Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Line (geometry) wikipedia , lookup
Location arithmetic wikipedia , lookup
Vincent's theorem wikipedia , lookup
Elementary algebra wikipedia , lookup
Recurrence relation wikipedia , lookup
Elementary mathematics wikipedia , lookup
System of polynomial equations wikipedia , lookup
10. HARDER PROBLEMS §10.1. Harder Inequalities x+1 x+2 Example 1: Solve the inequality 2x + 6 > 3x + 7 . x+1 x+2 Solution: If this was the equation 2x + 6 = 3x + 7 we would simple “cross multiply”, that is multiply both sides by the product of the denominators, to get (x + 1)(3x + 7) = (x + 2)(2x + 6) ∴ 3x2 + 10x + 7 = 2x2 + 10x + 12 2 ∴ x = 5, giving x = ±√5. Can we do something similar here? The answer is no, at least not without a lot of tedious case-splitting. We are permitted to “cross multiply” but if the product of the denominators is negative the inequality changes from “<” to “>”. Let’s see how this case-splitting would work. Case I: (2x + 6)(3x + 7) > 0: That will come about if both factors are positive or both are negative. 7 7 Case IA: 2x + 6 > 0 and 3x + 7 > 0: Here x > −3 and x > −3 . Since −3 < −3 both inequalities 7 are satisfied when x > −3 . In this case we can cross-multiply to get: (x + 1)(3x + 7) > (x + 2)(2x + 6) ∴ 3x2 + 10x + 7 > 2x2 + 10x + 12 2 ∴ x > 5, giving x < −√5 or x > √5. 7 We have to combine these with x > − 3 . 7 7 Now 3 is about 2.7 and √5 is about 2.2 so plotting −√5, √5 and 3 on the number line we get 7 −3 √5 −√5 7 7 so if x > − 3 and x < −√5 we get the interval −3, 5 and 7 if x > − 3 and x > √5 we get the interval (√5, ∞). The solution in this case is the union of these intervals which we write as 7 −3, 5 ∪ (√5, ∞). 7 7 Case IB: 2x + 6 < 0 and 3x + 7 < 0: Here x < −3 and x < − 3 . Since −3 < −3 both inequalities are satisfied when x < −3. In this case we can cross-multiply, again getting x2 > 5, giving x < −√5 or x > √5. We have to combine these with x < −3. Now x < −3 is incompatible with x > √5 and if x < −√5 and x < −3 we simply have x < −3. So the solution in this case is x < −3, or the interval (− ∞, − 3). 73 Case II: (2x + 6)(3x + 7) < 0: That will come about if one factors is positive and the other is negative. 7 7 Case IIA: 2x + 6 > 0 and 3x + 7 < 0: Here x > −3 and x < − . So in this case −3 < x < − . 3 3 In this case we can cross-multiply but we get: (x + 1)(3x + 7) < (x + 2)(2x + 6) ∴ 3x2 + 10x + 7 < 2x2 + 10x + 12 2 ∴ x < 5, giving x ∈ (−√5, √5). 2 We have to combine this with x ∈ (−3, −23 ). But there are no numbers in common with (−√5, √5) so case IIA cannot arise. 7 Case IIB: 2x + 6 < 0 and 3x + 7 > 0: Here x < −3 and x > − 3 . Again this case cannot arise. Putting all these cases together we get the solution 7 −3, 5 ∪ (√5, ∞) ∪ (−∞, −3). Are you still with me? This method involves endless case-splitting and then having to combine the resulting inequalities, keeping track of which ones are “and”’s and which are “or”’s. There has to be a better way! And there is. x+1 x+2 Example 1 (again): Solve the inequality 2x + 6 > 3x + 7 . x+1 x+2 Solution: We subtract to get 2x + 6 − 3x + 7 > 0. Putting over a common denominator we get: (3x2 + 10x + 7) − (2x2 + 10x + 12) > 0. (2x + 6)(3x + 7) x2 − 5 ∴ > 0. (2x + 6)(3x + 7) (x − √5)(x + √ 5) ∴ (2x + 6)(3x + 7) > 0. 7 Plotting the four numbers ±√5, −3 and −3 on the number line we get 7 −3 −3 −√5 √5 These numbers are called critical points because the sign of one of the factors changes as you cross from one side to the other. If x > √5 all four factors are positive and the inequality holds. As x moves left, every time it passes one of these four marked points one of the factors becomes negative. The sign (x − √5)(x + √ 5) of (2x + 6)(3x + 7) alternates between positive and negative as indicated below. 7 −3 −3 −√5 √5 + − −+ 74 + 7 So the solution set is −3, 5 ∪ (√5, ∞) ∪ (−∞, −3) as before. One has to be careful in squaring both sides of an inequality, Certainly if both a, b are positive then a < b implies that a2 < b2. But − 3 < − 2 but when we square both sides this would give 9 < 4 which is false. If both a, b are negative the inequality changes direction. That is, if a < b then a2 > b2. But if one of a, b is negative and the other is positive we can make no conclusion about their squares. Example 2: Solve the inequality 5x − 6 < x. 6 Solution: To begin with we must have x ≥ for the square root to exist. Also, since √ 5 6 denotes the non-negative square root we must have x > 0. If x ≥ 5 then the left hand side of the inequality is non-negative and the right hand side is positive so we can square both sides. ∴ 5x − 6 < x2 and so x2 − 5x + 6 > 0, that is (x −2)(x − 3) > 0. 6 This is satisfied when x < 2 and also when x > 3. But since x ≥ 5 this reduces to [1.2, 2) ∪ (3, ∞). 1.2 2 3 Example 3 (Hard): Solve the inequality x − 2 + x + 5 < 3. Solution: For the square roots to exist we must have x ≥ 2. Since both sides will be positive we can square both sides getting (x − 2) + (x + 5) + 2 (x − 2)(x + 5) < 9. ∴ (x − 2)(x + 5) < 3 − x. We can conclude from this that x ≤ 3 but we can make the interval narrower. We can square both sides again, getting (x − 2)(x + 5) < x2 − 6x + 9. ∴ x2 + 3x − 10 < x2 − 6x + 9. 19 1 1 ∴ 9x < 19 and so, x < 9 = 29 . The solution set is thus 2, 2 9 . §10.2. Surd Equations A surd is a square root, cube root etc. An equation involving surds is not a polynomial, but we can solve them by squaring both sides of the equation, or raising them to some other power, to get rid of the surds. Then we have a polynomial equation. We shall concentrate on equations involving just square roots. Example 4: Solve the equation 5x − 6 = x. Solution: Square both sides to get 5x − 6 = x2. ∴ x2 − 5x + 6 = 0. ∴ (x − 2)(x − 3) = 0. ∴ x = 2 or x = 3. 75 But beware! In the process of squaring we may pick up “solutions” that don’t satisfy the original equation. We must check our answers in the original surd equation. In Example 4 they both work but this is not always the case. Example 5: Solve the equation 3x − 12 − x − 3 = 1. Solution: Suppose 3x − 12 − x − 3 = 1. Add x − 3 to both sides. Then 3x − 12 = x − 3 + 1. Now square both sides. ∴ 3x − 12 = (x − 3) + 1 + 2 x − 3 .............. (1) ∴ 2 x − 3 = 2x − 10. ∴ x − 3 = x − 5. Now square both sides. ∴ x − 3 = (x − 5)2 .............. (2) = x2 − 10x + 25. ∴ x2 − 11x + 28 = 0. ∴ (x − 4)(x − 7) = 0. ∴ x = 4 or 7. These are the potential solutions. If x = 4 then 3x − 12 − x − 3 = −1 and so is not a solution to the original equation. It crept in when we squared both sides at step (1). If x = 7 then 3x − 12 − x − 3 = 3 − 2 = 1, so this is a valid solution. So x = 7 is the only solution. Example 6: Solve the equation 8 − x + x − 3 = 1. Solution: Suppose 8 − x + x − 3 = 1. Subtract x − 3 from both sides. Then 8 − x = 1 − x − 3 . ……………….(1) Now square both sides. ∴ 8 − x = (x − 3) + 1 − 2 x − 3 ∴ 2 x − 3 = 2x − 10. ∴ x − 3 = x − 5. ………………….. (2) Now square both sides. ∴ x − 3 = (5 − x)2 = x2 − 10x + 25. 2 ∴ x − 11x + 28 = 0. ∴ (x − 4)(x − 7) = 0. ∴ x = 4 or 7. These are the potential solutions. x = 4 is not a solution to either (1) or (2). It crept in when we squared both sides at step (2). x = 7 does satisfy (2), but not (1). It crept in when we squared both sides at step (1). So this equation has no solutions. 76