Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Virtual economy wikipedia , lookup
Non-monetary economy wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Real bills doctrine wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Quantitative easing wikipedia , lookup
Currency War of 2009–11 wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Helicopter money wikipedia , lookup
Economics Notes for Investors Roger Nightingale 12th November 2010 By dint of railing at fools, we risk becoming fools ourselves! Gustave Flaubert—be kind to politicians and central bankers, therefore! Some phenomena are essentially temporary. Currencies have been too stable for too long. The European monetary authorities have suppressed changes in EZ exchange rates. And a number of Asian Central Bankers, operating similarly, have preserved the dollar value of their currencies. Fooling traders is one. Until earlier this year, the policies were quite successful. A skilful mixture of psychology and open market operations convinced traders that there was little to be gained from speculation. No longer. It can be done, but there’s always a reaction. The money policies that caused currencies to converge prompted economies to diverge. And that convinced speculators that adjustments would have eventually to be made. The only issues worth debating were: how much and how soon? Trichet is about to be taught the lesson. Last week’s GDP numbers from the EZ demonstrated how urgent the need for change had become: the weak were getting weaker, and the strong stronger. Germany’s third quarter growth was 2¾% (excellent, given the better than 9% figure in the preceding period), but Spain’s and Portugal’s, Greece’s and Ireland’s, were in negative territory. The money policy appropriate for the one was clearly inappropriate for the others. It’s unlikely that either he . . . What was Trichet to do? Focus on the good or the bad? In either event, there’d be a disaster: if money were tightened to suit the strong, the weak would suffer a 1930sstyle depression; if it were loosened to accommodate the weak, the strong would overheat (or jump ship). . . . or the EZ will survive. In these circumstances, the only sensible thing to do was abandon the pretence of a single currency and let member countries implement independent money policies. That was the conclusion to which traders and hedge funds had come months ago. They saw the ECB as a busted flush. It’d not been respected in the past; it wouldn’t be in the future. Short term, the euro might rise. How much will the departing currencies fall in relation to the ongoing euro? Nobody knows, but the range of guesses is fairly tight: 15 to 40%! Much will depend on whether the Governments of the leaving countries honour or repudiate their eurodenominated bonds. But, eventually, it’ll morph into the DM. There’s another issue exercising the minds of traders. If the ongoing euro were to rise significantly in the aftermath of any departures, mightn’t that send the next candidate over the top? If the four obvious casualties were to go, it’s possible that a stronger euro, made stronger still by heightened German influence, would force out Italy and Belgium as well. Next in line: France! By 2014, it’s not impossible that the euro’ll be confined to Germany and a couple of its satellites! The Chinese know they have to tighten money. Asians are more logical than Europeans. They’ve already worked out what needs to be done, and have prepared themselves to do it. Currently, Central Bankers in Beijing may be resisting, but probably only for the sake of form. They know that the alternative is protectionism. They know as well that their domestic economy is overheating (property bubbling). Higher interest rates and a stronger currency are needed. The Indians also. India’s analysis proceeds similarly. The monetary authorities have been remiss: they have let inflation rise to 15% and the external deficit to 5% of GDP. It may be that a recession will be required to restore equilibrium. That’ll allow the Americans to loosen. The Fed has a problem on its hands. US growth faltered in the second and third quarters. It needs a boost: easier money, a weaker currency, or both. Inflation seems not to be a problem. Jobs are. They’re not being created quickly enough to make the recovery self-sustaining. The Fed wants a weaker currency. Bernanke realises that, in the slowing phases of the cycle that lie ahead, it’s recession that has most to be feared. Quantitative easing will be implemented, therefore. And, if the dollar were to fall 25 to 50% against the yuan, he’d probably not worry. Republican hotheads will be allowed to pretend that fiscal policy is important. He’ll control liquidity. So, probably, does the B-of-E. The Brits are taking a somewhat similar line, albeit less expertly. The Governor of the Bank of England has mis-analysed the economy fairly comprehensively in the past. It’s to be hoped he’ll not do so again. Pity about Cameron. Nor is the Government inspiring much confidence. The GDP numbers for the middle quarters of 2010 were satisfactory. In part, though, they were boosted by last year’s devaluation. Things will get worse in the new year. And what a pity it was that, on the fiscal front, the Government missed the golden opportunity provided by the spending review to contain the pensions of the public sector and the excesses of the eurocrats. The bull run isn’t yet over. Currently, financial markets are nervous. Investors fear that political aggravation in Seoul will hurt valuations. It probably won’t. They’ll rise again in the months ahead. Contact us . . . For further information about Pointon York’s SIPP products and services, call Natalie Oliver on 01858 419 371 or visit the corporate website at www.sippsolutions.com. Alternatively, contact Roger Nightingale, by telephone, on 01858 419300; by e-mail at [email protected], or browse his web site at www.rogernightingale.com. Disclaimer: This document reflects the opinions of Roger Nightingale, not those of Pointon York SIPP Solutions. It is for private information only. Pointon York is not soliciting any action based upon it. Whilst information contained in Roger Nightingale’s articles is based on sources believed to be reliable, neither the accuracy nor the completeness can be guaranteed. Any judgments articulated are Roger Nightingale’s as at the date appearing on the material. They are subject to change without notice and might not be followed with a specific ad-hoc document. This material should not be construed as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be illegal. It is for the general information of clients of Pointon York SIPP Solutions. It is intended for investment professionals only. It is not for public distribution.