Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Management of Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) in primary care Kifayat Ullah Core Surgical Trainee East of England Deanery Objectives 1. Background and prevalence of OME 2. Distinguishing OME from AOM 3. Risk factors of OME 4. Audit on OME management 5. Conclusion Background • OME or “glue ear” commonest cause of childhood hearing impairment • Inflammation of middle ear with collection of liquid in middle ear space • Peak 2-6 years of age • 85% of children experience fluid in ears following infection • 50% resolve within 3 months Prevalence of OME • 1993 - 1995 (NCHS),2 OM accounted for 18% ambulatory visits (1-4 yr) 14% visits during the 1st yr of life • OME episodes diagnosed2 81% in pediatric practices 13% in hospital ED 6% in hospital outpatient departments Distinguishing OME from AOM At least two of : 1. Abnormal color: white, yellow, amber, blue 2. Opacification not due to scarring 3. Decreased or absent mobility Yes Or Bubbles or air-fluid interfaces behind the TM Acute purulent otorrhea not due to otitis externa Yes Middle Ear Effusion (MEE) No Acute Inflammation Acute Inflammation 1. Distinct fullness or bulging of the TM 2. Substantial ear pain, including unaccustomed tugging or rubbing of the ear 3. Distinct erythema of the TM Yes Otitis Media with Effusion (OME) Acute Otitis Media (AOM) Yes Risk factors of OME • Host factors Age/Gender Genetic predisposition Cleft palate/Down syndrome Allergy/Immunity • Environmental factors Daycare/Siblings Bottle (versus breast) feeding Pacifier use Smoking Low socioeconomic status Season/Upper respiratory infections Why do this audit? Unnecessary visits to ENT clinic Parents frustration why symptoms have not resolved OME management not understood in community Audit • Prospective study run in ENT outpatient clinic at Tunbridge Wells Hospital, Kent • 250 children aged between 2 and 10 years of age referred from primary care • Data collected prospectively in the form of a questionnaire • New referrals recruited over 12 month period Main standards in audit Referral orientation for primary care Where OME is strongly suspected to have occurred irrespective of a known ear infection or to have continued for more than 1 month refer: • Under 4 years of age: To the second tier community audiology clinic for hearing assessment. Subject to resources and efficiency of booking, this is usually the most direct route to valid audiometry. • Over four years of age: To children’s ENT clinic for hearing assessment Watchful waiting is the initial management, unless there are overriding concerns about hearing, speech or language development accompanying an established history, or unless this has already occurred as set out above. Questionnaire: Initial referrals and management of OME Results Age Female 24% 6-10 16% Gender Male 76% 2-5 84% Results > 4 weeks 14% Duration of symptoms 86% < 4 weeks 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 8% Recent ear infection 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 8% OME episode 92% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Yes No 100% > 1episode 1 episode Results • No hearing test in community • All children reviewed developed conductive hearing loss • Tympanograms = type B in 90% of children • True OME in 90% of children examined • 10% of children have had recent AOM • 10% delay in development of speech Discussion • Most children managed in community not managed according to guidelines • OME management not understood to indicate an optimal strategy • Concern regarding hearing test where none of the children had this performed prior to ENT visit Discussion • OME huge impact on speech development and educational performance • 30% of children had delay in speech and development • Treatment for OME should initially start with ‘watchful waiting’ – 64% children started on decongestants/antihistamines/antibiotics Changes made • Standards had not been met mainly due to lack of knowledge in management of OME • Following action plan: Presentation at GP trainee teaching sessions Leaflet and poster distribution to GP clinics Develop a checklist for GP doctors in community when assessing children with possible OME • Currently – action plans have been implemented and re-audit is currently active Conclusion • Audit indicates OME management needs appropriate decision making • Concerns raised regarding audiology services in the community • After a watchful waiting period- refer to ENT clinic if no improvement for further management References • • • • • • • • • Audit Commission access to care 2002 http://www.audit-commission.gov.uk/reports/accessible.asp?ProdID=D4361C80-E5CB-11d6- B1E10060085F8572 Accessed 13/12/06 1 Lous J, Burton MJ, Felding JU, Oveson T, Wake M, Williamson IG. Grommets (ventilation tubes) for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children. (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4,2002. Oxford: Update Software. 2 Williamson I. (1999). Otitis media with effusion. Clinical Evidence: 2: 206-212. BMJ Publishing, London. 3 Williamson I. (2002) Otitis media with effusion. Clinical Evidence 7: 477-480. BMJ Publishing, London. 4 Cohen H, Friedman EM, Lai D, Pellicer M, Duncan N, Sulek M (1997) Balance in children with otitis media with effusion. Int J Ped Otorhinolaryngol 42, 107-115. 5 Bluestone CD, Gates GA, Klein JO, Lim DJ, Mogi G, Ogra PL, Paparella MM, Paradise J, Tos M. (2002). Definitions, Terminology and Classification of otitis media. In: Lim D (ed). Recent advances in otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. (supp). 111: 8-18. 6 Effective Health Care Bulletin. No. 4, (1992) The Treatment of Persistent Glue Ear in Children Effective Health Care Bulletin (4), University of Leeds, ISSN: 0965-0288. 7 Haggard M. (2003) MRC randomised trial on surgical treatment of OME (“glue ear”) in children – 50 findings from TARGET and related HSR & epidemiological studies. March 2003. MRC- ESS in Children’s Middle Ear Disease, Cambridge. (Unpublished report). Questions?