* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The Effects of Hyperinflationary Environments on
Survey
Document related concepts
Real bills doctrine wikipedia , lookup
Balance of payments wikipedia , lookup
Global financial system wikipedia , lookup
Early 1980s recession wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Foreign-exchange reserves wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
Currency War of 2009–11 wikipedia , lookup
Modern Monetary Theory wikipedia , lookup
Currency war wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Exchange rate wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
The Effects of Hyperinflationary Environments on Multination Corporations by Stephen L. Larson February 8, 2014 Introduction The General Electric Company (GE) is a multi-billion dollar multinational company providing products and services for such industries as power and water, oil and gas, energy, aviation, healthcare, transportation, home, and business (GE Annual Report, 2012). It is a global company with operations located throughout the world. Total assets and revenues of the company, as reported in the company’s 2012 annual report, are distributed as follows: Forty-nine percent of the company’s assets and fifty-two percent of the company’s revenues are located or generated outside of the United States. This creates significant exposure to foreign exchange (FX) volatility. Exposures to short-term and long-term FX exchange risk, impact on cost of raw materials and products, foreign interest rate exposures, and credit risk are significant. The company manages these risks through various tools including natural hedges, derivatives and hedging strategies (GE Annual Report, 2012). It is the company’s policy to minimize exposure to interest rate changes and currency fluctuations. Consequently, the company assesses its exposure periodically and establishes the necessary offsets in either natural hedges or derivatives so that parity within a 10% deviation in exchange rates can be maintained (GE Annual Report, 2012). Hyperinflationary Environments Hyperinflation was defined by Phillip Cagan in 1956 (Hyperinflation, 2012) as an average monthly increase of 50% in prices. On an annualized basis this would result in an inflation rate of 12,875 percent. Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 52 defines hyperinflation as 100% or more over a three year period (FASB 52 Summary, 1981) and International Accounting Standard (IAS) No. 29 defines hyperinflation as the cumulative inflation rate over a three year period that approaches or exceeds 100% (IAS 29 Summary, 2012). Though the SFAS and the IAS levels of inflation that trigger hyperinflation differ significantly from that proposed by Cagen in 1952, the disruption to a country’s economy is devastating leading to devaluation of a country’s currency, rampant price increase, economic decline, decline in savings, high unemployment, and political instability. The Effects of Hyperinflationary Environments on Multination Corporations by Stephen L. Larson February 8, 2014 Risks of Operating in a Hyperinflationary Environment In the 1980’s Argentina and Brazil experienced 20 to 25 percent monthly inflation (800 to 1,400 percent annualized, respectively) and Bolivia saw, at its peak in 1985, an annualized inflation rate of 50,000 percent (the highest inflation rate in world history for a peacetime economy) (Swanson, 2003). The primary cause of the high inflation rates was deficit spending. The three governments paid off debt by increasing the money supply without increasing production, which lead to higher prices (Swanson, 2003). In a hyperinflationary economy, a company operates in an unstable environment. The cost of doing business is constantly changing. Salaries are continually increasing, prices for raw materials escalate, and supplies disappear immediately. Management must maintain a policy of flexibility and be able to make decisions immediately for waiting a day may result in a significant increase in costs. The real value of money is eroding continually. As such, hyperinflationary thinking requires immediate use of the money. For example, at a 20% monthly inflation rate, a delay of 30 days in collections can eliminate a 20% profit margin on a sale. On the other side, a delay in the acquisition of goods results in higher costs. Consequently, hyperinflationary environments require stockpiling of excess inventories or arrangements of fixed prepaid purchased agreements. Available credit shrinks and is generally limited to short-term relationships at high interest rates. Leverage declines and funding sources are expanded with focus on owner infusions. Capital expenditures are minimized so that cash is freed up to support daily operations. Differences Between U.S. GAAP and IAS in Accounting for Hyperinflation U.S. GAAP is limited on its guidance as hyperinflation has not been a factor in the U.S. (Kampanje, 2012). U.S. GAAP addresses hyperinflation in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 830, Foreign Currency Matters. In International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), hyperinflation is addressed in IAS 29, Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. Each standard requires the determination of a functional currency to report results and the time periods for comparison purposes. However, as McGladrey (2012) notes, when hyperinflation exists, U.S. GAAP requires the financial statements to be re-measured in the functional currency of the parent company with any exchange differences reported in the income statement as gains or losses. But, IAS 29 allows for continuance of the current currency, however, requiring indexing using a general price level index and then translated into the reporting currency at the current rate. In IFRS, financial statements are to be restated using the general price index reflecting the change in purchasing power. When the period of hyperinflation is over, the amounts reported at the end of the previous period become the basis for subsequent financial statements (IAS 29 Summary, 2012). Consequently, companies not following IFRS will have significantly different numbers than those companies following IAS 29. Comparability between such companies will not exist. The Effects of Hyperinflationary Environments on Multination Corporations by Stephen L. Larson February 8, 2014 References Anonymous (2012). Hyperinflation. (2012, Sep 26, 2012). Mint, pp. n/a. FASB 52 Summary (1981). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 52: Foreign Currency Translation. Financial Accounting Standards Board. December, 1981. http://www.fasb.org/summary/stsum52.shtml. (accessed February 6, 2014). GE Annual Report (2012). General Electric Company Annual Report for 2012. http://www.ge.com/ar2012/pdf/GE_AR12.pdf. (accessed February 6, 2014). IAS 29 Summary (2012). International Accounting Standards No. 29: Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies. International Accounting Standards Board. January, 2012. http://www.ifrs.org/Documents/IAS29.pdf. (accessed February 6, 2014). Kampanje, B. (2012). Multinational banks operating in hyperinflationary economies. Available at SSRN 2099831. McGladrey. (2012). US GAAP vs IFRS Hyperinflation. IFRS Resource Center. http://mcgladrey.com/content/dam/mcgladrey/pdf/ifrs_foreign_currency_translation. pdf. (accessed February 6, 2014). Swanson, G. (2003). The hyperinflation survival guide: Strategies for american businesses Eric Englud.