Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Why is Africa poor? Annotated Bibliography 100 Points (HW) Your task is to pick one African country and investigate why it is poor. You will share your findings in an annotated bibliography. What does each entry need to contain? • An annotated bibliography contains all the usual info, like web page URL/date accessed or book title/author/publication city and year. • Entries are to be listed alphabetically and spaced properly. • In addition, each entry includes your evaluation about this source: how useful it was, what specific help it gave you, etc. • Your evaluation should also identify whether the sources is a primary or secondary source. How should each entry look? Format it in MLA style. Here an example of a book about the Congo: Hochschild, Adam. King Leopoldʼs Ghost. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1998. Print. This book was a gold mine of information about life in Congo under Leopoldʼs ownership. It describes well the feeling among European leaders during the Scramble. The story has good guys and bad guys, which many historical events have, but few authors seem willing to frame it that way. Maybe the fact that Hochschild teaches writing, not History, explains that. Leopoldʼs actions and his police forceʼs murderous cruelty were so awful, and the men who exposed the brutality so relentless, I was quite anxious to learn how it all turned out. So the book is quite readable. Hochschild has a habit of ending a chapter with a hook of sorts, a teaser for what the next chapter will cover. He is fair to Leopold, yet still manages to reveal monstrous greed and diabolical manipulations. The book even sheds light on the extent to which Joseph Conradʼs famous novel “Heart of Darkness” was based on specific people and events. Hochschild did research in both English and French, and used many Belgian sources. His treatment is fair, even though he clearly has a bias in favor of defending human rights. His bibliography runs over 12 pages of small print, and includes a few unpublished sources. So it is clear he has done his homework. Overall, a fascinating history, well told. It is a secondary source. What sources should every studentʼs annotated bibliography include? • An encyclopedia source for basic info on geography, population, ethnic groups. • Any books or videos at SAS library that focus on your country. • At least five current events articles (from 2011) about your country. How many sources should the annotated bibliography include? The minimum number of sources varies, depending on which materials are available about your country. (For South Africa, there are many sources, but not for Ivory Coast.) The absolute minimum number for all students is seven entries—and that applies only for countries about which SAS library has no materials whatsoever. Excellent (7-6) Good (5-4) Fair to Poor (3-0) Your Score ↓ Completeness of annotations: type of source, key info, how useful it was. (x2) # of high quality sources used, relative to the # available for your country. ______ / 5 current events articles ______ / _______ SAS library books ______ other sources Proper MLA formatting; neat presentation Raw Score: /28 Converted Score: /100 School of Liberal Arts University Writing Center “Because writers need readers” Cavanaugh Hall 427 University Library 2125 (317)274-2049 (317)278-8171 www.iupui.edu/~uwc Preparing an Annotated Bibliography Classes that require you to do research often require an annotated bibliography. An annotated bibliography is a useful way to start a research project because it asks you to collect and summarize sources that you might use later in a research paper. Collecting and summarizing sources early in the research process helps you narrow your research topic. The bibliography can also help you evaluate the possible usefulness of source material for later use in a paper. This handout is designed to show you how to create an annotated bibliography. Specifically, it will guide you through the process of creating an annotated bibliography by 1) describing in general terms the meaning of the words “annotated bibliography,” 2) explaining in general terms how to write an annotated bibliography, and 3) offering an example of what an annotated bibliography could look like. However, it is important to note that individual instructors may have different requirements for their annotated bibliography assignments. Please check with your teacher or assignment sheet BEFORE following the advice in this handout. What is an Annotated Bibliography? If you have been assigned to write an annotated bibliography, you might be confused about what the words "annotated" and "bibliography" mean. The word “annotated” is the past tense form of the verb “to annotate” which means to summarize. An annotation is simply a summary of a book, article, or some other written source. A bibliography is a list of sources on a particular topic. Put together, an annotated bibliography is a list of sources on a topic that offers a summary for each source. 1 What does an Annotated Bibliography look like? An annotated bibliography has two parts. The first part is the bibliography line which should be written according to the format your teacher requires, which could be MLA format, APA format, or some other format. (The University Writing Center can give you handouts on these formats.) The second part is the summary paragraph. Both parts taken together are called an “entry.” Entries are typically organized in alphabetical order according to the bibliography information, such as the last name of an author or the title of a book. The number of entries in a bibliography depends upon the assignment. The attached example is made up of two entries which offer a good example of the bibliography line and summary that are the key parts of any good annotated bibliography. How is an Annotated Bibliography summary written? What is included in the summary part of an annotated bibliography also depends upon the guidelines the instructor has given you. However, if the instructor is flexible about these guidelines, Timothy Crusius and Carolyn Channell in The Aims of Argument suggest that your summary should include the following elements: (1) a sentence or two that describes the author's credentials, purpose, and audience, (2) a brief “capsule” summary of its content, and (3) a sentence at the end of the summary that explains “why this source seems valuable and how you might use it” (255). Both of the summaries in the attached example include the three kinds of details listed above. When looking at the example summaries, look at the way the writer has blended these three components together rather than listing them one after another. Created by Teresa B. Henning, Updated 2011 Work Cited: Crusius, Timothy and Carolyn E. Channell. The Aims of Argument. 3rd ed. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield, 2000. Print. 2 Student’s Name Teacher’s Name Course Date A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Privacy and Technology Alderman, Ellen, and Caroline Kennedy. Right to Privacy. New York: Vintage, 2004. Print. The authors of this informative national bestseller, who have experienced privacy violations of their own, make the claim that since there is no comprehensive agenda to solve the problem of informational privacy, American citizens will have to be concerned These lines list the sources’ bibliography info. in MLA format. about protecting their personal information. One reason the authors give to support their claim is that most of citizens’ personal information is already being stored on computers This part of the sentence describes the authors, their purpose & audience. A summary of the book is offered here. that may not be well protected. For instance, as Alderman and Kennedy point out, most bank, insurance, medical and pharmaceutical records are stored on computers others may be able to access. A good example the authors provide of such ease of access is an incident in which a reporter was able to get Dan Quayle's credit report with a phone call, This sentence describes the useful part of the source. fifty dollars, and a home computer. Furger, Roberta. “Washington Tackles Internet Law.” PC World. PC World, 1 Sept. 2007. Web. 9 Dec. 2007. Internet expert and best-selling author, Roberta Furger informs the general public of the many Internet related bills that congress is considering. Furger claims that a more comprehensive law to govern the collecting of sharing on the Internet is needed that This part of the sentence describes the author, purpose, & audience. meets the needs of both privacy advocates and internet service providers. Furger supports this claim by detailing the ways that proposed bills fail to adequately meet the needs of either of these two groups. The article offers a useful listing of bills that are currently before congress. This sentence describes what is useful in the article. SCHOOL OF LIBERAL ARTS INDIANA UNIVERSITY University Writing Center IUPUI 3 A summary is offered here. How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/print/3187 olinuris.library.cornell.edu Published on olinuris.library.cornell.edu (http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu) Home > Printer-friendly How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography Versión española: Cómo Preparar una Bibliografía Anotada WHAT IS AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY? ANNOTATIONS VS. ABSTRACTS THE PROCESS CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE BOOK, ARTICLE, OR DOCUMENT CHOOSING THE CORRECT FORMAT FOR THE CITATIONS SAMPLE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ENTRY FOR A JOURNAL ARTICLE WHAT IS AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY? An annotated bibliography is a list of citations to books, articles, and documents. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and evaluative paragraph, the annotation. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. ANNOTATIONS VS. ABSTRACTS Abstracts are the purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly journal articles or in periodical indexes. Annotations are descriptive and critical; they expose the author's point of view, clarity and appropriateness of expression, and authority. Return to the top THE PROCESS Creating an annotated bibliography calls for the application of a variety of intellectual skills: concise exposition, succinct analysis, and informed library research. First, locate and record citations to books, periodicals, and documents that may contain useful information and ideas on your topic. Briefly examine and review the actual items. Then choose those works that provide a variety of perspectives on your topic. 1 of 3 5/5/11 10:26 AM How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/print/3187 Cite the book, article, or document using the appropriate style. Write a concise annotation that summarizes the central theme and scope of the book or article. Include one or more sentences that (a) evaluate the authority or background of the author, (b) comment on the intended audience, (c) compare or contrast this work with another you have cited, or (d) explain how this work illuminates your bibliography topic. CRITICALLY APPRAISING THE BOOK, ARTICLE, OR DOCUMENT For guidance in critically appraising and analyzing the sources for your bibliography, see How to Critically Analyze Information Sources. For information on the author's background and views, ask at the reference desk for help finding appropriate biographical reference materials and book review sources. Return to the top CHOOSING THE CORRECT FORMAT FOR THE CITATIONS Check with your instructor to find out which style is preferred for your class. Online citation guides for both the Modern Language Association (MLA) and the American Psychological Association (APA) styles are linked from the Library's Citation Management page. SAMPLE ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ENTRY FOR A JOURNAL ARTICLE The following example uses the APA format for the journal citation. Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51 (4), 541-554. The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living. This example uses the MLA format for the journal citation. NOTE: Standard MLA practice requires double spacing within citations. Waite, Linda J., Frances Kobrin Goldscheider, and Christina Witsberger. "Nonfamily Living and the Erosion of Traditional Family Orientations Among Young Adults." American Sociological Review 51.4 (1986): 541-554. Print. The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, 2 of 3 5/5/11 10:26 AM How to Prepare an Annotated Bibliography http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/print/3187 and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living. Return to the top Go to Library Research: A Hypertext Guide Last revised 1 April 2011 [MOE] Michael Engle, Amy Blumenthal, and Tony Cosgrave Olin Reference, Research & Learning Services Conditions for the use of this Web page Section: services_research_guides Page Contact: moe1 services_research_guides Subject Guides Source URL: http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/skill28.htm 3 of 3 5/5/11 10:26 AM Primary vs Secondary Sources http://www.princeton.edu/~refdesk/primary2.html What is a Primary Source? A primary source is a document or physical object which was written or created during the time under study. These sources were present during an experience or time period and offer an inside view of a particular event. Some types of primary sources include: ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS (excerpts or translations acceptable): Diaries, speeches, manuscripts, letters, interviews, news film footage, autobiographies, official records CREATIVE WORKS: Poetry, drama, novels, music, art RELICS OR ARTIFACTS: Pottery, furniture, clothing, buildings Examples of primary sources include: Diary of Anne Frank - Experiences of a Jewish family during WWII The Constitution of Canada - Canadian History A journal article reporting NEW research or findings Weavings and pottery - Native American history Plato's Republic - Women in Ancient Greece What is a secondary source? A secondary source interprets and analyzes primary sources. These sources are one or more steps removed from the event. Secondary sources may have pictures, quotes or graphics of primary sources in them. Some types of seconday sources include: PUBLICATIONS: Textbooks, magazine articles, histories, criticisms, commentaries, encyclopedias Examples of secondary sources include: A journal/magazine article which interprets or reviews previous findings A history textbook A book about the effects of WWI Search by keyword for Primary Sources in the Main Catalog You can search the Main Catalog to find direct references to primary source material. Perform a keyword search for your topic and add one of the words below: (these are several examples of words that would identify a source as primary) charters correspondence diaries early works interviews manuscripts 1 of 2 5/5/11 12:06 PM Primary vs Secondary Sources http://www.princeton.edu/~refdesk/primary2.html oratory pamphlets personal narratives sources speeches letters documents Selected Primary Sources on the Internet 2 of 2 5/5/11 12:06 PM Berlin Conference (1884) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference Berlin Conference (1884) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Berlin Conference) The Berlin Conference (German: Kongokonferenz or "Congo Conference") of 1884–85 regulated European colonization and trade in Africa during the New Imperialism period, and coincided with Germany's sudden emergence as an imperial power. Called for by Portugal and organized by Otto von Bismarck, first Chancellor of Germany, its outcome, the General Act of the Berlin Conference, is often seen as the formalisation of the Scramble for Africa. The conference ushered in a period of heightened colonial activity on the part of the European powers, while simultaneously eliminating most existing forms of African autonomy and self-governance. The conference of Berlin Contents 1 Early history of the conference 2 Conference 3 General Act 3.1 Common Misconception 3.1.1 Principle of Effectivity 4 Agenda 5 Consequences 6 References 7 Bibliography 8 External links Early history of the conference In the early 1880s, European interest in Africa increased dramatically, due to Africa's abundance of valuable resources such as gold, spices, tea, and opium. Henry Morton Stanley's charting of the Congo River Basin (1874–1877) removed the last bit of terra incognita from European maps of the continent. In 1878, King Léopold II of Belgium, who had previously founded the International African Society in 1876, invited Stanley to join him. The International African Society had the goal of researching and 'civilizing' the continent. In 1878, the International Congo Society was also formed, having more economic goals, but still closely related to the former society. Léopold secretly bought off the foreign investors in the Congo Society, which was turned to imperialistic goals, with the African Society serving primarily as a philanthropic front. From 1879 to 1885, Stanley returned to the Congo, this time not as a reporter, but as an envoy from 1 of 5 5/5/11 12:06 PM Berlin Conference (1884) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference Léopold with the secret mission to organize a Congo state, which would become known as the Congo Free State. At the same time, the French marine officer Pierre de Brazza traveled into the western Congo basin and raised the French flag over the newly-founded Brazzaville in 1881, in what is currently the Republic of Congo. Portugal, which also claimed the area due to old treaties with the Kongo Empire, made a treaty with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland on 26 February 1884 to block off the Congo Society's access to the Atlantic. At the same time, other European countries gained colonial footholds in Africa. France occupied Tunisia and today's Republic of the Congo in 1881 — which partly convinced Italy to become part of the Triple Alliance — and also Guinea in 1884. In 1882, the United Kingdom occupied nominally Ottoman Egypt, which in turn ruled over the Sudan and what would later become British Somaliland. Conference King Leopold II was able to convince France and Germany that common trade in Africa was in the best interests of all three countries. On the initiative of Portugal, Otto von Bismarck, German Chancellor, called on representatives of Austria–Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, the United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden-Norway (union until 1905), the Ottoman Empire, and the United States to take part in the Berlin seven Conference to work out policy. However, the United States did not actually participate in the conference. General Act The General Act fixed the following points: The Free State of the Congo was confirmed as private property of the Congo Society. Thus the territory of today's Democratic Republic of the Congo, some two million square kilometers, was made essentially the property of Léopold II (because of the terror regime established, it would eventually become a Belgian colony). It was primarily because of this point that Joseph Conrad sarcastically referred to the conference as "the International Society for the Suppression of Savage Customs" in his novel Heart of Darkness.[1] The 14 signatory powers would have free trade throughout the Congo basin as well as Lake Niassa and east of this in an area south of 5° N. The Niger and Congo Rivers were made free for ship traffic. An international prohibition of the slave trade was signed. A Principle of Effectivity (see below) was introduced to stop powers setting up colonies in name only. Any fresh act of taking possession of any portion of the African coast would have to be notified by the power taking possession, or assuming a protectorate, to the other signatory powers. Which regions each European power had a exclusive right to 'pursue' the legal owership of land (legal in the eyes of the other European powers).[2]:44 It is also noteworthy that the first reference in an international act to the obligations attaching to "spheres of influence" is contained in the Berlin Act. 2 of 5 5/5/11 12:06 PM Berlin Conference (1884) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference Common Misconception There is a common misconception that the main purpose of the conference was to allow the European powers to simply divide up Africa amongst each other. Olusoga and Erichsen describe it in the following way: It is a common misconception that the Berlin Conference simply 'divvied up' the African continent between the European powers. In fact, all the foreign ministers who assembled in Bismarck's Berlin villa had agreed was in which regions of Africa each European power had the right to 'pursue' the legal ownership of land, free from interference by any other. The land itself remained the legal property of Africans.[2]:44 Principle of Effectivity The Principle of Effectivity stated that powers could hold colonies only if they actually possessed them: in other words, if they had treaties with local leaders, if they flew their flag there, and if they established an administration in the territory to govern it with a police force to keep order (see Uti Possidetis). The colonial power also had to make use of the colony economically. If the colonial power did not do these things, another power could do so and take over the territory. It therefore became important to get leaders to sign a protectorate treaty and to have a presence sufficient to police the area. Agenda Portugal - Britain The Portuguese government presented a project, known as the "Pink Map" (also called the "Rose-Colored Map"), in which the colonies of Angola and Mozambique were united by co-option of the intervening territory (land that later became Zambia, Zimbabwe, and Malawi.) All of the countries attending the conference, except for the United Kingdom, endorsed Portugal's ambitions. A little more than five years later, in 1890, the British government, in breach of the Treaty of Windsor (and of the Treaty of Berlin itself[citation needed]), issued an ultimatum demanding that the Portuguese withdraw from the disputed area. France - Britain A line running from Say in Niger to Baroua, on the north-east coast of Lake Chad determined what part belonged to whom. France would own territory to the north of this line, and the United Kingdom would own territory to the south of it. The Nile Basin would be British, with the French taking the basin of Lake Chad. Furthermore, between the 11th and 15th degrees latitude, the border would pass between Ouaddaï, which would be French, and Darfur in Sudan, to be British. In reality, a no man's land 200 kilometres wide was put in place between the 21st and 23rd meridians. France - Germany The area to the north of a line formed by the intersection of the 14th meridian and Miltou was designated French, that to the south being German. Britain - Germany The separation came in the form of a line passing through Yola, on the Benoué, Dikoa, going up to the extremity of Lake Chad. 3 of 5 5/5/11 12:06 PM Berlin Conference (1884) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference France - Italy Italy was to own what lies north of a line from the intersection of the Tropic of Cancer and the 17th meridian to the intersection of the 15th parallel and 21st meridian. Consequences The Scramble for Africa sped up after the Conference, since even within areas designated as their sphere of influence, the European powers still had to take possession under the Principle of Effectivity. In central Africa in particular, expeditions were dispatched to coerce traditional rulers into signing treaties, using force if necessary, as for example in the case of Msiri, King of Katanga, in 1891. Within a few years, Africa was at least nominally divided up south of the Sahara. By 1895, the only independent states were: Liberia, founded with the support of the USA for returned slaves; Abyssinia (Ethiopia), the only free native state, which fended off Italian invasion from Eritrea in what is known as the First Italo-Abyssinian War of 1889-1896. European claims in Africa, 1913 Belgium Germany Great Britain Italy Spain France Portugal Independent The following states lost their independence to the British Empire roughly a decade after (see below for more information): Orange Free State, a Boer republic founded by Dutch settlers; South African Republic (Transvaal), also a Boer republic; By 1902, 90% of all the land that makes up Africa was under European control. The large part of the Sahara was French, while after the quelling of the Mahdi rebellion and the ending of the Fashoda crisis, the Sudan remained firmly under joint British–Egyptian rulership with Egypt being under British occupation before becoming a British protectorate in 1914. The Boer republics were conquered by the United Kingdom in the Boer war from 1899 to 1902. Morocco was divided between the French and Spanish in 1911, and Libya was conquered by Italy in 1912. The official British annexation of Egypt in 1914 ended the colonial division of Africa. Lastly, Ethiopia was invaded and annexed by Italy. By this point, all of Africa, with the exception of Liberia, was under European rule. 4 of 5 5/5/11 12:06 PM Berlin Conference (1884) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference References 1. ^ "Historical Context: Heart of Darkness." EXPLORING Novels, Online Edition. Gale, 2003. Discovering Collection (http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/DC) . Subscription required 2. ^ a b Olusoga, David; Erichsen, Casper W. (2010). The Kaisers's Holocaust: Germany's Forgotten Genocide and the Colonial Roots of Nazism. London, UK: Faber and Faber. pp. 394. ISBN 978-0-571-23141-6. Bibliography Chamberlain, Muriel E. (1999). The Scramble for Africa. London: Longman, 1974, 2nd ed. ISBN 0582368812. Crowe, Sybil E. (1942). The Berlin West African Conference, 1884–1985. New York: Longmans, Green. ISBN 0837132878 (1981, New ed. edition). Förster, Stig, Wolfgang J. Mommsen, and Ronald Edward Robinson (1989). Bismarck, Europe, and Africa: The Berlin Africa Conference 1884–1885 and the Onset of Partition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0199205000. Hochschild, Adam (1999). King Leopold's Ghost. ISBN 0-395-75924-2. Petringa, Maria (2006). Brazza, A Life for Africa. ISBN 9781-4259-11980. External links Geography.about.com - Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 to Divide Africa (http://geography.about.com/cs/politicalgeog/a/berlinconferenc.htm) . Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Conference_(1884)" Categories: Colonialism | History of Morocco | Treaties of Denmark | Treaties of the Ottoman Empire | Treaties of the United Kingdom | Treaties of the United States | European colonisation in Africa | 1884 in Portugal | 1885 in Portugal | 1884 in France | 1885 in France | Treaties of Austria-Hungary | Diplomatic conferences in Germany | 19th-century diplomatic conferences | 1884 treaties | 1884 in international relations | 1885 in international relations | Treaties of the Russian Empire | Treaties of the German Empire | Treaties of the United Kingdoms of Sweden and Norway | Treaties of the French Third Republic | Treaties of the Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946) | Treaties of the Kingdom of Portugal | Treaties of the Spanish Empire | Treaties of the Kingdom of the Netherlands This page was last modified on 21 April 2011 at 23:38. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. 5 of 5 5/5/11 12:06 PM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Scramble for Africa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Scramble for Africa, also known as the Race for Africa,[1] was a process of invasion, attack, occupation, and annexation of African territory by European powers during the New Imperialism period, between 1881 and World War I in 1914. As a result of the heightened tension between European states in the last quarter of the 19th century, the partitioning of Africa may be seen as a way for the Europeans to eliminate the threat of a Europe-wide war over Africa.[2] The last 59 years of the nineteenth century saw transition from ‘informal imperialism’ of control through military influence and economic dominance to that of direct rule.[3] Attempts to mediate imperial competition, such as the Berlin Conference (1884–1885), failed to establish definitively the competing powers' claims.[citation needed] Many African polities, states and rulers (such as the The Rhodes Colossus, a caricature of Cecil Rhodes Ashanti, the Abyssinians, the Moroccans and the after announcing plans for a telegraph line from Dervishes) sought to resist this wave of European Cape Town to Cairo. For Punch by Edward Linley [4] Sambourne. aggression. However, the industrial revolution had provided the European armies with advanced weapons such as machine guns, which African armies found difficult to resist.[5] Also, unlike their European counterparts, African rulers, states and people did not at first form a continental united front although within a few years, a Pan-African movement did emerge.[6] Contents 1 Background 2 Causes 2.1 Africa and global markets 2.2 Strategic rivalry 2.2.1 Bismarck's Realpolitik 2.2.2 Clash of rival imperialisms 2.2.3 American Colonization Society and foundation of Liberia 1 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa 3 Crises prior to the First World War 3.1 Colonization of the Congo 3.2 Suez Canal 3.3 Berlin Conference 3.4 Britain's occupation of Egypt and South Africa 3.5 Fashoda Incident 3.6 Moroccan Crisis 3.7 Dervish resistance 4 Colonial encounter 4.1 Colonial consciousness and exhibitions 4.1.1 Colonial lobby 4.1.2 Colonial propaganda and jingoism 4.1.2.1 Colonial exhibitions 4.1.2.2 Anthropology 4.2 Extermination of the Namaqua and the Herero 5 Conclusions 6 African colonies listed by colonizing power 6.1 Belgium 6.2 France 6.3 Germany 6.4 Italy 6.5 Portugal 6.6 Spain 6.7 United Kingdom 6.8 Independent states 7 See also 8 References 9 Further reading 10 External links Background The Portuguese had been the first Europeans to firmly establish settlements, trade posts, permanent fortifications and ports of call along the oceanic coasts of the African continent, from the beginning of the Age of Discovery, in the 15th century. This article is part of the New Imperialism series. Origins of New Imperialism Imperialism in Asia The Scramble for Africa Theories of New Imperialism European exploration of the African interior began in earnest at the end of the 18th century. By 1835, Europeans had mapped most of northwestern Africa. In the middle decades of the 19th century, the most famous of the European explorers were David Livingstone and H. M. Stanley, both of whom mapped vast areas of Southern Africa and Central Africa. Arduous 2 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa expeditions in the 1850s and 1860s by Richard Burton, John Speke and James Grant located the great central lakes and the source of the Nile. By the end of the 19th century, Europeans had charted the Nile from its source, traced the courses of the Niger, Congo and Zambezi Rivers, and realized the vast resources of Africa. Even as late as the 1870s, European states still controlled only 10 percent of the African continent, all their territories being near the coast. The most important holdings were Angola and Mozambique, held by Portugal; the Cape Colony, held by the United Kingdom; and Algeria, held by France. By 1914, only Ethiopia and Liberia were independent of European control. David Livingstone, early explorer of the interior of Africa. Technological advancement facilitated overseas expansionism. Industrialisation brought about rapid advancements in transportation and communication, especially in the forms of steam navigation, railways, and telegraphs. Medical advances also were important, especially medicines for tropical diseases. The development of quinine, an effective treatment for malaria, enabled vast expanses of the tropics to be accessed by Europeans. Causes Africa and global markets Sub-Saharan Africa, one of the last regions of the world largely untouched by 'informal imperialism', was also attractive to Europe's ruling elites for economic and racial reasons. During a time when Britain's balance of trade showed a growing deficit, with shrinking and increasingly protectionist continental markets due to the Long Depression (1873–1896), Africa offered Britain, Germany, France, and other countries an open market that would garner them a trade surplus: a market that bought more from the colonial power than it sold overall.[3] Britain, like most other industrial countries, had long since begun to run an unfavourable balance of trade (which was increasingly offset, however, by the income from overseas investments). As Britain developed into the world's first post-industrial nation, financial services became an increasingly important sector of its economy. Invisible financial exports, kept Britain out of the red, especially capital investments outside Europe, particularly to the developing and open markets in Africa such as to the white settler colonies, the Middle East, South Asia and Southeast Asia.[citation needed] In addition, surplus capitals was often more profitably invested overseas, where cheap materials, limited competition, and abundant raw materials made a greater premium possible. Another inducement for imperialism arose from the demand for raw materials unavailable in Europe, especially copper, cotton, rubber, palm oil, cocoa, diamonds, tea, and tin, to which European consumers had grown accustomed and upon which European industry had grown dependent. Additionally, Britain wanted the southern and eastern coasts of Africa for stopover ports on the route to Asia and its empire in India.[7] 3 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa However, in Africa – exclusive of the area which became the Union of South Africa in 1910 – the amount of capital investment by Europeans was relatively small, compared to other continents. Consequently, the companies involved in tropical African commerce were relatively small, apart from Cecil Rhodes's De Beers Mining Company. Rhodes had carved out Rhodesia for himself; Léopold II of Belgium later, and with considerably greater brutality, exploited the Congo Free State. These events might detract from the pro-imperialist arguments of colonial lobbies such as the Alldeutscher Verband, Francesco Crispi and Jules Ferry, who argued that sheltered overseas markets in Africa would solve the problems of low prices and over-production caused by shrinking continental markets. John A. Hobson argued, in Imperialism, that this shrinking of continental markets was a key factor of the global "New Imperialism" period. Areas controlled by European colonial powers on the African continent in 1914 William Easterly of New York University, however, disagrees with the link made between capitalism and imperialism, arguing that colonialism is used mostly to promote state-led development rather than 'corporate' development. He has stated that "imperialism is not so clearly linked to capitalism and free markets... historically there has been a closer link between colonialism/imperialism and state-led approaches to development."[8] Strategic rivalry While tropical Africa was not a large zone of investment, other regions overseas were. The vast interior between the gold and diamond-rich Southern Africa and Egypt, had, however, key strategic value in securing the flow of overseas trade. Britain was thus under intense political pressure to secure lucrative markets against encroaching rivals, in China and the British Empire's eastern colonies, most notably India, Malaya, Australia and New Zealand. Thus, securing the key waterway between East and West – the Suez Canal – was crucial. The rivalry between the UK, France, Germany and the other European powers account for a large part of the colonization. Thus, while Germany, which had been unified under Prussia's rule only after the 1866 Battle of Sadowa and the 1870 Franco-Prussian War, was hardly a colonial power before the New Imperialism period, it would eagerly participate in the race. A rising industrial power close on the heels of Britain, it had not yet had the chance to control overseas territories, mainly due to its late unification, its fragmentation in various states, and its absence of experience in modern navigation. This would change under Bismarck's leadership, who implemented the Weltpolitik (World Politics) and, after putting in place the basis of France's isolation with the Dual Alliance with Austria-Hungary and then the 1882 Triple Alliance with Italy, called for the 1884–1885 Berlin Conference which set the rules of effective control of a foreign territory. Germany's expansionism would lead to the Tirpitz Plan, implemented by Admiral von Tirpitz, who would also champion the 4 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa various Fleet Acts starting in 1898, thus engaging in an arms race with Britain. By 1914, they had given Germany the second largest naval force in the world (roughly 40% smaller than the Royal Navy). According to von Tirpitz, this aggressive naval policy was supported by the National Liberal Party rather than by the conservatives, thus demonstrating that the main supports of the European nation states' imperialism were the rising bourgeoisie classes.[9] The scramble for African territory also reflected a concern for the acquisition of military and naval bases for strategic purposes and the exercise of power on an international scene. The ability to influence international events depended largely upon new weapons – steel ships driven by steam power – and for the maintenance of these growing navies, coaling stations and ports of call were required. Defence bases were also needed for the protection of sea routes and communication lines, particularly of expensive and vital international waterways such as the Suez Canal.[10] Colonies were also seen as important aspects of 'balance of power' negotiations – useful as items of exchange at times of international bargaining. Colonies carrying a heavy native population were also important as a source of military power; Britain and France used large numbers of British Indian and North African soldiers respectively in many of their colonial wars. In the great age of nationalism there was strong pressure for a nation to acquire an empire as a status symbol; the idea of 'greatness' became inextricably linked with the sense of 'duty' that many European nations used to justify their imperialistic ambitions.[10] Bismarck's Realpolitik Germany began its world expansion in the 1880s under Bismarck's leadership, encouraged by the national bourgeoisie. Some of them, claiming themselves of Friedrich List's thought, advocated expansion in the Philippines and in Timor; others proposed to set themselves in Formosa (modern Taiwan), etc. At the end of the 1870s, these isolated voices began to be relayed by a real imperialist policy, which was backed by mercantilist thesis. In 1881, Hübbe-Schleiden, a lawyer, published Deutsche Kolonisation, according to which the ‘development of national consciousness demanded an independent overseas policy’.[11] Pan-germanism was thus linked to the young nation's imperialist drives. In the beginning of the 1880s, the Deutscher Kolonialverein was created, and got its own magazine in 1884, the Kolonialzeitung. This colonial lobby was also relayed by the nationalist Alldeutscher Verband. Wilhelm II continued the idea of colonial expansion in the 1900s with the Weltpolitik (‘World Politics’) strategy. Germany thus became the third largest colonial power in Africa. Nearly all of its overall empire of 2.6 million square kilometres and 14 million colonial subjects in 1914 was found in its African possessions of Southwest Africa, Togoland, the Cameroons, and Tanganyika. The scramble for Africa led Bismarck to propose the 1884–1885 Berlin Conference. Following the 1904 Entente cordiale between France and the UK, Germany tried to isolate France in 1905 with the First Moroccan Crisis. This led to the 1905 Algeciras Conference, in which France's influence on Morocco was compensated by the exchange of other territories, and then to the Agadir Crisis in 1911. Along with the 1898 Fashoda Incident between France and the UK, this succession of international crises reveals the bitterness of the struggle between the various imperalist nations, which ultimately led to World War I. 5 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Clash of rival imperialisms While de Brazza was exploring the Kongo Kingdom for France, Stanley also explored it in the early 1880s on behalf of Léopold II of Belgium, who would have his personal Congo Free State. While pretending to advocate humanitarianism and denounce slavery, Leopold II used the most inhumane tactics to exploit his newly acquired lands. His crimes were revealed by 1905, but he remained in control until 1908, when he was forced to turn over control to the Belgian government. This scene from an Ethiopian tapestry France occupied Tunisia in May 1881 (and Guinea in 1884), depicts the Ethiopian triumph against which partly convinced Italy to adhere in 1882 to the European forces at the Battle of Adwa. The German-Austrian Dual Alliance, thus forming the Triple Italo-Ethiopian War of 1895–1896 Alliance. The same year, Britain occupied the nominally distinguished Ethiopia as the only African Ottoman Egypt, which in turn ruled over the Sudan and state to maintain independence in the 19th parts of Somalia. In 1870 and 1882, Italy took possession of century with a decisive show of force. the first parts of Eritrea, while Germany declared Togoland, the Cameroons and South West Africa to be under its protection in 1884. French West Africa (AOF) was founded in 1895, and French Equatorial Africa (AEF) in 1910. Italy continued its conquest to gain its ‘place in the sun’. Following the defeat of the First Italo– Ethiopian War (1895–1896), it acquired Italian Somaliland in 1889–1890 and the whole of Eritrea (1899). In 1911, it engaged in a war with the Ottoman Empire, in which it acquired Tripolitania and Cyrenaica (modern Libya). Enrico Corradini, who fully supported the war, and later merged his group in the early fascist party (PNF), developed in 1919 the concept of Proletarian Nationalism, supposed to legitimise Italy's imperialism by a mixture of socialism with nationalism: ‘We must start by recognizing the fact that there are proletarian nations as well as proletarian classes; that is to say, there are nations whose living conditions are subject...to the way of life of other nations, just as classes are. Once this is realised, nationalism must insist firmly on this truth: Italy is, materially and morally, a proletarian nation.’[12] The Second Italo-Abyssinian War (1935–1936), ordered by Mussolini, would actually be one of the last colonial wars (that is, intended to colonize a foreign country, opposed to wars of national liberation), occupying Ethiopia which had remained the last African independent territory apart from Liberia, for five years. The Spanish Civil War, marking a new phase of what some call the European Civil War, began in 1936. On the other hand, the British abandoned their "splendid isolation" in 1902 with the Anglo-Japanese Alliance, which would enable the Empire of Japan to be victorious during the war against Russia (1904–1905). The UK then signed the Entente cordiale with France in 1904, and, in 1907, the Triple Entente which included Russia, thus pitted against the Triple Alliance which Bismarck had patiently assembled. American Colonization Society and foundation of Liberia 6 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Main articles: American Colonization Society and History of Liberia The United States took part, marginally, in this enterprise, through the American Colonization Society (ACS), established in 1816 by Robert Finley. The ACS offered emigration to Liberia (‘Land of the Free’), a colony founded in 1820, to free black slaves; emancipated slave Lott Carey actually became the first American Baptist missionary in Africa. This colonisation attempt was resisted by the native people. The ACS was led by Southerners, and its first president was James Monroe, from Virginia, who became the fifth president of the United States from 1817 to 1825. Thus, ironically one of the main proponents of American colonisation of Africa was the same man who proclaimed, in his 1823 State of the Union address, the US opinion that European powers should no longer colonise the Americas or interfere with the affairs of sovereign nations located in James Monroe, first the Americas. In return, the US planned president of the ACS and US to stay neutral in wars between European president (1817–1825). He powers and in wars between a European invented the Monroe power and its colonies. However, if these Doctrine, base of the US latter type of wars were to occur in the isolationism during the 19th Americas, the U.S. would view such century. action as hostile toward itself. This famous statement became known as the Monroe Doctrine and was the base of United States isolationism during the nineteenth century. Joseph Jenkins Roberts became the first president of Liberia, one of only two independent African nations (alongside Ethiopia) at the time of European control and domination. Although the Liberia colony never became quite as big as envisaged, it was only the first step in the American colonisation of Africa, according to its early proponents. Thus, Jehudi Ashmun, an early leader of the ACS, envisioned an American empire in Africa. Between 1825 and 1826, he took steps to lease, annex, or buy tribal lands along the coast and along major rivers leading inland. Like his predecessor Lt. Robert Stockton, who in 1821 established the site for Monrovia by ‘persuading’ a local chief referred to as ‘King Peter’ to sell Cape Montserado (or Cape Mesurado) by pointing a pistol at his head, Ashmun was prepared to use force to extend the colony's territory. In a May 1825 treaty, King Peter and other native kings agreed to sell land in return for 500 bars of tobacco, three barrels of rum, five casks of powder, five umbrellas, ten iron posts, and ten pairs of shoes, among other items. In March 1825, the ACS began a quarterly, The African Repository and Colonial Journal, edited by Rev. Ralph Randolph Gurley (1797–1872), who headed the Society until 1844. Conceived as the Society's propaganda organ, the Repository promoted both colonisation and Liberia. The Society controlled the colony of Liberia until 1847 when, under the perception that the British might annex the settlement, Liberia was proclaimed a free and independent state, thus becoming the first African decolonised state. By 1867, the Society had sent more than 13,000 emigrants. After the 7 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa American Civil War (1861–1865), when many blacks wanted to go to Liberia, financial support for colonisation had waned. During its later years the society focused on educational and missionary efforts in Liberia rather than further emigration. Crises prior to the First World War Colonization of the Congo David Livingstone's explorations, carried on by Henry Morton Stanley, excited imaginations. But at first, Stanley's grandiose ideas for colonisation found little support owing to the problems and scale of action required, except from Léopold II of Belgium, who in 1876 had organised the International African Association. From 1869 to 1874, Stanley was secretly sent by Léopold II to the Congo region, where he made treaties with several African chiefs along the Congo River and by 1882 had sufficient territory to form the basis of the Congo Free State. Léopold II personally owned the colony from 1885 and used it as a source of ivory and rubber. While Stanley was exploring Congo on behalf of Léopold II of Belgium, the Franco-Italian marine officer Pierre de Brazza travelled into the western Congo basin and raised the French flag over the Henry Morton Stanley newly founded Brazzaville in 1881, thus occupying today's Republic of the Congo. Portugal, which also claimed the area due to old treaties with the native Kongo Empire, made a treaty with Britain on February 26, 1884 to block off the Congo Society's access to the Atlantic. Pierre Savorgnan de Brazza in his version of ‘native’ dress, photographed by Félix Nadar By 1890 the Congo Free State had consolidated its control of its territory between Leopoldville and Stanleyville and was looking to push south down the Lualaba River from Stanleyville. At the same time the British South Africa Company of Cecil Rhodes (who once declared, ‘all of these stars... these vast worlds that remain out of reach. If I could, I would annex other planets’[13]) was expanding north from the Limpopo River sending the Pioneer Column, guided by Frederick Selous, through Matabeleland and starting a colony in Mashonaland. To the West, attention was drawn to the land where their expansions would meet Katanga, site of the Yeke Kingdom of Msiri. As well as being the most powerful ruler militarily in the area, Msiri traded large quantities of copper, ivory and slaves, and rumours of gold reached European ears. The scramble for Katanga was a prime example of the period. Rhodes and the BSAC sent two expeditions to Msiri in 1890 led by Alfred Sharpe, who was rebuffed, and Joseph Thomson who failed to reach Katanga. In 1891 Leopold sent four CFS expeditions. The Le Marinel Expedition could only extract a vaguely worded letter. The Delcommune Expedition was rebuffed. The well-armed Stairs Expedition had orders to take Katanga with or without Msiri's consent; Msiri refused, was shot, and the expedition cut off his head and stuck it on a pole as a 'barbaric lesson' to the people. The Bia Expedition finished off the job of establishing an 8 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa administration of sorts and a 'police presence' in Katanga. The half million square kilometres of Katanga came into Leopold's possession and brought his African realm up to 2,300,000 square kilometres (890,000 sq mi), about 75 times larger than Belgium. The Congo Free State imposed such a terror regime on the colonised people, including mass killings with millions of victims, and slave labour, that Belgium, under pressure from the Congo Reform Association, ended Leopold II's rule and annexed it in 1908 as a colony of Belgium, known as the Belgian Congo. A hard-hitting 1906 Punch cartoon depicting King Leopold II of Belgium as a rubber vine entangling a Congolese man. King Leopold II of Belgium's brutality in his former colony of the Congo Free State,[14][15] now the DRC, was well documented; up to 8 million of the estimated 16 million native inhabitants died between 1885 and 1908.[16] According to the former British diplomat Roger Casement, this Native Congo Free State labourers depopulation had four main who failed to meet rubber collection causes: "indiscriminate war", quotas were often punished by having starvation, reduction of births their hands cut off and diseases.[17] Sleeping sickness ravaged the country and must also be taken into account for the dramatic decrease in population. Estimates of the total death toll vary considerably. As the first census did not take place until 1924, it is difficult to quantify the population loss of the period. Casement's report set it at three million.[18] See Congo Free State for further details including numbers of victims. A similar situation occurred in the neighbouring French Congo. Most of the resource extraction was run by concession companies, whose brutal methods resulted in the loss of up to 50 percent of the indigenous population.[19] The French government appointed a commission, headed by de Brazza, in 1905 to investigate the rumoured abuses in the colony. However, de Brazza died on the return trip, and his "searingly critical" report was neither acted upon nor released to the public.[20] In the 1920s, about 20,000 forced labourers died building a railroad through the French territory.[21] Suez Canal Main article: Suez Canal Ferdinand de Lesseps had obtained many concessions from Isma'il Pasha, the Khedive of Egypt and 9 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Sudan, in 1854–1856, to build the Suez Canal. Some sources estimate the workforce at 30,000,[22] but others estimate that 120,000 workers died over the ten years of construction due to malnutrition, fatigue and disease, especially cholera.[23] Shortly before its completion in 1869, Khedive Isma'il borrowed enormous sums from British and French bankers at high rates of interest. By 1875, he was facing financial difficulties and was forced to sell his block of shares in the Suez Canal. The shares were snapped up by Britain, under its Prime Minister, Benjamin Disraeli, who sought to give his country practical control in the management of this strategic waterway. When Isma'il repudiated Egypt's foreign debt in 1879, Britain and France seized joint financial control over the country, forcing the Egyptian ruler to abdicate, and installing his eldest son Tewfik Pasha in his place. The Egyptian and Sudanese ruling classes did not relish foreign intervention. In 1881, the Mahdist revolt erupted in Sudan under Muhammad Ahmad, severing Tewfik's authority in Sudan. The same year, Tewfik suffered an even more perilous rebellion by his own Egyptian army in the form of the Urabi Revolt. In 1882, Tewfik appealed for direct British military assistance, commencing Britain's occupation of Egypt. A joint BritishEgyptian military force ultimately defeated the Mahdist forces in Sudan in 1898. Thereafter, Britain (rather than Egypt) seized effective control of Sudan. Berlin Conference Main article: Berlin Conference The occupation of Egypt, and the acquisition of the Congo were the first major moves in what came to be a precipitous scramble for African territory. In 1884, Otto von Bismarck convened the 1884–1885 Berlin Conference to discuss the Africa problem. The diplomats put on a humanitarian façade by condemning the slave trade, prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages and firearms in certain regions, and by expressing concern for missionary activities. More importantly, the diplomats in Berlin laid down the rules of competition by which the great powers were to be guided in seeking colonies. They also agreed that the area along the Congo River was to be administered by Léopold II of Belgium as a neutral area, known as the Congo Free State, in which trade and navigation were to be free. No nation was to stake claims in Africa without notifying other powers of its intentions. No territory could be formally claimed prior to being effectively occupied. However, the competitors ignored the rules when convenient and on several occasions war was only narrowly avoided. Britain's occupation of Egypt and South Africa Britain's occupations of Egypt and the Cape Colony contributed to a preoccupation over securing the source of the Nile River. Egypt was occupied by British forces in 1882 (although not formally declared a protectorate until 1914, and never an actual colony); Sudan, Nigeria, Kenya and Uganda were subjugated in the 1890s and early 1900s; and in the south, the Cape Colony (first acquired in 1795) provided a base for the subjugation of neighbouring African states and the Dutch Afrikaner settlers who had left the Cape to avoid the British 10 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa and then founded their own republics. In 1877, Boer women and children in a concentration camp Theophilus Shepstone annexed the South African during the Second Boer War (1899–1902) Republic (or Transvaal – independent from 1857 to 1877) for the British. The UK consolidated its power over most of the colonies of South Africa in 1879 after the Anglo-Zulu War. The Boers protested and in December 1880 they revolted, leading to the First Boer War (1880–1881). British Prime Minister William Gladstone signed a peace treaty on March 23, 1881, giving self-government to the Boers in the Transvaal. The Jameson Raid of 1895 was a failed attempt by the British South Africa Company and the Johannesburg Reform Committee to overthrow the Boer government in the Transvaal. The Second Boer War was about control of the gold and diamond industries and was fought between 1899 to 1902; the independent Boer republics of the Orange Free State and of the South African Republic (Transvaal) were this time defeated and absorbed into the British empire. Fashoda Incident Main article: Fashoda Incident The 1898 Fashoda Incident was one of the most crucial conflicts on Europe's way to consolidating holdings in the continent. It brought Britain and France to the verge of war but ended in a major strategic victory for Britain, and provided the basis for the 1904 Entente Cordiale between the two rival countries. It stemmed from battles over control of the Nile headwaters, which caused Britain to expand in the Sudan. Jules Ferry, French Republican who, as prime minister, directed the negotiations which led to the establishment of a protectorate in Tunis (1881), prepared the December 17, 1885 treaty for the occupation of Madagascar; 11 of 22 The French thrust into the African interior was mainly from West Africa (modern day Senegal) eastward, through the Sahel along the southern border of the Sahara, a territory covering modern day Senegal, Mali, Niger, and Chad. Their ultimate aim was to have an uninterrupted link between the Niger River and the Nile, thus controlling all trade to and from the Sahel region, by virtue of their existing control over the Caravan routes through the Sahara. The British, on the other hand, wanted to link their possessions in Southern Africa (modern South Africa, Botswana, Zimbabwe, Lesotho, Swaziland, and Zambia), with their territories in East Africa (modern Kenya), and these two areas with the Nile basin. Sudan (which in those days included modern day Uganda) was obviously key to the fulfilment of these ambitions, especially since Egypt was already under British control. This 'red line' through Africa is made most famous by Cecil Rhodes. Along with Lord Milner (the British colonial minister in South Africa), Rhodes advocated such a ‘Cape to Cairo’ empire linking by rail the Suez Canal to the mineral-rich Southern part of the continent. Though hampered by German occupation of Tanganyika until the end of World War I, Rhodes successfully lobbied on behalf of such a sprawling East African empire. If one draws a line from Cape Town to Cairo (Rhodes' dream), and one from Dakar to the Horn of Africa (now Ethiopia, Eritrea, Djibouti and Somalia), (the French ambition), these two lines intersect somewhere in 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia directed the exploration of the Congo and of the Niger region; and organised the conquest of Indochina. He resigned after the 1885 Tonkin incident. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa eastern Sudan near Fashoda, explaining its strategic importance. In short, Britain had sought to extend its East African empire contiguously from Cairo to the Cape of Good Hope, while France had sought to extend its own holdings from Dakar to the Sudan, which would enable its empire to span the entire continent from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea. A French force under Jean-Baptiste Marchand arrived first at the strategically located fort at Fashoda soon followed by a British force under Lord Kitchener, commander in chief of the British army since 1892. The French withdrew after a standoff, and continued to press claims to other posts in the region. In March 1899 the French and British agreed that the source of the Nile and Congo Rivers should mark the frontier between their spheres of influence. Moroccan Crisis Main articles: First Moroccan Crisis and Second Moroccan Crisis Although the 1884–1885 Berlin Conference had set the rules for the scramble for Africa, it had not weakened the rival imperialisms. The 1898 Fashoda Incident, which had seen France and the UK on the brink of war, ultimately led to the signature of the 1904 Entente cordiale, which reversed the influence of the various European powers. As a result, the new German power decided to test the solidity of the influence, using the contested territory of Morocco as a battlefield. Thus, on 31 March 1905 Kaiser Wilhelm II visited Tangiers and made a speech in favor of Moroccan independence, challenging French influence in Morocco. France's influence in Morocco had been reaffirmed by Britain and Spain in 1904. The Kaiser's speech bolstered French nationalism and with British support the French foreign minister, Théophile Delcassé, took a defiant line. The crisis peaked in mid-June 1905, when Delcassé was forced The Moroccan Sultan Abdelhafid, out of the ministry by the more conciliation minded premier who led an anti-imperialist resistance Maurice Rouvier. But by July 1905 Germany was becoming during the Agadir Crisis. isolated and the French agreed to a conference to solve the crisis. Both France and Germany continued to posture up until the conference, with Germany mobilizing reserve army units in late December and France actually moving troops to the border in January 1906. The 1906 Algeciras Conference was called to settle the dispute. Of the thirteen nations present the German representatives found their only supporter was Austria-Hungary. France had firm support from Britain, Russia, Italy, Spain, and the U.S. The Germans eventually accepted an agreement, signed on May 31, 1906, where France yielded certain domestic changes in Morocco but retained control of key areas. 12 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa However, five years later the second Moroccan crisis (or Agadir Crisis) was sparked by the deployment of the German gunboat Panther, to the port of Agadir on July 1, 1911. Germany had started to attempt to surpass Britain's naval supremacy – the British navy had a policy of remaining larger than the next two naval fleets in the world combined. When the British heard of the Panther's arrival in Morocco, they wrongly believed that the Germans meant to turn Agadir into a naval base on the Atlantic. The German move was aimed at reinforcing claims for compensation for acceptance of effective French control of the North African kingdom, where France's pre-eminence had been upheld by the 1906 Algeciras Conference. In November 1911 a convention was signed under which Germany accepted France's position in Morocco in return for territory in the French Equatorial African colony of Middle Congo (now the Republic of the Congo). France subsequently established a full protectorate over Morocco (March 30, 1912), ending what remained of the country's formal independence. Furthermore, British backing for France during the two Moroccan crises reinforced the Entente between the two countries and added to Anglo-German estrangement, deepening the divisions which would culminate in World War I. Dervish resistance Following the Berlin conference at the end of the 19th century, the British, Italians and Ethiopians sought to claim lands owned by the existing Somali empires such as the Warsangali Sultanate, the Ajuuraan State and the Gobroon Dynasty. The Dervish State was a response established by Muhammad Abdullah Hassan, a Somali religious leader who gathered Muslim soldiers from across the Horn of Africa and united them into a loyal army known as the Dervishes. This Dervish army enabled Hassan to carve out a powerful state through conquest of lands sought after by the Ethiopians and the European powers. The Dervish State successfully repulsed the British Empire four times and forced it to retreat to the coastal region.[24] Due to these successful expeditions, the Dervish State was recognized as an ally by the Ottoman and German empires. The Turks also named Hassan Emir of the Somali nation,[25] and the Germans promised to officially recognize any territories the Dervishes were to acquire.[26] After a quarter of a century of holding the British at bay, the Dervishes were finally defeated in 1920 as a direct consequence of Britain's new policy of aerial bombardment.[27] Statue of Sayyid Mohammed Abdullah Hassan, the "Mad Mullah", who led a twenty-year long anti-imperial resistance war. Colonial encounter Colonial consciousness and exhibitions Colonial lobby 13 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa In its earlier stages, imperialism was generally the act of individual explorers as well as some adventurous merchantmen. The colonial powers were a long way from approving without any dissent the expensive adventures carried out abroad. Various important political leaders such as Gladstone opposed colonisation in its first years. However, during his second premiership in 1880–1885 he could not resist the colonial lobby in his cabinet, and thus did not execute his electoral promise to disengage from Egypt. Although Gladstone was personally opposed to imperialism, the social tensions caused by the Long Depression pushed him to favor jingoism: the imperialists had become the ‘parasites of patriotism’ (Hobson[28]). In France, then Radical politician Georges Clemenceau also adamantly opposed himself to it: he thought colonisation was a diversion from the ‘blue line of the Vosges’ mountains, that is revanchism and the patriotic urge to reclaim the Alsace-Lorraine region which had been annexed by the 1871 Treaty Pygmies and a European. of Frankfurt. Clemenceau actually made Jules Ferry's cabinet fall after Some pygmies would be the 1885 Tonkin disaster. According to Hannah Arendt in The Origins of exposed in human zoos, such Totalitarianism (1951), this expansion of national sovereignty on as Ota Benga displayed by overseas territories contradicted the unity of the nation state which eugenicist Madison Grant in provided citizenship to its population. Thus, a tension between the the Bronx Zoo. universalist will to respect human rights of the colonised people, as they may be considered as ‘citizens’ of the nation state, and the imperialist drives to cynically exploit populations deemed inferior began to surface. Some, in colonising countries, opposed what they saw as unnecessary evils of the colonial administration when left to itself; as described in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness (1899) – contemporary of Kipling's The White Man's Burden – or in Louis-Ferdinand Céline's Journey to the End of the Night (1932). Thus, colonial lobbies were progressively set up to legitimise the Scramble for Africa and other expensive overseas adventures. In Germany, in France, in Britain, the bourgeoisie began to claim strong overseas policies to insure the market's growth. In 1916, Lenin would publish Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism describing this phenomenon. Even in lesser powers, voices like Corradini began to claim a ‘place in the sun’ for so-called ‘proletarian nations’, bolstering nationalism and militarism in an early prototype of fascism. Colonial propaganda and jingoism Colonial exhibitions However, by the end of World War I the colonial empires had become very popular almost everywhere in Europe: public opinion had been convinced of the needs of a colonial empire, although most of the metropolitans would never see a piece of it. Colonial exhibitions had been instrumental in this change of popular mentalities brought about by the colonial propaganda, supported by the colonial lobby and by various scientists. Thus, the conquest of territories were inevitably followed by public displays of the indigenous people for scientific and leisure purposes. Karl Hagenbeck, a German merchant in wild animals and future entrepreneur of most Europeans zoos, thus decided in 1874 to exhibit Samoa and 14 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Sami people as ‘purely natural’ populations. In 1876, he sent one of his collaborators to the newly conquered Egyptian Sudan to bring back some wild beasts and Nubians. Presented in Paris, London and Berlin, these Nubians were very successful. Such ‘human zoos’ could be found in Hamburg, Antwerp, Barcelona, London, Milan, New York, Warsaw, etc., with 200,000 to 300,000 visitors attending each exhibition. Tuaregs were exhibited after the French conquest of Timbuktu (discovered by René Caillé, disguised as a Muslim, in 1828, thereby winning the prize offered by the French Société de Géographie); Malagasy after the occupation of Madagascar; Amazons of Abomey after Behanzin's mediatic defeat against the French in 1894. Not used to the climatic conditions, some of the indigenous exposed died, such as some Galibis in Paris in 1892.[29] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Poster for the 1906 Colonial Exhibition in Marseilles (France) Geoffroy de Saint-Hilaire, director of the Parisian Jardin d'acclimatation, decided in 1877 to organise two ‘ethnological spectacles’, presenting Nubians and Inuit. The public of the Jardin d'acclimatation doubled, with a million paying entrances that year, a huge success for these times. Between 1877 and 1912, approximatively thirty ‘ethnological exhibitions’ were presented at the Jardin zoologique d'acclimatation.[30] ‘Negro villages’ would be presented in Paris's 1878 and 1879 World's Fair; the 1900 World's Fair presented the famous diorama ‘living’ in Madagascar, while the Colonial Exhibitions in Marseilles (1906 and 1922) and in Paris (1907 and 1931) would also display human beings in cages, often nudes or quasi-nudes.[31] Nomadic ‘Senegalese villages’ were also created, thus displaying the power of the colonial empire to all the population. In the U.S., Madison Grant, head of the New York Zoological Society, exposed Pygmy Ota Benga in the Bronx Zoo alongside the apes and others in 1906. At the behest of Grant, a prominent scientific racist and eugenicist, zoo director Hornaday, placed Ota Benga in a cage with an orangutan and labeled him ‘The Missing Link’ in an attempt to illustrate Darwinism, and in particular that Africans like Ota Benga are closer to apes than were Europeans. Such colonial exhibitions, which include the 1924 British Empire Exhibition and the successful 1931 Paris Exposition coloniale, were doubtlessly a key element of the colonisation project and legitimised the ruthless Scramble for Africa. In the same way, the popular comic-strip The Adventures of Tintin, full of clichés, were an obvious carrier of an ethnocentric and racist ideology, reflecting the masses' consent to the imperialist phenomenon; see Hergé's Tintin in the Congo (1930–1931) or The Broken Ear (1935). While comic-strips played the same role as westerns to legitimise the Indian Wars in the United States, colonial exhibitions were both popular and scientific, being an interface between the crowds and serious scientific research. Thus, anthropologists such as Madison Grant or Alexis Carrel built their pseudoscientific racism, inspired by Gobineau's An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races (1853–1855). Human zoos provided both a real-size laboratory for these racial hypotheses and a demonstration of their validity: by labelling Ota Benga as the ‘missing link’ between apes and Europeans—as was done in the Bronx Zoo—social Darwinism and the pseudo-hierarchy of races were ‘proved’, and the layman could observe this ‘scientific truth.’ 15 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Anthropology Anthropology, the daughter of colonisation, participated in this so-called scientific racism based on social Darwinism by supporting, along with social positivism and scientism, the claims of the superiority of the Western civilisation over ‘primitive cultures’. However, the discovery of ancient cultures would dialectically lead anthropology to criticise itself and revalue the importance of foreign cultures. Thus, the 1897 Punitive Expedition led by the British Admiral Harry Rawson captured, burned, and looted the city of Benin, incidentally bringing to an end the highly sophisticated West African Kingdom of Benin. However, the sack of Benin distributed the famous Benin bronzes and other works of art into the European art market, as the British Admiralty auctioned off the confiscated patrimony to defray costs of the Expedition. Most of the great Benin bronzes went first to purchasers in Germany, though a sizable group remain in the British Museum. The Benin bronzes then catalysed the beginnings of a long reassessment of the value of West African culture, which had strong influences on the formation of modernism. Several contemporary studies have focused on the construction of the racist discourse in the nineteenth century and its propaganda as a precondition of the colonisation project and of the Scramble of Africa, made with total disconcern for the local population, as exemplified by Stanley, according to whom ‘the savage only respects force, power, boldness, and decision.’ Anthropology thrived on these explorations, as had geography before them and ethnology would afterwards. According to several historians, the formulation of this racist discourse and practices would also be a precondition of ‘state racism’ (Michel Foucault) as incarnated by the Holocaust (see also Olivier LeCour Grandmaison's description of the conquest of Algeria and Sven Lindqvist, as well as Hannah Arendt). Extermination of the Namaqua and the Herero Main article: Herero and Namaqua genocide A nineteenth-century caricature of the ‘Hottentot Venus’. Saartje Baartman, a Khoisan woman, was exhibited naked and in a 16 of 22 In 1985, the United Nations' Whitaker Report recognised Germany's turn of the century attempt to exterminate the Herero and Namaqua people of South-West Africa as one of the earliest attempts at genocide in the 20th century. In total, some 65,000 Herero (80% of the total Surviving Herero, emaciated, after Herero population), and 10,000 their escape through the Omaheke Namaqua (50% of the total desert. Namaqua population) were killed between 1904 and 1907. Characteristic of this genocide was death by starvation and the poisoning of the population's wells whilst they were trapped in the Namib Desert. Conclusions 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa During the New Imperialism period, by the end of the century, Europe added almost 9,000,000 square miles (23,000,000 km2) – one-fifth of the land area of the globe – to its overseas colonial possessions. Europe's formal holdings now included the entire African continent except Ethiopia, Liberia, and Saguia el-Hamra, the latter of which would be integrated into Spanish Sahara. Between 1885 and 1914 Britain took nearly 30% of Africa's population under its control; 15% for France, 11% for Portugal, 9% for Germany, 7% for Belgium and 1% for Italy. [citation needed] Nigeria alone contributed 15 million subjects, more than in the whole of French West Africa or the entire German colonial empire. It was paradoxical that Britain, the staunch advocate of free trade, emerged in 1914 with not only the largest overseas empire thanks to its long-standing presence in India, but also the greatest gains in the ‘scramble for Africa’, reflecting its advantageous position at its inception. In terms of surface area occupied, the French were the marginal victors but much of their territory consisted of the sparsely populated Sahara. cage as a sideshow attraction in England, fueling the African Association's indignation. After her death, her genitals were dissected and cast in wax. Nelson Mandela formally requested France to return her remains, which had been kept at the Parisian Musée de l'Homme until 1974. The political imperialism followed the economic expansion, with the ‘colonial lobbies’ bolstering chauvinism and jingoism at each crisis in order to legitimise the colonial enterprise. The tensions between the imperial powers led to a succession of crises, which finally exploded in August 1914, when previous rivalries and alliances created a domino situation that drew the major European nations into the First World War. Austria-Hungary attacked Serbia to avenge the murder by Serbian agents of Austrian crown prince Francis Ferdinand, Russia would mobilise to assist allied Serbia, Germany would intervene to support Austria-Hungary against Russia. Since Russia had a military alliance with France against Germany, the German General Staff, led by General von Moltke decided to realise the well prepared Schlieffen Plan to invade France and quickly knock her out of the war before turning against Russia in what was expected to be a long campaign. This required an invasion of Belgium which brought Britain into the war against Germany, Austria-Hungary and their allies. German U-Boat campaigns against ships bound for Britain eventually drew the United States into what had become World War I. Moreover, using the Anglo-Japanese Alliance as an excuse, Japan leaped onto this opportunity to conquer German interests in China and the Pacific to become the dominating power in Western Pacific, setting the stage for the Second Sino-Japanese War (starting in 1937) and eventually World War II. African colonies listed by colonizing power Belgium Congo Free State and Belgian Congo (today's Democratic Republic of the Congo) Ruanda-Urundi (comprising modern Rwanda and Burundi, 1922–1962) France French West Africa : 17 of 22 French Equatorial Africa : French North Africa : French East Africa : 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mauritania Senegal Albreda (1681–1857, now part of Gambia) French Sudan (now Mali) French Guinea (now Guinea) Ivory Coast Niger French Upper Volta (now Burkina Faso) French Dahomey (now Benin) French Togoland (1916–1960, now Togo) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Gabon French Cameroun (1922–1960) French Congo (now the Republic of the Congo) Oubangi-Chari (now the Central African Republic) Chad French Algeria French Protectorate of Tunisia French Morocco Madagascar Comoros Scattered islands in the Indian Ocean French Somaliland (now Djibouti) French map of Africa c. 1898 with colonial claims. British possessions are in yellow; French possessions in pink; Belgian in orange; German in green; Portuguese in purple; Italian in striped pink; Spanish in striped orange; independent Ethiopia in brown Germany German Kamerun (now Cameroon and part of Nigeria, 1884–1916) German East Africa (now Rwanda, Burundi and most of Tanzania, 1885–1919) German South-West Africa (now Namibia, 1884–1915) German Togoland (now Togo and eastern part of Ghana, 1884–1914) Italy Italian North Africa Italian Libya Italian East Africa Italian Eritrea Italian Somaliland Portugal 18 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Portuguese West Africa (now Angola) Mainland Angola Portuguese Congo (now Cabinda Province of Angola) Portuguese East Africa (now Mozambique) Portuguese Guinea (now Guinea-Bissau) Cape Verde Islands São Tomé e Príncipe São Tomé Island Príncipe Island Fort of São João Baptista de Ajudá (now Ouidah, in Benin) Spain Spanish Sahara (now Western Sahara) Río de Oro Saguia el-Hamra Spanish Morocco Tarfaya Strip Ifni Spanish Guinea (now Equatorial Guinea) Fernando Po Río Muni Annobon United Kingdom The British were primarily interested in maintaining secure communication lines to India, which led to initial interest in Egypt and South Africa. Once these two areas were secure, it was the intent of British colonialists such as Cecil Rhodes to establish a Cape-Cairo railway. It is also important to stress that the United Kingdom had perhaps the most valuable possession in Africa: the Nile. Egypt Anglo-Egyptian Sudan (1899–1956) British Somaliland (now part of Somalia) British East Africa: Kenya Colony Uganda Protectorate Tanzania : Tanganyika Territory (1919–1961) Zanzibar Bechuanaland (now Botswana) Southern Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) Northern Rhodesia (now Zambia) British South Africa South Africa : Transvaal Colony Cape Colony Colony of Natal Orange River Colony South-West Africa (from 1915, now 19 of 22 The Gambia Sierra Leone Nigeria British Togoland (1916–1956, today part of Ghana) Cameroons (1922–1961, now parts of Cameroon and Nigeria) British Gold Coast (now Ghana) Nyasaland (now Malawi) Basutoland (now Lesotho) 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Namibia) Swaziland Independent states Liberia, founded by the American Colonization Society of the United States in 1821; declared independence in 1847 Ethiopian Empire (Abyssinia) had its borders re-drawn with Italian Eritrea briefly occupied by Italy from 1936–1941 during the Abyssinia Crisis; Sudan, independent under Mahdi rule between 1885 and 1899. Dervish State (Somalia) from 1889–1920, they had successfully repulsed the English colony and recaptured a third of the land under the leadership of Mohammed Abdullah Hassan. See also African Atlantis Banana Wars Chronology of colonialism Civilizing mission Decolonization of Africa Impact and evaluation of colonialism and colonization List of Colony and possessions of France List of former sovereign states#Pre-colonial Africa List of largest empires Scientific racism White African References 1. ^ McKay, John P.; Hill, Bennett D.; Buckler, John; Ebrey, Patricia Buckley; Beck, Roger B.; Crowston, Clare Haru; Wiesner-Hanks, Merry E. A History of World Societies: From 1775 to Present (http://books.google.com /books?id=ZLkOVE93dX8C&dq=0312682980& hl=en&ei=8QaRTOr-LJT2swON_62yDg& sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1& ved=0CDYQ6AEwAA) . Eighth edition. Volume C – From 1775 to the Present. (2009). Bedford/St. Martin's (http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/) : Boston/New York. ISBN 978-0-312-68298-9. ISBN 0-312-68298-0. "By 1883 Europe had caught 'African fever,' and the race for territory was on." (McKay 738). 2. ^ R, Robinson, J.Gallagher and A. Denny, Africa and the Victorians, London, 1965, Page. 175. 3. ^ a b Kevin Shillington, History of Africa: 20 of 22 Revised Second Edition, (New York: Macmillian Publishers Limited, 2005), 301 4. ^ "| The Fall of the Asante Empire: The Hundred-Year War For Africa's Gold Coast" (http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0743236386) . Amazon.co.uk. http://www.amazon.co.uk /dp/0743236386. Retrieved 2010-08-08. 5. ^ "The Matabele Campaign: being a narrative of the campaign in suppressing the native rising in Matabeleland and Mashonaland, 1896" (http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/0543848086) . Amazon.co.uk. http://www.amazon.co.uk /dp/0543848086. Retrieved 2010-08-08. 6. ^ "Pan-Africanism and nationalism in West Africa, 1900–1945; a study in ideology and social classes, by J. Ayodele Langley" (http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/2129768) . Catalogue.nla.gov.au. http://catalogue.nla.gov.au /Record/2129768. Retrieved 2010-08-08. 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 7. ^ Lynn Hunt, The Making of the west: volume C, Bedford/ St. Martin 2009 8. ^ Easterly, William (September 17, 2009). "The Imperial Origins of State-Led Development" (http://blogs.nyu.edu/fas/dri/aidwatch/2009/09 /the_imperial_origins_of_statel.html) . New York University Blogs. http://blogs.nyu.edu/fas/dri /aidwatch/2009/09 /the_imperial_origins_of_statel.html. Retrieved 2009-09-23. 9. ^ Alfred von Tirpitz, Erinnerungen (1919), quoted by Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, section on Imperialism, chapter I, part 3 10. ^ a b H.R. Cowie, Imperialism and Race Relations – Revised Edition, Nelson Publishing: Volume 5, 1982 11. ^ German colonial imperialism: a late and short-term phenomenon (http://www.paris4.sorbonne.fr/fr/IMG /pdf/navette-7.pdf) (PDF) by Bernard Poloni, in ‘Imperialism, hegemony, leadership’, March 26, 2004 Conference in the Sorbonne University, Paris (French) 12. ^ Enrico Corradini, Report to the First Nationalist Congress: Florence, December 3, 1919. 13. ^ S. Gertrude Millin, Rhodes, London, 1933, p.138 14. ^ Bourne, Henry Richard Fox (1903). Civilisation in Congoland: A Story of International Wrong-doing (http://books.google.com /?id=jWccAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA1& dq=%22Civilisation+in+Congoland%22#PPR3, M1) . London: P. S. King & Son. p. 253. http://books.google.com /?id=jWccAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA1& dq=%22Civilisation+in+Congoland%22#PPR3, M1. Retrieved 2007-09-26. 15. ^ Forbath, Peter (1977). The River Congo: The Discovery, Exploration and Exploitation of the World's Most Dramatic Rivers. [Harper & Row]. p. 374. ISBN 0-06-122490-1. 16. ^ The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com /books/98/08/30/daily/leopold-book-review.html. 17. ^ Hochschild p. 226–232 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa 18. ^ http://www.urome.be/fr2/reflexions /casemrepo.pdf 19. ^ Vansina, Jan (1966). Paths in the Rainforest. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. p. 239. 20. ^ Hochschild, Adam (1998). King Leopold's Ghost. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. pp. 280–281. 21. ^ Coquéry-Vidrovitch, Catherine (1971). Le Congo au temps des grandes compagnies concessionaires 1898–1930. Paris: Mouton. p. 195. 22. ^ L'Aventure Humaine: Le canal de Suez, Article de l'historien Uwe Oster (http://www.arte.tv /fr/connaissance-decouverte/aventure-humaine /Cette_20semaine/1291022.html) . 23. ^ BBC News website:The Suez Crisis — Key maps (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east /5195068.stm) . 24. ^ Kevin Shillington, Encyclopedia of African history, (CRC Press: 2005), p.1406. 25. ^ I.M. Lewis, The modern history of Somaliland: from nation to state, (Weidenfeld & Nicolson: 1965), p. 78 26. ^ Thomas P. Ofcansky, Historical dictionary of Ethiopia, (The Scarecrow Press, Inc.: 2004), p.405 27. ^ Samatar, Said Sheikh (1982). Oral Poetry and Somali Nationalism. Cambridge University Press. pp. 131 & 135. ISBN 0521238331. 28. ^ John A. Hobson, Imperialism, 1902, p.61 (quoted by Arendt) 29. ^ From human zoos to colonial apotheoses: the era of exhibiting the Other (http://www.africultures.com/anglais /articles_anglais/43blanchard.htm) , by Pascal Blanchard, Nicolas Bancel, and Sandrine Lemaire 30. ^ ‘These human zoos of the Colonial Republic’ (http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2000/08 /BANCEL/14145.html) , Le Monde diplomatique, August 2000, (French) (Translation (http://mondediplo.com/2000/08/07humanzoo) (English)) 31. ^ "February 2003, the end of an era" (http://www.discoverparis.net /newsletter.html?insight=3162983825694464) . Discoverparis.net. http://www.discoverparis.net /newsletter.html?insight=3162983825694464. Retrieved 2010-08-08. Further reading Arendt, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism (1951, second section on imperialism) ISBN 0-15-670153-7 Sections of The Age of Empire Eric Hobsbawm 21 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Scramble for Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa Lindqvist, Sven. Exterminate All the Brutes (Utrota varenda jävel, 1992) Pakenham, Thomas. The Scramble for Africa. Abacus, 1991 ISBN 0-349-10449-2 Maria Petringa. Brazza, A Life for Africa. AuthorHouse, 2006. ISBN 978-1-4259-1198-0 Rodney, Walter. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L'Ouverture Publications, London and Tanzanian Publishing House, Dar-Es-Salaam 1973. Primm, JT. ‘Causes/Effects of Imperialism’ DK Publications, 1999. Wesseling, Henk Divide and Rule. The Partition of Africa, 1880–1914. Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1996 (Translation of Verdeel en Heers: De Deling van Afrika, 1880–1914. 1991) External links Belgium exhumes its colonial demons (http://www.guardian.co.uk/print /0,3858,4460659-103681,00.html) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa" Categories: 19th century in Africa | 19th century in international relations | 20th century in international relations | European colonisation in Africa | Geopolitical rivalry | History of Africa | History of international relations | New Imperialism This page was last modified on 27 April 2011 at 04:38. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. 22 of 22 5/5/11 11:46 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa Decolonization of Africa From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The decolonization of Africa followed World War II as colonized peoples agitated for independence and colonial powers withdrew their administrators from Africa.[1] Contents 1 Background 2 Causes 3 Timeline 4 See also 5 Notes 6 References 7 External links Background Main article: Scramble for Africa During the Scramble for Africa in the late nineteenth century, European powers divided Africa and its resources into political partitions at the Berlin Conference of 1884-85. By 1905, African soil was almost completely controlled by European governments, with the only exceptions being Liberia (which had been settled by African-American former slaves) and Ethiopia (which had successfully resisted colonization by Italy). Britain and France had the largest holdings, but Germany, Spain, Italy, Belgium, and Portugal also had colonies. As a result of colonialism and imperialism, Africa suffered long term effects, such as the loss of important natural resources like gold and rubber, economic devastation, cultural confusion, geopolitical division, and political subjugation. [citation needed] Europeans often justified this using the concept of the White Man's Burden, an obligation to "civilize" the peoples of Africa. Causes World War II saw the colonies help their colonial masters 1 of 8 Cecil Rhodes: Cape-Cairo railway project. Founder of the De Beers Mining Company, one of the first diamond companies, Rhodes 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa was also the owner of the British South fight against an unknown enemy, but with no mention of independence for African nations. Future Prime Ministers Africa Company, which carved out Rhodesia Henrik Verwoerd and B.J. Vorster of South Africa for itself. He wanted to "paint the map supported Adolf Hitler while most French colonial [British] red," and once famously declared: governors loyally supported the Vichy government until "all of these stars... these vast worlds that 1943. German wartime propaganda had a part in this remain out of reach. If I could, I would defiance of British rule. Imperial Japan's conquests in the annex other planets."[2] Far East caused a shortage of raw materials such as rubber and various minerals. Africa was therefore forced to compensate for this shortage and greatly benefited from this change. Another key problem the Europeans faced were the U-boats patrolling the Atlantic Ocean. This reduced the amount of raw materials being transported to Europe and prompted the creation of local industries in Africa. Local industries in turn caused the creation of new towns, and existing towns doubled in size. As urban community and industry grew so did trade unions. In addition to trade unions, urbanization brought about increased literacy, which allowed for pro-independence newspapers. On February 12th 1941, United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill met to discuss the postwar world. The result was the Atlantic Charter. One of the provisions, introduced by Roosevelt, was the autonomy of imperial colonies. After World War II, the US and the African colonies put pressure on Britain to abide by the terms of the Atlantic Charter. When Winston Churchill introduced the Charter to Parliament, he purposely mistranslated the colonies to be recently captured countries by Germany in order to get it passed. After the war, the British still considered their African colonies as "children" and "immature"; they introduced democratic government only at the local levels. By the 1930s, the colonial powers had cultivated a small elite of leaders educated in Western universities and familiar with ideas such as self-determination. These leaders, including leading nationalists such as Jomo Kenyatta (Kenya); Kwame Nkrumah (Gold Coast, now Ghana); Senghor (Senegal); and Félix Houphouët-Boigny (Côte d'Ivoire), came to lead the struggles for independence. Timeline The "colonial power" and "colonial name" columns are merged when required to denote territories, where current countries are established, that have not been decolonized, but achieved independence in different way. Dates of independence of African countries 2 of 8 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa African countries in order of independence Country[3] Ethiopia establishment as the Kingdom of Aksum Liberia American Commonwealth Colonization of Liberia Society Libya Libya Egypt 3 of 8 Colonial name Colonial power[4] Independence date[5] Egypt Italy; Britain/France War for First head of independence state 4th century BC Menelik I - July 26, 1847 Joseph Jenkins Roberts - December 24, 1951 Idris - Britain 1922/1936/1953 n/a Urabi Revolt, Suez Crisis - Sudan Sudan Britain Ismail January 1, 1956 al-Azhari Tunisia Tunisia France Muhammad March 20, 1956 VIII al-Amin - Morocco Protectorate of Morocco France/Spain [6] April 7, 1956 Mohammed V Rif War, Ifni War Kwame Nkrumah - Ghana Gold Coast Britain/Germany;[7] Britain March 6, 1957 Guinea French West Africa France October 2, 1958 Sékou Touré - Cameroon Cameroun Germany; France/Britain January 1, 1960[8] Ahmadou Ahidjo UPC rebellion Senegal French West Africa France April 4, 1960 Léopold Senghor - 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Togo French Togoland Germany; France April 27, 1960 Sylvanus Olympio Mali French West Africa France June 20, 1960 Modibo Keita - Madagascar Malagasy Protectorate France June 26, 1960 Philibert Tsiranana Malagasy Uprising June 30, 1960 Joseph Kasa-Vubu Congo Crisis Britain Italy June 26, 1960 July 1, 1960 Muhammad Haji Ibrahim Egal Aden Abdullah Osman Daar Hubert Maga - DR Congo Belgian Congo Belgium - Somalia British Somaliland Italian Somaliland Benin French West Africa France August 1, 1960[10] Niger French West Africa France August 3, 1960 Hamani Diori - Burkina Faso Upper Volta France Maurice August 5, 1960 Yaméogo - France Félix HouphouëtAugust 7, 1960 Boigny - France August 11, 1960 François Tombalbaye - France August 13, 1960 David Dacko - France August 15, 1960 Fulbert Youlou - France August 17, 1960 Léon M'ba - Britain October 1, 1960 Nnamdi Azikiwe [11] [9] Côte d'Ivoire Côte d'Ivoire Chad French Equatorial Africa Central African Republic French Equatorial Africa Congo French Equatorial Africa Gabon French Equatorial Africa Nigeria 4 of 8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa Nigeria - 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mauritania French West Africa Sierra Leone Sierra Leone South Africa South Africa November 28, 1960 Moktar Ould Daddah - Britain April 27, 1961 Milton Margai - Britain 1910/1931 /1961[12] n/a - Germany; Britain Britain December 9, 1961 December 10, 1963 Julius Nyerere Jamshid ibn Abdullah - France Tanzania Tanganyika Zanzibar Rwanda Ruanda-Urundi Germany; Belgium July 1, 1962 Grégoire Kayibanda - Ruanda-Urundi Germany; Belgium July 1, 1962 Mwambutsa IV - Algeria Algeria France July 3, 1962 Ahmed Ben Bella Algerian War of Independence Uganda British East Africa Britain October 9, 1962 Milton Obote - Kenya British East Africa Britain December 12, 1963 Jomo Kenyatta Mau Mau Uprising Britain July 6, 1964 Hastings Kamuzu Banda - Britain October 24, 1964 Kenneth Kaunda - Britain February 18, 1965 Dawda Kairaba Jawara - Seretse Khama - [13] Burundi Malawi Nyasaland Zambia Northern Rhodesia The Gambia Gambia Botswana Bechuanaland Britain September 30, 1966 Lesotho Basutoland Britain Leabua October 4, 1966 Jonathan - Britain March 12, 1968 - Britain September 6, 1968 Mauritius Swaziland 5 of 8 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa Swaziland Sobhuza II - 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa Equatorial Guinea Spanish Guinea Spain October 12, 1968 GuineaBissau Portuguese Guinea September 24, 1973 Mozambique also known as Portuguese Mozambique East Africa Portugal Portugal June 25, 1975 Francisco Macías Nguema - Luis Cabral Guinea-Bissau War of Independence Samora Machel Mozambican War of Independence Cape Verde Portugal July 5, 1975 influenced by Guinea-Bissau War of Independence Comoros France July 6, 1975 - São Tomé and Príncipe Portugal July 12, 1975 - November 11, 1975 Agostinho Neto Angolan War of Independence June 29, 1976 James Richard Marie Mancham - Rhodesian Bush War Angola Angola (also known as Portuguese West Africa) Seychelles Portugal Britain Djibouti French Somaliland France June 27, 1977 Hassan Gouled Aptidon Zimbabwe Southern Rhodesia Britain April 18, 1980 Canaan Banana Germany; South Africa March 21, 1990[14] Namibian War of Sam Nujoma Independence Namibia Eritrea South West Africa Eritrea Italy; Britain; Ethiopia May 24, 1993 Isaias Afewerki Eritrean War of Independence 1 The Spanish colonial rule de facto terminated over the Western Sahara (then Rio de Oro), when the territory was passed on[citation needed] to and partitioned between Mauritania and Morocco (which 6 of 8 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa annexed the entire territory in 1979), rendering the declared independence of the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic ineffective to the present day (it controls only a small portion east of the Moroccan Wall). Since Spain did not have the right to give away Western Sahara,[citation needed] under international law de jure the territory is still under Spanish administration.[citation needed] However, the de facto administrator is Morocco (see United Nations list of Non-Self-Governing Territories). See also Colonialism Decolonization Scramble for Africa Wars of national liberation Year of Africa Notes 1. ^ Birmingham, David (1995). The Decolonization of Africa. Routledge. ISBN 1857285409. 2. ^ S. Gertrude Millin, Rhodes, London, 1933, p.138 3. ^ Timeline list arranged according to current countries. Explanatory notes are added in cases where decolonization was achieved jointly or where the current state is formed by merger of previously decolonized states. 4. ^ Some territories changed hands multiple times, so in the list is mentioned the last colonial power. In addition to it the mandatory or trustee powers are mentioned for territories that were League of Nations mandates and UN Trust Territories. 5. ^ Date of decolonization for territories annexed by or integrated into previously decolonized independent countries are given in separate notes. 6. ^ Cape Juby was ceded by Spain to Morocco on 2 April 1958. Ifni was returned from Spain to Morocco on 4 January 1969. 7. ^ The British Togoland mandate and trust territory was integrated into Gold Coast colony on 13 December 1956. 8. ^ After the French Cameroun mandate and trust territory gained independence it was joined by part of the British Cameroons mandate and trust territory on October 1, 1961. The other part of British Cameroons joined Nigeria. 9. ^ British Somaliland shortly after gaining independence merged with Italian Somaliland when it got independence as Somalia. 10. ^ Independent Benin unilaterally annexed Portuguese São João Batista de Ajuda in 1961. 11. ^ Part of the British Cameroons mandate and trust territory on October 1, 1961 joined Nigeria. The other part of British Cameroons joined the previously decolonized French Cameroun mandate and territory. 12. ^ South Africa was under apartheid regime until elections resulting from the negotiations to end apartheid in South Africa on 27 April 1994 when Nelson Mandela became president. 13. ^ After both gained independence Tanganyika and Zanzibar merged on 26 April 1964 14. ^ Sovereignty over Walvis Bay and the Penguin Islands was formally transferred to Namibia on 28 February 1994 References Michael Crowder, The Story of Nigeria, Faber and Faber, London, 1978 (1962) Understanding Contemporary Africa, April A. Gordon and Donald L. Gordon, Lynne Riener, 7 of 8 5/5/11 11:47 AM Decolonization of Africa - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa London, 1996 Vincent B. Khapoya, The African Experience, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1998 (1994) Ali A. Mazrui ed. General History of Africa, vol. VIII, UNESCO, 1993 Kevin Shillington, History of Africa, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1995 (1989) External links Africa: 50 years of independence (http://www.english.rfi.fr/africa/20100212-africa-50-yearsindependence) Radio France Internationale in English "Winds of Change or Hot Air? Decolonization and the Salt Water Test" (http://www.legalfrontiers.ca/2010/11/winds-of-change-or-hot-air-decolonization-and-thesalt-water-test/) Legal Frontiers International Law Blog Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decolonization_of_Africa" Categories: Colonialism | History of Africa | History of colonialism | European colonisation in Africa This page was last modified on 1 May 2011 at 01:54. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. 8 of 8 5/5/11 11:47 AM