Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Pollination Angiosperms – Flowering plants Flowering plants (250k sp) comprise the dominant plant life form on earth Evolved ~ 130 – 140 mya a modest beginning but… 20 – 30 million years later increased in diversity Insects Become Modern – the Cretaceous and Tertiary times The Cretaceous (145 – 65 MYA) is one of the most significant geological periods for insect evolution 1. Devonian – Hexapods 2. Carboniferous – Winged insects 3. Permian to Triassic – earliest members of most modern orders 4. Cretaceous – Nascent modern biota (amidst unprecedented geological and evolutionarily change) Insects Become Modern – the Cretaceous During Cretaceous period many modern families 1st appeared (some as early as Jurassic or Triassic), others like schizophoran flies & ditrysian leps evolved in the Tertiary – 65 million to 1.8 mya Estimated that perhaps half or more of recent families appeared in Cretaceous Appears to be related (both cause and effect) to the radiation of the angiosperms The Cretaceous Earth was geologically more active than at most times Dramatic climate change and Tectonic activity which resulted in widespread volcanism, splitting and drifting of the continents Fragmentation of Gondwana into the present southern continents is often invoked for contemporary distributions of various plant and animals The Cretaceous Appear to be little affected by KT boundary events (at gross scale) Geologic record from this time forward better preserved than earlier periods Evolved from Pollinivory in early seed plants • 250 + MYA (late Paleozoic, Mesozoic) • e.g. Cycadales, seed ferns • Probably Beetles • Pollination perhaps inadvertent initially, but floral traits that increased chances of pollination and encouraged visits by most efficient pollinators were favored by selection •Beetles also can destroy ovules-this may have promoted carpel closure and possibly evolution of inferior ovary Basal Angiosperms – e.g. Apetalous magnolias insect pollinated, probably Diptera, Coleoptera (early Cretaceous ~ 150 MYA) (Anemophily – wind pollination – derived later) Taxonomic Distribution 2/3 + of Angiosperms are animal pollinated + a small proportion of Gymnosperms (e.g. Ephedra, cycads) Pollinators include: •Flies (Diptera), Ants, bees, and wasps (Hymenoptera), Beetles (Coleoptera), Butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) •Hummingbirds, sunbirds, honey eaters •Bats, rodents, small marsupials • Oddities: Frogs, slugs, earthworms Insect Pollination Entomophily Cantharophily Myophily Sphecophily Myrmecophily Melitophily Phalaenophily Psycophily Traditional Pollinator “syndromes” suggest some degree of coevolution Faegri and van der Pijl (1979) Alison Brody: effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Competition for pollinator services has often been suggested as the primary selective force molding flowering schedules. Flowering and reproductive characters are likely to reflect an evolutionary compromise of responses to various selective forces. Apparent competition or associational resistance may be important to the composition and flowering patterns of plant communities. Two Big Ideas - Evolution has tended towards specialization of pollinator–plant interactions, which has led to “tight” coevolution (not just diffuse) between these groups and.. - Coevolutionary interactions between insect pollinators and angiosperms are responsible (at least in part) for the incredible diversification of these two groups Early Angiosperms Generalized flowers Many pollinators Open Sturdy (beetles) Recent Angiosperms Specialized flowers Rosidae few pollinators Zygomorphic-complex Nectaries Bees (50 MYA) Should specialized plant-pollinator associations evolve? Benefits Costs Plant -Avoid pollen loading -Minimize pollen & nectar theft -Efficient movement of gametes -Rewards large? -Risk of pollinator extinction & Dependence on pollinator populations Animal -Neurological efficiency? -Shorter “Handling time” -Rewards large? -Reduced Competition -Reduced foraging efficiency -Longer travel times -Phenological dependence -Dependence on plant populations Are plant-pollinator associations tightly co-evolved? Are plant-pollinator associations largely specialized? Some are: Expect specialized plants if long-lived, many reproductive episodes (continuous), pollinators whose populations fluctuate slightly Fig wasps Figs Tegeticula yuccasella •Local host Specificity •Oviposition into flower •Limited seed destruction •Pollination causing behavior 40 MYA! But many apparently coevolved pollinator mutualisms are asymmetric - antagonistic exploitation E.g. the Orchidaceae At least 8-10,000 species offer no reward, only deception and fraud - capture pollinators - intoxicate them - Prostitution - mimicry (rivals, enemies, prey) Basically parasitism of insect by plants Robbers Thieves Unfaithful Cheaters Most plants are visited by a variety of potential pollinators Robertson 1928 - Illinois Clements & Long 1923 – Pikes Peak, CO Pollinating animals tend to visit many plant species Clements & Long 1923 – Pikes Peak CO Ranunculaceae Even “advanced,” presumably Orchidaceae specialized, plant families tend to be moderate generalists Polemonianceae Bees, most of which rely obligately and solely on floral resources, also tend to be moderate generalists Andrenidae Halictidae Apidae Geographic ranges of plants and pollinators rarely correspond closely Plants often successful in new geographic areas, despite leaving their mutualists behind - Hawaiian ieie (Freycinetia arborea) formerly pollinated by extinct honeycreepers - In New Zealand Freycinetia baueriana lost bat pollinator Why are pollination syndromes so weak? or What prevents coevolution? Thompson 1999: Geographic mosaic theory of coevolution – dynamics of coevolution occur at a geographic scale above the level of local populations and below the level of the fixed traits of interacting species. Did insect pollination cause increased seedplant diversity? Root Gorelick, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (2001) 74:407-427. • Poaceae (grasses) diverse (10,000 sp.), almost all wind pollinated • Ants diverse, generally not pollinators • Cycads, Gnetales other groups of insect pollinated plants were either never diverse, or diversified and became extinct • Insect “diversity” decreased when angiosperms originated However, these are rather poor arguments - Orchidaceae -25,000 species, almost exclusively insect pollinated, many specialized (Fabaceae, Asteraceae,Rubiaceae, Euphorbiaceae) - Bees: 20,000 species, few of which could exist without angiosperm flowers. - Rhopalocera = butterflies + skippers, almost all visit flowers: 20,000 species - Large families of Diptera (e.g. Syrphidae, Bombyliidae) rely heavily on floral resources Most of the species diversity of angiosperms originated < 50 MYA e.g. • major eudicot families • Orchidaceae …and insect groups did diversify coincident with the angiosperms in the cenozoic Families… Angiosperms – Flowering plants Insects were original partners of angiosperms as pollinators and herbivores Undoubtedly pollinating insects facilitate and can control gene flow in most angiosperms and must effect speciation Questions ?