Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
University of Iowa Iowa Research Online Theses and Dissertations 1913 The vibration galvanometer, and a test of the current-sound sensibility of a telephone receiver Clarence William Hazellett State University of Iowa This work has been identified with a Creative Commons Public Domain Mark 1.0. Material in the public domain. No restrictions on use. This thesis is available at Iowa Research Online: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3620 Recommended Citation Hazellett, Clarence William. "The vibration galvanometer, and a test of the current-sound sensibility of a telephone receiver." MS (Master of Science) thesis, State University of Iowa, 1913. http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/3620. Follow this and additional works at: http://ir.uiowa.edu/etd Hazellett, Clarence William 1913 M.S. THE VIBRATION GALVANOMETER, AND A TEST OF THE CURRENT-SOUND SENSIBILITY OF A TELEPHONE RECEIVER. The two principal methods in use for the measurement of alternating currents depend upo 1 the heating effect produced in a small conductor carrying the current and the mutual interaction of two coils operated by currents from the name circuit, producing a relative displacement which is proportional to the product of the forces in the two coils and since they must be of the same sign, their product must be positive and the resulting deflection in the same direction. Both instruments are thus integrating instruments, adding up the effect of the current during the complete cycle. However neither of these instru ments can at all compare in sensibility with direct current instruments and a sensitive indicating meter for alternating currents is much needed in modern research, particularly in the branches pertaining to telephony. The ele c tr o dynamometer is fairly sensitive but its high self induction, particularly at high frequencies is a serious disadvantage. On the other hand the h o t wire instruments will measure currents of the frequency of Hertzian waves but is not at all sensitive to small currents. It has negligible self induction and produces no phase displacement in the circuit, wh i c h is undesirable. purely qualitative results are desired, Where as for instance in null methods of measuring capacity and inductance, the telephone receiver has been used extensively as an indicating instrument. But on account of the presence of harmonic currents in the circuit, of high frequency, to which the telephone receiver is quite sensitive, only a minimum may be determined which destroys the accuracy of the method. Here again it is highly desirable to have an alternating current detector of high sensibility and moreover one that will not respond appreciably to any other current than the fundamental. The first important step toward the solution of these problems was made by I'ax 7/ien » in 1891. His invention was known as the optical telephone and consisted of a membrane of some magnetic substance projecting over the magnetic pole of an ordinary telephone receiver. A small mirror was mounted upon the diaphragm, from which the image of an illumireted slit was reflected upon a scale. *Ann. d Physik Vol. 42 p 593 " " " " 44 p 601 It was necessary that some means be used for producing a current of the same frequency as the natural frequency of vibration of the membrane, or that some method of varying the latter to suit the former be used. The first method being much less difficult was used by Wien. When such a current is passed thru the coils wound upon the ends of the receiver magnet, a vibration of the membrane is set up which widens the image of the slit into a band. It was shown experimentally that the width of the band for small currents was proportional to the current. It will be seen at once that the essential principle of this instrument is the magnification of small forces by resonance. The optical telephone was practically dead beat and could be used for studying currents which varied quite rapidly with time, as polarization currents. With the scale at a distance of one meter from the mirror, required 3 X 1 G -7 Amp. it to produce one millimeter deflection or width of band. In his most sensitive instrument the diaphragm was replaced by a small watch spring with a soft iron armature attached to the end. This type of construction gave a very small sensibility to harmonics, the sensibility to the fundamental current being at least hundred times that for the first harmonic. one The range of frequencies of thi3 instrument i3 rather small work. and limits the adaptability to quantitative It is not at all suitable for hi^h frequency first on account of the impracticability of constructing a moving system which will operate satisfactorily and have a sensibility of value and second on account of the high self induction of such an instrument. Following out the principle of the optical telephone in a somewhat different manner, Rubens'" designed the first vibration galvanometer in 1895. A torsion wire is stretched between two magnetic ’poles and some small pieces of soft iron are fastened in a suitable manner* on this wire. Coils of fine wire are wound about the poles of i the magnet and an alternating current in them producing a differential effect in the magnetization and providing the moment of inertia of the magnet system and the free length of the suspension are properly adjusted the system vibrates in resonance with the current. A mirror system is used as in the optical telephone, to the wire. the mirror being shellaced Systems of various dimensions may be introduced to get a wide range of frequencies. This instrument has a sensibility about four times Q that of the optical telephone, requiring 7X10 Amp. per millimeter deflection with the scale at a distance of one meter. All instruments of this type, that is, operating on the principal of resonance have a very hi~h sensibility just at the resonance point ''Ann. d. Physik Vol. 5G, p 27 while a slight change of frequency of the current or of the instrument causes a very great decrease in the sensibility. sharpnesr A typical curve showing the of the resonance of such an instrument is given in figure 1. In 1901 Max Wien*improved the Ruben's type by replacing the soft iron pieces on the suspension by small permanent magnets. Instead of using the differential method however, he uses a field core built up of small iron wires to prevent eddy currents and the coil carrying the current is wound about this core. A sensibility was obtained of 1.8X10"8 per mm. Campbell described in 1907 a vibration galvanometer constructed on the principle of the D'Arsonval type. This instrument has a sensibility close to the figure given for the instrument above. It is evidently not adapted for high frequencies but is very satisfactory for frequencies under 750. Probably the most important advance in *Ann. d. Physik Vol. 309 p. 425 this line of work has been made by Duddell* in the invention of the bi-filar instrument. It consists of an ordinary coil galvanometer reduced to lowest terms, i.e, a coil of a single turn is placed between the poles of a very strong magnet and a mirror is mounted on the same. A phosphor bronze wire of very small diameter is stretched over two bridge pieces between the poles of the magnet and after running over a tension adjusting device is brought back parallel to the first part. When a current traverses this conductor one part tends to move in one direction and the other in the opposite direction. The suspended mirror is thus tilted and under the condition that the free length of the wires and the tension is properly adjusted the system will vibrate in a manner as described for the other instruments. A STUDY OF THE VIBRATION GALVANOMETER. THEORY. Consider the action of the ordinary galvanometer in which a relative displacement is produced by sending current through a coil situated in a magnetic field. If the current is gradually increased to a maximum the swing gradually increases to its maximum. In other words the displacement is in phase with the force. If the direction of the current is reversed at the end of the first swing the displacement in the other direction will be greater than the first, *Phil. Mag. Vol. and if the direction is IS, 1909 continuously changed at the proper time, when a steady state is reached the rate at which energy is converted is equal to the rate at which energy is I 0 3 1 by damping, and the maximum displacement will be much greater than that produced by the first deflection. In order that we shall have the condition that the motion of the vibrating system shall change direction with change of direction of the force, it w.ill be required that the moving system have the same period of vibration as the impressed force. Ordinarily the motion will be simple harmonic and the restoring force is continually equal to the displacement multiplied bjr a constant. However, when a steady state is reached, the phase of the force and displacement does not agree as in the above simple case but the moving system leads the force by ninety degrees. Rayleigh* in his discussion of forced vibrations develops the equation of m o ti o n of such a system. - • 2 YL-4 kti + n u E cos pt where u is the displacement, k the constant of damping, n the frequency of the system or the square root of the moment of inertia divided by the restoring moment and the right hand expression is the ordinary term indicating the phase relation. The solution of this equation is u = E s ift e c o s (p l + e) Ep "Rayleigh's Theory of Sound, Vol. 1, p. 46 where tan e = Rk_ n -o If n equals p the tangent of the nhase becomes infinity, and is therefore n i n e Jy degrees. Further if u or aIn zero and since the energy varies as • u 2 2 which in turn varies as sin e a solution for maximum is evidently where the sin e is one. It is evident from this that when the deflection passes the zero point that the velocity is greatest and that the current is a maximum. Since the counter electro-motive force develops is a function of the velocity, it follows that the C. E. I'. F and the current are in the same phase. the time The power converted is always equal to integral of the product of the C. E. M. F. and the current and it will be at once seen that a slight lack of timing, resulting in a phase displacement of the two will have a marked effect on the power converted and the sensibilitjr will thus drop rapidly. The solution of the equation expressing the power of any motor containing the impressed E. I'. F. and the C. E. M. F. terms for a maximum shows that the impressed E. M. F. should be double the C. E. I'. F. The fact that the C. E. M. F. depends upon the strength of the field makes it possible to tune for maximum deflection with a given current by varying the strength of the field or the distance between nthe poles. The calculation of the C. E. II. I'. may be made very conveniently by drawing tangents to the curve of calibration and the point at which they cut the E. U. F. axis is the C. E. M F. at that particular deflection denoted by the point of t an geney. A mathematical treatment of the instrument was reported by Frank V/enner of the U. S. bureau of standards in their bulletin of May 1909. A brief resume' with notes will If © i s be given. the angular displacement°f.<3 Y and are constants representing the moments of inertia, damping, restoration and displacement respectively, then from Grey's Abs. H e a s . in E l e c . and Hag. Vol 2, p. 392 the equation of motio n of the system is +Q do o< &tz ^ x o ~yrL dt and the free period is j_ - z. 77~ ir^ ~ f The solution of this equation after dropping terms which disappear when a steady state is reached is of the following form Vp73 w T ? "I being the effective value of the current and determined by the following relation, - Z " - ^ Co~s cu - f j c o s cr Y where Bb is the C. E. M. F. maximum value of 6. 0 represents the p 0 and p are the angular velocities of the displacement vectors of the moving system and the force respectively. In the equation for maximum displacement small and the p p p quantity (pQ - p ) becomes of great importance if the two frequencies do not a g r e e ,agreeing with the observed drop in sensibility under these conditions as mentioned above. In the equation for the effective value of the current the effective values of the electromotive forces are obtained simply by multiplying the forces by the cosine of the angle in order to get the components which are in phase with the current. Substitution of suitable expressions for the current and back E. M. F. give the following equations when the instrument is accurately tuned. V - w r(YQ+Vz) It is seen that the current sensibility is independent of the moment of inertia and that it will decrease with rise of frequency. Moreover the damping is one of the chief factors in sensibility and should be kept small. It is of two kinds, namely electrical and mechanical. The first can be reduced by eliminating the possible sources of eddy currents and by keeping the proper relations between the impressed and the back electro-motive forces. The latter may be decreased by using the galvanometer in a vacuum to decrease damping due to air friction and by employing suspensions of the greatest elasticity. It majr be concluded that for use in null methods it is desirable to use low frequencies on account of the greater sensibility. It is of some importance to consider the sensibility of the instruments to harmonics in a theoretical manner. If we substitute in the general equation for the electro-motive force sensibility, involving the frequencies of the force and the system, which is C.O S CO 0 = <r the values of the frequencies of the harmonics for p we shall obtain the value of 0*for this frequency. The following result is illustrative of what is obtained when the smaller terns are neglected, and considering the ciirrent to have three times the frequency of the system. <p3 = If a definite system of units is adopted and the sensibilities for the natural frequency and the harmonic frequency are compared it is found that the latter is very small compared with the former. In attempting to increase the sensibility of the vibration galvanometer by the use of resonating circuits, thus getting a magnification of the electric forces as well as the mechanical forces by the same principle, it was noticed that the connection of an inductance in parallel with the instrument increased its sensibility. Suitable variation of the inductance increased the deflection for a given current as much as two and one half times. On the other hand the introduction of any amount of capacity in the circuit decreased the sensibility markedly. I have attempted to explain this on the ground that the E. M, F. of self induction, being in quadrature ahead of the impressed E. M. F . , which is in quadrature behind the displacement is thus in exact phase with the displacement itself and thus should increase the deflection for a given amount of current. is however, ninety degrees E. M. F. The capacity E. M. F. behind the impressed and is hence in direct opposition to the displacement and should decrease the sensibility. Wenner has shown theoretically that the use of self induction should increase the sensibility under the condition that the impressed frequency should be raised at the same time. IIy results from a large number of trials show that the sensibility may be greatly increased without the readjustment of frequency and in each case the maximum sensibility was reached by increasing the frequency of the impressed force which agrees with W e n n e r 1s t heory. Wenner has also developed the equations relating the actions of the galvanometer when connected to the secondary of a transformer or when directly connected to the source of current. The relation of conditions necessary for a maximum sensibility is derived by solution of the equations for a maximum. In some work, using the galvanometer as a detector in the measurement of the conductivity of solutions I found it advantageous to use a transformer but no attempt was madeto get the most suitable conditions possible. With reference to the assumptions made in the theory discussed it should be mentioned that the moment of inertia may bo considered a constant only provided that the system is symetrical. If it is not symetrical the moments of inertia and of restoration will change with the frequency. The moment of displacement will not be exactly constant since it depends upon the effect hysteresis and eddy currents, of but these are of small magnitude and it is found the theory and experiment agree quite closely. A study of the construction desirable for laboratory use will disclose a few facts in regard to the relative value of the two instruments in various conditions. Taking the separate parts of the instruments for consideration and discussing the adaptability will be of some importance. The construction which will give the greatest sensibility at hi g h frequency will be the most sensitive at low frequencies providing the same system can be used for the low frequency. In the Ruben's type the strongest magnet for its weight and one which will have the least air damping for its cross section is desired. This requires a compound magnet to be used lor greatest strength and the distribution of the parts will be governed by the shape of the field poles, it being desired that they shall enclose a max i mu m number of lines of force when placed at right angles to their position of rest. Assuming that the square root of the moment of inertia is proportional to the reciprocal of the sensibility at high frequency and that the damping in air has the same ratio as the power required to pull an object of the same shape through a fluid medium it is easily shown that a rectangular cross section is to be preferred when the Instrument is used in a vacuum while the same general cross-section with tapering sides is most suitable for work at ordinary pressures. In practice it is difficult to mount such a system, it being necessary to anneal, bore, harden and magnetise the metal and it is found to be quite difficult to get the system of r.agnets symetrical. were obtained magnets. Not very satisfactory results in trying to use watch springs for I!ax ?-rien used a number of small steel wires fastened upon a small strip of mica, which was in turn fastened to the suspension by shellac. The wire used was one of the smallest phosphor bronze wires obtainable, but on account of the fact that the tuning of the instrument required the clamping of the wire in different places, which clamping flattened the wire in such a manner that the zero point shifted continually with change of free length that the manipulation of the instrument was very troublesome. This serious difficulty might be remedied by the use of a silk fiber as a suspension v/hich would be free from this flattening but on account of its low torsion coefficient would be useful only at lower frequencies. The most suitable size for the mirror is about 2-3 m m square. If made larger the period of vibration is too great and if too small the image of the slit is poor due to diffraction. The most satisfactory mirrors were made by blowing small glass bulbs which were very irregular in shape, silvering them on the outside, breaking them up into small pieces ana selecting cl pieces having a radius of curvature suitable for the scale distance. The field, core should be laminated to prevent the formation of eddy currents and there should be no collars or large pieces of metal about the pole tips on account of the transformer action which may impair the efficiency greatly. It should be possible to vary the distance of the magnetic poles from the m o vi n g system as this "ives an easy method of the most accurate tuning and this adjustment should be micrometric. If the instrument is to be used in avacuum it has been found advisable to do the final tuning by means of a magnetic shunt operated outside of the vacuum chamber. The tuning is quite sensitive to this and the change of damping is seen to explain the action, in the same manner as the variation of the field of an electric motor changes the speed. The coil for the field should preferably be divided into separate coils which can bo connected in series or in parallel. A coil of four ports having a resistance of fifty ohms each was used, #36 wire being used. The metho d of calibration used was to connect in series with a battery an electronagnetically operated was tuned to the galvanometer, interrupter, which in series with these were the galvanometer and a large non-inductive resistance, the galvanometer being shunted also at times. The effective value of the E. M. P. across the galvanometer and the series resistance was deternined and the circuit was considered as being without self induction, which is not very great at the frequencies used. No quantitative results connecting frequency and sensibility were sought but it was simply noticed that the sensibility decreases with increase of frequency. A calibration of the »■ instrument at a frequency of 100 is given below by the curve Fig. 2. Theoretically it appears that the curve should not be quite so straight on account of the increase of C. E. I,'. F. with increasing deflection. The sensibility of this instrument was not as high as that obtained by 7/ien, the current required to O give one m m deflection being 6.9 x 10- If a conductor is stretched in a magnetic field and a current passes through it the wire tends to move in a direction at right angles to the current and the field. If the same wire is returned through the same field, the relative direction of the current is opposite and the displacement is opposite, so that a mirror fastened upon both of them will be tilted. If the free length of the wires and their tension are capable of adjustment we have a variable frequency, vibration galvanometer. The wires are made of the smallest phosphor bronze material obtainable, i.e., .0015 in. in diameter and the variation of their free length is effected by two sliding bridge pieces in which they rest. The c o n struction of the mirror is the same as that with the other type 7/ith the additional precaution that the rear of the mirror should have a coat of paraffin to prevent the conducting layer of silver from short circuiting the two conductors. In some cases it is desirable to have the resistance of the instrument as low as possible and a suggestion may not be out of place. The upper bridge piece should be conducting thus cutting off the resistance of the upper ends which are not in use and the lower bridge being necessarily insulating m a y have two conducting pins connected with low resistance flexible conductors to remove the resistance of the lower part not in use. The magnetic field should be the strongest available and the magnetic pole faces should be narrow rectangles in cross- section, having their long side parallel to the suspension and as close to it as possible. A spring is found necessary between the j-ing over which the suspension runs and the tension a d ju st ing screw in order to prevent breakages. The general theory given applies to this instrument as w e -11 as to the instrument previously described. The accompanying diagrams will give a general idea of their construction. The source of current used in the calibration of the instruments was an electromagneticallv operated either of inter axpter consisting a tuning fork or vibrating wire. Two insulated contact devices were necessary one for the operating current and the other for the testing current. Contact was nade by means of small platinum wires dipping into mercury cups the contact being shunted by condensers to prevent sparking. The vibrating wire possesses the advantage that it can be tuned to a wide range of frequency. A rather large iron wire has two short sharp pointed platinum wires soldered to it. A large wire is needed for a small wire heats when the current ir sent through it necessary to operate, thus THE SINGLE SUSPENSION VIBRATION GALVANOMETER. W i s t h e wedge u s e d f o r v a r y i n h f r e o l e n g t h o f w ire b u t g e n e r a l l y some c l a m p i n g d e v i c e is u s 3 d . I P s t h e m i r r o r , S t h e magnet s y s te m and F t h e f i e l d . BI-FILAR VIBRATION GALVANOMETER. M is the mirror W the wedges S the spring changing the elasticity and hence the pitch. It is not possible as night be expected to have a piece of soft iron attached to the center of the wire to get a greater magnetic effect on account of the consequent damping of the fundamental. In an instrument of the single suspension type it is found that the interrupter must be at considerable distance from the galvanometer for obviously the galvanometer is very sensitive to changes in magnetization which are tuned to it. Where available a generator of constant speed but variable would be most desirable, while a motor generator set operated in synchronism with a tuning fork would give the greatest accuracy. For null methods a tuning fork interrupter is found to be very satisfactory but only suffices for qualitative work. To eliminate the effect of harmonics hi#i frequencies s’ n ould be used while for the greatest sensibilities low frequencies are bet ter The methods of tuning, part of which have been suggested are as follows: suspension and the bi-filar, For the single the variation of the free length of the suspension, the moment of inertia of the moving system, the distance of the pole faces from the moving system and the use of the mngnetic shunt are all found to be favorable under certain conditions. Wi t h the bi-filar a variation of the tension gives the fine adjustment in tuning. A stroboscope method of tuning was devised for accurate tuning and to indicate whether the instrument was responding to harmonics or the fundamental. It consisted of a mirror mounted on the shaft of a constant speed D. C. motor and so fastened that its plane was not perpendicular to the axis of the motor. The intermittent light produced at the interrupter when view reflected from this rotating mirror appeared as a ring of sparks which remained stationary if the speed of the motor was an aliquot part of the frequency of the interrupter If a small mirror was placed at the zero point of the scale of the galvanometer so as to reflect the image of the slit upon the rotating nirror also, when the nirror was vibrating just twice as many images of the slit are reflected from the rotating mirror as from the interrupter and if one set of images stands still the other will also if properly tuned. Any other ratio than two to one indicates a response to an incorrect frequency. Where a generator is used instead of the interrupter an incandescent lamp having a gas immersed filament will give the stroboscopic effect and in this case t iere will, be an equal number of images of the slit and the light. Since our aim is to be able to use the galvanometer as a quantitative instrument very accurate tuning is necessary and the very sharp resonance curve makes it imperative. lack of tuning does not throw A slight the system out of step but causes it to make forced vibrations which lag in phase behind the current. It may be mentioned that the above described stroboscope has a number of quite importan possibilities in demonstration of intermittent light phenomena and as a practical device in several branches of alternating current work. An experimental comparison of the two instruments shows that all most all differences of the two types is in favor of the bi-filar. The bi-filar may be tuned by making the rough and fine adjustments while looking at the scale while with the other type a trial adjustment must be made and then observed, making the process very tedious and uns a tisfactory. The shifting of the zero point as before mentioned does not occur at all with the bi-filar. The bi-filar is more easily operated in a vacuum due to the greater ease of tuning by varying the current in the field. The bi-filar has the lowest resistance, the least self induction possible, sharper resonance, no eddy current losa to mention, higher sensibility, easier manufacture and insertion of suspensions, and possessing a much greater range of frequencies. As pointed out, the max im u m power converted occurs when the impressed E. M. F. is double the C. E. M. F. There is no method of calculating the C. E. M. v . for the single suspension but the following simple equation will give the C. E. M. F. for any deflection. E, - 2 D* sin*x* A* (D*P b TUB---------where E b is the C. E. M. F . , A is the free length of the wires, P is the frequency, fl) the flux density, D the distance between the two wires of tht suspension, x is the angular deflection of the mirror or x - t a n -1- R where R is one half the total width of the band image of slit, and L the distance from the scale to the mirror. In the results to be given in the latter part of this paper it appears that the bi-filar instrument may be used satisfactorily for quantitative work and that it may be depended upon to give consistent results. * Moreover I have used the vibration galvanometer as a detector in the measxirement of the conductivity of solutions by the Kohlrausch bridge method and the results obtained are incomparably more accurate and consistent than the older methods. It seems probable that the vibration galvanometer, when tuned to the frequency of the trains of waves striking the antennae of a wireless telegraph system, might be used in place of the telephone receiver when it is used with the crystal rectifiers or the Marconi detector. Since the vibration galvanometer will detect a current one hundred times as small as that required to produce an audible sound and since its time constant is small it would possibly be of value in this field. TIP CURRENT-SOUND SENSIBILITY OF THE TELEPHONE RECEIVER. In the study of architectural acoustics some method of measuring accurately the intensity of sound at various parts of auditoriums, is greatly to be desired. etc., Three principal methods have been used in measuring the absolute intensity of sound, namely; by means of the Rayleigh disc, by measuring the increase of pressure at reflecting surfaces by means of a balance,'"'and by the change of pressure at the nodes of stationary waves being measured, using a manometer* Still another method using optical interference hrs been u s e d / ’ As a combined test of the use of the vibration galvanometer for quantitative use and a search for an easier method of measuring the current-sound sensibility of the telephone receiver, we have devised a method in which a source of sound of variable intensity sets up vibrations which impinge upon the diaphragm of a telephone receiver and act upon a Rayleigh disc. The current generated in the telephone receiver is measured by means of the vibration galvanometer connected, directly thereto, while the absolute sound intensity is determined * Zernov. Ann. d. Physik, 26, 1908, p. 79. * Altberg, " " " 11, 1903, p. 405 * Raps, " " " 36, 1889, p. 273 * 11 " " 50, 1893, p. 193 " from the deflection of the Rayleigh disc. The constant source of sound intensity consisted of an electromagnetically operated tuning fork mounted upon a resonator and actuated, by a current which was variable and thus varied the intensity of sound without varying the frequency of the note appreciably. A second method of varying the intensity was used to insure against the possibility of the variation made in one m a n n e r ,distorting the results. The two curves were identical within the limit of experimental error. A diagram of the apparatus is given below. A is the telephone receiver and the resonating tube connected therewith, B is the tuning fork apparatus and G represents the vibration galvanometer, and D is the Rayleigh disc apparatus. requires some description. This part A brass tube was originally used having a length equal to the half wave length of the sound used. One end is closed by means of a telescoping brass tube so as to be able to tune the instrument accurately, the other being very tightly closed by means of a diaphragm. Over this end another tube is placed which has a length of a quarter wave, for the purpose of obtaining resonance in order to get a larger change of pressure at the node. A light silvered disc is suspended in the eenter of the longer tube and the change of pressure at this point produces a constant deflection which has been shown to be directly proportional to the incident sound intensity. An ordinary mirror and scale is used to read the deflections of the disc. Dr. Stewart has modified this and obtained a greater sensibility by narrowing the tube down to a small channel in the center, thus virtually concentrating the pressure. The work of Stewart and Stiles ■Sfr indicate that the deflection is proportional to the sound intensity outside of the tubesnd it seems allowable to assume the same relation to hold in this case. Some precautions of manipulation must be observed. The relative positions of the instruments must not bechanged or of other objects in the room on account of the fact that we have standing waves i n the room and inconsistent results must follow. Even the movement of the hands of the observer will distort results and it is neccesr.ary that he must be able to read both galvanometer and Physical Rev. April 1913 Rayleigh disc apparatus without moving the head. In order to have the intensity of sound to remain constant with given conditions have it is necessary to a very smoothly operating contact device, and a spring upon a spring was employed, made simply of platinum wire and fastened directly to the fork. The other method besides that of varying the current in the operating coil to change the sound intensity was to slide a disc covered with felt across the opening in the resonator box. In the curves given the points marked by o were made by this latter method. The calibration of the galvanometer is that given in the first part of this paper and it will be remembered that it is a straight line over the range used. The indications of both instruments wi]] not be over three or four per ccnt in error. The resulting curves taken under the best conditions are given on the next page. It is to be noticed that they are approximately parabolic and the more distant points on the curve approach a maximum for the amount of current. of the current, The square that is, a constant times the e nergv when plotted with the sound intensity gives approximately a straight line, indicating that the two energies are proportional. The receiver used is thus calibrated and given the same conditions with any intensity of sound and a particular point of the curve is determined or vice versa. The frequency used was 256 and it w o ul d be much better to use a frequency corresponding to the natural frequency of the telephone receiver, which ordinarily is near 700. A typical sensibility curve of a telephone is given below where the frequency is varied, and it will be seen that for resonance the sensibility is much greater. The least audible current is plotted with frequency in this diagram. A tentative theory which may account for the results obtained may be made if we are allowed to assume that the amplitude of vibration of the vibrating diaphragm is directly proportional to the change in pressure or the condensation. It seems reasonable that this should be the case at least with small amplitudes. If we call the displacement X and assume S. II. motion, then X varies as the amplitude. Now the E. M. P. generated in the receiver is proportional to the current in the circuit, if we can neglect the self induction, and it is obviously proportional to X. Since theory shows that sound intensity varies as the square of the condensation, hence, the current should vary as the square root of the sound intensity, or Should give a parabola when plotted, and moreover, the square of the current should vary directly with the sound intensity. This rather crude theory agrees with e x p e ri me nt a l■results accurately but it is to be admitted that several other conditions are to be taken into account. Several receivers should be studied to see if the relation continually holds. Since resonating instruments have in general greater sensibility it would be somewhat important to design a receiver having a low natural frequency for this purpose, and having a large diaphragm and wide magnetic poles in order to be quite sensitive. It may be suggested that the telephone receivers used in wireless telegraphy with rectifiers be tuned as nearly as possible to the train frequency of the incoming waves, since a much higher sensibility may be obtained as is shown by the curve given on the previous page.