* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION AND GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION IN
Overexploitation wikipedia , lookup
Habitat conservation wikipedia , lookup
Biodiversity action plan wikipedia , lookup
Animal genetic resources for food and agriculture wikipedia , lookup
Island restoration wikipedia , lookup
Community fingerprinting wikipedia , lookup
Biogeography wikipedia , lookup
Ecological fitting wikipedia , lookup
Decline in amphibian populations wikipedia , lookup
JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, 21(4): 1007–1013, 2001 INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION AND GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION IN IDOTEA BALTHICA (ISOPODA: VALVIFERA) J. P. Wares University of New Mexico, Department of Biology, Castetter Hall, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-1091, U.S.A. ([email protected]) A B S T R A C T There is often more genetic diversity in a given ecosystem than is represented by current taxonomy. Historical patterns of isolation among populations play an important role in studying the variation in behavior, habitat, and other ecological interactions among different populations of a species or species group. Idotea balthica (Isopoda: Valvifera) is a common intertidal grazer of the North Atlantic which has been well-studied in Europe for intraspecific differentiation. Using DNA sequence data from a mitochondrial protein-coding gene (cytochrome c oxidase I), I studied the relationships among different populations of I. balthica in European and American coastal populations. It is apparent that there are at least three historically isolated populations of I. balthica on the North American coast, while the European Atlantic coast contains populations that are closely related to each other and to one of the North American populations. It appears that populations of I. balthica on the North American coast represent both recently arrived colonists from Europe as well as populations which have survived recent glacial maxima. With the advent of molecular techniques it has become apparent that there is often more biological diversity in a given ecosystem than is represented by current taxonomy (e.g., Henry, 1994; Foltz et al., 1996; Bastrop et al., 1998). Even brief periods of population isolation may permit rapid differentiation of various mating recognition mechanisms such as mating calls (Henry, 1994) or gamete recognition proteins (Metz and Palumbi, 1996; Hellberg, 1998; Pernet, 1999). These historical patterns of isolation among populations play an important role in studying the variation in behavior, habitat, and other ecological interactions (Travis, 1996) among different populations of a species or species group. The Valviferan isopod Idotea balthica (Pallas, 1772) is a common intertidal grazer of the North Atlantic which has been well-studied in Europe for intraspecific differentiation (Bulnheim and Fava, 1982; Legrand-Hamelin and Legrand, 1982a, b; Bulnheim, 1984) and the ecological significance of color polymorphisms (e.g., Salemaa, 1978; Guarino et al., 1993; Jormalainen et al., 1995; Merilaita, 1998). While I. balthica tends to be competitively displaced by congeneric grazers on European shorelines (Franke and Janke, 1998), it is a dominant grazer on the North American coast where it may be found feeding on a different suite of macroalgae and sea- grasses than in Europe (J. P. Wares, personal observation). The diet of I. balthica includes both rocky intertidal macroalgae (Shacklock and Croft, 1981; Schaffelke et al., 1995) and other algae and grasses (Robertson and Mann, 1980). There are undoubtedly both ecological and historical foundations for the geographic variation in dominance and diet of I. balthica (Endler, 1982; Travis, 1996). In particular, this system is of interest because of the changes in community composition of the North American Atlantic coast due to Pleistocene glaciation (Pratt and Schlee, 1969; Smith et al., 1998; Holder et al., 1999). Populations of species found in the rocky intertidal of New England and the Canadian Maritimes must be derived from refugial populations in Europe, the mid-Atlantic coast of North America, and a small portion of eastern Canada north of the glacial margin (Dyke and Prest, 1987; Ingólfsson, 1992; Wares, 2000). Studying the pattern of population recolonization in I. balthica invites comparisons to the current and historical distributions of its habitat and competitor species, allowing a better description of the ecology of this species. Using DNA sequence data from a mitochondrial protein-coding gene (cytochrome c oxidase I), the relationships among different populations of I. balthica in European and 1007 1008 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 4, 2001 American coastal populations were analyzed. The primary goal of this study was to determine whether or not the populations of I. balthica in the North Atlantic represent a single panmictic population. The alternative finding, that there are populations which have been historically isolated, may indicate that the amount of morphological and ecological diversity found in this species is partly attributable to localized adaptation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Specimens of I. balthica, I. metallica Bosc, 1802, I. granulosa Rathke, 1834, and I. emarginata Fabricius, 1793, were collected from intertidal sites listed in Table 1. The congeneric taxa were used for outgroup rooting. All species were identified using key morphological characters described in Hayward and Ryland (1995) and Gosner (1978). Individual specimens were placed in 95% ethanol or DMSO buffer (0.25M EDTA pH 8.0, 20% DMSO, saturated NaCl, Seutin et al., 1991) immediately. DNA Extraction and Amplification DNA was phenol-extracted from each specimen following the protocol in Hillis et al. (1996). PCR amplification of a portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) protein-coding gene was performed using the primers LCO1490 5′-ggtcaacaaatcataaagatattgg-3′ and HCO2198 5′-taaacttcagggtgaccaaaaaatca-3′ from Folmer et al. (1994). Amplification took place in 50-µl reactions containing 10–100 ng DNA template, 0.02 mM of each primer, 5 µl Promega 10× polymerase buffer, 0.8 mM dNTPs (Pharmacia Biotech), and 1 u Taq polymerase (Promega). A Perkin-Elmer 480 thermocycler with a temperature profile of 94° (60 sec)–40° (90 sec)–72° (150 sec) for 40 cycles was used. Double-stranded PCR products were purified using Promega (Madison, Wisconsin) Wizard PCR preps and resuspended in 30 µl ddH2O. The template was cyclesequenced using BigDyes fluorescently labeled dideoxy terminators according to manufacturer’s recommended conditions (Perkin-Elmer). Unincorporated dideoxynucleotides were removed by gel filtration using Sephadex G-25 (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri). The products were then electrophoresed on an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer. All DNA samples were sequenced completely in both directions using PCR primers. Sequence data was aligned and edited for ambiguities using complementary fragments in Sequencher 3.0 (GeneCodes Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts). No gaps or poorly aligned regions existed in the sequence alignment. Consensus sequences were exported as a NEXUS file for subsequent analysis using PAUP* 4.0b4a (Swofford, 1998). Phylogenetic Analysis Characters that were missing or ambiguous were removed from the analysis. A heuristic search for the set of most-parsimonious trees was performed in PAUP* 4.0b4a. These trees were used to estimate starting parameters for additional maximum-likelihood (ML) analysis. Starting trees were obtained via stepwise addition, with simple addition sequence. Tree-bisection-reconnection was used for branch swapping, and branches were collapsed if the maximum branch length was zero. Table 1. Location of intertidal sites from which specimens of Idotea were collected for this study. The sample size of individuals sequenced from each population is also indicated; not all sequence data is included in Fig. 1 for clarity, as many of the sequences were identical. Location Gloucester Point, Virginia Beavertail State Park, Rhode Island Damariscotta, Maine Antigonish, Nova Scotia Reykjavik, Iceland Galway, Ireland Roscoff, France Helgoland, Germany Species Collected (n) I. balthica (5) I. balthica (1) I. I. I. I. I. I. I. I. balthica (10) balthica (7) balthica (5), emarginata (1) balthica (5), granulosa (1) balthica (7) metallica (4) Maximum-likelihood analysis of these data was then performed in PAUP* 4.0b4a, using the best-fit model (see Felsenstein, 1988; Goldman, 1993; Cunningham et al., 1998). ModelTest (Posada and Crandall, 1998) was used to determine the best-fit model for likelihood analysis; likelihood ratio tests were used to generate the statistical fit of each model to the data. Support for clades within the ML tree was estimated using maximum parsimony bootstrapping (1,000 replicates). Likelihood-ratio tests (Felsenstein, 1988; Goldman, 1993) were used to test that the data collected were consistent with a constant-rate Poisson-distributed process of substitution (molecular clock model). First, the ML phylogeny was estimated using the best-fit model only, then this estimate was repeated under constraint of the molecular clock model. These estimates were used to calculate the likelihood-ratio test statistic δ = 2[ln(Lo) – ln(L1)], with (n – 1) d.f. where n is the number of taxa in the tree. RESULTS A total of 419 nucleotides of mtDNA sequence data were collected from the specimens listed in Table 1. Sequence data may be accessed in GenBank (AF241889– 241935). Of this data set, 288 characters are constant, 36 are autapomorphic, and 95 are parsimony-informative. Base composition for this fragment was AT-biased (A: 0.209, C: 0.181, G: 0.239, T: 0.371). ModelTest (Posada and Crandall, 1998) indicated that HKY + Γ is the best-fit model for these data, and it was chosen for all subsequent analyses. Maximum-likelihood analysis of these data produced the phylogeny in Fig. 1. The estimated transition : transversion ratio was 24.8, and the Gamma shape parameter α = 0.101. These data reject the molecular clock model (δ = 530.95, P < 0.001). Parsimony analysis produced topologically identical phylogenies to ML, so maximum parsimony was used as WARES: GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION IN IDOTEA BALTHICA the criterion for bootstrap analysis (1,000 replicates) of this data set in the interest of saving computational time. Bootstrap support is very strong for several geographically distinct clades in this phylogeny (Fig. 1). For example, all individuals of I. balthica collected in Virginia form a distinct clade, as do the individuals collected in Iceland. Another clade nested within I. balthica contains two individuals collected in Nova Scotia; this clade and the Virginia clade are well-supported sister clades. All other haplotypes found in North America are closely related or identical to individuals collected throughout western Europe, and all individuals identified morphologically as I. balthica comprise a clade with 100% bootstrap support (Fig. 1), suggesting that initial identification was not in error. While it is apparent that the genetic relationships among the clades of North American I. balthica populations represent a series of historical discontinuities in gene flow, the separations are too large to suggest that any clade is ancestral to another. The outgroup taxa are all quite divergent from I. balthica and each other. Based on HKY (transitions weighted greater than transversions) calculated distances, the four species in this study are 17–25% divergent from each other at this locus (Table 2). Precise estimates of the actual time of divergence based on a taxon-specific molecular clock are not available, but estimates of divergence in the COI gene fragment have been calibrated in other species to about 2% divergence per million years (for review see Knowlton and Weigt, 1998; Wares, 2000). This divergencerate estimate suggests that diversification of these taxa was probably in the Miocene and took place within the North Atlantic prior to the trans-Arctic Interchange 3.5 million years ago (Vermeij, 1991; Cunningham and Collins, 1998). Diversification of the I. balthica populations, however, encompasses only 2.5– 4.7% sequence change (Table 2), suggesting that North American populations diverged in the Pleistocene. DISCUSSION Studies of historical relationships among populations require that long-range dispersal events are relatively infrequent, so that the genetic signal may be used to estimate the timing of divergence (Nielsen and Slatkin, 1009 2000). Long-range dispersal events are probably rare in I. balthica because this genus broods its offspring. However, I. balthica is frequently found rafting on mats of drift algae (Tully and O’Ceidigh, 1986, 1987; Tuomi et al., 1988; Ingólfsson, 1995). This appears to be a primary mechanism of dispersal and recolonization of populations affected by cold winters and sea ice (Locke and Corey, 1989), and individuals have occasionally been found on drifting mats of algae hundreds of kilometers off the shore of Iceland (Ingólfsson, 1995). Even near shore, some studies have shown that I. balthica tends to be found in marginal driftweed habitats (Naylor, 1955; Franke and Janke, 1998). Thus, while dispersal distances may tend to be low for each generation it seems that there is a capacity for long-range dispersal over geologic time. The phylogeographic pattern found in this study supports this conclusion. It is apparent that there are at least three historically isolated populations of I. balthica on the North American coast, while the European Atlantic coast contains populations that are closely related to each other and to one of the North American populations. The North American populations, separated by genetic distances of 2.5–4.7%, have been isolated from each other since well before the most recent glacial maximum (~20 kya, Holder et al., 1999), based on the mtDNA sequence data presented here. This Pleistocene separation of populations is easily explained by focusing on glacial refugia, which seem to be found south of the glacial margin in both North America and Europe, and also in Newfoundland and Iceland (Dyke and Prest, 1987; Holder et al., 1999). The genetically distinct populations from Virginia, Nova Scotia, Iceland, and mainland Europe may represent historical isolates which have survived many of the Pleistocene glacial maxima. Recent dispersal events have connected European and North American populations in the amphi-Atlantic group (Fig. 1); although eastward dispersal might be predicted based on the directionality of the Gulf Stream and North Atlantic Drift currents, patterns of haplotype diversity and genealogical signal indicate that post-glacial expansion from Europe is more likely (Wares, 2000). The geographically isolated populations of I. balthica in this study do not appear to be misidentified congeners. The genetic diver- 1010 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 4, 2001 Fig. 1. ML phylogeny of Idotea individuals in this study, using the HKY + Γ model. All members of divergent clades (Iceland, Nova Scotia, and Virginia) are present, but some identical DNA sequences have been pruned from the basal amphi-Atlantic group for clarity. This tree does not fit the molecular clock model (P < 0.001). Numbers below branches indicate bootstrap support from 1,000 MP replicates. WARES: GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION IN IDOTEA BALTHICA 1011 Table 2. Genetic distances between populations of I. balthica and congeneric species in this study. Populations are delineated according to the cladistic structure in Fig. 1. Amphi-Atlantic population represents the basal cluster of I. balthica which are found in both European and American collection localities. Distances were calculated using the HKY model in PAUP* 4.0b4a (Swofford, 1998). Amphi-Atlantic Virginia Iceland Nova Scotia I. metallica I. granulosa I. emarginata Amphi-Atlantic Virginia Iceland Nova Scotia I. metallica I. granulosa I. emarginata 0.002 0.041 0.010 0.047 0.213 0.222 0.172 0.004 0.044 0.025 0.206 0.255 0.189 0.002 0.046 0.215 0.222 0.178 0.00 0.219 0.243 0.181 0.00 0.246 0.187 n/a 0.215 n/a gences among these populations are still lower than those among other Idotea species (Table 2), and these populations identified as I. balthica form a monophyletic clade (Fig. 1). This is important, as the North American endemic species I. phosphorea Harger, 1828, was not available for analysis; genetic similarity between populations of I. phosphorea and isolated populations of I. balthica could suggest mitochondrial introgression. There is no evidence for introgression of I. metallica, another North American species, however. The specimens of I. metallica from the North Sea are clearly divergent from I. balthica, and permanent European populations have only recently been established from North American source populations (Franke et al., 1999), though dispersal from North America via the Gulf Stream may be common (Naylor, 1955). A large amount of morphological and genetic diversity has been described for I. balthica in European populations (Bulnheim and Fava, 1982; Legrand-Hamelin and Legrand, 1982b; Bulnheim, 1984). This includes subspecific populations in the Adriatic Sea (I. b. basteri Audouin, 1826), North Sea (I. b. triscuspidata Audouin, 1826), and Baltic Sea (I. b. baltica), which are all distinct based on allozyme data (Bulnheim, 1984). The genus is also considered to be diverse and is distributed worldwide (Brusca, 1984; Rafi and Laubitz, 1990), although Idotea may contain many species which actually belong to other Valviferan genera (Poore and Lew Ton, 1993). It should not be assumed that the diverse ecological and morphological characters found in this species, and in this genus, are simply due to labile development and ecological parameters. This study illustrates that there may often be unrecognized populations within a species that have been historically isolated from one another. Isolation among populations will also generate variation in morphological and life-history traits, and more molecular data may continue to indicate the importance of historical isolation on producing variation within and among species. For example, many of the polymorphic characters used to define subspecies may be genetically sex-linked (Legrand-Hamelin and Legrand, 1982a, b), and these characters also influence habitat choices via predator avoidance (Jormalainen and Tuomi, 1989; Merilaita and Jormalainen, 1997). Variable predation on different color morphs is the most promising explanation for the maintenance of color polymorphism (Jormalainen et al., 1995), and these color morphs actually change in frequency following seasonal changes in substrate composition (Guarino et al., 1993). Populations that are historically isolated in different geographic locations may develop different patterns of response to local predators and algal communities; this hypothesis has not been tested with direct reference to populations that are known to be historically isolated. However, other species seem to share this pattern of divergence. Dahlgren et al. (2000) report a highly differentiated allele found in Nova Scotia populations of the quahog Arctica islandica (Linnaeus, 1767), and Chopin et al. (1996) indicate that the red alga Chondrus crispus also has a genetically divergent population in Nova Scotia. The fact that I. balthica is commonly found grazing on Chondrus in North American populations, and the concordance of these population divergences, suggests that historical isolation due to Pleistocene glaciation has certainly played a role in genetically structuring many North American populations. In conclusion, history and ecology appear to be intimately intertwined in I. balthica. 1012 JOURNAL OF CRUSTACEAN BIOLOGY, VOL. 21, NO. 4, 2001 There appear to be distinct grazing habits and patterns of color polymorphism among different populations of this species. While most of this variation may be attributed to varying availability of algal habitat or the geographic distribution of congeneric competitors (Shacklock and Croft, 1981; Shacklock and Doyle, 1983; Salemaa, 1987; Schaffelke et al., 1995), there are also historical discontinuities among populations of I. balthica, signified by the genetic differentiation in this study. Any of these factors may interact in promoting ecological diversification. Further studies of the ecology and evolution of I. balthica must consider the historical isolation of populations within the North Atlantic. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thanks go to Cliff W. Cunningham who supported this molecular work, V. A. Miller for technical assistance, E. Sotka, H. D. Franke, J. E. Duffy, L. Watling, and R. Wetzer for assistance in obtaining and identifying specimens as well as valuable discussions of Idoteid ecology. T. H. Oakley, R. Wetzer, M. J. Hickerson, E. Naylor, and two anonymous reviewers provided helpful suggestions for improving this manuscript. J.P.W. was financially supported by Sigma Xi, a National Science Foundation Dissertation Improvement Grant, and NSF research grant DEB-96-15461 (C. W. Cunningham). LITERATURE CITED Bastrop, R., K. Jurss, and C. Sturmbauer. 1998. Cryptic species in a marine polychaete and their independent introduction from North America to Europe.—Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 97–103. Brusca, R. C. 1984. Phylogeny, evolution and biogeography of the marine isopod Subfamily Idoteinae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Idoteidae).—Transactions of the San Diego Society of Natural History 20: 99–134. Bulnheim, H. P. 1984. Biochemical genetic studies on the differentiation of species and populations in amphipods and isopods.—Zoologische Beitraege 28: 349–368. ———, and G. Fava. 1982. Color polymorphism and genetic variation in Idotea balthica populations from the Adriatic Sea and Baltic Sea.—Genetica 59: 177–190. Chopin, T., C. J. Bird, C. A. Murphy, J. A. Osborne, M. U. Patwary, and J. Floc’h. 1996. A molecular investigation of polymorphism in the North Atlantic red alga Chondrus crispus (Gigartinales).—Phycological Research 44: 69–80. Cunningham, C. W., and T. M. Collins. 1998. Beyond area relationships: Extinction and recolonization in molecular marine biogeography. Pp. 297–321 in B. Schierwater, B. Streit, G. P. Wagner, and R. DeSalle, eds. Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel. ———, H. Zhu, and D. M. Hillis. 1998. Best-fit maximum-likelihood models for phylogenetic inference: empirical tests with known phylogenies.—Evolution 52: 978–987. Dahlgren, T. G., J. R. Weinberg, and K. M. Halanych. 2000. Phylogeography of the ocean quahog Arctica islandica: influences of paleoclimate on genetic diversity and species range.—Marine Biology 137: 487–495. Dyke, A. S., and V. K. Prest. 1987. Late Wisconsonian and Holocene history of the Laurentide ice sheet.—Geographie physique et Quaternaire 41: 237–263. Endler, J. A. 1982. Problems in distinguishing historical from ecological factors in biogeography.—American Zoologist 22: 441–452. Felsenstein, J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences: inference and reliability.—Annual Review of Genetics 22: 521–565. Folmer, O., M. Black, W. Hoeh, R. Lutz, and R. Vrijenhoek. 1994. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.—Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 3: 294–299. Foltz, D. W., J. P. Breaux, E. L. Campagnaro, S. W. Herke, A. E. Himel, A. W. Hrincevich, J. W. Tamplin, and W. B. Stickle. 1996. Limited morphological differences between genetically identified cryptic species within the Leptasterias species complex (Echinodermata: Asteroidea).—Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 1275–1283. Franke, H.-D., L. Gutow, and M. Janke. 1999. The recent arrival of the oceanic isopod Idotea metallica Bosc off Helgoland (German Bight, North Sea): an indication of a warming trend in the North Sea?—Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen 52: 347–357. ———, and M. Janke. 1998. Mechanisms and consequences of intra- and interspecific interference competition in Idotea balthica (Pallas) and Idotea emarginata (Fabricius) (Crustacea: Isopoda): a laboratory study of possible proximate causes of habitat segregation.—Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 227: 1–21. Goldman, N. 1993. Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution.—Journal of Molecular Evolution 36: 182–198. Gosner, K. L. 1978. A Field Guide to the Atlantic Seashore from the Bay of Fundy to Cape Hatteras. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. Guarino, S. M., C. Gambardella, M. Ianniruberto, and M. de Nicola. 1993. Colour polymorphism in Idotea balthica from the Bay of Naples and its ecological significance.—Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 64: 21–33. Hayward, P. J., and J. S. Ryland. 1995. Handbook of the Marine Fauna of North-West Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Hellberg, M. E. 1998. Sympatric sea shells along the sea’s shore: the geography of speciation in the marine gastropod Tegula.—Evolution 52: 1311–1324. Henry, C. S. 1994. Singing and cryptic speciation in insects.—Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9: 388–392. Hillis, D. M., B. K. Mable, A. Larson, S. K. Davis, and E. A. Zimmer. 1996. Nucleic Acids IV: Sequencing and cloning. Pp. 321–384 in D. M. Hillis, B. Mable, C. Moritz, eds. Molecular Systematics, Second edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Holder, K., R. Montgomerie, and V. L. Friesen. 1999. A test of the glacial refugium hypothesis using patterns of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequence variation in rock ptarmigan (Lagopus mutus).—Evolution 53: 1936–1950. Ingólfsson, A. 1992. The origin of the rocky shore fauna WARES: GEOGRAPHIC ISOLATION IN IDOTEA BALTHICA of Iceland and the Canadian Maritimes.—Journal of Biogeography 19: 705–712. ———. 1995. Floating clumps of seaweed around Iceland: natural microcosms and a means of dispersal for shore fauna.—Marine Biology 122: 13–21. Jormalainen, V., S. Merilaita, and J. Tuomi. 1995. Differential predation on sexes affects colour polymorphism of the isopod Idotea balthica (Pallas).—Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 55: 45–68. ———, and J. Tuomi. 1989. Sexual differences in habitat selection and activity of the colour polymorphic isopod Idotea balthica.—Animal Behaviour 38: 576–585. Knowlton, N., and L. A. Weigt. 1998. New dates and new rates for divergence across the Isthmus of Panama.—Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 2257–2263. Legrand-Hamelin, E., and J. J. Legrand. 1982a. Genetic determinism of the female sex inversion accompanying the crossing of 2 subspecies of Idotea balthica: 1. Results on the albafusca, bilineata and uniformis phenotypes.—Reproduction Nutrition Development 22: 753–766. ———, and ———. 1982b. Genetic determinism of the female sex inversion accompanying the crossing of 2 subspecies of Idotea balthica: 2. Results on the bilineata-lineata phenotype and its association with the albafusca phenotype.—Reproduction Nutrition Development 22: 889–904. Locke, A., and S. Corey. 1989. Amphipods, isopods and surface currents: a case for passive dispersal in the Bay of Fundy, Canada.—Journal of Plankton Research 11: 419–430. Merilaita, S. 1998. Crypsis through disruptive coloration in an isopod.—Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 265: 1059–1064. ———, and V. Jormalainen. 1997. Evolution of sex differences in microhabitat choice and colour polymorphism in Idotea balthica.—Animal Behavior 54: 769–778. Metz, E. C., and S. R. Palumbi. 1996. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin.— Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 397–406. Naylor, E. 1955. The ecological distribution of British species of Idotea (Isopoda).—Journal of Animal Ecology 24: 255–269. Nielsen, R., and M. Slatkin. 2000. Likelihood analysis of ongoing gene flow and historical association.—Evolution 54: 44–50. Pernet, B. 1999. Gamete interactions and genetic differentiation among three sympatric polychaetes.—Evolution 53: 435–446. Poore, G. C. B., and H. M. Lew Ton. 1993. Idoteidae of Australia and New Zealand (Crustacea: Isopoda: Valvifera).—Invertebrate Taxonomy 7: 197–278. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution.—Bioinformatics 14: 817, 818. Pratt, R. M., and J. Schlee. 1969. Glaciation on the continental margin off New England.—Geological Society of America Bulletin 80: 2335–2342. 1013 Rafi, F., and D. R. Laubitz. 1990. The Idoteidae (Crustacea: Isopoda: Valvifera) of the shallow waters of the northeastern North Pacific Ocean.—Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 2649–2687. Robertson, A. I., and K. H. Mann. 1980. The role of isopods and amphipods in the initial fragmentation of eelgrass (Zostera marina) detritus in Nova Scotia, Canada.—Marine Biology 59: 63–69. Salemaa, H. 1978. Geographic variability in the colour polymorphism of Idotea balthica (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic.—Hereditas 88: 165–182. ———. 1987. Herbivory and microhabitat preferences of Idotea spp. (Isopoda) in the northern Baltic sea.— Ophelia 27: 1–16. Schaffelke, B., D. Evers, and A. Walhorn. 1995. Selective grazing of the isopod Idotea balthica between Fucus evanescens and F. vesiculosus from Kiel Fjord (western Baltic).—Marine Biology 124: 215–218. Seutin, G., B. N. White, and P. T. Boag. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses.—Canadian Journal of Zoology 69: 82–90. Shacklock, P. F., and G. B. Croft. 1981. Effects of grazers on Chondrus crispus in culture.—Aquaculture 22: 331–342. ———, and R. W. Doyle. 1983. Control of epiphytes in seaweed cultures using grazers.—Aquaculture 31: 141–152. Smith, M. W., R. W. Chapman, and D. A. Powers. 1998. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of Atlantic Coast, Chesapeake Bay, and Delaware Bay populations of the teleost Fundulus heteroclitus indicates temporally unstable distributions over geologic time.—Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology 7: 79–87. Swofford, D. 1998. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, v. 4.0b4a. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. Travis, J. 1996. The significance of geographical variation in species interactions.—American Naturalist 148: S1–S8. Tully, O., and P. O’Ceidigh. 1986. The ecology of Idotea species (Isopoda) and Gammarus locusta (Amphipoda) on surface driftweed in Galway Bay (west of Ireland).—Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 66: 931–942. ———, and ———. 1987. Investigations of the plankton of the west coast of Ireland: VIII. The neustonic phase and vertical migratory behavior of benthic Peracaridae in Galway Bay.—Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy B 87: 43–64. Tuomi, J., V. Jormalainen, and H. Ilvessalo. 1988. Does the aquatic isopod Idotea balthica minimize the survival costs of reproduction?—Oikos 52: 245–249. Vermeij, G. 1991. Anatomy of an invasion: the transArctic Interchange.—Paleobiology 17: 281–307. Wares, J. P. 2000. Abiotic influences on the population dynamics of marine invertebrates.—Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. RECEIVED: 5 July 2000. ACCEPTED: 16 April 2001.