Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the work of artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Carcinogenesis vol.19 no.10 pp.1777–1781, 1998 Elevated expression and altered pattern of activity of DNA methyltransferase in liver tumors of rats fed methyl-deficient diets N.G.Lopatina, B.F.Vanyushin1, G.M.Cronin and L.A.Poirier2 Division of Nutritional Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, NCTR Drive, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA 1Present address: A.N.Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow 119899, Russia 2To whom correspondence should be addressed Email: [email protected] DNA methyltransferase (MTase) activity in nuclear extracts from neoplastic and preneoplastic livers of rats fed a methyl-deficient diet (MDD) is elevated compared with that seen in the livers of control rats. Nuclear proteins were prepared in the presence of protease inhibitors including trans-epoxy succinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanido)butane and were fractionated by isoelectric focusing. In normal, control liver, two distinct MTase fractions were observed. In MDDinduced malignant liver, a third fraction, in addition to the previous two, was also seen. Both the DNA substrate and the cytosine site specificities of the third MTase fraction differ from those of the other two fractions. The distinct MTase activity in liver tumor has significantly more de novo MTase activity than do the MTase fractions of normal, control liver. Thus, normal and neoplastic rat livers differ in DNA MTase fractionation patterns and site specificities. The altered DNA MTase activity observed in rat liver tumors caused by MDDs may be one of the critical factors contributing to cancer formation through abnormal DNA methylation. Introduction Methyl-deficient diets (MDDs) cause cancer (1–3) and DNA under-methylation in rodent liver (4–10). Since DNA methylation plays a significant role in the regulation of transcription, DNA replication and DNA repair (11), it is postulated that abnormal DNA methylation may play an essential role in carcinogenesis (12–15). Currently, little is known about the nature and specificity of DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase (EC 2.1.1.37) (MTase) in malignant tissues (14–17) and about the extent to which the enzyme may be responsible for the abnormal DNA methylation found in cancer cells. Furthermore, the effects of stringent dietary methyl deficiency on hepatic DNA MTase require further investigation. Previous studies have shown that the chronic administration of methyl-deficient diets to rats leads to increased MTase activity both in preneoplastic liver and in the resultant tumors (7,9,10). The present study provides evidence showing that tumors produced by MDD display elevated expression and activity of DNA Abbreviations: E-64, trans-epoxy succinyl-L-leucylamido-(4-guanido)butane; m5C, 5-methyldeoxycytidine; MDD, methyl-deficient diet; MSD, methylsufficient diet; MTase, DNA(cytosine-5)-methyltransferase; PMSF, phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride; SAM, S-adenosylmethionine; TLCK, N-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone; TPCK, N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone. © Oxford University Press MTase(s), as well as changes in the patterns and site specificity of these enzymes. Thus, hepatocarcinogenesis by methyl deficiency is accompanied by the appearance of new DNA MTase(s) with a modified site specificity. Materials and methods Animals and feeding regimens Male weanling F344 rats (50–60 g) were divided into two groups, and fed one of two amino-acid-defined diets developed by Mikol et al. (1). One group received the methyl-sufficient diet (MSD), while the other was fed the MDD (1). MSD contained 0.5% DL-methionine and 0.2% choline chloride. MDD contained no methionine or choline, but was supplemented with an amount of DL-homocystine equimolar to the methionine removed. Each diet contained folic acid (5 mg/kg) and vitamin B12 (50 µg/kg). Normal liver was obtained from control animals fed MSD for 6, 64 and 82 weeks. Liver tumors were obtained from rats fed MDD for 82 weeks, while preneoplastic liver was obtained from rats fed MDD for 6 and 64 weeks. The rats were killed with CO2, the livers were excised and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then kept at –70°C until used for the isolation of nuclei, RNA and DNA. The patterns of MTase activities obtained from normal and tumorous liver were also compared in a second experiment. In this case, the MDD consisted of a semi-synthetic soy bean-based diet previously used in this laboratory (9). This diet contained 0.18% methionine, and lacked both choline and folic acid; the corresponding control diet contained 0.4% methionine, 0.3% choline and 2 mg/kg folic acid (9). Both the liver tumors and the control livers used in the second study were obtained from animals fed the respective MDD and MSD for 54 weeks. No sulfa drugs or carcinogens were used in any of these investigations. In both studies, care was taken during autopsy to separate the tumor tissue from the preneoplastic liver. However, the presence of some nonneoplastic tissue in the tumor samples cannot be completely excluded. The effects of both types of MDD on growth inhibition and on liver pathology have been amply described elsewhere (1,3,5,9,10). As shown in Results, the effects of both deficient diets on tumor DNA MTase distribution were virtually identical. DNA isolation Frozen rat liver tissue (50–60 mg) was homogenized, using a glass homogenizer with a teflon pestle, in 600 µl of a solution (pH 8.3) containing 25 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 1% SDS and 150 µg/ml of proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). Homogenates were incubated overnight at 37°C, treated with RNase A (10 µg/µl) (Boehringer Mannheim) for 1 h at 37°C, and DNA was isolated using a Puregene DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Plymouth, MN). DNA was quantitated spectrophotometrically at 260 nm, and its purity was determined by the ratio of absorbance at 280 to 260 nm. Assay of methylation status of DNA MTase gene Eight microgram DNA aliquots were hydrolysed with 10 U of HpaII restriction endonuclease (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, MD). DNA hydrolysates were fractionated by electrophoresis in 0.9% agarose (16) and transferred to Hybond N1 (Amersham, Amersham, UK) by alkaline blotting as recommended by the manufacturer. The membranes were prehybridized for 1 h as described (16), and then incubated with a random primed [α-32P]dCTP-labeled probe at 60°C for 18 h. The 4423 bp C-terminal murine cytosine DNA MTase gene fragment cut from the pBlueScript construct containing a full copy of this gene (a gift from Dr T.H.Bestor) by BamHI restriction endonuclease (Gibco BRL) and isolated by electrophoresis in a 0.9% polyacrylamide gel was used as a probe. The membranes were washed (16) and exposed to Kodak X-Omat AR film for 14 days at –70°C. The progressive loss of high molecular weight material with the accumulation of smaller molecular weight bands in DNA samples hydrolyzed by HpaII enzyme is indicative of DNA demethylation at Cm5CGG sites. RNA isolation and northern blots mRNA was isolated from 0.5 g frozen liver samples using a FastTrack mRNA isolation kit (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). RNA was measured by its absorbance at 260 nm. Aliquots of 1 µg liver mRNA from control and experimental rats 1777 N.G.Lopatina et al. were applied to Hybond as described by the manufacturer. Hybridization with a random primed [α-32P]dCTP-labeled 4423 bp C-terminal murine DNA MTase gene fragment was performed in 0.25 M Na2HPO4 (pH 7.2), 7% SDS at 64°C for 18 h, and the membranes were washed twice for 15 min each in 0.02 M Na2HPO4, 5% SDS and twice for 15 min each in 0.02 M Na2HPO4 1% SDS at 64°C. The blots were exposed at –70°C to Kodak X-Omat film for 1–2 days. Isolation and determination of DNA MTase activity Rat liver nuclei and nuclear extracts were isolated as described (17,18). The protein concentrations both in nuclear extracts and in samples obtained by isoelectric focusing were determined as previously described (19). The DNA MTase reaction conditions were such that both the methyl donor and the DNA template were in excess, so that the extent of methyl group incorporation was dependent on the level of DNA MTase activity. Extracts were incubated for 4 h at 37°C in a 130 µl reaction mixture containing 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg of calf thymus DNA (Sigma, St Louis, MO), and 1 µCi of S-adenosyl-L-[methyl-3H]methionine (SAM, sp. act. 7.9 Ci/mmol; NEN, Boston, MA). The samples were applied to Whatman DE filters, and DNA radioactivity was quantified by liquid scintillation counting; enzyme activity was expressed as cpm/mg protein. DNA MTase fractionation and the site specificity assay To fractionate DNA MTases, the nuclear proteins were precipitated by the addition of solid ammonium sulfate to the nuclear extracts obtained above (600 mg/ml, or 80% saturation) (17). The precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 105 000 g for 1 h and dialyzed as previously described (20). The resulting protein preparations were processed on a Rotofor Cell column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) as described by the manufacturer. Twenty 4 ml fractions of each protein preparation applied were obtained as the result of the isoelectric focusing for 6 h in the presence of ampholytes at pH 3–10. All procedures on DNA MTase isolation (tissue homogenation, nuclei isolation, protein precipitation and dialysis, and electrophoresis) were carried out at 4°C and in the presence of our standard set of protease inhibitors, i.e. 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and 1 µg/ml leupeptin (17,20). In a second set of studies, MTase was prepared from tumors derived from rats fed the semi-synthetic MDD (9); in this case the DNA MTase isolation procedure was modified to include, in addition to the PMSF and leupeptin used as above, the protease inhibitors trans-epoxy succinyl-L-leucylamido(4-guanido)butane (E-64), N-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK) and N-tosyl-L-phenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), each at 10 µg/ml as previously described (18). The studies with the additional protease inhibitors were prompted by the findings of Xu et al. (18), showing that they effectively inhibited proteolysis during the isolation and partial purification of DNA MTase from tissue. All five protease inhibitors were purchased from Boehringer Mannheim. As described above, aliquots of each fraction obtained by isoelectric focusing were used for the determination of DNA MTase activity. To distinguish between the site specificities of the DNA MTases found, 10 µg calf thymus DNA was incubated with 50 µl aliquots of each peak containing fraction in the presence of [methyl-3H]SAM under the conditions already described. The labeled DNA was hydrolyzed by treatment with 66% formic acid 1 1% diphenylamine at 30°C for 18 h. The DNA pyrimidine isopliths liberated were fractionated by thin-layer DEAE-cellulose chromatography (21), and the radioactivity in monopyrimidine (pCp1pm5Cp1pTp), dipyrimidine [(C2p3 1 pm5CpCp 1 pCpm5Cp 1 m5C2p3) 1 (pCpTp 1 pTpCp 1 pm5CpTp 1 pTpm5Cp) 1T2p3] and tripyrimidine (Py3p4) isopliths was measured. This method allowed us to determine the radioactivity not only of all newly formed 5-methyldeoxycytidine (m5C) residues in DNA pyrimidine isopliths but also of possible thymine residues resulting from the enzymatic deamination of m5C formed during in vitro DNA methylation (22). Results DNA MTase activity The relative DNA MTase activities in nuclear extracts from the preneoplastic livers of rats fed MDD for 6 weeks and from the tumorous livers of rats fed MDD for 86 weeks were 130 6 8.6 and 184 6 8.7% (mean 6 SD), respectively, of that found in the livers of control rats fed MSD (100 6 10.1). Thus, carcinogenic MDD produces a significant increase in the total nuclear DNA MTase activity. This observation is consistent with previous results on the general increased DNA MTase activity in neoplastic and preneoplastic tissues (7,12,13), including the livers of methyl-deficient animals (7,9,10). 1778 Fig. 1. Slot blots of rat liver mRNA hybridized with the 32P-labelled 4423 bp murine DNA MTase gene probe. From top to bottom, the lanes contain: mRNA from control rats fed MSD for 6 weeks; mRNA from rats fed MDD for 6 weeks; mRNA from rats fed MDD for 64 weeks; and mRNA from tumors of rats fed MDD for 82 weeks. The DNA MTase to β-actin signal (mRNA) ratio in neoplastic livers was 2.1–2.9-fold higher compared with that in normal livers. Fig. 2. Southern blot of rat liver DNA hydrolysed by HpaII restriction endonuclease and hybridized with the 32P-labeled 4423 bp murine DNA MTase gene probe. Lane 1, DNA from control rats fed MSD diet; lanes 2 and 3, DNA from rats fed MDD diet for 6 weeks; lane 4, DNA from liver tumors of rats fed MDD for 82 weeks. DNA MTase gene expression and methylation A significant increase in liver DNA MTase expression was found in rats fed MDD for 6 weeks (Figure 1). A lesser increase was observed after 64 weeks of MDD feeding. The difference in MTase expression between 6 and 64 weeks’ feeding of MDD cannot now be explained; however, it is consistent with other biochemical alterations whose magnitude is greater in the early stages of MDD carcinogenesis than in the later stages (2,4). Finally, liver tumors caused by MDD were characterized by high DNA MTase expression (Figure 1). The DNA MTase gene sequence in preneoplastic (Figure 2, lanes 2 and 3) and tumorous (Figure 2, lane 4) rat livers is less resistant to HpaII restriction endonuclease than is the same sequence in normal liver (Figure 2, lane 1). Thus, the internal C residues in CCGG sequences in the rat DNA MTase gene are under-methylated in preneoplastic and neoplastic livers compared with the corresponding internal C residues in normal liver. This coincides with the under-methylation of other genes in the liver carcinomas of rats fed MDD (6–9). Thus, the hypomethylation of the DNA MTase gene in the livers of MDD rats correlates well with an elevated transcription of this gene. Multiplicity of DNA MTase activities Fractionation by isoelectric focusing of the hepatic nuclear proteins obtained from control rats showed two protein frac- Expression and pattern of activity of DNA transferase Fig. 3. The distribution patterns of DNA MTase activities toward calf thymus and Drosophila DNA following isoelectric focusing of rat liver nuclear proteins. (A) Normal liver without E-64. (B) Liver tumor without E-64. (C) Normal liver with E-64. (D) Liver tumor with E-64. cpm, radioactivity incorporated from (methyl-H3)SAM into DNA in presence of MTase protein fraction; pI, protein isoelectric point. The studies with E-64 protease inhibitor were prompted by the findings of Xu et al. (18) that this compound was an effective inhibitor of proteolysis during the isolation and purification of DNA MTase from mouse tissue. tions, with pI values at ~4.3 and 7.3, respectively, possessing significant MTase activity (Figure 3A and C). The same two fractions were obtained regardless of whether the DNA MTase was isolated using the standard mixture of protease inhibitors (20) or the more complete set of such inhibitors including E-64 (18) (Figure 3A and C). As is commonly the case with mammalian DNA MTase, the two DNA MTase fractions obtained from control livers exhibited greater enzymatic activity toward calf thymus DNA, which is methylated, than toward Drosophila DNA, which is not (Figure 3). In addition, the high proportion of monopyrimidine isopliths (66%) obtained from the hydrolyzed calf thymus DNA methylated in vitro with the MTase fraction at pI 4.3 indicates methylation of cytosine residues located between two purines in the DNA sequence (Table I). In contrast, the distribution pattern of radioactivity incorporated from 3H-methyl groups from SAM into DNA pyrimidine isopliths obtained from calf thymus DNA treated with MTase at pI 7.3 that had been isolated from control livers was quite different (Table I); in this case the proportion of radioactivity incorporated into the DNA tripyrimidine isopliths was 10 times greater than that seen with the MTase isolated at pI 4.3 (Table I). Thus, the pI 7.3 Table I. Distribution of radioactivity among pyrimidine isopliths (Pyn pn11) in calf thymus DNA methylated in vitro in the presence of S-adenosyl-L[methyl-3H]methionine by DNA MTase fractions isolated from the rat liver nuclear extracts by isoelectric focusing Protein fraction pI Radioactivity (%) incorporated into DNA pyrimidine isopliths Mono Di Tri 31.9 29.9 2.1 22.1 Normal liver from rats fed MSD 4.3 7.3 66.0 48.0 Neoplastic liver from rats fed MDD for 82 weeks 4.3 62.2 32.4 7.3 50.8 30.0 8.5 73.3 15.7 5.4 19.2 11.0 SD values were not higher than 5% of data represented; n 5 8–10. fraction may represent a peptide that is different from that seen at pI 4.3. In contrast to normal liver, the nuclear extracts obtained 1779 N.G.Lopatina et al. from hepatic tumors in methyl-deficient rats showed three different fractions with MTase activity, viz. at pI 4.3, 7.3 and 8.5, respectively, following fractionation by isoelectric focusing (Figure 3B and D). Again, identical results were obtained regardless of the combination of protease inhibitors used (Figure 3B and D) (17,18). The tumor enzyme fractions at pI 4.3 and 7.3 were equivalent to the corresponding fractions obtained from the control livers. They each methylated calf thymus DNA better than Drosophila DNA (Figure 3). The tumor pI fractions at 4.3 and 7.3 each produced distribution patterns of radioactivity among the three pyrimidine isopliths, obtained by hydrolysis of the substrate DNA, closely resembling the patterns produced by the corresponding MTase pI fractions from control livers (Table I). However, the DNA MTase fraction at pI 8.5 found in neoplastic liver had no equivalent in normal liver (Figure 3). Unlike the fractions at pI 4.3 and 7.3, the tumor MTase at pI 8.5 had greater enzymatic activity toward Drosophila DNA than toward calf thymus DNA (Figure 3). In its radioactive distribution patterns among the pyrimidine isopliths, the tumor DNA MTase at pI 8.5 also exhibited significant differences in site specificity compared with the fractions at pI 4.3 and 7.3 (Table I). Incubation of calf thymus DNA with the pI 8.5 MTase fraction produced greater incorporation of 3H-methyl groups from SAM into the monopyrimidine and less into the dipyrimidine isopliths than did the corresponding MTase fractions at pI 4.3 and 7.3 (Table I). Finally, the fact that the DNA MTase fraction at pI 7.3 preferentially methylates the C residues in the longer pyrimidine sequences indicates that it may preferentially methylate CpNpG sequences in the DNA of animal cells (23). We are greatly indebted to Dr T.H.Bestor for supplying us with the murine DNA MTase clone and to Dr S.J.James for the tumors from methyl/folatedeficient rats. This work was supported by ORISE Fellowships to N.G.L. and B.F.V. Discussion References The major finding of this study is the detection by isoelectric focusing of a new form of MTase activity in the liver tumors of rats fed MDDs. This new MTase fraction is not found in normal liver, exhibits altered substrate specificity, and, unlike normal mammalian MTase, preferentially exerts de novo methylase activity. Apparently new forms of MTase activity have been previously observed in the lymphocytes of leukemic cows (14), in HeLa cells (15) and in human thyroid goiters (20). Unfortunately, the exact origin of the new activity of MTase observed in liver tumor is unknown. It has also been suggested that DNA MTases in L cells may exist in more than one form that differ in site specificity and in sensitivity to SAM analogs (24). Despite strong precautions, including multiple protease inhibitors in the isolation medium, the possibility of partial proteolysis still cannot be completely excluded. Thus, some DNA MTase fractions may appear indirectly as a result of proteolysis of their common precursor during isolation. Previous studies have shown that the proteolytic removal of a large N-terminal sequence from murine DNA MTase does not change its maintenance methylation activity but does appear to increase its de novo methylation ability (25). If such proteolysis proceeds in vivo with the formation of new DNA MTase activities, it could be a mechansim of natural regulation of the enzyme site specificity and de novo DNA methylation. On the other hand, it is very likely that some nuclear DNA MTases observed here are encoded by different genes. This seems to be the case for some animal (13) and plant nuclear DNA MTases (26). Further, mammals appear to have a gene for adenine DNA MTase (27), 1. Mikol,Y.B., Hoover,K.L., Creasia,D. and Poirier,L.A. (1983) Hepatocarcinogenesis in rats fed methyl-deficient, amino acid-defined diets. Carcinogenesis, 4, 1619–1629. 2. Shivapurkar,N. and Poirier,L. (1983) Tissue levels of S-adenosylmethionine and S-adenosylhomocysteine in rats fed methyl-deficient, amino aciddefined diets for one to five weeks. Carcinogenesis, 4, 1051–1057. 3. Ghoshal,A.K. and Farber,E. (1984) The induction of liver cancer by dietary deficiency of choline and methionine without added carcinogens. Carcinogenesis, 5, 1367–1370. 4. Wilson,M.J., Shivapurkar,N. and Poirier,L.A. (1984) Hypomethylation of hepatic nuclear DNA in rats fed with a carcinogenic methyl-deficient diet. Biochem. J., 218, 987–990. 5. Locker,J., Reddy,T.V. and Lombardi,B. (1986) DNA methylation and hepatocarcinogenesis in rats fed a choline-devoid diet. Carcinogenesis, 7, 1309–1312. 6. Bhave,M.R., Wilson,M.J. and Poirier,L.A. (1988) c-H-ras and c-K-ras gene hypomethylation in the livers and hepatomas of rats fed methyldeficient, amino acid-defined diets. Carcinogenesis, 9, 343–348. 7. Wainfan,E., Dizik,M., Stender,M. and Christman,J.K. (1989) Rapid appearance of hypomethylated DNA in livers of rats fed cancer-promoting, methyl-deficient diets. Cancer Res., 49, 4094–4097. 8. Zapisek,W.F., Cronin,G.M., Lyn-Cook,B.D. and Poirier,L.A. (1992) The onset of oncogene hypomethylation in the livers of rats fed methyldeficient, amino acid-defined diets. Carcinogenesis, 13, 1869–1872. 9. Pogribny,I.P., Basnakian,A.G., Miller,B.J., Lopatina,N.G., Poirier,L.A. and James,S.J. (1995) Breaks in genomic DNA and within the p53 gene are associated with hypomethylation in livers of folate/methyl-deficient rats. Cancer Res., 55, 1894–1901. 10. Wainfan,E. and Poirier,L.A. (1992) Methyl groups in carcinogenesis: Effects on DNA methylation and gene expression. Cancer Res., 52, 2071s–2077s. 11. Jost,J.P. and Saluz,H.P. (ed.) (1993) DNA Methylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel. 12. Jones,P.A. (1986) DNA methylation and cancer. Cancer Res., 46, 461–466. 13. Laird,P.W. and Jaenisch,R. (1994) DNA methylation and cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet., 3, 1487–1495. 1780 and their nuclear and mitochondrial cytosine DNA MTases are not the same (28). The present results are consistent with what is currently known about the possible role of DNA methylation in carcinogensis. The high level of DNA MTase in tumor tissue is an almost universal observation (7,9–13). As described above, the high tumor MTase activity noted in the present study was also in accord with the elevated expression and CCGG site under-methylation of the DNA MTase gene. To the best of our knowledge there is but one other publication describing altered substrate specificity of MTase from mammalian tumors (14). A recent report, however, shows the presence of an abnormally high de novo MTase activity in a lung cancer cell line (29). Modified DNA MTases with altered site specificity are good candidates as the enzymes responsible for selective DNA hypermethylation observed in some cancers (13,30). Possibly the lower tumor incidence in transgenic animals with decreased DNA MTase activity (31) could be ascribed to the lessened amounts of abnormal enzymes. The development of an altered form of DNA MTase with altered substrate specificity during carcinogenesis would provide a plausible mechanism linking the mutations (32–34), hypomethylation (6–13) and hypermethylation (35,36) seen in DNA during cancer development. Acknowledgements Expression and pattern of activity of DNA transferase 14. Burtseva,N.N., Gimatudinov,O.A. and Vanyushin,B.F. (1987) Properties and specificity of action of DNA methylases from healthy and chronically lympholeucocytic cows. Biokhimiya, 52, 290–302. 15. Delfini,C., Crema,A.L., Alfani,E., Lo Presti,E., Eremenko,T. and Volpe,P. (1987) DNA methylases separated through the HeLa cell cycle methodology show allosteric properties. FEBS Lett., 210, 17–21. 16. Maniatis,T., Fritsch,E.F. and Sambrook,J. (1982) Molecular Cloning—A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 387–389. 17. Basnakian,A.G., Boubnov,N.V., Kirsanova,I.D. and Votrin,I.I. (1991) Nuclear topoisomerase I and DNase activities in rat diethylnitrosamineinduced hepatoma, in regenerating and fetal liver. Biochem. Int., 24, 429–437. 18. Xu,G., Flynn,J., Glickman,J.F. and Reich,N.O. (1995) Purification and stabilization of mouse DNA methyltransferase. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 207, 544–551. 19. Sedmak,J.J. and Grossberg,S.E. (1977) A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie brilliant blue G250. Anal. Biochem., 79, 544–552. 20. Nikol’skaia,I.I., Sharkova,E.V, Zenina,E.N., Lopatina,N.G., Atakhanova, B.A., Adylova,A.T., Koneeva,A.E., Kovalev,L.I. and Shishkin,S.S. (1993) Human thyroid gland DNA methylase in nodular and diffuse goiter. Biochimiya, 58, 1616–1624. 21. Kirnos,M.D., Vasiliev,V.K. and Vanyushin,B.F. (1975) Separation of pyrimidine deoxyribooligonucleotides according to length and composition using thin-layer chromatography on deae-cellulose. J. Chrom., 104, 113– 122. 22. Shen,J.-C., Rideout III,W.M. and Jones,P.A. (1992) High frequency mutagenesis by a DNA methyltransferase. Cell, 71, 1073–1080. 23. Clark,S.J., Harrison,J. and Frommer,M. (1995) CpNpG methylation in mammalian cells. Nature Genet., 10, 20–27. 24. Kiryanov,G.I., Isaeva,L.V., Kirnos,M.D., Ganicheva,N.I. and Vanyushin, B.F. (1982) Replicative DNA methylation in L cells: action of Sisobutyladenosine and cycloheximide and possible existence of two DNA methylases. Biochimiya, 47, 153–162. 25. Bestor,T.H. (1992) Activation of mammalian DNA methyltransferase by cleavage of a Zn-binding regulatory domain. EMBO J., 11, 2611–2617. 26. Finnegan,E.J. and Dennis,E.S. (1993) Isolation and identification by sequence homology of a putative cytosine methyltransferase from Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucleic Acids Res., 21, 2383–2388. 27. Kay,P.H., Pereira,E., Marlow,S.A., Turbett,G., Mitchell,C.A., Jacobsen,P.F., Holliday,R. and Papadimitriou,J.M. (1994) Evidence for adenine methylation within the mouse myogenic gene Myo-D1. Gene, 151, 89–95. 28. Kudryashova,I.B., Kirnos,M.D. and Vanyushin,B.F. (1976). DNA methylases from animal mitochondria and nuclei. Different specificity of DNA methylation. Biochimiya, 41, 1968–1977. 29. Kamwing,J., Ray-Whay,C.Y., Toyota,M., Ho,C., Baylin,S.B. and Issa,J.-P.J. (1998)De novo DNA-methyltransferase activity in a lung cancer cell line. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 39, 95. 30. Wu,J., Issa,J.P., Herman,J., Bassett,D.E., Nelkin,B.D. and Baylin,S.B. (1993) Expression of an exogenous eukaryotic DNA methyltransferase gene induces transformation of NIH 3T3 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90, 8891–8895. 31. Laird,P.W., Jackson-Grusby,L., Fazeli,A,, Dickinson,S.L., Jung,W.E., Li,E., Weinberg,R.A. and Jaenisch,R. (1995) Suppression of intestinal neoplasia by DNA hypomethylation. Cell, 81, 197–205. 32. Shen.,J.C., Rideout III,W.M. and Jones,P.A. (1992) High frequency mutagenesis by a DNA methyltransferase. Cell, 71, 1073–1080. 33. Smith,M.L., Yeleswarapu,L., Scalamogna,P., Locker,J. and Lombardi,B. (1993) p53 mutations in hepatocellular carcinomas induced by a cholinedevoid diet in male Fischer 344 rats. Carcinogenesis, 14, 503–510. 34. Magewu,A.N. and Jones,P.A. (1994) Ubiquitous and tenacious methylation of the CpG site in codon 248 of the p53 gene may explain its frequent appearance as a mutational hot spot in human cancer. Mol. Cell Biol., 14, 4225–4232. 35. Herman,J.G., Jen,J., Merlo,A. and Baylin,S.B. (1996) Hypermethylationassociated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res., 56, 722–727. 36. Makos,M., Nelkin,B.D., Chazin,V.R., Cavenee,W.K., Brodeur,G.M. and Baylin,S.B. (1993) DNA hypermethylation is associated with 17p allelic loss in neural tumors. Cancer Res., 53, 2715–2718. Received on December 1, 1997; revised on May 29, 1998; accepted on June 4, 1998 1781