Download The Impact on Design When Operating or Maintain Pipe

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Thermal comfort wikipedia , lookup

Thermal conductivity wikipedia , lookup

Cogeneration wikipedia , lookup

Radiator (engine cooling) wikipedia , lookup

Heat sink wikipedia , lookup

Copper in heat exchangers wikipedia , lookup

Dynamic insulation wikipedia , lookup

Hypothermia wikipedia , lookup

Heat exchanger wikipedia , lookup

Solar air conditioning wikipedia , lookup

Intercooler wikipedia , lookup

Heat equation wikipedia , lookup

Heat pipe wikipedia , lookup

R-value (insulation) wikipedia , lookup

Economizer wikipedia , lookup

Heat wave wikipedia , lookup

Thermal conduction wikipedia , lookup

Thermoregulation wikipedia , lookup

Hyperthermia wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
PRODUCT / APPLICATION INFORMATION
The Impact on Design When Operating or Maintain
Pipe Temperature Approaches the T-Rating
In areas with explosive atmospheres, the heat tracing
design must be done such that the heat tracer sheath
temperature does not exceed the T-Rating while energized. The heat tracer sheath temperature is a function
of power output (watt density), tracer circumference,
overall U-value, and the pipe temperature.
Tsheath =
W + Tpipe
UC
While maximum sheath temperatures for T-rating are
often done and based on a run-away uncontrolled pipe
temperature (stabilized design), the interest in this discussion is for the case where there is a relatively high
maintain temperature specified and a controlled design
method is used. As the specified maintain temperature
approaches the T-Rating the allowable watt density for
the tracer decreases resulting in a design with multiple
tracers. This impacts the cost of the tracing system and
in some instances results in a design that is impractical.
On some occasions when the customer specifications
were reviewed in light of this issue, it was found that the
T-rating was arbitrarily assigned. It was then raised to
the represent the actual gases and explosive conditions
that were present. Then a more cost-effective design
was possible. Similarly on a second review the process
engineers were able to lower the required pipe maintain
temperature which in turn allowed for a more practical
or cost-effective design.
To be able to assess the situation up front before significant design effort, the following graphs are provided.
These show the number of tracers required based on
the heat loss and temperature difference between the
specified T-rating and pipe maintain temperature. As
stated above, as the pipe maintain temperature approaches the T-rating, the number of tracers needed
dramatically increases.
Most of these higher temperature maintenance applications involve MI cable. As a result the data provided, is
based on MI cable with a diameter of 4.1 mm (0.016 in).
Since the overall heat transfer coefficient is temperature
dependent, correlations are shown for four different
pipe maintain temperatures: 10ºC, 50ºC, 180ºC, and
300ºC. For a case where the maintain temperature is
not one of these four, use simple interpolation or the
graph with the next lower maintain temperature.
Note that an AIT may be specified instead of a T-rating.
If that is the case use TAIT instead of TRATING in calculating
the temperature difference for the X-axis.
Here is an example case:
Given
T maintain = 180ºC
Heat loss = 50 W/m
T-rating of T3 (200ºC)
Assessment
T-rating – T maintain is 20ºC
From the graph showing a maintain of 180ºC, seven
or more heat tracers are needed.
The T-rating is changed from T3 to T2
With the new specified T-rating of T2 (300ºC) the
temperature difference is now 120ºC. The design can
be done with two heat tracers.
For high temperature maintenance applications in
classified area, the graphs will assist in making a first
cut assessment for:
(1)Number of MI tracers needed,
(2)Impact on the design if the AIT or T-rating is
changed,and
(3)Possible reduction in tracers if the maintain
temperature is lowered.
THERMON . . . The Heat Tracing Specialists®
www.thermon.com
Form PAF0053-0110 © Thermon Manufacturing Co. Subject to change without prior notice.
The Impact on Design When Operating or Maintain
Pipe Temperature Approaches the T-Rating
Number of Heat Tracers
Temperature Diff. (T RATING-T PIPE) vs. Number of
Heat Tracers for 10°C Maximum Pipe
Temperature
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Heat Loss
15 W/m
25 W/m
50 W/m
75 W/m
0
50
100
150
200
T RATING-T MAX PIPE (°C)
Number of Heat Tracers
Temperature Diff. (T RATING-T PIPE) vs. Number of
Heat Tracers for 50°C Maximum Pipe
Temperature
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Heat Loss
15 W/m
25 W/m
50 W/m
100 W/m
0
50
100
150
T RATING-T MAX PIPE (°C)
THERMON . . . The Heat Tracing Specialists®
www.thermon.com
200
The Impact on Design When Operating or Maintain
Pipe Temperature Approaches the T-Rating
Number of Heat
Tracers
Temperature Diff. (TRATING-TPIPE) vs. Number of
Heat Tracers for 180°C Maximum Pipe
Temperature
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Heat Loss
15 W/m
25 W/m
50 W/m
100 W/m
0
50
100
150
200
TRATING-TMAX PIPE (°C)
Number of Heat
Tracers
Temperature Diff. (T RATING-T PIPE) vs. Number of Heat
Tracers for 300°C Maximum Pipe Temperature
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Heat Loss
25 W/m
50 W/m
75 W/m
125 W/m
0
50
100
TRATING-TMAX PIPE (°C)
THERMON . . . The Heat Tracing Specialists®
www.thermon.com
150
200