Download Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial Intelligence

Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Vol 10(16), DOI: 10.17485/ijst/2017/v10i16/109422, April 2017
ISSN (Print) : 0974-6846
ISSN (Online) : 0974-5645
Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial
Intelligence
M. Shiva Prakash1* and Vijayakumar Maragal Venkatamuni2
Department of ISE, PVP Polytechnic, Malathahalli, Nagarabhavi, Bangalore – 560056, Karnataka, India;
[email protected]
2
Department of Computer Science, Research Progress Review Committee [RPRC], Dr.Ambedkar Institute of
Technology, Visvesvaraya Technological University, Bengaluru – 560056, Karnataka, India;
[email protected]
1
Abstract
This paper is mainly on the emergent intelligence associated with artificial life and its principals. In order to analyze the
model adaptive or intelligent behaviors, economic theory to artificial life can be applied. The principles whereby an animated competent for its resources, and to survey the intelligent behavior are the main concern of this research. The level
of decision making, cost function and utility behavior (the macroeconomic level), physiological and goal oriented behavior
are the qualities of this literature survey which are investigated. The behavior of the agent can be analyzed using many
different metrics; for example, competition, metabolic activity and economic interaction with respect to macro-microeconomics and environment.
Keywords: Artificial General Intelligence, Cognitive Architectures, Learning, Society of Mind
1. Introduction
To build up synthetic minds with the capacity of doing
or behaving like an animal or individual cleverness
that is synthetic originated. Intelligent systems, thinking, knowledge representation and robotics would be
the wide range of instructions where cleverness that is
synthetic developed. Within the want to expertise that
incorporates the usually separate procedures of computer
technology, therapy and philosophy as well as in purchase
to advance our understanding of tasks like problem-solving, decision-making, thinking, perception, language,
memory, learning, Cognitive Science had become. The
growth of intellectual architectures ended up being primarily on viewpoint on the best way to do these tasks.
These intellectual architectures will also be called Mind
that is “Artificial. To be capable performing habits being
specific functions predicated on our knowledge of human
being and non-human minds intellectual architectures
were created. Task effectiveness, objective success, plus
the power to work in unique circumstances would be the
*Author for correspondence
essential problems in developing architectures which are
intellectual.
2. Related Work
2.1 The Micro Level in AI and Economics
In the region, in the event that degree that is a micro
mostly contract involving the two procedures. The particular level that is micro consists of intractable specific
actors (people and agents, correspondingly).Nevertheless,
both procedures stress different factors. The main focus
that is primary of is concerning the architecture that is
intellectual the thought of model knowledge purchase
and memory, perception and problem-solving. This
causes a give attention to creating algorithms that create
for verified input a suitable (rational?) Manufacturing, as
expressed by the acceptance that is extended of and game
concept. On conversation and relationships between
actions and actors is concentrated by Economics regarding the degree that is micro. Social actions, in other words.
Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial Intelligence
Actions which are directed at changing those things, aftereffects of the actions or values of some other person are
believed by a sociologist. Actions like unwillingly causing
a direct impact on another person and actions directed at
things are excluded, but contains actions like threatening
another specie (social within the sense of connected with
other folks rather than within the sense of caring). These
distinctions are more important even as we keep on to
have a review of the quantity that is macro even though
the perception of what is interesting about the degree that
is macro significantly.
2.2 Overview of Views regarding the MicroMacro Link in Economics
An exhaustive conversation for the concept of the style
that is macroeconomics surely surpasses the space supplied here (and our competence). In reality, some will
argue that this conversation is the same as doing research
that is financial this conversation fills volumes. Numerous
definitions occur with this, all tailored to a theory that is
certain, without any obvious success within the control
to generalize from particular theories. An extra issue is
that there’s no matching real reality, in fact, while presenting a clear-cut concept of the sociological idea associated
with a degree that is macro. Perhaps the phenomena used
in combination with somewhat connotations which can
be differing. g. Whenever referring to the connection of
faith and politics as their bi-directional impacts, that are
phenomena of this level that is a macro, the main topic of
social sciences might be analyzed thereafter likewise from
micro, consequently, to macro or met standpoint that
is sociological based on the standpoint of observation.
According to the study that is differentiated, the lacking of a generally accepted idea of these outcomes which
can be social distortions and growth of different schools.
Thus, different paradigms co-exist for the analysis concerning the emergence associated with a framework that
is social in opposition to Kuhn’s thesis on “changes of
paradigms”26.
A description that is brief of four views follows:
2.2.1 Meso-Level
Economics although the technology associated with organizations that may be businesses which effortlessly are
social. Investigation of the results from social companies,
e.g.: organization economics, work economics, technique
economics, and economics of training.
2
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
2.2.2 Macro-Level
Economics as a technology for the tradition that is entire
its security (fixed aspects) and alters (dynamical aspects).
It analyses which forces have a­ ctually really the last outcome of security and modification: faith, economics,
tradition, companies, etc. Investigates the results associated with the ‘society’ and culture, e.g. Basic system
concept, the economics of traditional.
2.2.3 Meta-Level
Economics as a technology for the ­fundamental some
guidelines which can be fundamental a tradition when
analysis ideology. Investigates tradition and tradition
recommendations which are built, services and products and values, e.g. Knowledge economics, social
philosophy, critical tradition concept (Frankfurter
Schuler).
2.3 Macro-Approaches
Big social formations or collective procedures (the
dwelling that’s the lie that is objective one’s heart of
the approaches. The dwelling as well as the modification that is notified of businesses and companies (age.
g. Capitalist society formations as strata, classes, and
activities) are the examples pertaining to their objective. The eye that is main to aim the analysis of the
tradition that is whole of objectified social structures.
To spell it away and present a reason of procedures
of reproduction (fixed aspect) and economics modification (effective aspects) of communities under
economic, social and social points of view will be the
objective with this macro-orientation on social life
phenomena. The tradition will likely be considered to
be a chance that is genuine of, which might never be
deduced from particular contexts (or in other words.
From acting and behavior). The tradition does not
adapt to the sum the elements in this view. For the
constitution of social life and its conditions which
are genuine, specific topics play a role that is small.
In reality, by reconstructing the social in macro-models their impact on social framework just happens as
exchangeable information (contingent functions of
an individual). See including the alleged normative
paradigm of Parsons’ action theory36: confronted by
social objectives (may-, shall-, must-expectations),
who owns a social place (objective social framework)
will, regardless of Parsons voluntarism presumptions,
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
M. Shiva Prakash and Vijayakumar Maragal Venkatamuni
be forced under societal conditions with various levels
of ­sanctions to adjust to the dwelling that is objective.
Hence, the home economical is deemed satisfied obediently the integrative and forced upon the big event
of the very abstraction layer into the system that is
social. To offer a good example: In Lehmann’s conception of social systems28,29 the actors had been entirely
excluded through the concept of interaction while the
element that is fundamental of communities additionally the selective procedure for information, mediation
and understanding, their concept of social systems
describes the in-patient (psychical systems) as a breeding ground for the device, that may just be involved in
the economy of interaction1,2,36,38,46.
2.4 The Micro Approaches
The approach being micro-economical the social by viewing the people that are social their connection behavior
(age. g. 17). The situation that is a must this research area is:
exactly how exactly does a behavior that is certain, mind,
and cognition) without the explicit and coordination that
is prepared the social, in other words. The emerging of
financial coordination and also the provided structures1.
The reliance upon the dwelling that is economic surrounding individuals is not refused, but plays an element
that is little this standpoint. As an answer and review
within the objective (i.e. macro-) standpoint in addition
to its presumptions of a social system, of practical adaptation of someone towards the machine into the first half
the century, the micro-perspectives received increased
attention (start to see the critiques on Parsons by Schutz,
Mead, Blumer etc.). A motivation that is 2nd the intention to scale back the number of traditional analysis of
one’s treatment range that is monetary of behavior and
alter. Procedures in the team concept21. Micro-perspective
approaches attempt to investigate the way in which people typically operate underneath the presumption using
this existence associated with basic other (see the Mead’s
notion of recognition as inter subjectivity and gestures
being certain significant symbols). These approaches pose
the concern that is appropriate of motives and objectives guides the in-patient’s behavior. They attempt to
reconstruct these motives and objectives from watching
contexts, being a situational behavior (commence to realize paradigm that is interpretative a basic concept which
summarizes the approaches of Schutz and Mead using
their supporters).
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
3. Brief Summary of the
Fundamental Concept
Concerning the Macro-Level in
Economics
Viewing the macro-level of and approaches which are
conventional attribute autonomy towards the issues
which is often structural a context that is affordable. These
aspects happen security and alter and that could be summarized by such some fundamental some ideas as faith,
economics, tradition, businesses, etc. Autonomy here
helps you to make sure that no one includes the charged
capacity to alter these structures and it will in addition be
hard for a united team of males and ladies. Additionally,
means the dwelling just isn’t influenced by the existence
that is obviously of a man or woman who’s undoubtedly
the dwelling survives the person that is normal. The people can influence) while this self-reliance regarding the
framework from certain holds, it’s also genuinely that the
dwelling varies in line with the populace that is an entire
reproduction associated with the framework (where
reproduction would be the aspect that is merely. It is vital
to recognize that this reproduction occurs additionally
without explicit comprehension of a person. The effectiveness that exists in most supplied frameworks that is
economically created by the misallocation of resources to
individuals. The structures that develop are manufactured
as a method that is real of this complexity of life. In this
feeling, affordable or business can merely take place if and
simply if participation connected with someone may be
the “reasonable” thing to accomplish.
In this context, it is interesting to remark the partnership between learning and frameworks (or adaptation)
in the comprehended level that is definitely seen Figure
2). Learning will be the cause of structural modifications
(changing goals, needs and types of the reproduction from
the framework) and framework sorts the axioms that
constrain, just wait and just what sort of in-patient will
see an easy method. That is an indicate that is proven fact
that is indisputable is connecting the construction of cleverness through the context15 that is societal. But there is,
however, but, but, an indirect, that is extra is (connection
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
3
Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial Intelligence
through the notion that is fundamental of: disputes are
stimuli for learning (Reinforcement learning) and learning might trigger disputes. Conflict again is connected to
create, after the modification of framework usually causes
disputes and disputes may be the complexities for such
adjustments being structural.
3.1 In Contrast: The Macro Level in AI
Firstly, we will have the designs in a sociologically determined simulation that is agent-based provides a report
that is brief with different applications through the distinctions that can be a micro - macro. Next, we are going
to correctly see what could possibly be called systems
being application-oriented multivalent. Count and Moss12
divide social simulation (possibly, maybe not AI) about
into those two approaches so we will follow their terms.
1st (sociologically inspired) number of research seeks to
make the fundamental maxims of social concept by just
utilizing AI the theory may be the recognized fact that is
undeniable evaluation by simulation, which Canute and
Moss call the ­foundational.
Approach. A method that is extra they label the
approach that is representational develops modeling methods and need that is representative express
seen socially and procedures being institutionalized.
The team that is initial of and implementations may
be primarily objecting to knowledge transfer from AI
to sciences being social whereas the set that is the benefit that is 2nd of knowledge regarding better system
­performance.
3.2 Agent-Based Social Simulation: The
Foundational Approaches
Firstly, there was clearly obvious, clearly a simulation
that is social that is prompted by game approaches which
are theoretic for a good example, it gives the works
being ongoing developments on Axelrod’s research3,24.
These works pay attention to attitudes which can be
modeled egoism that is altruistic is vs. certain rationality) and improves these notions, e.g. By mechanisms
for protecting agents that are cooperative agents being
self-interested. These works could be seen examining
the micro, effortlessly put. Conversation quantity of economics. Ah, a whole many more, a behaviorist strand
of studies is the work that is platforms being ongoing
SUGARSCAPE and SWARM (age. g. 23). Here the macro
level is unquestionably practiced that emerge from sim4
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
ple approaches to big populations which may be seized.
But, this cannot be brought on by social actions like these
models, there’s absolutely no proven fact that is fundamental of and various people who have no action that
is intended to influence some other person’s belief or
actions here is the prerequisite that is incredibly of action.
An exception that is determining this strand of research,
are anthropological models that you will certainly need to
produce structures being emergent behavior that is social
behavior that is inclined to numerous other people). An
illustration that is fantastic if The investigation will probably be the EOS task14, which might show the emergence
of in-group hierarchies, which in sociological terms is a
mesolevel function (due to the grasped fact relations of
teams may be the topic of research). The macro-level is
regarded as the behavior that is fundamentally associated
with the population of agents, an emergent structuring
that isn’t hardwired by the designer inside the approaches
which are final. This might be distinctive through the
point of view that is sociological the respect that economics would need a good amount of hierarchies and teams
to build, connect and cause alterations bi-directionally
between micro and degree that is macro. Additionally,
there is a strand of research that attempts to explicitly
model framework that is a macro of the Society. But,
such simulation that is multi-level is social maybe not
recommend the total bandwidth of affordable maxims of
societal levels. For a couple of reasons (modeling work,
simulation speed) acutely typical training to restrict the
simulation to simply a relationship that is uni-directional
micro and macro level, which still render impressive
results. E.g. Troitzsch44 describes a simulation this is
the person that is behavior that is multi-level wound up
being certainly simulated to help make predictions about
the money spending behavior of a population, mindset development in a population without the structural
improvements, intercourse desegregation in schools
etc. The number that is macro comprises of an aggregation through the amount that is micro in a number of
among these simulations. The design tips out any possibility for the average person that is particular replace
the constraints which can be structurally regarded the
population. In front of Canute and Caste franchise11 the
option related to hyperlinking that is a simulation that is
unidirectional is affordable research that existent simply
holds for the micro-to-macro method additionally for
the contrary.
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
M. Shiva Prakash and Vijayakumar Maragal Venkatamuni
3.3 Application-Oriented Multi-Agent
Systems: The Representational
Approaches
Predicated concerning the The Web47, the pressing problem that is micro-macro a pressing issue, which raises the
nagging problems that comprise the meaning of-of AI
research itself. Consequently, we will revisit these problems which are pushing they relate to the discussion that
is micro-macro we try to discover essential strands of
­current research and exactly how. It is advisable to keep in
mind also though macro that is micro.
Problem plays work that is, such is principally it is
not a term that is generally the works being literary (age.
g. 25). In a large amount regarding works which can be
literary it is described simply implicitly by planning to
decompose the problem that is nagging sub problems
that are a couple of. A variety that is first is influential
of sub problems where we have been able to discover at
least the notions which are implicit the AI for the problem
that is micro-macro the guide by Bond and Gasser6. They
list five conditions being mean: • which are AI exactly
enabling agents do decompose their objectives and tasks,
to allocate sub-goals and sub-tasks to varied other agents,
also to synthesize outcomes which can be solutions which
are often partial.
• How precisely to permit agents to communicate.
Exactly what relationship languages and protocols to
work well with.
• How precisely allowing agents to share and explain
about the actions, plans, and knowledge of other agents
positively assists get in touch of their mind correctly.
• How agents being correctly enabling state and description according to the state among these relationship
procedures. How exactly to allow them to know them
to boost their state concerning the coordination and
also to work coherently, it’s possible for whether or not
they have actually accomplished progress inside their
coordination efforts, and how in order to make.
• How precisely allowing agents to together once
acknowledge and acquire more viewpoints which are
disparate disputes. How to synthesize views and outcomes? Know that set alongside the concept that is
sociological the total amount that is macro these problems could be more making use of relationship that is
representative societal dilemmas. Moulin and ChairDraa33 add a software engineer (or norm) standpoint,
this is the reason the perception of AI.
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
4. Towards a Micro-Macro
Definition of AI
Our work is probably perhaps not into the location to
supply an and for that reason, is final the trend that is a
macro of based simulation (either foundational or representational) or determine most likely the numerous
complicated concept that is a macro of should be found
in AI. The concern for this url that is micro-macro with
various magnitude:
a) for averagely sized systems which are ­multi-agent
that are however the top the majority of today’s applications) record of issue definitions of our research
nevertheless, we conclude we could recognize three various strands of research where the truth is.b) This view isn’t
adequate whenever complexity is increased: start and big
systems being transfer that is mitigate the social sciences
absolutely help produce systems which can be adaptive,
scalable and given the feasible to eliminate disputes which
is unpredictable. A stronger concept through the aspects
businesses which are being are macro energy, fraudulence
etc.) will become necessary and economics consist of a
motivation for versatile architectures for scalable MAS. In
close analogy to your progress which AI research has built
by approaching therapy that is an AI that is intellectual
should expected to be brought ahead by the cooperation
with economics. c) For the info transfer from AI towards
the social sciences a conceptualization that is satisfactory
to the aspect that is macro it’s seen in economics is paramount to guide simulation that is agent-based well as lead
to the results transferable to economics. The approaches
in paragraphs a) and b) may be viewed approaches that
can be representational whereas c) corresponds towards
the approach that is foundational. Paragraph b) views
the representative as dependent on features like freedom,
autonomy, and competence that is affordable where sociologists would argue that the power that is social assumes
the flexibleness). Having found that for most issues the
use of a successful and complex proven fact that is wellfounded with a qualification that is macro desirable, we
have to talk about some implications for future work.
5. Summary
An observation that is fundamental to what is stated thus
far will be the truth, it is consequently, barely current it
may possibly be safer to make use of affordable launched
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
5
Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial Intelligence
ideas, though the calculation of bi-directionally interacting micro and simulation that is a macro - level evidently
too complex and far too tough to create plus. Whenever
considering this shortcoming of up-to-date simulation
that is social it seems that there clearly was a need to
judge, which concept that is sociological regarding the
one hand enhance the model that is simulated age. g. The
writing that is bi-directional of and macro) in addition
to about the same an added hand, simplify the style of
agents (frameworks for socially more competent agents).
They are what’s needed of a concept that is hybrid has the
explanatory energy which extends through the behavior
that is specific structures in regards to the affordable
context and back the action that is specific. A theory
that may spring to mind could be the idea of Anthony
Giddens. The potency of the idea is created with the idea
that is quite off of framework and action. Conte and
Castelfranchi11 criticize that although Giddens’ concept
“is process-oriented, it certainly will not simply take into
adequate account the component in regards to the procedures being intellectual the micro and levels” that is
macro. In your research that is ongoing are finding that
the habits-field notion of Pierre Bourdieu is a theory
which covers a spectrum that is an action that may be
contrasted framework, whilst in addition, having a larger
explanatory energy into the real subject that Canute
and Castelfranchi describe since the shortcoming of
Giddens’ concept. Bourdieu’s concept of habitus comprises of a dispositions which are few actions and means
of perception. These dispositions, except the last a reputation of this specific and simply just what it experienced
in the past; they might be included or imitated, simply
put. Found by observation and obtained by advice. We
declare that the idea that is extremely of dispositions
is a point that is ideal is beginning connect bounded
rationality research combined with the AI research of
affordable contexts. Additionally, the fact that Bourdieu
emphasizes the applying that is sensible of concept and
contains reported extensively regarding the ongoing
work that makes sense the hope that their methodology
may be used for application in AI.
For Bourdieu, the methods could be the website link
between procedures that conform to the encompassing
framework that is afforded into the logic making use of
this context that is social. This makes the world, consequently, the result concerning the framework for this
tradition that is representing the behavior associated with
specific, while nonetheless describing what kind of shots
6
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
that might be a framework that is sure. Bourdieu views
the individual which is made of desires and actions as the
powerful force that works well the growth, modification,
and reproduction of affordable framework. For folks, this
total outcome that is total a call for considerably more
use extra thinking about structures instead of reasoning
about aggregated values for agents in social simulation.
We believe utilizing the habitus-field theory, a theory is
discovered by us that is sociological provides what Canute
and Castelfranchi11 demand, once they compose:
We think that the web link that is internet site is a
micro-macro not just a challenge that is twofold it’s not\
only a matter of relating macro-structures and microinteractions, affordable and action, just as much social
begins including Giddens, generally seems to think.
Inside our conception, it really is a challenge that is threefaceted, including (a) outside forces and structures, (b)
agents’ cognition, and (c) their actions. Cognition plays a
linking that is fundamental between your forces which is
often far from the representative’s actions.
a) Unlike what’s commonly called rationality, cognition
reflects and embodies in lots of techniques pre-conditions
that are objective societal prescriptions and organizations, and results which can be reinforced. Cognition is
without a doubt arranged by Society. The thing is exactly
how is this feasible?
b) macro- phenomena being emerge that is affordable
inadvertently from micro interactions. Nonetheless,
they not merely directly emerge from techniques, as
well as, rely on the representative’s cognitive representations and state. Some structures of interdependencies
emerge through the interrelationships the big selection
of interior properties of agents located in a globe that
is standard an example that is great despite the fact that
many conventions right emerge from methods. Bourdieu
defines their methods if the framework that is arranged
by the individual’s social context which may be additionally structuring the social context by the individual’s
involvement in this context (the “structured and structuring structure”). The incorporation for the framework
may be the procedure of learning heuristics to utilize
it and perception being sufficient for various contexts.
These heuristics will not be earnestly reconsidered ahead
of the methods is important in an emergency ahead of
Bourdieu. This is often a pointer that is learning that
is interesting like reinforcement learning and that will
guide our future research.
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
M. Shiva Prakash and Vijayakumar Maragal Venkatamuni
6. References
1.Alexander J. Theoretical logic in economics. Vol. 4: The
Modern Reconstruction of Classical Thought. Berkeley/Los
Angeles: University of California Press; 1983.
2.Alexander J. Fin-de-siècle Social Theory: Relativism,
Reduction and the Problem of Reason, London; 1995.
3. Bazzan ALC, Bordini RH, Campbell JA. Agents with moral
sentiments in an iterated Prisoner’s dilemma Exercise. 1997.
4. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of ­reality:
A treatise in the economics of knowledge. New York,
Doubleday; 1966.
5. Blumer H. Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs/New
Jersey; 1969.
6. Bond AH, Gasser L. Readings in distributed artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann; 1988. p. 3–35.
7. Bourdieu P. La Distinction: Critique social du judgment.
Translated by Nice R, Distinction: A social critique of the
judgement of taste. Harvard Univ Press; 1987
8.Castelfranchi C, Falcone R. Principles of trust for MAS:
Cognitive anatomy, social importance, and quantification. Proceedings of theThird International Conference on
Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 98); 1998. Crossref
9.Colemann J. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge/
Mass; 1990.
10. Colemann J, Bourdieu P. Theory for changing Society. NY;
1991.
11. Conte R, Castelfranchi C. Simulating multi-agent interdependencies. A two- way approach to the micro-Macro link.
Troitzsch. 1996. Crossref
12.Conte R, Moss S. Agent-based social simulation:
Technological roadmap. Document for the AgentLink SIG
on Agent-Based Social Simulation. (In preparation).
13.Dautenhahn K, Masthoff J, Numaoka C. Socially intelligent agents. 1997 AAAI Fall Symposium, 1997 Nov 8–10,
Cambridge, Massachusetts, Technical Report FS-97-02; 1997.
14. Doran JE. From computer simulation to artificial societies.
Transactions SCS. 1997; 14(2):69–77.
15.Edmonds B, Dautenhahn K. The contribution of society
to the construction of individual intelligence. Edmonds
B, Dautenhahn K, editors. Socially situated intelligence: A
workshop held at SAB’98, 1998 Aug, Zürich. University of
Zürich Technical Report; 1998. p. 42–60.
16. Giddens A. The constitution of Society.Cambridge; 1984.
17. Goffmann E. Interaction Ritual. New York: Anchor Books;
1967.
18. Goffmann, E. The presentation of Self in Everyday-Life. NY;
1959.
19. Goffmann E. Encounters. Indianapolis. NY; 1961.
20. Hannoun M, Sichman J, Boissier O, Sayettat C. Dependence
relations between roles in a multi-agent system: Towards
the detection of inconsistencies in organization. Sichman
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
J, Conte R, Gilbert N, editors. Multi-Agent Systems and
Agent-Based Simulation, LNAI 1534; 1998.
21. Homans C. The human group. New York; 1950
22. Homans C. Social Behavior. New York; 1974.
23.Kennedy J. Artificial Sociocognition: Cultures of belief
in populations of elementals. In Landauer C, Bellman
KL, editors. Virtual Worlds and Simulation Conference
(VWSIM’99), Simulation Series, The Society for Computer
Simulation. 1999; 31(2).
24. Jennings NR, Campos JR. Towards a social level characterisation of socially responsible agents. IEE Proceedings on
Software Engineering. 1997; 144(1):11–25. Crossref
25.Jennings NR, Sycara K, Wooldridge MJ. A roadmap of
agent research and development. Autonomous Agents and
Multi-Agent Systems. 1998; 1:7–38. Crossref
26.Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago;
1970.
27. Langton CB. Artificial life. Studies in the sciences of complexity. Addison-Wesley. 1989; 6:1–48.
28.Luhmann N. Social systems. Stanford University Press;
1995.
29. Luhmann N. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp;
1997.
30.Marcenac P, Courier R, Calderoni S, Soulie C. Towards
an emergence machine for complex systems simulations.
In Del Phil AP, Mira J, Ali M, editors. Lecture Notes
in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag. 1998; 1416.
Crossref
31. Malsch T. From a talk given at the kick-off meeting of the
German socio nic’s projects in Hamburg Risen; 2000.
32. Mead G. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago; 1934.
33. Moulin B, Chaib-Draa B. An overview of distributed artificial intelligence. In O’Hare GMP, Jennings NR, editors.
Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence. John
Wiley & Sons Inc., New York; 1996. p. 3–55.
34.Müller HJ, Malsch T, Schulz-Schaefer I. SOCIONICS:
Introduction and Potential. Journal of Artificial Societies
and Social Simulation. 1998; 1(3).
35.Nwana HS. Software Agents: An Overview. Knowledge
Engineering Review. 1996; 11(3):205–44. Crossref
36. Parsons T, Shills C. Toward a General Theory of Action.
New York; 1962.
37.Parsons T. The social system. Routledge &Kegan Paul,
London; 1951.
38.Parsons T. The system of modern societies. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ; 1971.
39. Sandholm T. Distributed Rational Decision Making. Weiss;
1999.
40.Sichman JS, Conte R, Castelfranchi C, Demazeau Y. A
social reasoning mechanism based on dependence networks. Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on
Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam; 1994.
Indian Journal of Science and Technology
7
Survey on Macro-Micro Approaches in Artificial Intelligence
41. Schillo M, Rovatsos M, Funk P. Using trust for detecting
deceitful agents in artificial societies. AAI Journal. Special
Issue on Deception, Fraud, and Trust in Agent Societies,
Castelfranchi C, Tan Y, Falcone R, Firozabadi BS; 2000.
42.Schütz A, Luckmann T. The structures of life-world.
London: Northwestern University Press; 1973.
43. Troitzsch K, Mueller U, Gilbert N, Doran J. Social Science
Microsimulation. Springer; 1996. Crossref
44. Troitzsch K. Multilevel Simulation; 1996.
45.Verhagen H, Smit R. Multi-agent systems as simulation tools for social theory testing. Poster presentation at
8
Vol 10 (16) | April 2017 | www.indjst.org
International Conference on Computer Simulation and the
Social Sciences (ISSC&SS), Cortona; 1997.
46. Wallerstein I. The modern world-system: Capitalistic agriculture and the origins of the european world-economy in
the sixteenth century. Academic Press; 1991.
47. Weiß G. Multi-agent systems: A modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press; 1999.
48. Yamagishi T. The provision of a sanctioning system as a
public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
1986; 51(1):110–16. Crossref
Indian Journal of Science and Technology