Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
JACC Vol. 31, No. 4 March 15, 1998:869 –70 Editorial Comment Progress in Developing a Noninvasive Load-Independent Marker of Ventricular Contractility* HENRY SHIN, MD, NELSON B. SCHILLER, MD, FACC San Francisco, California The Frank-Starling model of myocardial work (1,2), which relates pressure to volume changes throughout the cardiac cycle, and the subsequent work of Sarnoff and Berglund on the preload dependence of the stroke work index set the experimental stage for evaluating intrinsic myocardial performance. Unfortunately, these relations were nonlinear and required extensive invasive manipulation, which prevented their application to the clinical field. In 1991, Kass and Beyer (3) revisited the pressure–volume relation and found that when stroke work was divided by the square of the end-diastolic volume (EDV2), stroke work remained independent of preload and afterload changes. They called this index “preload-adjusted maximal power” and suggested applying this index as a clinical marker of myocardial performance now that technologic advances in echocardiography allowed accurate estimates of volume changes through the cardiac cycle. Kass and Beyer (3) explained the preload independence of the index as follows: Mean power is the product of mean pressure and flow; pressure is the product of flow and resistance; and, therefore, power is the product of resistance and flow squared. Power divided by volume squared is then proportional to resistance divided by seconds squared. Mean arterial resistance is minimally altered with steady state changes of circulating volume. Thus, at constant heart rate and contractility, preload-adjusted maximal power reflects contractility (3). In response to this suggestion, Mandarino et al. (4), in this issue of the Journal, report the results of their derivation of preload-adjusted maximal power using automatic border detection (ABD) from canine echocardiographic images to measure cross-sectional area changes (dA/dt) through the cardiac cycle. The product of dA/dt and instantaneous central arterial pressure yields a stroke work analog that is adjusted for *Editorials published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of JACC or the American College of Cardiology. From the Echocardiography Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Address for correspondence: Dr. Nelson B. Schiller, Echocardiography Laboratory, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, Room 342A, San Francisco, California 94143-0214. ©1998 by the American College of Cardiology Published by Elsevier Science Inc. 869 loading conditions by the term EDV3/2 based on the substitution of dA/dt for dV/dt (Kass and Beyer [3] used EDV2 instead of EDV3/2 as a correction term because they used dV/dt). The resulting preload-adjusted maximal power index was found to be independent of preload changes experimentally achieved through vena caval occlusions and independent of afterload changes through aortic occlusion. Potential limitations of preload-adjusted maximal power as a clinical index of myocardial performance. First, as noted by Mandarino et al. (4), the contribution of the autonomic nervous system is ignored in this canine model. This effect may be important in humans subject to continuous inotropic and chronotropic modulation by the autonomic nervous system. Second, the studies of Kass and Beyer (3) and Mandarino et al. (4) were performed in normal dog hearts. Underestimation of true myocardial stroke work may occur in patients with severely dilated cardiomyopathies, where the denominator term is EDV2 or EDV3/2. Third, a noninvasive surrogate of central arterial pressure is highly preferable to an invasive measurement for clinical application. Although studies (5) have been performed to correlate pressures in the carotid or femoral arteries using ultrasound transducers, the procedure is too burdensome to make it practical. Fourth, most pharmacologic interventions, including dobutamine, will affect not only contractility but other variables as well, such as afterload. These interrelated hemodynamic effects must be carefully considered before drawing the conclusion that preload-adjusted maximal power is a loadindependent measure of end-systolic elastance. Future steps in the development of preload-adjusted maximal power as an index of myocardial performance. A successful index must be easy to use and to understand. The variables necessary to calculate preload-adjusted maximal power include central arterial pressure, instantaneous EDV and ESV. The index is unlikely to gain wide acceptance unless a noninvasive surrogate of central arterial pressure is used. Mean peripheral arterial pressure is probably the best correlate of mean central arterial pressure. Although instantaneous central arterial pressure cannot be obtained, mean peripheral arterial pressure in the steady state may be an acceptable substitute if supported by future studies. EDV and ESV may be measured accurately by tedious volume manual planimetry but may provide a more accurate component of preloadadjusted maximal power than ABD-derived area from a single plane, especially in hearts with altered geometry. Because the index is not intuitively physiologic (units are mW/cm4), a range of normal and abnormal values must be established. The index must be demonstrably superior to ejection fraction. Despite its shortcomings, ejection fraction is the preferred index of myocardial function because of its simplicity, reproducibility and prognostic value. Only if an index such as preload-adjusted maximal power turns out be robustly independent of preload and afterload factors can it improve on the prognostic power and accuracy of ejection fraction. 0735-1097/98/$19.00 PII S0735-1097(98)00049-7 870 SHIN AND SCHILLER EDITORIAL COMMENT Abbreviations and Acronyms ABD 5 automatic border detection dA/dt 5 rate of change of left ventricular cross-sectional area dV/dt 5 rate of change of left ventricular volume EDV 5 end-diastolic volume ESV 5 end-systolic volume The evolutionary refinements in echocardiography may now provide the tools for transferring benchwork pressure– volume studies to the clinical arena. References 1. Frank O. Zur Dynamik des Herzmuskels. Biology 1895;32:370. 2. Patterson SW, Starling EH. On mechanical factors which determine output of ventricles. J Physiol (Lond) 1914;48:37. 3. Kass DA, Beyer R. Evaluation of contractile state by maximal ventricular power divided by the square of end-diastolic volume. Circulation 1991;84: 1698 –708. 4. Mandarino WA, Pinsky MR, Gorcsan J. Assessment of left ventricular contractile state by preload-adjusted maximal power using echocardiographic automated border detection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31:861– 8. JACC Vol. 31, No. 4 March 15, 1998:869 –70 5. Sharir T, et al. Validation of a method for noninvasive measurement of central arterial pressure. Hypertension 1993;21:74 – 82. 6. Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation 1986;3:586 –95. 7. Kass DA, Beyar R, Lankford E, Heard M, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Influence of contractile state on curvilinearity of in situ end-systolic pressurevolume relations. Circulation 1989;79:167–78. 8. Glower DD, et al. Linearity of the Frank-Starling relationship in the intact heart: the concept of preload recruitable stroke work. Circulation 1985;71: 994 –1009. 9. Gorcsan J, Romand J, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR. Assessment of left ventricular performance by on-line pressure-area relations using echocardiographic automated border detection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23: 242–52. 10. McKay RG, Aroesty JM, Heller GV, Royal HD, Warren SE, Grossman W. Assessment of the end-systolic pressure-volume relationship in human beings with the use of a time-varying elastance model. Circulation 1986;74: 97–104. 10. Sharir T, Feldman MD, Haber H, et al. Ventricular systolic assessment in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy by preload-adjusted maximal power: validation and noninvasive application. Circulation 1994;89:2045–53. 11. Little WC, Freeman GL, O’Rourke RA. Simultaneous determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume and pressure-dimension relationships in closed-chest dogs. Circulation 1985;6:1301– 8. 12. Russell RO, Porter CM, Frimer M, Dodge HT. Left ventricular power in man. Am Heart J 1971;81:799 – 808. 13. Snell RE, Luchsinger PC. Determination of the external work and power of the left ventricle in intact man. Am Heart J 1965;69:529 –37. 14. Stein PD, Sabbah NH. Rate of change of ventricular power: an indicator of ventricular performance during ejection. Am Heart J 1976;91:219 –27.