* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Atrial Fibrillation - NHS Education for Scotland
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Atrial Fibrillation Steve McGlynn Specialist Principal Pharmacist (Cardiology), Greater Glasgow and Clyde Honorary Clinical Lecture, University of Strathclyde Some types of arrhythmia Supraventricular Sinus Nodal Sinus bradycardia Sinus tachycardia Sinus arrhythmia Atrial Atrial tachycardia Atrial flutter Atrial fibrillation AV Nodal AVNSVT Heart blocks Junctional Ventricular Escape rhythms Ventricular tachycardia Ventricular fibrillation Atrial fibrillation A heart rhythm disorder (arrhythmia). It usually involves a rapid heart rate, in which the upper heart chambers (atria) are stimulated to contract in a very disorganized and abnormal manner. A type of supraventricular tachyarrhythmia The most common arrhythmia Aetiology Rheumatic heart disease Coronary heart disease (MI) Hypertension Myopericarditis Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy Cardiac surgery Thyrotoxicosis Infection Alcohol abuse Pulmonary embolism Caffeine Exercise Lone AF Incidence / Prevalence 1.7 / 1000 patients / year 3 / 1000 patients / year (>60 years) 0.4 - 1% (overall) 2 – 4% (>60 years) >8% (>80 years) Classification New / Recent onset < 48 hours Paroxysmal variable duration self terminating Persistent Non-self terminating Cardiovertable Permanent Non-self terminating Non-cardiovertable Symptoms / Signs Breathlessness / dyspnoea Palpitations Syncope / dizziness Chest discomfort Stroke / TIA 6 x risk of CVA 2 x risk of death 18 x risk of CVA if rheumatic heart disease Irregularly irregular pulse Atrial rate 300-600bpm Ventricular rate depends on degree of AV block 120-160bpm Peripheral rate slower (pulse deficit) Investigations Electrocardiogram (ECG) All patients May need ambulatory monitoring Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) Establish baseline Identify structural heart disease Risk stratification for anti-thrombotic therapy Transoesophogeal echocardiography (TOE) Further valve assessment If TTE inconclusive / difficult Normal Sinus Rhythm ‘Fast’ AF ‘Slow’ AF Atrial Flutter Investigations Electrocardiogram (ECG) All patients May need ambulatory monitoring Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) Baseline Structural heart disease Risk stratification for anti-thrombotic therapy Transoesophogeal echocardiography (TOE) Further valve assessment TTE inconclusive / difficult Diagnosis Based on: ECG Presentation Response to treatment Treatment objectives Rhythm / rate control Stroke prevention Treatment strategies New / Recent onset Cardioversion Rhythm control Paroxysmal Rate control or cardioversion during paroxysm Rhythm control if needed Persistent Cardioversion Rhythm control Peri-cardioversion thromboprophylaxis Permanent Rate control Thromboprophylaxis Pharmacological Options Class Ic Anti-arrhythmics Flecainide / Propafenone Rhythm control May also be pro-arrhythmic Class II Anti-arrhythmics Beta-blockers Mainly rate control Control rate during exercise and at rest Generally first choice Choice depends on co-morbidities Class III Anti-arryhthmics Amiodarone / Dronedarone Mainly rhythm control May be pro-arrhythmic Concerns over toxicity Class IV Anti-arryhthmics Calcium channel blockers (verapamil / diltiazem only) Rate control only Alternative to beta-blockers if no heart failure Digoxin Rate control only Does not control rate during exercise Third choice unless others contra-indicated Acute AF Treatment will depend on: History of AF Time to presentation (<> 24 hours) Co-morbidities (CHD, CHF/LVSD etc) Likelihood of success (History) Rate Vs. Rhythm control Rhythm control not feasible or safe Beta-blocker Verapamil Digoxin (CHF) Rhythm control if possible and safe DC cardioversion (if possible) Amiodarone (CHD or CHF/LVSD) Flecainide (Paroxysmal AF) Paroxymal AF Rhythm control* Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Beta-blocker Aspirin 75-300mg Class 1c agent or sotalol warfarin to INR 2-3 If CHD - sotalol See later If LVD: Amiodarone Dronedarone? *May be “Pill in the pocket” Persistent AF Rhythm control Beta blocker No structural heart disease: Class 1c* or sotalol Structural heart disease: amiodarone Rate control As for permanent AF * not if CHD present Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Pre-cardioversion thromboprophylaxis of at least 3 weeks If rate control, as for permanent AF Permanent AF Beta blocker or Antithrombotic therapy as per risk assessment Calcium channel blocker and/or Aspirin 75-300mg Digoxin Warfarin to INR 2-3 See later Amiodarone? Stroke prevention (non-rheumatic AF) Stroke Risk Assessment (CHADS2) C H A D S Chronic Heart Failure (1 point) Hypertension (1 point) Age > 75 years (1 point) Diabetes (1 point) Stroke, TIA or systemic embolisation (2 points) Score < 2: low risk, aspirin or anticoagulant Score ≥ 2: high risk, anticoagulant indicated Stroke Risk Assessment (CHA2DS2VASc) Alternative to CHADS2 C H A D S V A Sc Chronic Heart Failure (1 point) Hypertension (1 point) Age > 75 years (2 points) Diabetes (1 point) Stroke, TIA or systemic embolisation (2 points) vascular disease (1 point) Age 65-74 years (1 point) Sex category (1 point if female) Bleeding Risk Assessment (HAS-BLED) 1 point each for: Hypertension Abnormal renal/liver function (1 for each) Stroke Bleeding history or predisposition Labile INR Elderly (age over 65) Drugs*/alcohol** concomitantly (1 for each) *Drugs that increase bleeding, e.g. aspirin ** Alcohol excess Anticoagulants Warfarin remains standard anticoagulant at present 3 new oral anticoagulants (unlicensed for AF as of June 2011) Dabigatran (Direct thrombin inhibitor) Rivaroxiban (Factor Xa inhibitor) Apixaban (Factor Xa inhibitor) Fixed doses No monitoring At least as effective as warfarin Safer than warfarin? Much more expensive (even allowing for INR costs) Place in therapy not clear yet Conclusions AF is a common condition. Patients may be unaware of its presence and are therefore at risk of a stroke Alternative treatment strategies exist to control symptoms Alternative treatment strategies exist to reduce the risk of stroke Patient education and choice are central to improving the likelihood of treatment success