* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Stellar Luminosity Function
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Theoretical astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Chinese astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Corona Borealis wikipedia , lookup
Tropical year wikipedia , lookup
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup
Auriga (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup
H II region wikipedia , lookup
Canis Minor wikipedia , lookup
Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup
Cassiopeia (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Corona Australis wikipedia , lookup
Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Canis Major wikipedia , lookup
Aries (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Star formation wikipedia , lookup
Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
THE STELLAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION Moat text-books on astronomy state that the sun is a middle-sized star. This may be true when one compares it to the relative sizes of super-giants and white dwarfs. But how does the sun compare with the majority of stars? To answer this, I decided to calculate the stellar luminosity function as well as I could, using only the limited facil ities at ray disposal, that is, a slide rule and the Observers’ hand book. The stellar luminosity function may be defined as the mathematical curve which shows the relative number of stars for each given magni tude for a given volume of space. Using the table on p.87 of the 1968 RASC Observers' Handbook, I calculated the absolute visual magnitude of the nearest 55 stars, which occupy the space within 16 light years of the sun. To calculate the absolute visual magnitudes, I used the formula M=m+5-5 log r where M is the absolute magnitude, m is the visual magnitude and r is the distance in parsecs . Since the table gives the distances in light years, the formula had to be modified to M =m+5-5 logD/3.26 . Th e absolute magnitudes were then rounded to the nearest whole magnitude and then plotted. (See fig.1 .) The sun's absolute magnitude is 4.8. It can be seen readily that there are only 3 stars within the 16 light year radius that are in trinsically brighter than the sun. They are Sirius A (1.45), Altair (2.3) and Procyon (2.7). Th e majority of stars fall between absolute magnitudes 9 and 16, with the greatest number being of 13th magni tude. Therefore, it may be seen that tae sun is not a typical star/ in this part of the galaxy. S tellar L u m in osity F u n ction of S ta r s The curve descends more sharply than it ascends. This may be caused by evolutionary factors and may throw light on the density of interstellar gases in this area during the formation of the galaxy. The fact that the sun is brighter than its neighbours may be seen from the list of luminosities on the same page, but I feel that a survey of the absolute magnitudes may be more readily understood. K.E.Chilton Hamilton Centre Figure 1 Number of Stars A bsolute Visual Magnitude