* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Chapter 32 Inflation and Growth: The Phillips Curve
Survey
Document related concepts
Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory wikipedia , lookup
Real bills doctrine wikipedia , lookup
Fear of floating wikipedia , lookup
Nominal rigidity wikipedia , lookup
Fiscal multiplier wikipedia , lookup
Edmund Phelps wikipedia , lookup
Money supply wikipedia , lookup
Interest rate wikipedia , lookup
Monetary policy wikipedia , lookup
Business cycle wikipedia , lookup
Full employment wikipedia , lookup
Inflation targeting wikipedia , lookup
Transcript
Chapter 32 Inflation and Growth: The Phillips Curve 1. When unemployment and inflation were both falling in the 1990s, it was because aggregate supply was increasing at an unusually rapid rate-in response to a series of favorable supply shocks (low oil prices, advances in technology, strong U.S. dollar). This extraordinary economic performance does not contradict the basic trade-off between unemployment and inflation; favorable supply shocks should produce rapid economic growth with falling inflation. 2. In the long run, the aggregate supply curve and the Phillips curve are vertical. Therefore it is true that the effects of fiscal and monetary policy upon output are temporary, if they move output away from its natural or full employment level. It is also true that a recession is temporary; the economy will eventually self-adjust automatically back to full employment. This does not imply, however, that it is useless to use fiscal and monetary policy to shorten recessions. It may take a very long time for an economy in recession to self-adjust back to full employment. Expansionary fiscal and monetary policy can raise aggregate demand and restore full employment faster. 3. Decisions about changing aggregate demand depend partly upon objective criteria, such as the shape of the short-run Phillips curve and the time it takes the economy to self-adjust. They also depend, however, upon political and value judgments - such as whether one fears the costs of unemployment more than the costs of inflation. And of course, “fiscal and monetary policy” are not just one thing. Different policies can have the same effect on aggregate demand, but very different effects on income distribution and the composition of output; these are issues over which there are usually serious political disagreements. 4. A Phillips curve shows the trade-off between unemployment and inflation. When one is high, the other is low. During the period 1954-1969, shifts in aggregate demand led to an inverse relationship between unemployment and inflation. But during the 1970s, reductions in aggregate supply led to the collapse of the Phillips curve, as both unemployment and inflation rose. 5. Labor and management bargain over money wages, but one suspects that they really care more about real wages, that is, money wages corrected for changes in the price level. If workers expect rapid inflation in the future, they will demand higher money wages, to protect their purchasing power. If management expects to be able to sell output for higher prices in the future, it will be willing to grant higher wages. 6. Rational expectations are forecasts of inflation that make optimal use of all relevant available information. If people’s expectations are rational, they will sometimes make mistakes in forecasting inflation, but they will not systematically underpredict inflation. The forecasting errors will be random, centering around the true value. The positively sloped aggregate supply curve and the negatively sloped Phillips curve are based on the assumption that when prices rise, wages and other costs lag behind. But the rational expectations school denies that they will necessarily lag; rather, any differences between wage and price increases will be random. Therefore, even the short-run aggregate supply and Phillips curves are vertical. The only events that could shift output away from its natural level are unexpected events, for example, completely unpredicted government policy. The stunning implications of the rational expectations theory are, therefore, that output and unemployment will not depart from their natural rates, and that government policy cannot change output and unemployment, even temporarily, unless they are unexpected. Believers in rational expectations do not favor fighting recessions with expanded aggregate demand because, since the aggregate supply curve is vertical, the economy is seldom below its natural level, and furthermore, increased aggregate demand will cause only inflation, not more output. They do, however, favor fighting inflation by cutting aggregate demand. Since output will not change, the full impact of the demand cut will be on reducing inflation, and there will be no increase in unemployment at all. 7. Figure 32-1 shows that when the aggregate supply curve is vertical, shifting aggregate demand curves change the price level, but do not change output. Belief in rational expectations leads to the assertion that the aggregate supply curve is vertical, and that therefore changes in aggregate demand affect only inflation, not unemployment. FIGURE 32-1 8. Answers to this question can reveal the students’ expectations of inflation. At a nominal interest rate of 5 percent, the real interest rate depends upon what the students think future inflation will be. If they predict 3 percent inflation, the real interest rate is 2 percent, while if they predict 4 percent inflation, the real rate is 1 percent, etc. A person predicting 3 percent inflation would prefer a bond indexed at a real rate of 3 percent to a non-indexed 5 percent bond, but would not prefer a bond indexed at a real rate of 2 percent (and would certainly not prefer a bond indexed at a real rate of 1 percent). The higher the expected rate of inflation, the lower the rate on an indexed bond a person would be willing to accept. 9. The president may have worried that Greenspan would keep a tight check on the money supply, in order to squelch the inflationary potential of the economy, while the president would have preferred a more expansive monetary policy that would have brought unemployment lower. 10. (a) Expansionary fiscal policy was appropriate, to stimulate growth in real GDP and reduce unemployment. Expansionary monetary policy would also help to stimulate real GDP and reduce unemployment without an adverse impact on the federal deficit. (b) The budget is in deficit and inflation is close to 3 percent so contractionary fiscal policy would reduce the deficit and keep inflation in check. Similarly, contractionary monetary policy would keep inflation in check but possibly increase the deficit as interest rates rise. The real concern was that the growth rate of the economy would become too stagnant. (c) Students will differ. The actual choice in Washington, D.C. was expansionary fiscal policy, to stimulate the economy, coupled with mildly expansive monetary policy.