Download The Times of India

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified crops wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified food wikipedia , lookup

History of genetic engineering wikipedia , lookup

Genetically modified organism containment and escape wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
The Times of India, 23.11.15. pp6.
Geneticist warns against
dangers of fiddling with
Nature
The buzz around sustainable agriculture has been growing and the idea of Green
Revolution has moved on to Evergreen revolution. P C Kesavan, a radiation biologist
and distinguished fellow at M S Swaminathan Research Foundation, in an interview with
Meera Vankipuram, talks about why India needs sustainable agriculture, the hazards of
genetically modified food and how technology can help. He is the former director of the
biomedical group of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, and former professor and dean,
school of life sciences at JNU.
Government has reportedly asked research institutions to self-finance projects and
develop revenue models. Will this help or hinder research?
Scientific research is not a quick thing, only biotechnology gives fast results. If you
want me to put a gene into something, I can do it much faster because everything is
streamlined. But in other cases we need time, equipment and laboratory support. In
these days of intellectual property rights and patenting, other countries are advanced in
scientific research. If the government does not support research, the next generation
will find a knowledge gap that is unbridgeable.
Dr Swaminathan has spoken about an `evergreen revolution', with the focus being
on cultivating crops without damaging soil fertility. What is the role of technology in
sustainable agriculture?
We should consider eco-friendly technologies. There is interdependence among all
beings -every other being is directly or indirectly linked and makes this planet
habitable. Technology should not ruin that. Nowadays, there is indiscriminate use of
pesticides, and almost all of them are endocrine disruptors (chemicals that interfere
with the hormone system causing tumors and other disorders). Today farming families
in Punjab have the highest number of cancer affected cases in the world. Some of the
current farming practices are bad for the environment and soil health. At MSSRF , we
focus on eco-agriculture and eco-enterprises for developing long-term livelihood
opportunities these are done by blending frontier technologies with traditional wisdom
and ecological prudence of farmers and tribals.
The Centre is reportedly considering a proposal to permit commercial cultivation of
genetically modified mustard when earlier it had halted Bt brinjal. What are your views
on GM crops?
Genetic engineering causes disruption of coordinated molecular and cellular functions
that evolved over millions of years. The immediate consequence of that is the other
genes that were functioning normally begin to become abnormal. That is why people
find unintended effects, for example enzymes become allergens. Science has not solved
these riddles, because there aren't enough funds for research. Instead there are more
attractive propositions for researchers in commercial ventures. Science and ethics are
weak against the push for technology by commercial enterprises.
But GM companies claim these crops are pest-resistant, can increase yield, and
reduce pesticide use?
Companies should work towards weather-resistant crop varieties.But they cannot offer
this as it is difficult to achieve, they go for the easier option of putting genes that can
offer resistance to insects and weeds. As biologists we know that there is both
competition and harmony in the natural world. Parasitism is good and bad, but this was
disrupted by chemical pesticides. Now the government is thinking of releasing
genetically modified mustard, which the companies claim is resistant to herbicides, but
some of which are also carcinogenic. In my opinion, it should not have been
experimented upon at all.