* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 3. Sir Isaac Newton
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Equivalence principle wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Astronomical unit wikipedia , lookup
Timeline of astronomy wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Modified Newtonian dynamics wikipedia , lookup
Chapter 3. Sir Isaac Newton 1. Newton’s Laws of Motion Kepler was able to describe the motion of the planets, but had no understanding of why they moved that way. Newton was the first person to suggest an underlying “law” of nature which could account for the way the planets moved. It was in terms of a force, which has come to be called “gravity”. It turns out that gravity is one of the four fundamental forces operating in the Universe today, and an important one for this course, since it controls the motions of planets, stars and galaxies and a lot about their character. In this Chapter, we will derive the gravitational force law as Newton did, based on his ideas of force and motion and the observations of motions of the Moon and planets. It is assumed that all students in this course have studied Newton’s Laws of mechanics in a physics course, either in high school or college and are basically familiar with them. A key test of Newton’s theory of Gravity is that it predicts Kepler’s Laws.....in particular his Harmonic Law (P2 =a3 ) and provides the basis for determining masses of the planets (and stars and galaxies) from the motion of their satellites. Because of the important role of this law in determining masses of all astronomical objects, we emphasize it here. Newton’s concepts of force and motion are often summarized in terms of three laws, and can be expressed as follows: 1) A body in motion in a straight line at constant speed continues like that unless acted on by a force (from outside itself). 2)The amount of acceleration (change in speed or direction) is proportional to the force applied and inversely proportional to the object’s mass (acceleration=Force/mass) 3. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction A simple equation which expresses these concepts is the famous F = m a where the boldfaced type here reminds the reader that force (F) and acceleration (a) are vector quantities, while mass (m) is a scalar. Again, if these concepts are not familiar to you you should review an introductory physics text on force and motion. A key aspect of these concepts for understanding Newton’s derivation of the law of gravity is that motion in a circle at constant speed requires a constant force. With a little calculus (or even without it) it is possible to derive the relationship between the magnitude of the acceleration that is involved when the circular speed is v and the radius of the circle –2– is r. The answer is a = v2 /r. Note that this is written as a scalar relation, since it only involves the magnitudes of the vectors. Knowing the acceleration of an object moving in a circle, it was possible for Newton to calculate the amount of force required to keep the object moving in a circle. The object he had in mind was the Moon, which orbits the Earth in roughly a circle. This required that there be some force involved and his brilliant concept was that the force was gravity – the same force that operated within the terrestrial sphere on falling objects. By this notion of universality of gravity – that it could stretch across the vast distance to the Moon – into the celestial sphere – he gave birth to modern astronomy. Today we take it as given that the laws of physics that apply here on Earth also apply across the cosmos, at least until proven otherwise! Astronomy could not advance as a science without that presumption and, fortunately, to the extent we can test it (which is considerable) the principle has held up. 2. Newton’s Theory of Gravity Newton knew the distance to the Moon, hence the radius of the circle in which it orbited. He also knew the sidereal period (P) of the Moon to orbit the Earth, which is 27.3 days. Assuming a circular orbit for the Moon, which is roughly true and appropriate for this calculation, he could calculate the speed of the Moon in its orbit from the relationship Pv = 2πr, which is simply time x rate = distance traveled. Then, using the relationship between acceleration, speed and radius of orbit derived above, he could calculate the acceleration of the Moon in its orbit, which in mks units is about 2.5 × 10−3 m/s/s. This, of course, is much less than the acceleration of gravity at the surface of the Earth, also known as 1 “gee”, which is g=9.8 m/s/s. Hence, one might think that the same force that causes things to fall on Earth could not be the force keeping the Moon in its orbit – one requires a much weaker force. Here is where Newton’s genius kicked in and he realized that it could be the same force if he supposed that gravity actually weakened with distance from its source. The Moon is much further away from the center of the Earth (the supposed center for the force of gravity since everything on Earth falls towards its center) than is an object on the surface of the Earth. If we compare the distance to the Moon (about 250,000 miles) to the radius of the Earth (which is the distance of an object at the surface from the center), we find an amazing fact. The ratio of the force of gravity needed to explain the Moon’s acceleration to the force at the surface of the Earth is precisely the ratio of the distance to the Moon to the radius of the Earth, quantity squared! In other words, if gravity were inversely proportional to distance from an object squared, one could account for both the acceleration of objects on –3– the Earth and the acceleration of the Moon in its orbit with the same force! In terms of magnitude F ∝ 1/d2 . To complete his law, Newton employed the reasoning behind his laws of motion derived on Earth, including the reciprocity law that for every action there is an equal reaction. That implied that the Moon must be pulling on the Earth as well and gave rise to the notion that the force of gravity acted between ANY two masses. What one had to do was to add up the contributions from all the little bits of matter comprising any object to get the net resulting force. He had to invent integral calculus to do this kind of calculation, of course. But, for example, he showed (and you undoubtedly learned in a physics class) that summing up the gravitational force from all the components of a spherical body leads to the same net force (outside the object) as if you put all its mass at a single “point mass” located at the center of mass of the object. And the reciprocity law requires that the force of gravity be symmetrical. It needs to depend on the masses of both objects (e.g. Moon and Earth) in the same way. Hence, Newton surmised that gravity was a force acting between any two masses (call them M and m) separated by a distance (d) and that the magnitude of the force was proportional to the product of the masses divided by the separation squared: F ∝ mM/d2 while the direction of the force was along the line between them and it was always attractive. To complete the description as we usually write it today, we can add the “Gravitational constant”, often called “Big Gee” whose value depends on the unit system used. In the mks system, where lengths are measured in meters, masses in kilograms and time in seconds, the value of G is 6.67 × 10−11 . The expression of Newton’s Law of Gravity, then in terms of the magnitude of the force is: GMm F = . d2 3. Testing Newton’s Theory and Deriving Masses in Astronomy One test of Newton’s theory of gravity was to finally explain Kepler’s mysterious Harmonic Law. The explanatory sheet that is available on the Links page provides the details of how Newton was able to show, for a circular orbit, that P2 = 4π 2 3 a GM While our version of this law was only derived for a circle (i.e. where a, the semi-major axis is the same as r, the radius of the circle, or d, the constant distance between the objects) Newton actually derived this expression for the general case of an elliptical orbit. He furthermore showed that point masses acting under the influence of his gravitational –4– law would orbit in ellipses – explaining Kepler’s first law of planetary motion. He further showed that the speed in the orbit would change with distance in just the way required by Kepler’s second law. Hence, Newton’s rather simple formulation of a law of gravity was highly successful at explaining planetary motion. Newton’s form of Kepler’s third law is an extremely powerful and useful tool for astronomers since it gives us the ability to determine the masses of any object which has a satellite orbiting it. In the form given above and derived on the sheet, we assume that there is a large central mass (M) and a much smaller orbiting mass (m), in which m<<M. (This assumption is not necessary and a more general form of the law is discussed below). If we can measure the orbital period of the satellite (e.g. moon of a planet, or planet orbiting a star) and the radius of its orbit (a) then we can determine M, the mass of the central object. This is exactly how we do determine the masses of all the planets except Mercury (which has neither a natural nor artificial satellite). For objects without orbiting satellites we need a more complex method but one that involves the partial orbit or amount of deflection from a straight line of a passing object.