Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Vulnerability of coastal fishery communities to climate change in Kerala state 5-11-2013, Annemarie Groot, Tanya Singh and Kirstin van Riel, Outline Vulnerability to climate change Case study: Vulnerability of coastal fishery communities to climate change in Kerala state Exercise (tools) Vulnerability to climate change? Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with adverse effects of climate change (including climate variability and extremes) (IPCC, 2007) Primary determinants: exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity Vulnerability to climate change: main determinants (IPCC, 2007) Exposure: exposure of a system to stimuli that act on a particular system (temperature increases, changes in frequency or intensity of precipitation..) Sensitivity: responsiveness of a system to climate hazards Adaptive capacity: refers to the ability of a system to adjust to CC. Ability is measured in terms of resources availability (human, technical, biophysical and financial capital) and institutional capacity Vulnerability indices and indicators (examples) Location of houses Change in temperature Infrastructure onset of the demographics exposure monsoon Age sensitivity diversification Vulnerability precipitation generation adaptive Change in income capacity no. of intensity income of precipitati access to access to generating on information technology activities early warning Awareness system raising Contextual nature of vulnerability and difficulties of validating indicators provide challenges to development of vulnerability indicators Approaches: top down - bottom up Top down Bottom up (Kerala case study) Case study: Vulnerability of fisheries and fishery dependent communities to climate change Start to build understanding about vulnerability Context: Indo Mareclim Research question What determines the vulnerability of the fisheries sector, in particular the fishing communities under consideration to changes in the biophysical system? And how do different actors within the fisheries sector perceive and respond to the affects that shape their vulnerability? Climate change is an add-on stressor Fishery communities are affected by multiple anthropogenic factors (climate change is just one of these Source: CMFRI Overexploitation Climate Change Impact on Fishing communities Applied methodology Bottom up approach - participatory vulnerability assessment Focus on current vulnerability (future vulnerability touched upon) Desk study research combined with interviews with stakeholders.... Study area .... Stakeholders / interviewees • Community (n=39): • Traditional fishermen (canoes and catamarans) • Traditional motorised • Trawlers • Fish vendors • ‘Middle man’ • Fishermen wives • State level (n=15): • Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) • State Fisheries Department • NGO’s • Students of the Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean studies (KUFOS) university Study area: Kerala state - Ernakulam district (Vypin Island) and Alappey district General information on fisheries and fishery communities Fisheries industry in Kerala has a dominant role in its economic development. Share of Kerala is 8.2% in India’s total fish production Marine fishery sector in Kerala has increased over the years (no. people) Marine fishes dominate total landing include Indian Oils sardines, India Mackerel, threadfin breams, ribbon fishes, tuna (pelagic fishes) and perch, sharks, prawns Traditional (marine and inland) and mechanized (incl. trawling boats)(marine). Traditional fishermen mainly involved in pelagic fisheries, trawlers involved in highly valued export fish (e.g. marine shrimps) Fishermen are active in the traditional (marine and inland) or mechanized fishery sector, fisher women are mainly involved in post harvesting activities (processing, peeling) General information on fisheries and fishery communities (continuation): coastal zone management, fishery regulation Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (CRZ) Integrated coastal zone management programme still to be developed Kerala fisheries development and management policy (1993) Trawl-ban (mechanized boats), 47 days mid June - end of July, marine fisheries) Welfare and self help programmes to enhance social and economic security No state level Climate Change action plan yet Outcomes: based on interviews – literature Exposure to climate change Change in monsoon pattern (SW): decrease in frequency and intensity (years before 2013). In 2013, intense rain and air currents Decrease in occurrence of coastal upwelling Increased sea surface temperature (SST) (0.2˚- 0.3˚C in past 45 years) Increased sea level rise Increased salinity Increase in heavy storms, coastal flooding and such coastal erosion ST2 Slide 15 ST2 sometimes kirstin mentions droughts, but emphasis is more on floods Singh, Tanya, 03-11-2013 Sensitivity to climate change High dependency on fisheries sector Lack of job alternatives (women are an exception) Housing location (very close to the water, thus prone to floods and storms) High sensitivity Impact of CC on fish resources and fishing community Exposure Impact Decrease in frequency and intensity of monsoon rainfall 1) Before 2013 • Fishermen/women: negative effect on spawning • Officials: change in monsoon can have positive and negative effect on spawning season - production capacity • Less opportunities to go out fishing –decrease in catch • Decrease in income 2) 2013 Increase in sea surface temperature • Increase in fast growing, smaller, short lived and low value fish • Extended distribution of pelagic fish (India mackerel still abundant but migrating to North, oil sardine abundant) • Sharks and catfish are declining (both fishermen/ officials) (not clearly linked to SST) • Shift in spawning season (towards cooler periods) Decrease in occurrence of coastal upwelling (no upwelling in 2013) • Less pelagic fish in inshore waters Coastal erosion Houses , roads .. destroyed Inland fisheries • Eutrophication and mass fish kills • Emerging fish diseases Trends in fisheries resources based on interviews and literature findings Marine fish species Trends based on stakeholders perception Source of information Literature findings Oil Sardine – Sardinella longiceps Increased Trawler Increased (since 2000) Increased CMFRI, State Fisheries Department wives of fishermen Increased (i.e. CMFRI, 2013) Vivekanandan, 2011; Mohamed et al., 2013) Declining (Mohamed et al., 2013). Silver moony – Monodactylus Argenteus Tiger prawns - Penaeus monodon Decreased since 2000 Decreased in quantity and quality (size) Decreased in quality (size) CMFRI, State Fisheries Department Gill netters Fisherwoman Marine shrimp (penaeid prawns) Threadfin bream (pink perch) Decreased Decreased Mechanized/ Trawler Mechanized/ State Fisheries Dept. Tuna Cat fishes - Tachysurus sp. Decreased Depleted since 1973 Mechanized Mechanzed, State Fisheries Dept. Declining ‘Vanished’ Trawler; FGD Trawler, traditional fishing couple; motorised Indian Mackerel – Rastrilliger kanagurta Sharks / Rays / Skates Elasmobranchs Declining FGD; CMFRI No change Trawler / net mender Decreased Traditional, small scale fisherman Abundant but showing a negative growth (Sathianandan et al., 2011) Decreasing since 1997 (Nair,2011) Increase (i.e. CMFRI, 2013) Decreased (Sathianandan et al., 2011) X Disappeared since 1997 (Nair, 2011) Collapsed (Mohamed et al., 2013) Declining (Mohamed et al., 2013) Less abundant (Sathianandan et al., 2011) Inland fish species Pearl spot - Etroplus suratensis x Adaptive capacity Poor access to financial resources (high interest rates) Poor access to education Access to networks: Women seems to have better access to networks than men Access to information: Tsunami warning system is perceived as being effective Roads, bridges are constructed to facilitate evacuation Governance, leadership: Coastal Regulation Zone notification is perceived as being partially effective, trawl ban is considered to be effective Vulnerability Traditional fishermen (highest: lack access to facilities, live close to the water, difficult to get loans, no alternative, at high risks during storms) Mechanized fishermen/trawlers (lower; capacity to extent fishing range towards deeper water) Chinese-net fishermen (lower: highly vulnerable during SW monsoon) Women of fishermen (lower: take on alternative employment, SHG) Youth (lower: might have a better future, due to education and migration) Fish vendors (low: more financial capital, affected by price fluctuation) Recommendations to better dealing with CC impacts and sustain fisheries resources (coping/adaptation) Trawl-ban might need to be adjusted as spawning seasons and distribution ranges of fishes are said to be changing Support development of alternative income generating activities e.g. in tourism (mal adaptation!) Support adaptive fishing and post-harvest practices to sustain fish production and quality Increase awareness about CC among fishing communities and other stakeholders Develop decision support systems for fisheries (prices, .. Stop overfishing and adopt Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries and Integrated Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management Future outlook Total amount of rainfall is likely to decrease The occurrence of upwelling is likely to become even less frequent (SW wind flow is likely to weaken) Decrease in amount of (pelagic) fish in the inshore waters Traditional fisheries might become a dying tradition But, effects of the monsoon/CC on fish production, fishery community remain unclear. Need for research! Exercise: introduction of tools Climatic hazard trend analysis Objective To gain insight into past climatic hazards and identify trends in their nature, intensity and impacts To develop insight into the impact of the climatic hazards To understand past and present coping strategies, incl. their effectiveness To identify a first set of adaptation options Procedure 1.Start with the earliest hazard event anyone can remember, a timeline of the last 20-30 years is developed to identify and discuss large climatic hazard events. 2.Discuss the impacts of the events, community reaction and coping strategies and institutional support. 3.Assess and discuss the effectiveness of the coping/ adaptation strategies (past, present and future) 4.Identify new adaptation strategies that are more effective Climatic hazard trend analysis (example) Tool ‘Livelihood Resource Vulnerability Assessment’ (Regmi et al, 2010) Objective of the tool To assess the intensity of impact of climatic hazards on livelihood resources Process and procedure Identify a number of climate induced hazards and relevant resources. Resources can be technical capital (e.g. roads), social/human capital (e.g. networks) or financial. Write the climate induced hazards and relevant resources in a table. Participants rate the impact severity of the climatic hazards on the different resources. Scores are decided by consensus, use rating system as described in the tool description Expected outputs Insight into those livelihood assets that are heavily affected by climateinduced hazards Table: Livelihood Resource Vulnerability Assessment Climate induced hazards Resources Fish (marine) Fish (back waters) Marketing network Roads Etc. Increased uncertainty in rain fall Increased risk of soil erosion 3 (High impact on the resource) Etc. Etc. etc. Tool Vulnerability Assessment (Regmi et al, 2010) Use of the tool To differentiate vulnerability to climatic hazards across different sectors and social groups To identify most vulnerable social groups within a community and most vulnerable sectors Process and procedure Preferably, make use of a focus group discussion. Participants discuss the vulnerability of each social group to each climatic hazard and consensually agree a rating as below. Climate induced hazards are listed along one side of a grid, as shown hereafter. Because of time constraints focus only on social groups (if you have time you could assess different sectors as well). List different social groups (age, gender, types of fishermen/women..) as shown in the table hereafter. Expected output: Insights into the most vulnerable people and groups within a community (and/or the most vulnerable sectors), including the reasons why Table: Vulnerability Assessment social groups within the community age differentiatio n gender differentiatio n climate change induced hazards etc. increased increased increased uncertainty illness in risk of in rain fall the family erosion youth adults elderly men women etc. Types of fisherman/women Traditional Mechanized etc. Sectors Fisheries Agriculture Etc. (2) (3) End slide or section heading Tekst