Download The Stellar Luminosity Function

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup

Theoretical astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Chinese astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup

History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup

Orrery wikipedia , lookup

Serpens wikipedia , lookup

Lyra wikipedia , lookup

History of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Corona Borealis wikipedia , lookup

Tropical year wikipedia , lookup

Ursa Major wikipedia , lookup

International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup

Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup

Star wikipedia , lookup

Auriga (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup

H II region wikipedia , lookup

Hipparcos wikipedia , lookup

Canis Minor wikipedia , lookup

Cygnus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

CoRoT wikipedia , lookup

Stellar evolution wikipedia , lookup

Cassiopeia (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Corona Australis wikipedia , lookup

Perseus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Canis Major wikipedia , lookup

Aries (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Observational astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Boötes wikipedia , lookup

IK Pegasi wikipedia , lookup

Star formation wikipedia , lookup

Standard solar model wikipedia , lookup

Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Ursa Minor wikipedia , lookup

Stellar kinematics wikipedia , lookup

Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup

Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup

Cosmic distance ladder wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
THE STELLAR LUMINOSITY FUNCTION
Moat text-books on astronomy state that the sun is a middle-sized
star. This may be true when one compares it to the relative sizes of
super-giants and white dwarfs. But how does the sun compare with the
majority of stars? To answer this, I decided to calculate the stellar
luminosity function as well as I could, using only the limited facil­
ities at ray disposal, that is, a slide rule and the Observers’ hand­
book.
The stellar luminosity function may be defined as the mathematical
curve which shows the relative number of stars for each given magni­
tude for a given volume of space. Using the table on p.87 of the 1968
RASC Observers' Handbook, I calculated the absolute visual magnitude
of the nearest 55 stars, which occupy the space within 16 light years
of the sun. To calculate the absolute visual magnitudes, I used the
formula
M=m+5-5 log r where M is the absolute magnitude, m is the
visual magnitude and r is the distance in parsecs . Since the table
gives the distances in light years, the formula had to be modified
to M =m+5-5 logD/3.26 .
Th e absolute magnitudes were then rounded to the nearest whole
magnitude and then plotted. (See fig.1 .)
The sun's absolute magnitude is 4.8. It can be seen readily that
there are only 3 stars within the 16 light year radius that are in­
trinsically brighter than the sun. They are Sirius A (1.45), Altair
(2.3) and Procyon (2.7). Th e majority of stars fall between absolute
magnitudes 9 and 16, with the greatest number being of 13th magni­
tude. Therefore, it may be seen that tae sun is not a typical star/
in this part of the galaxy.
S tellar L u m in osity F u n ction
of
S ta r s
The curve descends more sharply than it ascends. This may be
caused by evolutionary factors and may throw light on the density
of interstellar gases in this area during the formation of the
galaxy.
The fact that the sun is brighter than its neighbours may be
seen from the list of luminosities on the same page, but I feel
that a survey of the absolute magnitudes may be more readily
understood.
K.E.Chilton
Hamilton Centre
Figure 1
Number
of
Stars
A bsolute Visual Magnitude