Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
A228 RIGHT ATRIAL PRESSURE AS A MEASURE OF VENTRICULAR CONSTRAINT IN THE NEWBORN LAMB Fauchère J-C, Skuza EM, Walker AM, Ramsden AR*, Grant DA Centre for Baby Health Research, Institute of Reproduction and Development, Monash University, and * Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168. Due to their close apposition to the heart, the chestwall, the lungs and the pericardium constrain the heart, limit diastolic filling, and thus limit cardiac output. Experimentally, ventricular constraint can be quantified by measuring pericardial pressure using a balloon transducer but, as yet, no means of clinical assessment of ventricular constraint in the sick newborn exists. Nor is there a method for assessing the impact of mechanical ventilation on ventricular constraint. Aim: To determine if right atrial pressure is a useful estimate of ventricular constraint in newborn lambs. Methods: We measured right atrial pressure (Pra) and thoracic inferior vena cava pressure (Pivc) with fluid-filled catheters in 4 week old anaesthetised, ventilated lambs (n=12). Pericardial pressure (Pper) was measured with a flat, liquid-containing balloon positioned over either the left ventricle (n=6), or over the right ventricle (n=6). Initially, the relationships between mean Pra, Pper, and Pivc were assessed while changing intravascular volume (Fig. 1). Pra, Pper and Pivc were subsequently measured while airway pressure was briefly reduced from various levels of CPAP (2.5, 5, 7.5 and 15 cmH 2O) to atmospheric pressure (Fig. 2). Changes in Pra, Pper, and Pivc (Pper, Pra and Pivc) were calculated following the reduction of airway pressure to evaluate the effects of mechanical ventilation on ventricular constraint (Fig. 3). Results: A strong linear relationship existed between Pra and Pper (Pra = 0.9 Pper + 0.3, r = 0.9; p < 0.0001). A strong linear relationship also existed between Pra and Pivc (Pra = 1.0 Pivc - 0.1, r = 1.0; p < 0.0001). Changes in Pper induced by altering airway pressure were reliably reflected by Pra (Fig. 3); Pra = 0.8 Pper + 0.1, r = 0.97, p < 0.0001). Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Airway (cmH2O) 20 5 y = 0.99x - 0.74 2 R = 0.99 0 0 5 10 Pper (mmHg) 15 0 10 -10 10 -10 Pra (mmHg) Pericardial (mmHg) 10 6 Right Atrial (mmHg) Pra (mmHg) 15 4 2 y = 0.80x + 0.05 2 R = 0.94 0 0 2 4 Pper (mmHg) 6 Conclusions: Our study reveals that right atrial pressure and inferior vena cava pressure are accurate measures of pericardial pressure and thus of ventricular constraint. Moreover, by briefly interrupting mechanical ventilation, changes in right atrial pressure can be used to quantify the magnitude of ventricular constraint arising from mechanical ventilation. Applications of our findings to the clinical setting may allow ventilation to be manipulated with the aim of minimising ventricular constraint while optimising gas exchange.