* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Effective population size N Factors affecting N
Gene expression programming wikipedia , lookup
Heritability of IQ wikipedia , lookup
Polymorphism (biology) wikipedia , lookup
Dominance (genetics) wikipedia , lookup
Designer baby wikipedia , lookup
Koinophilia wikipedia , lookup
Human genetic variation wikipedia , lookup
Hardy–Weinberg principle wikipedia , lookup
Population genetics wikipedia , lookup
9/22/14 Effective population size Ne v the number of individuals in a theoretically ideal population having the same magnitude of random genetic drift as the actual population v for most natural populations, Ne is smaller than the census size ² often substantially smaller! Factors affecting Ne v changes in population size across generations ² Ne = harmonic mean population size # 1 1 1 & Ne = t % + + ...+ ( N t−1 ' $ N 0 N1 ² e.g., € " 1 1 1 1 % Ne = 4 $ + + + ' = 76.2 #1000 2000 20 1000 & € 1 9/22/14 Factors affecting Ne v sex ratio (of breeding individuals) ² “bottleneck” through the less numerous sex Ne = 4 Nm N f Nm + N f ² e.g., Ne = 4 × 10 ×100 = 36.4 10 +100 Factors affecting Ne v variation in “family size” (i.e., fitness) ² What is Ne in a haploid population in which every individual leaves one offspring? ² Diploid? Ne = 4N t−1 var(k) + k 2 − k ² where k is family size for a pair of diploid individuals ² what is k for a stable population? ² poisson distribution: mean = variance 2 9/22/14 Factors affecting Ne v sex chromosomes ² the “population” size of sex chromosomes is smaller than for autosomes ² Ne for X-linked genes: Ne = 9N m N f 4N m + 2N f ² if Nm= Nf, then Ne = 3N/4 ² mtDNA and Y-chromosome Ne = N/4 ² assuming equal variance in RS between males and females € 3 9/22/14 N = 1000; at time 0, A1 = A2 = 0.5; mt; nuc 1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 1 12 23 34 45 56 67 78 89 100 111 122 133 144 155 166 177 188 199 number of generations x 10 606 trials 140 120 number of trials 100 80 mt nuc 60 40 20 0 2000+ generations 10 0 20 0 30 0 40 0 50 0 60 0 70 0 80 0 90 0 10 00 11 00 12 00 13 00 14 00 15 00 16 00 17 00 18 00 19 00 20 00 21 00 frequency of A1 0.8 number of generations to fixation N = 1000; at time 0, A1 = A2 = 0.5 4 9/22/14 Factors affecting Ne v population structure with gene flow ² population subdivision maintains relatively greater genetic diversity (slows the process of drift to fixation in the overall population) ! 1 $ N e =ND #1+ & " 4Nm % ² …where N is the population size in each of D demes and m is the migration rate between demes Factors affecting Ne v breeding sex ratio v fluctuation in population size v variance in family size (or # offspring) v number of gene copies ² sex chromosomes, mtDNA v population structure 5 9/22/14 Fig. 3.4 Random genetic drift in 107 Drosophila populations; 8 males, 8 females each generation Why different from ideal expectations ? “Identical by Descent” v concept used to derive theoretical expectations for Ne v Hartl & Clark develop the concept using a structured population model (Fig. 3.9) 6 9/22/14 v Fig. 3.9 Overall average allele frequency stays the same but heterozygosity declines Fig. 3.5 Predicted distributions of allele frequencies in replicate populations of N = 16 Fig. 3.9 (last slide) is showing the exact same process as this figure 7 9/22/14 “Identical by Descent” v what is the probability that two randomly sampled alleles are identical by descent (i.e., “replicas of a gene present in a previous generation”)? ² Wright’s “fixation index” F v at the start of the process (time 0), “declare” all alleles in the population to be unique or unrelated, Ft = 0 at t = 0 v in the next generation, the probability of two randomly sampled alleles being copies of the same allele from a single parent = 1/(2N), so… “Identical by Descent” Ft = 1 # 1 & + %1− (Ft−1 2N $ 2N ' or t # 1 & Ft = 1- %1− ( $ 2N ' € € 8 9/22/14 “Identical by Descent” Ft = 1 # 1 & + %1− (Ft−1 2N $ 2N ' = probability that alleles are copies of the same gene from the immediately preceding generation plus the probability that the alleles are copies of the same gene from an earlier generation € or t # 1 & Ft = 1- %1− ( $ 2N ' assuming F0 = 0 € compare to: mean time to fixation for new mutant = ~4N 9 9/22/14 Random genetic drift in 107 Drosophila populations; 8 males, 8 females each generation t " 1 % H t = $1− ' H0 # 2N e & ≈ H 0e −t 2 Ne 10 9/22/14 Deriving the population size effect v Start here: 1 # 1 & Ft = + %1− (Ft−1 2N $ 2N ' v Finish here: € # 1 1 1 & Ne = t % + + ...+ ( N N N $ 0 1 t−1 ' v other effects on Ne are similarly based on the logic of identity by descent (Hartl & Clark: pp. 116-122) € 11