Download Pre-Anesthesia Evaluation Exercise - Module 3 - 111.5 KB

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Remote ischemic conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup

Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup

Cardiothoracic surgery wikipedia , lookup

Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup

Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup

Quantium Medical Cardiac Output wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION in the
ELDERLY
Module 3
PRE-ANESTHESIA
EVALUATION EXERCISE
Ed Vandenberg, MD, CMD
Geriatric Section OVAMC
&
Section of Geriatrics
981320 UNMC
Omaha, NE 68198-1320
[email protected]
Web: geriatrics.unmc.edu
OBJECTIVES:
OBJECTIVES:
On completion of the module the resident should be
able to:
1) List the elements of a history necessary for an
effective preanesthesia evaluation
2) List the appropriate physical exam elements for an
effective preanesthesia evaluation
3) List the appropriate pre-operative testing with
indications.
4) List and evaluate patients for pre-operative risk
factors for Cardiac disease
5) Clinically assess functional capacity
6) Demonstrate ability to:
• a. Interpret preoperative testing
• b. Evaluate mental status
EXPLANATION of PROCESS
Step one: You will leave this PowerPoint and enter the module at the web-based
address below. After module is entered, review the summary card on the left hand
side of page. It will enlarge by clicking on it.
Step two: after familiarizing yourself with the card, start the explanation of the cards
content by clicking on the underlined items and a full explanation will appear on the
right hand side.
Step three: Review this material by scrolling downward. When the right hand scroll down
is completed, click on the next underlined item to work through the summary card.
Step four: After completing the last slide, to complete the question for credit for this
module, please close out that module, and advance to the question 2 in
Blackboard,(see next slide), then answer the question and review the answer. Then,
when read, proceed to module #3 where we will complete our work on cardiac
evaluation.
Now link to this website for completion of step 1-3.
http://webmedia.unmc.edu/intmed/geriatrics/anesthesia/Module2/preanesthesia_evaluati
on_index.htm
Post-test
•
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
A 72-year-old man with mild osteoarthritis and glaucoma is being
evaluated before an elective cholecystectomy. Examination shows
clear lungs, absence of a third heart sound, tenderness of the right
upper quadrant of the abdomen, and no peripheral edema. Serum
creatinine level is 1.4 mg/dL, and serum electrolyte levels and
complete blood cell count are normal. Radiograph of the chest and
electrocardiogram show normal findings. Which of the following
is the most appropriate next step?
Proceed with the operation without invasive cardiac monitoring
during the procedure.
Proceed with the operation using invasive cardiac monitoring
during the procedure.
Order exercise stress testing before proceeding.
Order dipyridamole-thallium stress testing before proceeding.
Order echocardiography before proceeding.
Used with permission from: Murphy JB, et. al. Case Based Geriatrics Review: 500 Questions and
Critiques from the Geriatric Review Syllabus. AGS 2002 New York, NY.
Answer: A. Proceed with the operation without
invasive cardiac monitoring during the procedure.
The most appropriate next step for this patient at
low risk for perioperative myocardial infarction is
to proceed with the operation without invasive
cardiac monitoring during the procedure. In a
patient planning to undergo noncardiac surgery,
a basic assessment should be performed to
determine whether cardiac testing should be
done before the procedure. The risk for
perioperative myocardial infarction during
noncardiac surgery is 1% to 2% in otherwise
healthy patients older than 40 years. The risk
increases with age or the presence of
cardiovascular disease, or both.
• The risk for perioperative myocardial infarction is
assessed by information in the patient's medical
history, physical examination, and findings on
electrocardiogram.
• For patients with no cardiovascular disease risk
factors other than advanced age, the risk for
complications associated with cardiac
catheterization and subsequent
revascularization is greater than the risk for
death associated with noncardiac surgery.
• For patients at moderate risk, such as multiple
cardiovascular disease risk factors or stable
cardiovascular disease, preoperative
noninvasive cardiac testing, such as exercise
testing, is of most value. If the patient is unable
to exercise, testing with dipyridamole-thallium
scintigraphy may be helpful in identifying risk
factors. Factors that indicate a patient is at high
risk include a recent myocardial infarction,
severe congestive heart failure, advanced atrial
and ventricular arrhythmias, or unstable angina.
For these patients, diagnostic testing would not
be helpful, but invasive monitoring during the
operation would be appropriate. End
Post-test
• A 76-year-old woman who resides in an assisted-living
apartment is admitted to the hospital for right
femoropopliteal bypass surgery. She has experienced
increasing claudication pain, which has confined her to a
wheelchair. Preoperative evaluation, including review of
history, examination, and preoperative testing, reveal the
following: the patient had an uncomplicated inferior wall
myocardial infarction 1 year ago; she has osteoarthritic
changes of both knees; she is a well-controlled, insulindependent diabetic; her blood urea nitrogen level is 56
mg/dL and serum creatinine is 1.4 mg/dL. Her
electrocardiogram shows normal sinus rhythm with Q
waves in leads II, III, and a VF. Hydrate and proceed
with surgery. Order radionuclide angiography. Order
transthoracic echocardiography. Order an exercise
stress test. Order dipyridamole-thallium imaging. Which
of the following is the next correct step?
Which of the following is the next correct
step?
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Hydrate and proceed with surgery.
Order radionuclide angiography.
Order transthoracic echocardiography.
Order an exercise stress test.
Order dipyridamole-thallium imaging.
Answer: E. Order dipyridamolethallium imaging.
• The goal of the preoperative clinical evaluation is to establish and
minimize the perioperative risk of the patient. This patient scores 15
points on the Modified Cardiac Risk Index (based on age > 70
years; myocardial infarction > 6 months earlier; poor general
medical status given the elevated blood urea nitrogen) and would be
assigned a class I risk. However, she has three low-risk variables:
age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus, and Q waves on
electrocardiogram. These factors increase her to intermediate-risk
status (3% to 15%) for a perioperative cardiac event. As the patient
is scheduled to undergo vascular surgery, it may be advisable to
delay surgery to further evaluate her potential for cardiac
complications in the perioperative period. Hydration, without
evidence of decreased volume status, is not indicated and may
increase the patient?s risk for perioperative congestive heart failure.
Used with permission from: Murphy JB, et. al. Case Based Geriatrics Review: 500 Questions and
Critiques from the Geriatric Review Syllabus. AGS 2002 New York, NY.
• Neither radionuclide angiography nor
transthoracic echocardiography is
recommended to determine perioperative risk.
Radionuclide angiography is used to assess left
ventricular function. Studies of radionuclide
angiography in predicting perioperative cardiac
complications have found poor predictive
negative test results when patients with normal
left ventricular ejection fraction are evaluated,
and poor predictive positive test results when
patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction
are evaluated. Likewise, transthoracic
echocardiography adds little to the clinical
evaluation in determining risk of cardiovascular
complications.
• Exercise stress testing is commonly used to
screen for coronary artery disease because of its
low cost and wide availability. Unfortunately,
patient-related problems may limit its utility. A
patient with degenerative joint disease,
peripheral vascular disease, previous stroke, or
other mechanical disability may have difficulty in
exercising to meet her target heart rate.
Because of these limitations, exercise stress
testing has a poor predictive value and is not
recommended in these patients for determining
perioperative risk.
• Studies of dipyridamole thallium imaging have
demonstrated its utility in determining the
potential for cardiac complications in
intermediate-risk patients, such as the patient in
this case. A posttest probability of 1% for cardiac
complications is associated with a negative
dipyridamole thallium scan, and the risk for
complications rises to 23% with a positive scan.
Dobutamine stress echocardiography is also
effective in determining the level of risk in
patients with a low score on the Modified
Cardiac Risk Index but one or more low-risk
variables. Patients with a normal dobutamine
stress echocardiography study are at very low
risk for cardiac complications during vascular
surgery, but their risk climbs dramatically with an
abnormal study.
• Patients with normal findings on dipyridamole thallium
imaging or dobutamine stress echocardiography can
proceed with the vascular surgery. Those with abnormal
studies may need to have the nature of their high-risk
state determined. Those with modifiable risk factors
(congestive heart failure, arrhythmia) should have their
medical status optimized prior to surgery. If factors are
not modifiable and surgery is essential, more intensive
perioperative monitoring may be required. In patients
with a high-risk state due to ischemic heart disease, the
need and timing of coronary revascularization must be
determined. While dipyridamole thallium testing allows
the determination of risk and closer monitoring in the
perioperative period, further research is needed to
determine whether this results in improved clinical
outcomes. End