Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Revolutionary Politics: Mexico I. Backdrop: from Tumult to “Order & Progress” (1821-1910) II. The Mexican Revolution (1910-1940) III. Theories of Revolution and the Mexican Revolution IV. The PRI & the Mexican “Miracle” (1940-1982) I. Backdrop: from Tumult to “Order & Progress” Political Instability (1821-76) • 75 changes in the chief executive in 55 years – 4 interim or provisional presidents for every 1 president chosen constitutionally • regional warlords (caudillos) resisted national authority when they were not fighting to gain control of the government • bitter conflict over church-state relations – liberals (led by Juarez) want a secular state – conservatives back the Catholic Church • French invasion & occupation (1861-67) defeated militarily, thus paving way for a return to electoral politics – Porfirio Díaz is hero of the 1862 victory at Puebla The Porfiriato (1876-1911): • authoritarian modernization under Díaz – establish order via strong-arm tactics – work to build infrastructure & attract foreign capital in commodity exports • GDP growth rate is 2x population growth – railroads expand from 400mi to 15,000mi. – mining & oil extraction welcomed – 1883 land law led to massive concentration • most smallholders lost their land • 134 million acres of fertile land titled to approximately 300 families • middle class kept out of politics – Díaz controlled politics through fraud & repression from 1884 onward – no cabinet members under 60 by 1910 – his friends grew rich in cabinet & as state governors • many more landless peasants than ever before – the end to traditional communal lands (ejidos) left many at brink of starvation and many more w/ no path out of poverty • these 2 forces will push Díaz into exile by 1911… II. The Mexican Revolution (1910-1940) The Civil War (1910-1920) • 2 revolutions fought simultaneously & violently – POLITICAL: “no reelection”(Francisco Madero) – SOCIAL: “land for all”(Emiliano Zapata) • → social, not socialist • Zapata wants traditional ejido lands returned • a series of bloody conflicts led by different leaders in different regions at different times • roughly 1 in 10 Mexicans died in the conflict Constitution of 1917: • • re: POLITICAL REVOLUTION: – U.S. system w/o reelection & w/ strong president re: SOCIAL JUSTICE: – land reform – labor laws – government ownership of natural resources The Rise of Plutarco Calles (1920-34) • More moderate generals become presidents: – Alvaro Obregón (1920-24) – Plutarco Calles (1924-28) – Obregón assassinated after reelection in 1928 • PNR established in 1929: – elite, cadre party w/ PEC as “jefe máximo” • Calles is the key figure behind the PNR candidates – effort to avoid future assassinations & strife Lázaro Cárdenas(1934-40) • Mobilized & organized masses (incl. “militia”) • SOCIOECONOMIC REFORMS: – land reform – wage hikes & union rights – social services – nationalization of oil & railroads • MASS PARTY created: – PNR becomes PRM w/ CNC, CTM, military, & “popular” branches • w/ diverse support & conflicting policy priorities • PRESIDENT rules, uses dedazo to pick successor, & steps down III. Theories of Revolution & the Mexican Revolution Q: Which of these theories applies to this revolution? IV. The PRI & The Mexican “Miracle” (1940-82) CORPORATISM: • • inclusive cooptation selective coercion PATRON-CLIENTELISM: • the PRI ties access to resources to support for the government EXECUTIVE CENTRALISM: • President can remove governors • has majority w/in a weak legislature • approves all PRI candidates IV. (cont.) “PENDULUM” THEORY: • if you stay in, your ideological wing will get its shot... Pendulum Politics in Mexico STATE CAPITALISM: • • state control over key resources & sectors along w/ protectionism led several importsubstituting industrialization (ISI) successes: – 6% average annual GDP growth for 40 years – low inflation during 1941-1970 NEGATIVE SIDE of Mexican “miracle”: – rising inequality & continuing absolute poverty