* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Lecture 23 Slides
International Ultraviolet Explorer wikipedia , lookup
Circumstellar habitable zone wikipedia , lookup
Nebular hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Corvus (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Geocentric model wikipedia , lookup
Aquarius (constellation) wikipedia , lookup
Planets in astrology wikipedia , lookup
Astrobiology wikipedia , lookup
Planets beyond Neptune wikipedia , lookup
Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems wikipedia , lookup
Future of an expanding universe wikipedia , lookup
Rare Earth hypothesis wikipedia , lookup
Formation and evolution of the Solar System wikipedia , lookup
Planetary system wikipedia , lookup
History of Solar System formation and evolution hypotheses wikipedia , lookup
Exoplanetology wikipedia , lookup
IAU definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Satellite system (astronomy) wikipedia , lookup
Definition of planet wikipedia , lookup
Extraterrestrial life wikipedia , lookup
Announcements Astro 101, 12/4/08 • Last OWL homework: up tomorrow around noon • Study materials for final exam will appear over the weekend (on course web page) • Practice exam up midweek next week • Final exam: Monday, Dec. 15, 10:30 AM, Hasbrouck 20 Three hypotheses about the origin of the Earth’s Moon Each of the these hypotheses makes different predictions: 1. The Moon was an independent planet that was captured by the Earth in a gravitational encounter 2. The Moon and Earth formed as “twins” in the same place in the protosolar disk 3. The Earth was originally spinning so rapidly that a chunk broke off and became the Moon. Different composition from Earth Same composition as the Earth Same composition as the Earth’s crust All of these hypotheses fail compared to observations! 1 Formation of the Moon (Giant Impact Theory) • The Earth was struck by a Marssized planetesimal • A part of Earth’s mantle was ejected • This coalesced and turned into the Moon. • Rocks returned to Earth by astronauts on Apollo missions support this theory: The composition of the Moon is very similar to the composition of the Earth’s crust, but the easily vaporized stuff is missing (Moon rocks are dominated by materials with a high melting point; low melting point materials are missing) The age of the Earth and the Moon are similar... How can we determine the age of the Solar System? Radiometric dating: by measuring the proportions of selected atoms and isotopes in a solid, we can determine the age of the solid. 2 Recall from previous lectures: Hydrogen The number of protons in the nucleus identifies the element. e- p+ atomic number = 1 atomic mass number = 1 Recall from previous lectures: Hydrogen Deuterium e- isotope p+ n atomic number = 1 atomic mass number = 2 Isotopes of a particular element all have the same number of protons but have differing numbers of neutrons 3 How can we determine the age of the Solar System? Radiometric dating: by measuring the proportions of selected atoms and isotopes in a solid, we can determine the age of the solid. Radioactive isotope: an isotope that tends to spontaneously change the number of protons or neutrons (or both) in its nucleus. Radioactive Decay • When a radioactive isotope suddenly changes, the process is called radioactive decay. • Most common carbon isotope: carbon-12 (6 protons & 6 neutrons). Stable isotope. • Radioactive carbon isotope: carbon-14 (6 protons & 8 neutrons) • Energy is released when radioactive decay occurs. The energy can be carried away by particles (e.g., electrons) or light (typically gamma rays). “Parent” isotope 14C radioactive decay “Daughter” isotope 14N 4 14N is a stable isotope with atomic number = 7 and atomic mass = 14 What happens when carbon-14 radioactively decays into nitrogen-14? PRS question 1. 2. 3. 4. The carbon becomes ionized A proton turns into a neutron A neutron turns into a proton Neutrons and protons both change forms “Parent” isotope 14C radioactive (6 protons, 8 neutrons) decay “Daughter” isotope 14N Radioactive Decay • When a radioactive isotope suddenly changes, the process is called radioactive decay. • Most common carbon isotope: carbon-12 (6 protons & 6 neutrons). Stable isotope. • Radioactive carbon isotope: carbon-14 (6 protons & 8 neutrons) “Parent” isotope 14C radioactive (6 protons, 8 neutrons) decay “Daughter” isotope 14N (7 protons, 7 neutrons) 5 Radioactive decay half-life • Half-life: the amount of time required for half of the parent nuclei in a solid to decay PRS QUESTION. Suppose that one year you put 10 kilograms of a radioactive isotope in a cabinet in your laboratory. The stuff has a half-life of 10 years. If 30 years later you stumble across that stuff, you will find that you still have 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 7.5 kilograms of the radioactive isotope 5.0 kilograms of the radioactive isotope 2.5 kilograms of the radioactive isotope 1.25 kilograms of the radioactive isotope 0.625 kilograms of the radioactive isotope 10 years 10 kg 10 years 5 kg 10 years 2.5 kg 1.25 kg We can see that there is an precise equation that governs the amount of radioactive substance that remains versus time: Current amount Original amount () = 1 2 time half-life 6 Radioactive decay half-life • Half-life: the amount of time required for half of the parent nuclei in a solid to decay • Half-lives range from small fractions of a second to billions of years 40 40 Decay rate is precise! K Ar Half-life = 1.25 billion yrs • Start with 1 gram of pure potassium-40 • After 1.25 x 109 years, it will have turned into 0.5 g of argon-40 and 0.5 g of potassium-40 • 40K decays exponentially; 40Ar grows exponentially Radiometric dating requires chemistry knowledge! • How do we know the initial composition of a rock? • Argon-40 does not combine with other elements into solids and does not condense in the protosolar nebula • If we see 40Ar “trapped” inside a rock, we know that it started out as 40K and decayed into 40Ar. This is why this only works for solids - after the decay, the 40Ar has to be trapped in place. • Radioactive isotopes have been intensively studied, so many parent-daughter duos can be analyzed to infer a consistent age of a solid. 7 Examples • Some rocks brought back from the Moon contain lead206, but these minerals cannot contain lead when they initally form. • However, they can form with uranium-238, which decays into lead-206 with a half-life of 4.5 billion years. • Laboratory measurements show that these Moon rocks contain equal amounts of uranium-238 and lead-206. Therefore these lunar rocks are 4.5 billion years old! • The radiometric date only goes back to the last time the rock solidified. Rocks often melt on Earth, so they only provide lower limits on the age. Oldest Earth rocks: >4 billions years old Meteorites are ideal for determining when the protosolar disk formed • Leftovers from initial protosolar disk • Oldest known meteorites: 4.55 billion years 8 Xenon-129 in meteorites • Like argon, xenon refuses to condense into rocks. • But, xenon-129 is found in meteorites. • Iodine, on the other hand, can chemically bind and become part of rocks • Iodine-129 radioactively decays into xenon-129, but the half-life is “only” 17 million years. • Iodine must be quickly incorportated into a rock before it turns into xenon129 • Iodine-129 is produced inside stars, so these meteorites must have formed relatively soon after some nearby star had exploded. A nearby star explosion likely provided the iodine-129 as well as the “trigger” for the initial collapse Extrasolar Planets (Unit 34) • Our Sun has a family of planets. Do other stars have them as well? • First direct evidence of the existence of an extrasolar planet was obtained in 1995. – A planet was discovered in orbit around the star 51 Pegasi. – Over 300 such extrasolar planets are now known to exist. 9 Most extrasolar planets cannot be observed directly in pictures for two reasons: • The angle between a star and its planets, as seen from Earth, is too small to resolve with our biggest telescopes. • A star like the Sun would be a billion times brighter than the light reflected off its planets. Background: binary stars orbit around the center of mass • Some stars (e.g., Sirius A & B) are binary stars; they orbit each other like a planet orbits a star • They both orbit around the center of mass 10 Background: binary stars orbit around the center of mass • Some stars (e.g., Sirius A & B) are binary stars; they orbit each other like a planet orbits a star • They both orbit around the center of mass Planets and stars like the Sun and Earth also both orbit a center of mass, but the center of mass is very close to the star due to its greater mass. Background: binary stars orbit around the center of mass • Some stars (e.g., Sirius A & B) are binary stars; they orbit each other like a planet orbits a star • They both orbit around the center of mass Planets and stars like the Sun and Earth also both orbit a center of mass, but the center of mass is very close to the star due to its greater mass. 11 Detecting Extrasolar Planets by the Doppler Effect Wobble • We can detect the planets indirectly by observing the motion of the host star. • The planet gravitationally tugs the star, causing it to wobble. • This periodic wobble is measured from the Doppler Shift of the star’s spectrum. The size and period of a binarystar orbit (or a planet-star orbit) are governed by Kepler’s 3rd law P 2 = a3 However, this version of Kepler’s 3rd law only applies to the Solar System, and only if P is in years and a is in AU 12 Newton’s Version of Kepler’s Third Law Using the calculus, Newton was able to derive Kepler’s Third Law from his own Law of Gravity. In its most general form: P2 = 4π2 a3 / G (m1 + m2) If you can measure the orbital period of two objects (P) and the distance between them (a), then you can calculate the sum of the masses of both objects (m1 + m2). Measuring the Properties of Extrasolar Planets Amplitude Period • A plot of the radial velocity shifts forms a wave. – Its wavelength tells you the period and size of the planet’s orbit. – Its amplitude tells you the mass of the planet. 13 Source of uncertainty: the tilt of the orbit • If the orbit is “face-on”, there will be no measurable Doppler effect • The mass that we infer for the planet depends on the tilt of the orbit • In general, the method provides a robust lower limit on the mass of the planet, and usually the true mass will be less than 2 times larger than the lower limit Measuring the Properties of Extrasolar Planets • The Doppler technique yields only planet masses and orbits. • Planet must eclipse or transit the star in order to measure its radius. • Size of the planet is estimated from the amount of starlight it blocks. • We must view along the plane of the planet’s orbit for a transit to occur. – transits are relatively rare • They allow us to calculate the density of the planet. – extrasolar planets we have detected have Jovian-like densities. 14 Properties of Other Planetary Systems • planets appear to be Jovian • more massive than our system • planets are close to their stars • many more highly elliptical orbits than in our Solar System Above: many of the extrasolar planets so far discovered Implications for the Nebular Theory • Extrasolar systems have Jovian planets orbiting close to their stars. – Theory predicts Jovian planets form in cold, outer regions. • Many extrasolar planets have highly eccentric (i.e., not circular) orbits. – Theory predicts planets should have nearly circular orbits. • Is the nebular theory wrong? – – – – – – Not necessarily; it may be incomplete. Perhaps planets form far from star and migrate towards it. Doppler technique biased towards finding close Jovian planets Are they the exception or the rule? Migrating Jovians could prevent terrestrials from forming Is our Solar Solar System rare? 15