Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Subject: 1. Non-Paper - Transatlantic Marine and Maritime Cooperation The EU's context Human activities are increasingly constrained by scarcity of land and freshwater. At the same time, the seas and oceans represent a large, and mostly untapped, resource. The EU's Integrated Maritime Policy (IMP), led by DG MARE, aims at a more coherent European approach to maritime issues in order to contribute to the creation of sustainable growth and jobs from sea-related activities. The IMP was recently complemented by two Communications: 'Developing a Maritime Strategy for the Atlantic Ocean Area'1 and 'Blue Growth2: opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth'. The objective of the EU's blue growth strategy is to provide a package of EU measures to realise this potential. The EU's blue economy currently delivers gross added value of just under €500 billion a year. It is set to grow to €600 billion by 2020. This is to be achieved by maximising the effectiveness of EU policies in supporting the goals of blue growth and jobs. The strategy puts particular emphasis on the potential of research to create innovation in new emerging industries such as ocean energy, seabed mineral resources and marine biotechnology as well as traditional ones such as aquaculture. It is underpinned by specific maritime policy measures on marine knowledge (from seabed mapping to ocean forecasting), on spatial planning and on maritime surveillance (awareness of potentially illegal or threatening activities at sea) that contribute to a number of EU policies and a number of industrial sectors. These measures will stimulate growth and jobs by lowering the costs and reducing the risk of doing business at sea. The optimum measures needed depend on the geography, oceanography, climate, culture and economy tailored for each sea-basin. The Atlantic strategy has been crafted that looks at ways of encouraging joint responses to common challenges as well as focusing on measures to support growth and jobs that can be implemented by the five EU coastal states – Spain, Portugal, France, Ireland and the UK. Another example the Arctic strategy aims to help those who live and work in this region cope with a changing climate and increasing human activity. 2. Existing transatlantic cooperation in research and innovation DG RTD has been contributing to the implementation of the IMP, including the Atlantic Strategy, through well-established transatlantic marine and maritime research cooperation within successive research framework programmes. The priorities of the EU's blue growth strategy feature prominently in many of the societal challenges identified in the Commission’s proposal for Horizon 2020. However the enormous economic potential of the North Atlantic remains largely untapped as many opportunities will require a wider participation of the main Atlantic coastal states. Research that underpins a drive for growth and jobs could in many cases 1 2 COM(2011) 782 final of 21.11.2011 COM(2012) 494 final of 13.9.2012 be more effectively coordinated on a transatlantic basis thus providing mutual benefit and bringing new opportunities for innovative technologies. In line with the challenges identified in the IMP, the Commission services believe that successful transatlantic cooperation activities can already be identified in the following areas which would constitute a good basis for further enhancing transatlantic research and innovation cooperation: Sustainable Atlantic ecosystem approach Sustainable marine food production (fisheries and aquaculture) Innovative uses and conservation of the Atlantic/marine biodiversity (including seabed biological resources) Seabed Critical Raw Materials (CRM – seabed mining) Two horizontal areas, namely Ocean Observation Technologies, and Bridging to Society - Ocean Literacy seem suitable to complement the proposed four focal areas. Furthermore, on both sides of the North Atlantic a number of bi-lateral and multilateral cooperation frameworks - such as GEO, the Belmont Forum, the EU-US TF on Biotechnology, the international KBBE Forum, the NOAA-JRC cooperation activities already exist (see short overview in annex 1). Their potential to facilitate research and innovation collaboration on both sides of the Atlantic could be further exploited. 3. Leveraging existing cooperation What would be needed at transatlantic level is to connect information and resources from these different bi-lateral and multilateral cooperation frameworks under one umbrella as they have strong links to each other and involve same or similar actors on both sides of the Atlantic. This umbrella could take the form of a Transatlantic Marine Research Alliance which would bring under one umbrella EU and US and Canadian 'marine' institutes, specific agencies and relevant funding agencies as central stakeholders, but also members of the already existing bilateral and international cooperation frameworks3. Such a Transatlantic Marine Research Alliance would allow for: 3 Identifying where we stand individually and jointly and what capabilities we need collectively to put in place by 2020 in order to provide effective and efficient responses to our common marine and maritime challenges. Formulating precise targets in order to turn capability needs into opportunities for joint or synchronised research action. Flexible bottom-up coordination and cooperation without addition bureaucracy. see more details in annex 1 2 Sharing information regularly and exploiting the many similarities and complementarities between different marine research activities/initiatives identified within the above proposed areas. The Transatlantic Marine Research Alliance could have the following objectives: Based on our capability needs jointly define specific '2020 targets' in areas of common interest for implementing the respective marine/ocean strategies existing today on both sides of the Atlantic; Agree on a joint strategic research agenda (SRA) to achieve the agreed targets by 2020; Implement systematically synchronised/joint research activities through programme level cooperation and coordination (avoiding the establishment of new structures and bureaucratic procedures); Report jointly every year on progress towards the agreed targets to EU and US and Canadian authorities and stakeholders (e.g. in Summits and/or other existing political and scientific fora). In addition to its coordinating role and the development of joint or synchronised research programmes, such an Alliance would provide political and valuable scientific input to overall transatlantic Marine and Maritime Cooperation. For each of the below proposed areas one or two flagship initiatives could be agreed so as to assure focus and concrete results by 2020. Flagship initiatives could be formulated as provided in the two examples mentioned in the chapter below. 4. The potential for an enhanced Transatlantic Marine Cooperation Initiative Area 1 : Sustainable Atlantic ecosystem approach e.g. data exchanges: - on Ocean Acidification - on Arctic Monitoring - other…. Objective: The implementation of the ecosystem based approach to marine activities, and Ocean/climate interactions with the particular role of the Atlantic Ocean circulation on marine living organisms and how they could be affected by climate Change. Better ocean management requires a reinforced knowledge base of the impact of global changes and human pressures on the North Atlantic marine ecosystems and its regions. Given the scale of global change there will be considerable added value in coordinating the scientific activities, including research programmes of the EU and North America. Regarding ocean and ocean acidification (OA) research, there is on-going collaboration between the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NSF and the EC in the context of the BASIN transatlantic initiative. The aim of BASIN is to understand and simulate the impact of climate variability and change on key species of plankton and fish, as well as community structure as a whole, in the North Atlantic and to 3 examine the consequences for the cycling of carbon and nutrients in the ocean and thereby contribute to ocean management. For this proposed area enhanced transatlantic cooperation could be proposed under existing frameworks involving US and Canada (e.g. GEO, Belmont Forum, G8 HORCS). The following provides two examples of possible flagship initiatives: High Resolution Map: To date, analysis of the ocean environment, as well as human impacts on that environment, has mostly been carried out at the sectoral level. 4 The EU, US and Canada could collaboratively conduct a fully integrated assessment of coastal and ocean areas for the North Atlantic. Today the EU and the US are both engaged in developing high resolution maps in selected areas, and efforts should be made to coordinate this work within a coherent programme covering the North Atlantic Transatlantic Ocean Observation System: Ocean observation underpins all marine activities in all seas and oceans, whether they are scientific or economic. Investments in ocean observation infrastructures have therefore a high societal / socioeconomic value but they are also costly. It is therefore natural to optimise them, by maximising their value. Ocean challenges and ocean observation have different scales: local (e.g. measuring a localised pollution or identifying resources in a coastal area), regional (e.g. assessing a fish stock that spans over a large area between several countries), or global (e.g. assessing how a large oceanic current like the gulf stream affects and is affected by climate change). If a transatlantic research alliance is developed to address those Atlantic challenges that are relevant for countries on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, it is natural that such research is supported by a capacity to observe the underlying ocean processes. A Transatlantic Ocean Observation System would be a baseline of ocean observation infrastructures, developed and sustained in a coordinated way by countries across the Atlantic, to measure on a regular and long term basis parameters necessary to address ocean challenges with a transatlantic or global scale. Such a system would build on existing ocean observation and data management initiatives on both sides of the Atlantic. It should as well build on prominent international initiatives in the domain such as GEO (Group on Earth Observation) and its Blue Planet task and the GOOS initiative (Global Ocean Observing System) with a view to maximise societal value and value for money of the corresponding investments. Area 2: Sustainable marine food production (fisheries and aquaculture) Area 3: Innovative use and conservation of the Atlantic marine biodiversity (including seabed biological resources) Objective: Exploration and sustainable exploitation of marine biodiversity (fisheries, aquaculture, biotechnology) Sustainable exploitation of marine living resources to secure food, supply (Fisheries, Aquaculture) is a key priority for the EU and also for US and Canada. The ocean's bio4 Policy brief CALAMRE project: Policy recommendations for improved EU and US cooperation in maritime governance by: Ecologic Institute Andrew Reid and Sandra Cavalieri 4 resources provide 15% of the animal protein consumed globally and are a significant source of business opportunities. The EU seafood market (2010) is worth more than 120 billion Euro/year (fisheries 90, Aquaculture 25, algae 5). Both sides of the Atlantic have a long expertise in managing fisheries in close collaboration with the fishing industry and have developed a strong aquaculture sector. The implementation of an ecosystem approach to fisheries management in order to achieve maximum sustainable yield whilst preserving goods and services for present and future generations is a high priority in both the US and Canada and is a key element of the proposed EU Common Fisheries Policy reform. The development of competitive and environmentally friendly aquaculture will require continuing research (in particular on health, disease, nutrition, and breeding). New technologies and innovative engineering should be developed to progressively move aquaculture offshore, sharing the space with other infrastructures. The EU would benefit from exchanging best practices through the KBBE forum, twinning on-going research projects with those in the US and Canada, and launching of joint initiatives in research & innovation areas of common interest. Innovative use and conservation of the Atlantic marine biodiversity (including seabed biological resources): The global market for innovative biomarine products and processes has a yearly growth rate of 5 to 10%. As an example, Ireland plans to double its ocean-derived wealth by 2030 while Norway foresees that its biomarine industry may increase six times from today’s 12 billion Euro to 75 billion Euro in 2050. The EU Marine biotechnology market was more than 3 billion Euro in 2010. Marine research institutes and research funding agencies in both the EU and US are well placed to deepen understanding of what the rich biodiversity of the ocean can further offer for innovative foods, pharmaceuticals, biochemical or biofuels whilst preserving ecosystem functions. Increasingly they are working together. At EU level DG RTD and JRC are collaborating with US NOAA and NSF on this issue within the framework of the EU- US TF on Biotechnology. In complement to the improved understanding and exploitation of the deep sea marine biological diversity in the Atlantic, DG MARE is working in the frame of a United Nations working group on the legal aspects of "conservation and sustainable use of marine diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ)". For these two proposed areas possible opportunities for enhanced transatlantic cooperation could be identified under the international KBBE forum. Area 4: Critical Raw Materials (CRM) with focus on: - Seabed exploitation technologies (incl. transport aspects) - Sustainable exploitation practices - CRM in Energy Objective: Sustainable exploitation of seabed resources Between 2000 and 2010 there has been an annual increase of about 15% in the price of many non-energy raw materials. The EU and US are industrial economies dependent on 5 importing raw materials; this is partly true also for Canada. Our economies share a need in terms of demand. In terms of offer, the US and Canada have relatively more important mineral reserves than the EU. By 2020, 5% of the world's minerals, including cobalt, copper and zinc could come from the ocean floors. This could rise to 10% by 2030. Global annual turnover of marine mineral mining can be expected to grow from virtually nothing to €5 billion in the next 10 years and up to €10 billion by 2030. The EU, US and Canada have a shared interest in Atlantic ocean management and in the growth of the related economy as well as in appropriate environmental protection, The recent BP accident in the Gulf of Mexico has highlighted that deep sea operations are not yet under full technological control. For this proposed area possible opportunities for enhanced transatlantic cooperation could be identified under the trilateral dialogue (EU-US-JP), with Canada to be associated. Horizontal underpinning area : Bridging to society - Ocean Literacy An increased understanding of ocean issues among the public can improve acceptance and sustainability of new marine / maritime activities. Cooperation with the US and Canada on the issue can generate mutual benefits as the EU and the US have followed sometimes different but complementary approaches. The US has gone further in integrating ocean literacy principles in school curricula while the EU has done more in the area in engaging with society through participative approaches. Ocean Literacy5 is a prerequisite in Europe’s objective of a more ocean-oriented society and economy. Preparing an entire community for a closer interaction with the sea is rewarding for the marine research community and for the science policy-makers. It is important that the public at large have the information necessary to engage meaningfully in the discussions and decisions about investments in ocean sciences and the management of the marine ecosystem in a science-based, sustainable and respectful way. 5 The First Conference in Ocean Literacy in Europe took place October 2012 in Bruges. Scientists, educators and policy makers discussed the future societal challenges related to the seas. The experience can be used as starting point for transatlantic cooperation. A second conference is to be organised in Plymouth in September 2013. This could be given a higher profile, with a little EU-US support, by adding to it a strong transatlantic dimension. 6 Annex 1 BUILDING ON EXISTING CONTACTS AND FORA A number of existing bi-lateral and multilateral cooperation frameworks with potential to facilitate research and innovation collaboration on both sides of the North Atlantic exist and should be exploited as appropriate to foster the cooperation under the Transatlantic Marine Research Alliance idea. These are: o GEO - Blue Planet Task of GEOSS Blue Planet Task is a multilateral initiative chaired by the EU, US and Japan and where Canada participates. The objective of this task is to provide sustained ocean observations and information to underpin the development, and assess the efficacy, of global-change adaptation measures (such as those related to vulnerability and impacts of sea-level rise). GEO being a platform with very wide activities is nevertheless a well-established cooperation forum. o Belmont Forum and G8 Heads of Research Councils The Belmont Forum is a multilateral cooperation involving the Commission as a member (RTD/Dir. I), the USA (NSF), Canada (NSRC) and several other countries. The Forum is a high level group of the world's major and emerging funders of global environmental change research and international science councils. In 2012 the International Opportunities Fund is organised as a joint funding call between the Belmont Forum and G8 Heads of Research Councils (G8HORCs) for approximately 20 million Euros. o EU-US Task Force on Biotechnology Research (TF): Well established long lasting task force with a working group on marine genomics in which NSF and NOAA participate; TF has a tentative roadmap for 2012-2015-; workshop of the marine group is planned for spring 2013 to explore the application of marine genomics for the development of marine sensors as part of a larger early warning system of ocean monitoring. No direct Canadian involvement yet, which however could be associated to a specific activity. o International Knowledge Based Bio-Economy Forum (KBBE) The forum created in 2010 has one working group on fisheries and aquaculture in which Canada is involved; No direct involvement of US yet, which however could be associated to a specific activity. o Trilateral dialogue EU-US-Japan on Critical Raw Materials Well-structured cooperative dialogue moving towards joint research implementation; first-line DoE involvement and growing NSF interest, in view of possible joint research actions. Mining under extreme conditions is proposed for the agenda of the next Trilateral Conference scheduled to be held in Brussels on 29-30 May 2013. (Canada also participated in certain events). This list is not exhaustive; beside the above mentioned fora there might be others which could be linked to a Transatlantic Marine Research Alliance between EU, US and Canada. 7