzzy topological space te then the fuzzy product topology, on π j∈J E j is defined as the initial fuzzy topology on π j∈J E j for the family of spaces (E j ,δ j ) j∈J and functions ƒi: π j∈J π j∈J E j → Ei where ∀ i ∈J fi = the projection on ith coordinate we denote this fuzzy Es p ri topology π j∈J δ j . 6.5. Theorems of Initial Topologies- The Theorems related to initial fuzzy topologies is as follows- 6.5.1 Lemma- if ƒ: E → F, δ then i (ƒ-1 (δ )) = ƒ-1 (i(δ )) = i (ƒ-1(δ)). Proof - ƒ:E; ƒ-1 (i (δ)) → F. i (δ) is continuous: thus ƒ: E; W (ƒ-1(i(δ )))→ F; δ is fuzzy continuous. This implies W (ƒ-1 (i(δ ))) ⊃ ƒ-1 (δ) ⊃ ƒ-1 (δ) ⇒ ƒ-1 (i(δ)) ⊃ i (ƒ-1 (δ ))) ⊃ i (ƒ-1 (δ)). Further: ƒ: E ; ƒ-1 ( δ ) → F δ is fuzzy continuous thus ƒ E : i (ƒ-1 (δ)) → F. i (δ) is continuous and this implies i (ƒ-1(δ)) ⊃ ƒ-1 (i(δ)). 6.5.2 Theorem- If E is a set (F j : T j ) j∈J is a family of topological space and ƒ j : E → E j is a family of functions then we have la r Sup ƒ-1 j (w(T j ))= w (supƒ j -1 (T j )) j∈J j∈J Proof- we can prove this theorem By the following lemma:- First Lemma 1:- if ƒ: E → F : δ then te i (ƒ-1 (δ )) = ƒ-1(i(δ)) = i (ƒ-1(δ)). Lemma 2:- if ƒ: E → F: W (T) then W (ƒ-1(T)) = ƒ-1 (W(T)). Es Consider now a set E; a family of fuzzy topological spaces (F j : δ j ) j∈J and a family of functions ƒ j : E → F j Then on the one hand: we can consider the initial fuzzy topology as defined and take the associated topology i.e. i (sup) ƒ-1 (δ j )) j∈J on the other hand we can consider the family of topological spaces (F j ; i (δ j )) j∈J and take the initial topology i.e. Sup ƒ-1 j (i(δ j )). j∈J Showing that these two topologies are equal is trivial. 6.5.3 Theorem- if E is a set (F j . δ j ) j∈J is a family of fuzzy topological spaces: and ƒ j : E → F j is a family of function: then we have i (sup ƒ-1 j (δ j )) = sup ƒ j -1(i(δ j )). j∈J j∈J la r Proof- we can prove this theorem by the help of lemma 1if ƒ: E → F: δ then i (ƒ-1(δ)) = ƒ-1(i(δ)) = i (ƒ-1(δ)). It follows that ∀ j∈J te ƒ j -1 (i(δ j )) = i ƒ-i j (δ j ). and the result then follows analogously by the lemma 3- Lemma 3:- if E is a set and (T j ) j∈J is a family of topologies on E then Es Sup ω(T j ) = ω(sup T j ). j∈J j∈J 6.6 Final Fuzzy TopologiesConsider a set F a fuzzy topological space (E:δ): and a function ƒ: E → F Then we can define ƒ (δ) = <{∨ :ƒ-1 (∨ ) ∈ δ }> more generally consider a family of fuzzy topological space (E j : δ j ) j∈J and for each j∈J a function ƒ j : E j → F. It is easily seen that the intersection ∩ ƒ j (δ j ) j∈J is the finest fuzzy topology on F making all the functions f j fuzzy continuous. 6.6.1 Definition- the final fuzzy topology on F: for the family of fuzzy la r topological spaces (E j :δ j ) j∈J and the family of functions ƒ j : (E j :δ j ) → F is the finest fuzzy topology on F making each functions ƒ j : fuzzy continuous. And ∀ j ∈ J : te Let δ j = ω (T j ) Then on the other hand we have Es ∩ ƒ j (ω (T j )). j∈J and on the other hand we have W(∩ j∈J ƒ j (T j )) again we can show the two fuzzy topological to be the same. 6.6.2 Lemma 1- if ƒ:E δ → F Then we have i (ƒ(δ)) = ƒ(i(δ)) ⊃ i (ƒ(δ)). Proof- to show the inclusions i (ƒ(δ )) ⊃ ƒ (i(δ)) ⊃ i (ƒ(δ)) we proceed as we proceeded in lemma:if ƒ: E → F: δ then i (ƒ-1(δ)) = ƒ-1 (i(δ)) = i (ƒ-1 (δ )). The remaining inclusion is shown using the latter one upon δ. i.e i (ƒ(δ)) ⊂ ƒ(i(δ)) = ƒ(ioω (i(δ)))=ƒ (i(δ)). 6.6.3 Lemma 2- if ƒ:E: ω (T) → F then we have ƒ (ω(T)) = ω (ƒ (T)). la r Proof- from lemma as proved above. at follows with δ = ω (T) then ƒ (ω (T)) = W (ƒ (T)) However: ƒ (ω (T) is topologically generated indeed it is the te finest fuzzy topology making ƒ: E : ω (T) → F: ƒ (W(T)) fuzzy continuous But since ω (T) is topologically generated Es ƒ: E: ω (T) → F: ƒ (ω(T)) still is fuzzy continuous and thus ƒ (ω(T) = ƒ (w(T)). 6.5. Conclusion- In this section we discussed about the fuzzy Tychonoff theorems and initial and final fuzzy topology.fuzzy Tychonoff theorems is describes as – “ Arbitrary products of compact spaces are compact”. We show that with our notion of fuzzy compactness the Tychonoff product theorem is safeguarded. ******