* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download influence of arrangement and sizes of magnets upon
Survey
Document related concepts
Switched-mode power supply wikipedia , lookup
Buck converter wikipedia , lookup
Three-phase electric power wikipedia , lookup
Stray voltage wikipedia , lookup
Alternating current wikipedia , lookup
Commutator (electric) wikipedia , lookup
Mains electricity wikipedia , lookup
Voltage optimisation wikipedia , lookup
Dynamometer wikipedia , lookup
Brushed DC electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Variable-frequency drive wikipedia , lookup
Brushless DC electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Electric motor wikipedia , lookup
Stepper motor wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) 43 Želmíra Ferková Technical University of Košice, Slovakia Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics INFLUENCE OF ARRANGEMENT AND SIZES OF MAGNETS UPON COGGING TORQUE AND EMF OF TWO-PHASE PMSM Abstract: Discussed in the paper are two-phase permanent magnet synchronous motors, and explored is influence of the magnet sizes as on induced voltage (EMF) so on cogging torque (CT). Induced voltage and the cogging torque have been calculated in ANSYS/Maxwell program. In more detail contemplated is influence of the magnet size, their positioning and orientation to the CT in two basic rotor types. The cogging torque waveform for critical dimensions has been considered using the FFT analysis. The first rotor type is the one with semi-arc shaped magnets located on the rotor surface. The other motor type features magnets embedded in its rotor. Shape of the stator magnetic circuit has been predetermined. Kewords: cogging torque, EMF, permanent magnets 1. Introduction In the matter of several recent years, utilisation of permanent magnet synchronous motors has dramatically increased. The advantage of excitation with the permanent magnets (PM) is the absence of Joule losses in excitation, and especially then elimination of the sliding contact. The disadvantage is that excitation is uncontrollable, whilst the recent growing price of magnets is an issue too. Analysed in the present article is a two-phase two-pole motor with permanent magnets (NdFeB, Hc= -849000 A/m, Br=1.125 T). Used was a ready-made stator stack. Shape and number of stator slots could not be changed. The equations clearly imply induced voltage Uf of the synchronous machine influences its behaviour. This depends on the number of turns and the arrangement of the stator winding as well as on the arrangement and size of magnets. Moreover, placement of magnets affects the reactance Xd and Xq. 2. Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor In the steady state, behaviour of a two-phase synchronous machine can described by the use of the below equations: U1 = R1I1 + jX d I1d + jX q I1q + U f , I1 = I1d + I1q a) (1),(2) where: R1 is phase resistance, Xd is d-axis synchronous reactance, Xq is q-axis synchronous reactance, U1- input voltage, I1- one phase current, I1d a I1q – d and q axis stator currents, Uf – voltage (EMF) induced by magnetic excitation flux of the rotor. Phasor diagrams of over-excited and underexcited motors are presented in Fig. 1. b) Fig. 1. Phasor diagrams of PMSM, a) overexcited motor, b) under-excited motor For the PMSM electromagnetic torque it holds that: Te = 2 ω synch U ⋅U f U 2 1 1 sin θ + − sin( 2θ ) (3) 2 X q X d X d where: U1, and Uf are effective values of phase voltage and the voltage induced by excitation, θ is the loading angle [2]. Te is the electromagnetic torque that neglects CT. Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) 44 3. Dynamic Model of PMSM Electromagnet torque with CT considered is: The d-q dynamic model is expressed in a rotating frame that moves at synchronous speed ωr. The general equation of PMSM working as motor are following: did ud Rid Lq = − + pωr iq dt Ld Ld Ld diq dt Te = = uq Lq − Riq Lq + Ld pωr pωr id − Φ Lq Lq 3 p Φiq + ( Ld − Lq )id iq 2 [ (4) ] where id and iq are the d and q axis stator currents, Ld and Lq are the d and q axis inductances, ud and uq are d and q axis stator voltages, R is phase resistance, p is the number of pole pairs, ωr is the rotor angular speed, Φ is excitation flux created by the PM. a) Te´=Te+Tc (5) Tc depends on stator/rotor angular position. Explored by ANSYS/Maxwell was the impact of the permanent magnet volumes and arrangement on the voltage induced and on the cogging torque. Chosen were 2 types of designs, when both motors were two-pole ones. Type A has two poles composed of on the motor surface positioned magnets. The magnets have semi-arc shapes (rotor-surface-mounted magnets). With this type it can be anticipated that the reactance Xd and Xq are identical. Type B has two poles made of six magnets embedded in rotor (Fig. 2). Altering was the width, thickness and angles among magnets of one pole. b) Fig. 2. Design types explored: a) A – motor with rotor surface-mounted magnets, b) B – motor with tangentially embedded magnets. Dimension of rotor: Drot=55 mm, rotor_length=26 mm, air_gap=0.5 mm 4. Impact of the Magnet Geometry upon Cogging Torque When designing 2-pole and 2-phase synchronous motors with permanent magnets emerging is the cogging torque (CT) issue in a greater extent than in the three-phase machines with PM. In this case, the situation becomes worse due to the fact that magnetic circuit of the stator cannot be changed. The stator has a concentric winding. Oscillation frequency of the cogging torque depends on the number of slots, and is given by the following equation [2]: fc = z1 ⋅f p (6) z1 is the number of stator slots, z1=24 p is the number of pole pairs f is the input frequency, f=50Hz Analytical methods for calculating the cogging torque usually neglect the magnetic flux through the stator slot and saturation of the magnetic circuit. The cogging torque can by computed by the derivative of magnetic energy W produced by permanent magnets with respect to the rotor position angle α: Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) Tc = dW dα (7) Upon adjustment and introduction of coordinate x that represents the air gap length we have arrived to the below equation: Tc = D2 out dW 2 dx (8) α=2x/D2uot, It is anticipated that the rotor outer diameter is roughly equal with the stator inner diameter D2out≈D1in. In addition to fc frequency in the timeline of the CT found can be frequencies that are related to the arrangement of magnets. Waveform of CT can be, if neglected is saturation of the magnetic circuitry, described by equation [5]: ∞ M c ( α ) = ∑ M k ⋅ sin( k ⋅ z1α + ϕ k ) (9) k =1 Where z1 is the number of stator slots, Mk is the related harmonic’s amplitude, ϕk is phase shift of the respective harmonic, and α is the rotor position. 45 embrace=1 corresponds to a central angle of 180° and a pole embrace=0.5 corresponds to 90°. Changing in case of type B, which is made of 6 magnets forming 2 poles, were the magnet thickness (HM), magnet width (SM), and arrangement of magnets that was characterised by an angle between one pole magnets. (Fig. 2b) In both cases, the magnet length equals length of the magnetic circuit. Type A Dependence of CT from pole embrace is shown in Fig. 3. Dashed line shows multiples of the groove spacing (slot pitch). The smallest values and the minimum CT are for: Pole embrace ≈ (π-k.2π/z1+αod)/π. Where: 2π/z1 is slot pitch in degrees (2π/z1 =15°), kinteger (k=<1,5>), αod corresponds to 1/4 of the angle corresponding with the slot opening. The cogging torque can by minimised by the proper design [2]. Measures taken to minimise the torque ripple by motor design include elimination of stator slots skewed slots special shape slots and stator laminations selection of the number of stator slots with respect to the number of poles decentred magnets skewed magnets shifted magnet segments selection of magnet with direction-dependent magnetization of permanent magnets Fig. 3. Average value of the absolute values of CT as depending on the pole embrace. (HMthicknesses of magnets) Calculated in ANSYS/Maxwell 2D was cogging torque for the given magnetic circuit of stator, for two principal rotor types (types A and B; Fig. 2), and for a varying geometry of magnets. Changing in type A, which has two arched magnets on surface of the rotor, was the thickness (HM) and also the magnet central angle represented by the pole embrace. Pole The smallest CT value can be seen with pole embrace = 0.59. Corresponding with this is the magnet central angle of 106.2°. Differing content of higher harmonics in the cogging torque waveform can be for selected pole embrace seen in Fig. 4. Prevailing in local max values is the frequency of 1200Hz. (Equation (6)) • • • • • • • • • 46 Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) parameters are: the magnet widths (SM) and thicknesses (HM), respectively. The curves show the minimum for the angle of 55°. It is the angle between two magnets of one and the same pole. The CT waveform dramatically changes for angles to the left and to the right of the minimum. The CT time waveforms for angles of 53°, 55°, and 57° for magnet thicknesses of 3 mm-s and for magnet width of 18mm and 19 mm, respectively, are shown in Fig. 7. Fig. 4. Cogging torque as function of time for different „pole embrace”. Rotor speed =3000rpm. (pole embrace: 0.54, 0.59,0.635, 0.675, 0.72, 0.82) Fig. 6. The average value of the CT (absolute values) depending on the angle between PM. (HM-heights of magnets, SM –widths of magnets) Fig. 5. Harmonic components of the waveform (mag(CT)) given in Fig. 4. (pole embrace: 0.54, 0.59,0.635, 0.675, 0.72, 0.82) Type B In this motor type is each pole composed of three magnets. In symmetric distribution the angle between magnets is 60°. Analysis has shown that arrangement of magnets is of significant impact on the cogging torque, and that there exists an angle at which is the cogging torque minimal. CT average value (avgabs(CT)), as depending on the angle between magnets is shown in Fig. 6. The Fig. 7. Fig. 8 Cogging torque as function of time for different width of PM and the angle between PM. Rotor speed =3000 rpm Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) In the harmonic analysis shown in Fig. 9 seen can be distribution of individual harmonics. Prevailing are multiples of 1200Hz. The 1200Hz frequency is given by the number of slots (equation (6)). 47 Type B The calculated values of by permanent magnet flux induced voltage (EMF) are shown in Fig. 11. A slight drop in induced voltage is brought about by leakage flux within magnets. The induced voltage is dependent mainly on the size of magnets. Fig. 11. Dependence of EMF on the magnet thicknesses (HM) and widths (SM), respectively 6. Conclusion Fig. 9. Harmonic components of the wavwform (mag(CT)) given in Fig. 7. 5. Impact of Magnet Geometry on the Permanent Magnet Induced Voltage Type A The no-load rms voltage induced in one phase of the stator winding (EMF) by PM excitation flux for varying pole embraces, and for magnet thicknesses of 1 and 2 mm are shown in Fig. 10. Uf 200.00 rms(InducedVoltage) [V] 150.00 Curve Info rms(InducedVoltage) Setup1 : Transient HM='1mm' rms(InducedVoltage) Setup1 : Transient HM='2mm' 0.00 0.50 0.60 0.70 pole embrace [-] 0.80 Results better than have been presented can be reached by using skewing of magnets. The issue has been resolved but it is not discussed in this article. Effect of size and storage of magnets on the induced voltage has a logical course. In type B, if the magnets are not arranged symmetrically, anticipated is adjustment of the magnetic circuit so that Lq≈Ld. 100.00 50.00 The paper presents dependencies of the cogging torque and induced voltage on the dimensions and geometry of placement of magnets. Fourier analysis of CT waveforms shows changing spectrum that changes with arrangement of magnets. Prevailing in both cases are frequencies of fc=1200Hz, which are determined by the number of slots, and also multiples of fc. In areas with a minimum value of CT, these frequencies are significantly suppressed. 0.90 Fig. 10. Dependence of the induced voltage on the pole embrace and the magnet thicknesses 48 Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014 (104) 7. Bibliography [1]. Pyrhönen L., Jokinenm T., Hrabovcová V.: Design of Rotating Electrical Machines. John Wiley &Sons,Ltd, 2008 [2]. Gieras J.,Wing M.: Permanent Magnet Motor Technology. Marcel Dekker 2002, USA [3]. Gieras J: Analytical Approach to cogging Torque Calculation of PM Brushless Motors, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol.40, No.5, 2004 [4]. Glinka T.: Maszyny elektryczne wzbudzane magnesami trwałymi, Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, Gliwice 2002 [5]. Glinka T. Jakubiec M.: Silniky elektryczne z magnesami trwałymi umieszconymi na wirniku, Zeszyty problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne no 71/2005, pp. 103-, Katowice 2005 [6]. Luke Dosiek, Pragasen Pillay: Cogging Torque Reduction in Permanent Magnet Machines, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol.43, No65, 2007 [7]. Tudorache T.,Trifu I., Ghita C., Bostan V.: Improved mathematical model of PMSM taking into account cogging torque oscilations, Advances in Elevtrocal and Computer Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2012, pp.59-66 [8]. Rosa R., Pistelok P.: The algotithm for the electromegnetic calculations of the concentrated winding permanent magnet synchronous motors, Zeszyty problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2013, BORME Komel, pp. 161-169, Katowice 2013 [9]. Mynarek P., Kowol M.: Field-circuit analysis of permanent magner synchronous motors, Zeszyty Problemowe – Maszyny Elektryczne Nr 4/2014, BORME Komel, pp. 73-76, Katowice 2013 [10]. Sekerák, P., Hrabovcová, V., Pyrhönen, J., Kalamen, L., Rafajdus, P., Onufer, M. : Comparison of synchronous motors with different permanent magnet and winding types, IEEE, Transaction on Magnetics, Vol. 49, no. 3 (2013), 2013, ADC, pp. 1256-1263, 0018-9464 [11]. Dúbravka, P., Rafajdus, P., Hrabovcová, V., Mušák, M., Peniak, A.: Improvement of Switched Reluctance Motor Fault Tolerances Using Novel Design by Means of 3D FEM Parametrical Model, SMM21-Soft Magnetic Materials, Conference Program and Book of Abstracts, Budapešť, 2013, 09, 1.-4., AFG, str. 319 Acknowledgement This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No APVV-0138-10. (90%) and SKCZ-2013-0065. Author Želmíra FERKOVÁ (Assoc. Prof. Ing. CSc.) graduated in electrical engineering from the Technical University Košice in 1982 and received her PhD degree in 1994. At present she is active as associated professor at the Department of Electrical Engineering and Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Informatics TU Košice. Her professional area covers design of electrical machines and their performance.