Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Illustrations of a constructivist approach to transform and assess the teaching and learning process in introductory science and education courses. Carmen Bellido, Ph.D Division of Education and Professional Studies, University of Puerto Rico at Mayagüez [email protected] Abstract (300 words) One of the results of the Collaborative for the Excellence on Teacher Preparation of Puerto Rico (PR-CETP), has been to bring together a group of professors from Biology, Physics and Education and motivate them to improve their courses. In this panel we will present and discuss content-based examples to illustrate our approach to promote discovery and transform traditional lessons. The common denominators of our methodology are constructivism, active learning and authentic assessment. Examples from Physics will assess misconceptions on the behavior of falling objects and the use of peer discussion and technology to overcome them. In Biology, we will show how the application of biotechnology to relevant problems serves to clarify the underlying biological concepts. The use of pictorial representations to identify misconceptions in conditioning learning theory will be modeled within an educational psychology setting. Finally, we will use examples from pseudoscientific theories to demonstrate how critical thinking skills are essential for objective interpretations of scientific data. Abstract (50 words) A team of Biology, Physics and Education professors will present and discuss contentbased examples to illustrate their approach to promote discovery and transform their lessons into constructivist ones, promoting authentic assessment. A common theme of content-based, student-centered activities will provide the framework for this panel discussion. Thinking in pictures; the use of pictorial representations as a learning and assessment tool. We are intensely visual animals. The eyes contain nearly 70 percent of the body’s sensory receptors and send millions of signals along the optic nerves to the visual centers of the brain. It is not surprising that the visual components of a memory are so robust and that it is why visuals are powerful retention aids that also serve to increase understanding. The ability to transform thoughts into images is often viewed as a test of true understanding[1]. In the exercise that I ask my students to do they have to translate their understanding of classical learning key concepts into a visual example. This serves as learning and assessment tool, notwithstanding their ability to draw and also lets me pinpoint what could be confusing or vague in my explanations. It is an exercise that could be used in any kind of course. The process is very simple. I start by showing them in a transparency a picture that frequently appears in textbooks illustrating the central concepts of classical conditioning (see Figure 1 [2]). After a brief explanation of the theory, I ask the students to work in pairs to make a list of all the key terms that either appear or are implied in the illustration. When they finish the list, we write it on the blackboard to make sure that everybody has the complete list. Then I ask them to continue to work in pairs to draw an original example of a learning situation (either in people or animals) that could be explained with the classical conditioning theory, following much or less the same format that appeared in the book. I give them 8 to 10 minutes to finish their work in a sheet of paper showing all the key terms of the list in their example and then I collect them. I evaluate the illustrations in terms of accuracy and completeness in the usage of the concepts to discuss it on the next class. Trough this simple exercise it is demonstrated what the students have understood of the lesson and is interesting to notice the wide variability in their explanations. Often the concepts are confused with elements of other theories of learning (as those of operant conditioning) allowing me to address these misunderstandings on time. I used several approaches to correct them in the next class. Sometimes, I use students who demonstrate correct understanding of the terms to explain others that did not. Oftentimes I make transparencies of pictures that show frequent incorrect usages of the key terms (making sure they are from past year sessions and without the name of the authors) for a group discussion. It is a version of the game “what is wrong with this picture” that results in a simple and pleasant way of engaging the students to probe their own understanding of the lesson. As educators many times we assume that because we show it with a picture from the book it its so clear, that everybody understood immediately what we want to communicate. Now picture, how wrong we could be!! Figure 1. From Lifespan Development, 1997. [1] Wolf, P. 2001. Brain Matters: Translating research into classroom practice Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development [2] Seifert, K, Hoffnung, R., Hoffnnung, M. 1997. Lifespan Development. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company (p.42)