Download edge effect species movement

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Theoretical ecology wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Reserve design features for persistence
SIZE
Edge to area ratio
Shape
Environmental
gradients
Disturbance
regime
Corridors
Matrix habitat
CONNECTIVITY
Functional
units
SIZE
Larger size 
• More species (interactions, functions), S-A relationship
• More habitats (interactions, functions)
• Larger populations –
• Protects vulnerable species
– Area demanding: large-bodied, high-trophic level, rare
– Habitat specialists (if habitat included)
– Species requiring multiple habitat types
• Shape Reduced edge/area ratio, edge effects
• Disturbance regime: maintenance of disturbancegenerated patch heterogeneity
• Includes whole functional units
• Includes whole environmental gradients
Ecosystem Boundaries?
• It is easy to picture ecosystems as having
distinct boundaries.
• The area of transition from one ecosystem
to another is considered to be an ecotone.
• Ecotones have a mixture of species from
both ecosystems.
– A marsh between a freshwater lake and dry
land.
– Zone of grasses, shrubs, and scattered small
trees between forests and grasslands.
Where does one
ecosystem end and the
other begin?
Two examples of
ecotones.
Species Overlap in Ecotones
Land zone
Transition zone
Number
of species
Species in land zone
Species in aquatic zone
Species in transition
zone only
Aquatic zone
Edge Effect
• Higher species diversity found on the
edge of an ecosystem (ecotone) than in
the interior
– Marsh and open water (shrimp, crabs, juvenile
finfish)
• Edge species – those species that are
concentrated in ecotones
• Sharp edge usually a poor habitat
– Clear cut – forest edge
SIZE & EDGE
EFFECTS
Edges create core
versus edge habitat
Example: many
songbirds
experience high
nest predation near
edges in woodlots
within sub-urban
areas
From
Prim
Shape and
edge effects
Meffe & Carroll 1997
Biological Consequences of
Fragmentation
• Edge Effects
• One of the best documented effects of
fragmentation are ‘edge effects’
• Edge effects have mostly been examined
in forests
• Sunlight and wind alter the micro-climate
at the forest edge, changing which plant
species are favored
The forested areas of Warwickshire, England
Habitat
fragmentation
• Above and beyond
habitat loss
• Isolation: reduced
immigration, recolonization
• Edge effects
From Primack 2002
Biological Consequences of
Fragmentation
• In WI forests, edge zones of shadeintolerant plants may extend 10-15m
into a forest (N,E,S) and 30m (W)
• In Douglas Fir forests of Pacific NW,
increased rates of blowdowns and other
physical edge effects may extend over
200m into the forest
• In Queensland, elevated rates of canopy
and sub-canopy damage extend 500m in
Biological Consequences of
Fragmentation
• In some landscapes, especially in warmer
climates, sealing of edges occurs through
accelerated growth and increased
regeneration of understory trees and
shrubs
• In some cases animals are then
attracted to these edges, which may
then function as an ‘ecological trap’
• In MI, songbirds nest at higher rates
Biological Consequences of
Fragmentation
• Consider the impact on birds
• Roads and powerline corridors as narrow
as 8m may produce edge effects
• Cowbird parasitism may be significant for
100’s of m into a forest
• Predation can also be significantly higher
near the edges as densities and
movements of raccoons, opossums,
crows, foxes, jays, skunks, are all
higher
DISTURBANCE REGIME
• Disturbance promotes habitat
heterogeneity
– By resetting successional sequence in parts of
the landscape
– Creating patchiness in the landscape which is
determined by the temporal and spatial scale
of the disturbance(s)
•
SIZE & DISTURBANCE
REGIME
Disturbance promotes habitat
heterogeneity
– mosaic of patches at different successional
stages
• Habitat heterogeneity:
– supports species requiring multiple habitat
types
– Supports early successional species (e.g.
Heath fritillary butterfly = “Woodman’s
follower”)
• Size of reserve  ideally as big as or
bigger than scale of likely disturbances
Invasion
HOMOGENIZATION
– The distribution of
species on Earth is
becoming more
homogenous
– The rate of invasion is
increasing over time
Growth in Number of Marine Species
Introductions in North America and
Europe
SIZE &
FUNCTIONAL
UNITS
Functionally interdependent
ecosystems:
e.g. “a complex,
dynamic
patchwork of
mangroves, sea
grass bed and
reefs”
(Moberg &
Ronnback 2003)
Reserve design features for persistence
SIZE: Bigger is better!
Edge to area ratio
Shape
Environmental
gradients
Disturbance
regime
Corridors
Matrix habitat
CONNECTIVITY
Functional
units
CONNECTIVITY
• Isolation is a key factor causing loss of
species from reserves
– Preventing gene flow, maintenance of genetic
diversity
– Reducing recolonization following extinction
(rescue effect)
– Preventing access between summer/winter
grounds for migratory species
– Preventing access to multiple habitat types
needed for different life stages
– Preventing response to global warming
CONNECTIVITY:Multiscale responses
PROBLEM of FRAGMENTATION
RESPONSE
– Preventing gene flow, maintenance of genetic diversity
– Reducing recolonization following extinction (rescue effect)
•Create corridors between reserves
•Manage the matrix around reserves
– Preventing access between summer/winter grounds for
migratory species
– Preventing access to multiple habitat types needed for different
life stages
– Preventing response to global warming
Wildlife overpass
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century provides
funding
Managing the Matrix
Making matrix “friendly” to wildlife
---
Reserve zonation: core, buffer, transition
Wildlife friendly farming/Restoration
CONNECTIVITY:
Multiscale responses
PROBLEM of FRAGMENTATION
RESPONSE
– Preventing gene flow, maintenance of genetic diversity
– Reducing recolonization following extinction (rescue effect)
•Create corridors between reserves
•Manage the matrix around reserves
– Preventing access between summer/winter grounds for
migratory species
Protect migratory routes/stop-overs
– Preventing access to multiple habitat types needed for different
life stages
– Preventing response to global warming
Stop-over sites along songbird
migration routes
• Neotropical birds
• Use radar to detect
nocturnal bird
movement
– Timed to get
departure events
from stopover
points (20-40 min
after sunset)
– Signal
characteristics
http://www.njaudubon.org/Education/Oases/RadImages.html
Breeding
wintering
CONNECTIVITY:
Multi-scale responses
PROBLEM of FRAGMENTATION
RESPONSE
– Preventing gene flow, maintenance of genetic diversity
– Reducing recolonization following extinction (rescue effect)
•Create corridors between reserves
•Manage the matrix around reserves
– Preventing access between summer/winter grounds for
migratory species
Protect migratory routes/stop-overs
– Preventing access to multiple habitat types needed for different
life stages
•Include whole functional units, disturbance
regimes, environmental gradients within reserves
or reserve networks
– Preventing response to global warming
•Include elevational or latitudinal gradients
within reserves
New Reserve Design Methods
• Represent species or
habitats efficiently
• Minimize edge
effects, maximize
clustering
• Maximize
connectivity
Leslie et al. 2003 Ecol App.
Conclusions
• Biodiversity has great value, both
intrinsically, and also because human life
depends on it
• But, it is under threat, from habitat loss and
degradation, invasive species, climate
change, pollution and over-exploitation
• Conservation biologists have many tools to
protect biological diversity, from genetic to
ecosystem levels.
Conclusions
• Protected areas are an important tool for
biodiversity conservation.
• The design of protected areas and reserve
networks should foster representation of
biodiversity and its persistence.
– Reserves need to be sited efficiently to represent
biodiversity.
– Size, shape and connectivity of reserves and
relationship with the surrounding landscape
matrix are essential considerations for
biodiversity persistence.
Species Overlap in Ecotones
Land zone
Transition zone
Number
of species
Species in land zone
Species in aquatic zone
Species in transition
zone only
Aquatic zone
Ecosystem Function
• A combination of production, respiration,
and decomposition
• What are the anthropogenic impacts on
ecosystem function?
• Ecological Footprint – a measure of the
anthropogenic effect on the environment
Ecological Footprint
•
•
Ecological footprint – amount of land needed to produce the
resources needed by the average person in a country
Methods:
1. Correct consumption data for trade imports and exports
Consumptionwheat= production + imports – exports
2. Convert to land area needed to produce the item
Awheat = Cwheat / ywheat
A=total area needed, C=consumed, Y=yield
3. Obtain per capita ecological footprint by dividing by
population size
fwheat = awheat/population size
Ecological footprint in relation to
available ecological capacity.
It would take about 3 times the current land area of
Earth if all 6.1 billion people consumed the same as
the 276 million people in the US
Per Captia Ecological Footprint
(Hectares of land per person)
Country
10.9
United States
5.9
The Netherlands
India
Country
1.0
Total Ecological Footprint
(Hectares)
3 billion
hectares
United States
The Netherlands
India
94 million hectares
1 billion
hectares