Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 138:651–653 DOI 10.1007/s10549-013-2450-0 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Earwax type and osmidrosis: prognostic factor for breast cancer? Yang Sun • Jianhong Long Received: 29 January 2013 / Accepted: 15 February 2013 / Published online: 27 February 2013 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 To the Editor, Many women with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy suffer from resistance or relapsed disease while other patients with similar clinical and pathological tumors do not. Accumulating evidence strongly suggests that this inter-individual difference is mainly coming from the genetic variants. However, identification of all the specific single genes is not only expensive but also unrealistic, especially in developing countries. Could there be any highly cost-effective choice for risk assessment? I have read the article ‘‘High expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC11 in breast tumors is associated with aggressive subtypes and low disease-free survival’’ with great interest. Akimitsu Yamada et al. [1] have suggested the ABCC11 to be a biomarker for prediction of the recurrence risk and anticancer drug sensitivity. The underlying molecular mechanism was reported earlier that one single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), 538G[A (Gly180Arg), in the ABCC11 gene could perturb the conformation and affects the function and stability of the protein [2]. The non-functioned protein fail to transport the anticancer drugs like 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu) [3] and methotrexate (MTX) [4]. Thus, the SNP (538G[A) of the ABCC11 gene is suggested to be a clinical biomarker for prediction of chemotherapeutic efficacy [5]. It is notable that the wet earwax and osmidrosis are the visible genetic traits of the functional ABCC11 protein [6]. Y. Sun J. Long (&) Department of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, China e-mail: [email protected] So I wonder if patient with the wet earwax and osmidrosis is more likely to have a higher level of drug resistance as the anticancer drugs exportation may comparatively be more. If so, the earwax type and osmidrosis may be an easy and visible indicator of patients’ chemotherapeutic efficacy and may determine the kind and the amount of drug needed for an efficient therapy while spare the rigors and potential complications associated with chemotherapy. Although it is only a hypothesis that should be carefully evaluated by clinical studies, it would be unfortunate if it is effective but never attempted. References 1. Yamada A, Ishikawa T, Ota I et al (2013) High expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC11 in breast tumors is associated with aggressive subtypes and low disease-free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(3):773–782 2. Toyoda Y, Sakurai A, Mitani Y et al (2009) Earwax, osmidrosis, and breast cancer: why does one SNP (538G[A) in the human ABC transporter ABCC11 gene determine earwax type? FASEB J 23(6):2001–2013 3. Oguri T, Bessho Y, Achiwa H et al (2007) MRP8/ABCC11 directly confers resistance to 5-fluorouracil. Mol Cancer Ther 6:122–127 4. Chen ZS, Guo Y, Belinsky MG, Kotova E, Kruh GD (2005) Transport of bile acids, sulfated steroids, estradiol 17-beta-Dglucuronide, and leukotriene C4 by human multidrug resistance protein 8 (ABCC11). Mol Pharmacol 67(2):545–557 5. Toyoda Y, Ishikawa T (2010) Pharmacogenomics of human ABC transporter ABCC11 (MRP8): potential risk of breast cancer and chemotherapy failure. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 10:617–624 6. Yoshiura K, Kinoshita A, Ishida T et al (2006) A SNP in the ABCC11 gene is the determinant of human earwax type. Nat Genet 38:324–330 Y. Sun e-mail: [email protected] 123 652 Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 138:651–653 Response to Letter to the Editor REBUTTAL LETTER Response to Letter to the Editor Akimitsu Yamada Takashi Ishikawa Kazuaki Takabe Itaru Endo To the Editor, We appreciate Drs. Sun and Long’s interest in our work. We cannot agree with them more that it will be of considerable benefit if we can identify biomarkers for the chemotherapeutic efficacy and prevention of relapse. Indeed, the ear wax phenotype and osmidrosis are phenotypes associated with the functional, 538G[A (Gly180Arg) single-nucleotide polymorphism in ABCC11 [7]. Multiple epidemiologic studies have attempted to clarify the link between functional ABCC11 and the risk of breast tumorigenesis; however, the relationship remains controversial and inconclusive [8–10]. The essential difference between these studies and our article published in February issue of Breast Cancer Research and Treatment [11] is that we analyzed the ABCC11 expression in the tumor, and not in the patients’ stromal tissue. We found that ABCC11 expression in the tumor is associated with low disease-free survival, but we also did not find any association between the tumor ABCC11 expression and the ear wax type. Therefore, from our observation, we cannot conclude that the ear wax phenotype and osmidrosis can be used as prognostic factors of breast cancer. On the other hand, we did find that ABCC11 positive tumors tend to have a low response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. ABCC11 is known to efflux 5-fluorouracil (5-FU); however, 5-FU is not the most commonly used drug for breast cancer in the latest regimen, and only 30.9 % of our cohort received it. Therefore, efflux of 5-FU alone cannot entirely explain the association of ABCC11 expression in the tumor with poor disease-free survival, and it is more likely that some other function of ABCC11 may contribute to the phenomenon. Given the recent advances in the understanding of the role of cancer stem cells in breast cancer survival, it is tempting to speculate that ABCC11 expression may be related to drug resistance in cancer stem cells, which is the case in some ABC transporters [12]. Along this line of investigation, we are planning to explore the mechanism by which the expression of ABCC11 in tumors is associated with poor prognosis utilizing in vitro and in vivo systems. Acknowledgments Kazuaki Takabe is supported by NIH (R01CA 160688) and a Susan G. Komen for the Cure Investigator Initiated Research Grant (IIR12222224). References for Rebuttal letter A. Yamada, I. Endo Department of Clinical Oncology and Breast Surgery, Yokohama City University, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan T. Ishikawa (&) Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, 4-57 Urafunecho, Minami-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 232-0024, Japan e-mail: [email protected] K. Takabe Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, 7-402 West Hospital, 1200 E Broad Street, Richmond, VA, USA. 123 1. Yoshiura K, Kinoshita A, Ishida T, Ninokata A, Ishikawa T, Kaname T, Bannai M, Tokunaga K, Sonoda S, Komaki R, Ihara M, Saenko VA, Alipov GK, Sekine I, Komatsu K, Takahashi H, Nakashima M, Sosonkina N, Mapendano CK, Ghadami M, Nomura M, Liang DS, Miwa N, Kim DK, Garidkhuu A, Natsume N, Ohta T, Tomita H, Kaneko A, Kikuchi M, Russomando G, Hirayama K, Ishibashi M, Takahashi A, Saitou N, Murray JC, Saito S, Nakamura Y, Niikawa N (2006) A SNP in the ABCC11 gene is the determinant of human earwax type. Nat Genet 38(3):324–330. doi:10.1038/ng1733 2. Ota I, Sakurai A, Toyoda Y, Morita S, Sasaki T, Chishima T, Yamakado M, Kawai Y, Ishidao T, Lezhava A, Yoshiura K, Togo S, Hayashizaki Y, Ishikawa T, Endo I, Shimada H (2010) Association Breast Cancer Res Treat (2013) 138:651–653 between breast cancer risk and the wild-type allele of human ABC transporter ABCC11. Anticancer Res 30(12):5189–5194 3. Lang T, Justenhoven C, Winter S, Baisch C, Hamann U, Harth V, Ko YD, Rabstein S, Spickenheuer A, Pesch B, Bruning T, Schwab M, Brauch H (2011) The earwax-associated SNP c.538G[A (G180R) in ABCC11 is not associated with breast cancer risk in Europeans. Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(3): 993–999. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1613-0 4. Beesley J, Johnatty SE, Chen X, Spurdle AB, Peterlongo P, Barile M, Pensotti V, Manoukian S, Radice P, Chenevix-Trench G (2011) No evidence for an association between the earwax-associated polymorphism in ABCC11 and breast cancer risk in Caucasian women. 653 Breast Cancer Res Treat 126(1):235–239. doi:10.1007/s10549010-1292-2 5. Yamada A, Ishikawa T, Ota I, Kimura M, Shimizu D, Tanabe M, Chishima T, Sasaki T, Ichikawa Y, Morita S, Yoshiura K, Takabe K, Endo I (2013) High expression of ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCC11 in breast tumors is associated with aggressive subtypes and low disease-free survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 137(3):773–782. doi:10.1007/s10549-012-2398-5 6. Dean M (2009) ABC transporters, drug resistance, and cancer stem cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 14(1):3–9. doi:10.1007/ s10911-009-9109-9 123