Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Molecular Medicine Oncogenes, Tumor Suppressor Genes, - Lecture 3 Dr. Maureen J. O’Sullivan Consultant Pediatric Pathologist Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital and National Children’s Hospital Oncogenes Proto-oncogenes [wild-type form of gene] may become oncogenes through mutation Oncogenes generally cause neoplastic transformation by interfering with normal cell growth or differentiation, often disrupting control of cell cycle. Either act by up-regulating cell proliferation OR immortalising cells by rescue from apoptosis and senescence. TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Oncogene ‘Activated’ –HOW? – mechanisms include: Amplification –e.g. N-Myc; ErbB2 Chromosomal rearrangement – translocation: Promoter exchange or Novel Fusion oncogene in chromosomal translocations mainly in hematopoietic and mesenchymal malignancy Activating mutation – e.g. EGFR; KIT Epigenetically, including miRNAs, chromatin remodelling TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Fluorescent In Situ Hybridisation N-Myc TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Oncogene Activation The type of gene involved may encode Growth factor, Receptor, Signal transducer, Transcription factor, Novel fusion protein, Epigenetic modifier …….miRNA TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Oncogenes EGFR Epidermal growth factor receptor – protein kinase family member avian erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog Receptor tyrosine kinase – ligand binding induces dimerisation [homo- or heterodimerisation], auto- phosphorylation of residues resulting in downstream signal transduction TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan EGFR Amplification, over-expression, mutation of EGFR occur in human cancers Mutation of EGFR common in never-smokers’ lung cancer - signalling through AKT and STAT promote cell survival TKI - effective in mutant EGFR lung cancers– targeted therapy with gefitinib/erlotinib [problem of resistance] Family member: ErbB2 gene amplified in breast carcinoma –HER2 protein targeted with Antibody – HerCeptin [Trastuzumab] TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Activating mutation in Tyrosine kinase KIT or PDGFRa– Gastrointestinal stromal tumor [GIST] One of the first tumors to be targeted with molecular therapy Based on a understanding of the structure of the receptor and mutation site TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan WT KIT Receptor Tyrosine Kinase TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Mutant KIT Receptor Tyrosine Kinase TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan KIT Mutation and Sensitivity to Imatinib Mesylate Exon 11 mutation [71%] = most sensitive to I.M. Exon 9 much less so, but can get response by dose escalation Problem of treatment resistance TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Oncogenes -RAS TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Fusion Oncogene by Translocation t(11;22) Produces Ews-Fli1 transcript TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Fusion Oncogene EWS-Fli1 EWS introns 7-10 N C N introns 3-9 N Trans. Dom. C Fli1 C EWS-Fli1 DBD TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Fusion Gene from Chromosomal translocation – A novel transcription factor Transcription regulatory domain DNA Binding Domain RNA Polymerase Complex DNA Binding Site TATA Box mRNA Exon 1 Exon 2 Exon 3 TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Promoter Exchange P1 P2 Gene 2 Gene 1 TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Table of Diagnostic Sarcoma Translocations Tumour Translocation Fusion Gene Alveolar Rhabdomyosarc t(1;13)(p36;q14) t(2;13 )(q35;q14) t(X;17)(p11;q25) t(12;16)(q13;p11) t(12;22)(q13;q12) t(17;22)(q22;q13) t(11;22)(p13;q12) t(11;22)(q24;q12) t(21;22)(q22;q12) t(12;15)(p13;q25) t(1;2)(q22;p23) t(2;19)(p23;p13) t(7;16)(q33;p11) t(9;22)(q22;q12) t(12;16)(q13;p11) t(X;18)(p11;q11) PAX3-FKHR PAX7-FKHR ASPL-TFE3 TLS-ATF1 EWS-ATF1 COL1a1-PDGFβ EWS-WT1 EWS-Fli1 EWS-ERG ETV6-NTRK3 TPM3-ALK TPM4-ALK TLS-CREB3L2 EWS-CHN TLS-CHOP SYT-SSX1 SYT-SSX2 SYT-SSX4 Alveol. Soft Part Sarc. Angiom. Fibrous Histiocytoma Clear Cell Sarcoma DFSP/GCF DSRCT Ewing sarcoma/PNET Infantile Fibrosarcoma/CCMN Inflamm. Myofibrobl. Tumour Low-grade Fibromyxoid Sarc. Myxoid Chondrosarcoma Myxoid/round cell Liposarc Synovial Sarcoma black=tyrosine kinase activation pink = promoter exchange, others=fusion TFs TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Tumor Suppressor Genes – Insights from Familial Cancer 1971 Knudson’s two-hit theory based on familial versus sporadic cancer Retinoblastoma* TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor Genes Knudson’s Conclusion: Cancer = a recessive effect and need to lose the function of both alleles of tumor suppressing genes to get this effect. First hit deletion leads to hemizygosity, subsequent mutation produces loss of heterozygosity = LOH But note: concept of haploinsufficiency TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Retinoblastoma gene (Rb) The first TSG to be isolated (1986) Germline mutation of Rb gene in hereditary predisposition to retinoblastoma, an eye cancer occurring in children also at high risk of osteosarcoma. Sporadically mutated in a variety of cancers Re-introduction of WT Rb gene into tumor cells suppresses their neoplastic properties [– this is not a requirement for the definition of a TSG] TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Retinoblastoma gene (Rb) Nuclear phosphoprotein Rb regulated by phosphorylation by cdc2 kinase family members Hyper-Phosphorylated form inactive; Hypo-/Unphosphorylated form blocks cell cycle progression from G1 S TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Rb role in cell cycle progression Retinoblastoma gene (Rb) Therefore, Rb apparently plays a role in gating entry into the S phase of the cell cycle (gatekeeper gene) – Not only mutated in retinoblastoma Inactivation of Rb by mutation e.g in inherited predisposition (familial Retinoblastoma) or somatically; abnormal phosphorylation; or binding to viral oncoproteins (e.g. HPV E7 protein) all can disrupt its role in gated control of the cell cycle. TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan p53 53 kD protein precipitated in 1979 High expression in cells post γ-irradiation and in chemically induced tumor Induces cell cycle arrest (G1 arrest to allow repair pre-replication; or G2 arrest pre-mitosis) Mediator of apoptosis Mutated in a large number of tumors, notably with tumor progression TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan p53 Cell cycle arrest mediated through p21WAF1 (CDKI); Gadd45; Rb vs. Apoptosis (mediated through FAS/APO1, death receptor family; Bax = antagonist of bcl-2; IGF-BP3) Cell type, extent of damage, survival factors, level of p53…..determine route taken TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan p53 Guardian of the genome – a role in preventing the replication of cells containing DNA damage – EITHER permits time for repair by cell cycle arrest or induces apoptosis if damage irreparable Caretaker function TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Viral oncogenesis and p53 HPV EBNA HBV CMV Adenovirus E6 protein^ p53 degradation X protein IE84 protein E1B All form complex with p53 ^E7 forms complex with Rb protein TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan p53 Roles in: Cell cycle control DNA repair Genome stability Programmed cell death [Differentiation, senescence and angiogenesis] Caretaker and Gatekeeper functions TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Germline p53 Mutation = Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Familial cancer predisposition syndrome with increased risk especially of sarcomas including osteosarcoma, also breast cancer, choroid plexus carcinoma, leukemia, adrenocortical carcinoma. TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Gatekeepers vs. Caretakers Gatekeepers generally have more tissue specificity for tumor development – RB, APC , VHL, WT1. Mutated in germline predisposition syndromes and also may be mutated as somatic events. Usually need additional mutations to = cancer. Caretakers germline mutation = cancer predisposition; may occur as later somatic mutation also. Classic example = DNA repair genes NOT quite as tissue-type specific as gatekeepers in terms of tumor types TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan DNA Integrity Constantly under assault but we have repair mechanisms to deal with this damage Flaws in the genetic mechanisms involved in preservation of the integrity of the genome can provide a background which facilitates tumorigenesis mutator phenotype (Secondary to mutation of Caretaker genes) TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan Summary of Lecture Functions of Oncogenes – the hierarchy of the signalling pathway and possibility of mutation at various levels in cascade. How activating mutation of oncogene can occur – amplification, chromosomal rearrangement, point mutation –importance of understanding mutation for targeted therapy – TKI; Antibody – EGFR, KIT, RAS Protein structure dictates function – importance of mutation of key functional domains in genes Tumor Suppressor Genes – gatekeepers and caretakers Rb and insights into TSG function from familial cancer P53 Guardian of the Genome TCD Medical Students 2009 MO’Sullivan