* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Spectra of Underwater Light-Field Fluctuations in the Photic Zone
Mössbauer spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Retroreflector wikipedia , lookup
Ultrafast laser spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Chemical imaging wikipedia , lookup
Optical coherence tomography wikipedia , lookup
Fourier optics wikipedia , lookup
Spectral density wikipedia , lookup
Thomas Young (scientist) wikipedia , lookup
Rutherford backscattering spectrometry wikipedia , lookup
Spectrum analyzer wikipedia , lookup
3D optical data storage wikipedia , lookup
Optical rogue waves wikipedia , lookup
Photon scanning microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Surface plasmon resonance microscopy wikipedia , lookup
Nonlinear optics wikipedia , lookup
Magnetic circular dichroism wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
Two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy wikipedia , lookup
SPECTRA OF UNDERWATER LIGHT-FIELD FLUCTUATIONS IN THE PHOTIC ZONE1 HOWARD R. GORDON, JAMES M. SMITH, AND OTIS B. BROWN University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric and Optical Physics Laboratory Sciences ABSTRACT The temporal spectrum of underwater light-field fluctuations in the photic zone close to the Florida Current was measured for light seas using an irradiance meter. An experimental technique to study the biological significance of these fluctuations is suggested, and the data are then analyzed in a manner suitable for the experimental application. The relation between the resulting spectra and surface waves is briefly discussed. INTRODUCTION In a previous paper, Dera & Gordon (1968) discussed some of the fluctuating characteristics of the underwater light field due to wave action and suggested the possibility that these fluctuations may influence primary productivity in the oceans. To determine experimentally the relevancy of these fluctuations to growth rates of marine organisms, some knowledge of the temporal spectra of the fluctuations is required. To this end we have measured the spectra of such fluctuations at depths near the surface in the Florida Current. EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES AND RESULTS The underwater light field was studied, using a standard irradiance meter consisting of a photomultiplier tube viewing a diffusing screen through a green filter (530 nm with a 50-om passband). The amplified signal from the tube is then displayed on a strip-chart recorder. The recorder will respond perfectly to fluctuating signals as high as 3.2 Hz, after which the response decays exponentially, reaching 50 per cent at 5 Hz and 25 per cent at 7 Hz. The recorder is normally run at a speed of 2 in/sec, and data taken for about 30 seconds. The resulting trace for intensity versus time is then digitized and Fast-Fourier transformed on an IBM 360-65 Computer. With the transform computed, one must then find a realistic way of normalizing and displaying the data to maximize its usefulness to the experimental marine biologist. The normalization method we have chosen is very closely tied to a simple experimental arrangement now in use in biological studies at the University of Miami. In this arrangement one focuses the filament of a lamp on a small hole, and places the sample to be studied Contribution No. 1356 from the University of Miami, Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science. This research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. GA 1086. 1 1971] Gordon et al.: Underwater Light-Field Fluctuations 467 some distance behind the hole. A rotating mechanical chopper is placed close to the hole, resulting in square wave intensity versus time illumination at the sample. If the chopper blade does not attenuate 100 per cent (i.e., the blade is a neutral density filter), then the resulting intensity pattern is given by I() t 4 I( = I + -6, 0 'll' cos3wot cos wot - ---3 cosswot) + ---- 5' (1) where M is the amplitude (one-half of the peak-to-peak variation) of the square wave, Wo is the basic frequency, and 10 the average intensity. In order to duplicate in situ conditions as realistically as possible, M is chosen such that qualitative comparisons can be made between the experimental and the actual field spectra. To effect this, we rewrite equation (1), 1T (/(t) I -/0) = -(cos M lu 4 0 1 wot --cos 3 3 wot + .... ), ( I') and notice that if the chopper is 100 per cent attenuating, the Fourier coefficient at the fundamental frequency Wo is 1, and that for a partially transparent chopper, it is less than 1, i.e., M -~1. 10 Thus, we have chosen to present our results according to equation (1'); that is, to determine the Fourier coefficients (relative oscillatory power in per cent) of the time series .!!..-(I (t) 4 -10) 10 ' and plot these as a function of frequency. Some results of this analysis are shown in Figure 1, where only the magnitude of the Fourier coefficients has been used, in order to account for the absence of phase information. The transforms have been smoothed five times using a Tukey window to partially compensate for the uncertainty in the frequency domain. This display is consistent with Dera & Gordon, as their results can be reproduced by plotting the maximum relative oscillatory power as a function of depth. In the upper right-hand corner of each curve we have displayed the chopping sequence which reproduces the dominant peak in the spectrum, and the vertical lines of the figure itself represent the "relative oscillatory power" for this chopping sequence. The recorder's response will strongly attenuate the relative oscillatory power at frequencies above about 4 Hz, as is evident from the surface curve. Since the recorder's response at higher frequencies is strongly dependent on the amplitude of the signal, no attempt was made to compensate for this decay in the results. 1. Temporal spectra of fluctuations as a function of depth near the Florida Current. The inserted figures represent the chopping sequence which reproduces the dominate peak, as discussed in the text. FIGURE 1971] Gordon et al.: Underwater Light-Field Fluctuations 469 The most evident feature of these spectra is the dominant peak that starts to develop at about 2 meters and becomes sharper with increasing depth. In studying some of our previous irradiance data we feel that this peak must become very sharp and move toward lower frequencies at increased depth. The increasing sharpness of the spectrum with depth is due to the dependence of the focal length of the wave on depth; i.e., the shorter waves focus the incoming radiation nearer the surface, while the longer waves (swells) do so at greater depths (20-100 meters). Thus, as the depth of the irradiance meter is increased, the primary oscillating signals are caused by longer waves with longer periods. The signal from the shorter waves rapidly disappears after their focal depth is reached, causing a sharpening of the spectrum. The major wave component producing the spectra in Figure 1 is estimated to be characterized by an average wavelength of two meters with an average amplitude of 0.1 meters, which would give rise to a focal depth of four meters, and a frequency of about 0.9 Hz. This is in good agreement with the appearance of the sharp peak occurring in the 4-meter spectrum. There are, of course, other benefits to this kind of analysis of irradiance data which do not contribute to the biological application discussed above, but should be briefly discussed for the sake of completeness. By measuring the average intensity (10), one can use ledov's (1968) theory to calculate an average absorption coefficient for the near surface water from the irradiance measurements alone. This generally cannot be done very accurately, due to the masking effect of the fluctuations. For the data presented in Figure 1, we find an absorption coefficient at 530 nm of 0.07 m-I. Thus, by making these irradiance measurements spectrally, so as to yield the concentration of dissolved organic material of "Gelbstoff" (Kalle, 1966), one could study the horizontal diffusion of surface waters from estuaries and banks. The second application of this type of data is in the measurement of wave spectra. This, however, is very difficult, since it appears that one must make measurements at several depths in order to measure all of the major components of the waves. There is no simple relationship between the "raw" spectra and the properties of the waves, so any analysis of the data will be very difficult (Snyder & Dera, 1970). We are at present investigating the possibility of inverting the fluctuation spectra to recover information about the wave spectra. We wish to thank Professor John Bunt for reading the manuscript prior to submission, and Dr. James Nearing for several helpful suggestions. SUMMARY An experimental technique for studying the influence of underwater lightfield fluctuations on biological activity is suggested. Fluctuation spectra analyzed in accordance with the above technique are presented for near 470 Bulletin ot Marine Science [21 (2) surface waters in the Florida Current. Good agreement between the observed wave structure and the spectra is obtained and the absorption coefficient at 530 nm is measured. SUMARIO ESPECTROS DE LAS FLUCTUACIONES EN DEL LA ZONA CAMPO LUMINOSO SUBMARINO FOTICA Se sugiere una tecnica experimental para estudiar la influencia de fiuctuaciones del campo luminoso submarino en la actividad biol6gica. Se presentan espectros de fiuctuaci6n analizados de acuerdo con la tecnica expresada anteriormente en aguas pr6ximas a la superficie, en la Corriente de la Florida. Se obtuvo buena concordancia entre la estructura de las ondas observadas y los espectros y se rnidi6 el coeficiente de absorci6n a 530 nm. LITERATURE CITED H. R. GORDON 1968. Light field fluctuations in the photic zone. Limnol. Oceanogr., 13(4): 697-699. JERLOV, N. G. 1968. Optical oceanography. Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 194 pp. DERA, J. AND KALLE, K. 1966. The problem of Gelbstoff in the sea. Oceanogr. mar. BioI., 4: 91104. SNYDER, R. L. AND J. DERA 1970. Wave-induced light-field fluctuations in the sea. J. opt. Soc. Am., 60(8): 1072-1079.