Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Automated DNA fingerprinting analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using fluorescent detection of PCR products. W R Butler, W H Haas and J T Crawford J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34(7):1801. These include: CONTENT ALERTS Receive: RSS Feeds, eTOCs, free email alerts (when new articles cite this article), more» Information about commercial reprint orders: http://journals.asm.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml To subscribe to to another ASM Journal go to: http://journals.asm.org/site/subscriptions/ Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on February 26, 2014 by PENN STATE UNIV Updated information and services can be found at: http://jcm.asm.org/content/34/7/1801 JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, July 1996, p. 1801–1803 0095-1137/96/$04.0010 Copyright q 1996, American Society for Microbiology Vol. 34, No. 7 Automated DNA Fingerprinting Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Using Fluorescent Detection of PCR Products W. RAY BUTLER,1* WALTER H. HAAS,2 AND JACK T. CRAWFORD1 Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta Georgia 30333,1 and University Childrens Hospital, Heidelberg University, Germany2 DNA fingerprints of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are produced by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the insertion element IS6110. We modified a PCR-based subtyping method, mixed-linker PCR with fluorescent-labeled IS6110-specific oligonucleotides, to demonstrate rapid, automated, and unattended electrophoretic analysis. Variation in band sizing (normally occurring with fragment mobility), an artifact of lane-to-lane and gel-to-gel differences, was controlled with an internal lane standard, resulting in accurate and precise DNA sizing. By using this method, fingerprint analysis can be performed using actual fragment length rather than estimated position analysis. ored electrophoretic image with corresponding tabular data on band sizes. Mycobacterium strains. We examined M. tuberculosis strains from the collection at CDC. They represented isolates obtained from clinical laboratories as part of investigations of outbreaks or suspected occurrences of laboratory cross-contamination. PCR method. For the ML-PCR method, mycobacterial DNA was isolated in an aqueous phase after aggressive shaking with glass beads with a Mickle apparatus (Brinkman Instruments, Westbury, N.Y.) as described by Plikaytis et al. (6). The procedure for ML-PCR has been previously described by Haas et al. (4). Briefly, DNA is digested with HhaI, and a double-stranded oligonucleotide, designated mixed linker, is ligated to the cut ends. The mixed linker is an unphosphorylated product with a GC overhang at the 39 end compatible with the HhaI-restriction fragments. One strand of the linker contains uracil instead of thymidine and is subsequently removed by treatment with uracil N-glycosylase. Restriction fragments containing the IS6110 sequence are amplified by PCR by using an IS6110-specific primer and a linker primer. Subsequently, a nested amplification with a second primer specific for IS6110 increases the specificity of the reaction. Substitution of fluorescently labeled primers for this second IS6110-specific primer resulted in production of fluorescence-labeled PCR products. For clarity, the sequences are shown in Table 1. With the exception of the fluorescence-labeled primers, primers were synthesized at the Biotechnology Core Facility, CDC, on a DNA synthesizer (Model 381A; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Fluorescent tags. Four different fluorescent labels were used: FAM (blue), JOE (green), TAMRA (yellow), and ROX With the resurgence of tuberculosis, there has been a concurrent increase in basic molecular investigative research on Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Some of this basic research has been applied in mycobacterium reference laboratories, and molecular approaches are fast becoming standard methods of analysis. One such method is the molecular subtyping of M. tuberculosis isolates by DNA fingerprinting. A standardized restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) procedure has been adopted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to track strains of M. tuberculosis associated with epidemiological investigations (8). The procedure is based on variability in copy number and sites of insertion of IS6110. The DNA fingerprint patterns generated by this method are identified by arbitrarily assigned series numbers and have been shown to be reliable for tracking outbreaks of M. tuberculosis (2, 8). Compared with the earlier phage-typing method (7), IS6110 RFLP is a rapid method that yields results in several weeks. However, compared with other molecular methods, the IS6110 RFLP procedure is slow. Alternatively, PCR methods produce DNA fingerprint results quickly. One such procedure is the mixed-linker PCR (ML-PCR). This method does not rely upon growing cultures or viable cells and reliably detects fragments containing IS6110 (4). Patterns generated by using MLPCR have shown a direct correlation to those obtained with the standard RFLP method, providing the same clustering of isolates (1, 3, 4, 5). Electrophoretic separation of the DNA fragments on gels is used for both methods, and the sizes of the fragments are estimated by their migration distances relative to standard fragments of known size. However, standardization of fingerprints can be problematic because lane-to-lane and gelto-gel variation caused by electrophoretic separation reduces the accuracy of estimated fragment sizing. We report here a procedure in which fluorescence-labeled oligonucleotide primers are used in the ML-PCR method to generate fluorescencetagged PCR products for rapid, accurate analysis using the 373A DNA sequencer (ABI) with Genescan 672 software. Output from the DNA sequencer is in the form of a multicol- TABLE 1. Modified oligonucleotides for ML-PCR Purpose Linker construction Linker amplification IS6110 amplification IS6110 nested amplification * Corresponding author. Mailing address: Mailstop F08, NCID/ DASTLR, CDC, 1600 Clifton Rd., Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone: (404) 639-1280. Fax: (404) 639-1287. 1801 Sequence 59-AGA ACT GAC CTC GAC TCG CAC G-39 39-TCU UGA CUG GAG CUG AGC GU-59 59-AGA ACT GAC CTC GAC TCG CA-39 59-TCG ACT GGT TCA ACC ATC GCC G-39 59-dye-ACC AGT ACT GCG GCG ACG TC-39 Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on February 26, 2014 by PENN STATE UNIV Received 16 January 1996/Returned for modification 19 March 1996/Accepted 1 April 1996 1802 NOTES J. CLIN. MICROBIOL. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on February 26, 2014 by PENN STATE UNIV FIG. 1. Polyacrylamide gel analysis of PCR-amplified HhaI RFLP from representative strains of M. tuberculosis. (A) Precise base sizing of M. tuberculosis isolate CA 93-8287, series 134, fluorescently labeled with yellow tag (lanes 1 to 10). Overlapping PCR fragments from electrophoresis of three M. tuberculosis strains per lane shown as purple (lanes 11 to 15). (B to D) Detection of individual fluorescent dyes as discriminated by analysis software. The strains and the respective fluorescent tags used in lanes 11 through 15 are as follows. Lane 11, CA 93-8408, series 141 (blue); NY 94-8256, series 021 (green); and TN 93-8263, series 132 (yellow). Lane 12, CA 93-8407, series 141 (blue); GA 93-8013, series 147 (green); and CA 93-8287, series 134 (yellow). Lane 13, TN 94-8003, series 146 (blue); CA 93-8003, series 079 (green); and CA 93-8223, series 127 (yellow). Lane 14, TN 94-8002, series 146 (green); TN 93-8262, series 132 (blue); and CA 93-8223, series 127 (yellow). Lane 15, CA 93-8286, series 134 (blue); MN 93-8405, series 068 (green); and TN 93-8227, series 126 (yellow). VOL. 34, 1996 1803 ping PCR fragments electrophoresed in these lanes are displayed as purple in Fig. 1A. Panels B, C, and D show detection of the individual fluorescent dyes as discriminated by the analysis software. In total, 15 different M. tuberculosis strains, representing 10 different CDC epidemiological investigations, were easily separated in lanes 11 through 15. Different strains representing the same RFLP series produced identical PCR restriction fragments. The analysis demonstrated the separation of DNA restriction fragments from strains coloaded into lanes 11 to 15 (Fig. 1B, C, and D). Coloading of multiple samples into a single lane did not affect migration distances of the fragments for individual samples. The ML-PCR procedure can be completed in 3 days. Because detection of the three fluorescent tags is independent of each other, 72 DNA samples could be analyzed in the 24 lanes of a single gel with this technique. The number of HhaI restricted amplification fragments produced with the ML-PCR does not always match the number of genomic DNA bands produced from the same strain of M. tuberculosis digested with PvuII for standard RFLP fingerprinting analysis. However, this variation was never more than a single band difference for the samples analyzed. Moreover, the method is suitable for epidemiological studies, since the grouping of the fingerprints by ML-PCR is consistent for repetitive isolates and is in agreement with the clusters determined by standard RFLP results. For the standard RFLP analysis method, DNA is isolated from 1-week-old 7H9 broth cultures of M. tuberculosis and digested with PvuII as previously described (8). PCR-based analysis of DNA has the advantage that it does not rely upon growing cells. REFERENCES 1. Braden, C. R., and an Investigative Team. 1995. Infectiousness of a university student with laryngeal and cavitary tuberculosis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:565–570. 2. Cave, M. D., K. D. Eisenach, P. F. McDermott, J. H. Bates, and J. T. Crawford. 1991. IS6110: conservation of sequence in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and its utilization in DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Cell. Probes 5:73–80. 3. Cleveland, J. L., J. Kent, B. F. Gooch, S. E. Valway, D. W. Marianos, W. R. Butler, and I. M. Onorato. 1995. Multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an HIV dental clinic. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 16:7–11. 4. Haas, W. H., W. R. Butler, C. L. Woodley, and J. T. Crawford. 1993. Mixedlinker polymerase chain reaction: a new method for rapid fingerprinting of isolates of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31: 1293–1298. 5. Horn, D. L., D. Hewlett, W. H. Haas, W. R. Butler, J. T. Crawford, C. Alfalla, E. Tan, A. Levine, A. Nayak, S. Peterson, and S. M. Opal. 1994. Superinfection with rifampin-isoniazid-streptomycin-ethamabutol (RISE)-resistant tuberculosis in three AIDS patients: confirmation by polymerase chain reaction. Ann. Intern. Med. 121:115–116. 6. Plikaytis, B. B., R. H. Gelber, and T. M. Shinnick. 1990. Rapid and sensitive detection of Mycobacterium leprae using a nested-primer gene amplification assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:1913–1917. 7. Snider, D. E., W. D. Jones, Jr., and R. C. Good. 1984. The usefulness of phage typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 130:1095– 1099. 8. van Embden, J. D. A., M. D. Cave, J. T. Crawford, J. W. Dale, K. D. Eisenach, B. Gicquel, P. W. M. Hermans, C. Martain, R. McAdam, T. M. Shinnick, and P. M. Small. 1993. Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:406–409. Downloaded from http://jcm.asm.org/ on February 26, 2014 by PENN STATE UNIV (red). Applied Biosystem’s FluoroProbes Service synthesized the nested primer and 59-labeled it with one each of the different dyes, except red. The red dye was used for the internal lane size standard (i.e., GS2500 ROX-labeled standard) designed for detection of fragments from 37 to 400 bp. The Genescan software used the internal standard to create a calibration curve of peak detection time and used the curve to automatically calculate the sizes of the PCR products. Analysis of fluorescence-labeled sample. For loading, 2 ml of fluorescence-labeled PCR products was rapidly evaporated in a Savant SpeedVac (Savant Instruments, Inc., Farmingdale, N.Y.) at ambient temperature. Each sample or multiple sample mixture was suspended in 5 ml of loading mixture, consisting of 4.3 ml of deionized formamide, 0.5 ml of GS2500 (ROX) standard, and 0.2 ml of an aqueous solution of blue dextran (8 mg/ml). Samples were denatured by heating at 928C for 5 min and snap cooled before loading. Multiple samples with different fluorescent labels were coloaded in the same well for analysis. PCR products were separated on a 6% polyacrylamide denaturing gel with a 24 cm well-to-read distance for 7 h at 800 V. Electrophoretic data were automatically analyzed and sized in base pairs with the Genescan software and reconstructed as a gel image. Automated fluorescence detection, following ML-PCR amplification of HhaI restriction fragments of IS6110, was accomplished by substitution of a 59-fluorescence-labeled oligonucleotide for the nested amplification primer (Table 1, Fig. 1). To show accuracy of the sizing, the cleavage site for HhaI was determined for the published sequence of the flanking region for the single copy of IS6110 in Mycobacterium bovis BCG. This was calculated to result in a fragment of 257 bp; the observed band size was 257.4 bp. To demonstrate the precise base size reproducibility of a single M. tuberculosis isolate, CA 93-8287, series 134, was fluorescently labeled with the yellow tag and separated in lanes 1 through 10 (Fig. 1A). The Genescan software utilized the 14 DNA fragments produced from the GS2500 ROX-labeled internal lane size standard to compensate for variability in laneto-lane band migration and allowed for precise base sizing (Fig. 1A). Seven bands were detected for this sample in the 10 lanes. The band at 129 bp is an artifact produced by all samples analyzed with this method. However, this fragment was used as a reference marker for the start of the fragments of interest. Reproducibility was demonstrated by calculating the following mean 6 standard deviation base pair values (n 5 10) for the remaining six PCR fragments: 161.99 6 0.07, 178.22 6 0.09, 227.49 6 0.05, 253.86 6 0.05, 404.97 6 0.08, 446.55 6 0.36. Similar results were demonstrated with different gels, and the base sizing was not affected by gel-to-gel differences (data not shown). In 5 lanes, 11 through 15, multiple samples (n 5 15) were electrophoresed in a single gel lane. Each gel lane contained three different strains. These three M. tuberculosis strains were fluorescently labeled with different dyes (yellow, blue, or green) and coloaded into a single well for analysis. Overlap- NOTES