Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Energy Generation and the Age of the Sun Stars shine – we know that. But they can only shine until all their energy is used up. So where do they get their energy from? And how long will stars shine? The lifetime of a star depends on the amount of fuel divided by the consumption rate. (Analogy: if your car has a full 15-gallon gas tank and it consumes 2 gallons/hour on the highway, then your car can travel for 15 gallons/(2 gallons/hour) = 7.5 hours.) The fuel of the sun corresponds to the total amount of energy that is available, and the consumption rate is how much energy per second it emits. The energy per second that a star emits is called Luminosity. Thus the lifetime of a star is the energy available divided by the luminosity; or in terms of a formula: t age −of − sun = E L Why is this important? We know the luminosity of the sun, and if we could somehow figure out how much energy is available, we could calculate the sun’s age. Is the energy source of the sun coal? It sounds funny, but that’s what people used to believe. We can test this. We can measure how much energy is produced when burning coal. It turns out that one kilo-gram of coal produces 5 ×106 Joules. How much energy would the entire sun produce if it was made of coal? The sun’s total mass is 2 ×1030 kg, so the energy available is: E = 5 × 10 6 J × 2 × 10 30 kg = 1037 J kg How long does this last if the sun emits energy at the present rate? The Luminosity of the sun is 4 × 1026 W (1Watt = 1 Joule/sec). t age −of − sun = E = L 10 37 J 4 × 10 26 J sec = 2.5 × 1010 sec = 2.5 × 1010 sec = 800 years sec 7 3 × 10 yr So, if the sun received its energy through burning coal, it would radiate for 800 years. Clearly this is a ridiculously short time-scale. In fact an energy source is needed that provides energy for roughly 10,000,000 times as long a time. Is the energy source of the sun gravitational energy? In the mid 1800’s Kelvin & Helmholz came up with another suggestion. What if the sun is collapsing, and what if gravitational energy gets transformed into light energy? Again, this can be calculated. The gravitational energy of a spherical self gravitating body can be shown (using calculus) to be: E grav = − 3 GM 2 5 R where M is the total mass of all the particles and R the radius of the sphere. How much of that energy can be transformed into light? As the star collapses, it turns out that one half of the gravitational energy goes into heating the star, while the other half is radiated away. This is known as the “Viral Theorem”. In terms of a formula this is: 1 E light = − E grav 2 Thus the total energy reservoir that is available to be radiated away during the lifetime of the sun would then be: E grav = 3 GM 2 10 R Again, the age of the sun would be given by: t age −of − sun 3 GM 2 E 10 R 3 GM 2 = = = L L 10 RL So, if we know the mass, radius and the luminosity of the sun, we ought to be able to calculate for how long the sun would radiate at its present rate, if it obtained all of its energy from gravitational energy. Inserting R¤= 7 × 108 m, M¤= 2 × 1030 kg, L¤= 4 × 1026 W or 4 × 1026 kg×m2/sec3 (since 1Watt = 1 kg×m2/sec3) and G = 6.67 × 10-11 m3/(kg×sec2): t= 3 GM 2 3 = 10 RL 10 m3 2 30 2 × ( 2 × 10 kg ) kg × sec = 9.5 × 10 14 sec = 3 × 10 7 years 2 kg × m 7 × 10 8 m × 4 × 10 26 sec3 6.67 × 10 −11 Is this age reasonable and can life on earth have formed in that time-span? Well, the Neandertaler’s existed already a million years ago, and fossils are much older than that, implying that the sun must have existed for a much longer time. Kelvin & Helmholz already knew that in the mid 1800’s, but no other energy source was known. This puzzle was resolved in the 1930’s with the discovery of the hydrogen bomb. However, while gravity is not the main energy source of the sun, gravitation is indeed an important energy source. Proto-stars receive all their energy from gravitation!! And proto-stellar lifetimes are much shorter than the main sequence lifetimes. Is the energy source of the sun nuclear fusion? We now believe that the energy source of the sun is nuclear fusion of hydrogen to helium. This procedure requires four hydrogen atoms. It turns out that four hydrogen atoms have more mass than one helium atom. So where did the extra mass go? The mass somehow got converted into energy. A few years prior to this discovery, Einstein had already shown this - at least in theory. His discovery can be summarized as: E = mc 2 This means that Energy and Mass are “different faces of the same thing” (c is the velocity of light, and thus a constant), and that one can be transformed into the other. If “hydrogen to helium burning” is really what is happening in the sun, we ought to be able to calculate the total amount of energy that the sun could produce. Since we know the mass of the hydrogen and the helium atoms, we can calculate how much mass has been lost, and how much energy was produced during this process. The mass of one hydrogen atom is 1.673 × 10-27 kg and that of one helium atom is 6.645 × 10-27 kg. 4 × mhydrogen = 6.693 × 10 −27 kg 1 × mhelium = 6.645 × 10− 27 kg Difference = 0.048 × 10 − 27 kg Thus the energy is: E = mc2 = 0.048 × 10 −27 kg × ( 3 × 108 m / sec) 2 E = 4.3 × 10 −12 Joules The fraction of the hydrogen mass that is lost is: fractionlost − mass = 0.048 × 10 −27 kg = 0.007 6.693 × 10 −27 kg which means that only 0.7% of the hydrogen mass has been converted to energy. One kilo-gram of hydrogen then produces: E = mc 2 = 0.007 kg × ( 3 × 10 8 m / sec) 2 E = 6.3 × 1014 Joules How much energy is that? As a reference, to get the same amount of energy, you would have to burn 20,000 tons of coal; and 20,000 tons corresponds to roughly 4×1011kg of coal. This is quite a lot of coal! So you can do quite a lot of damage with only one kilo-gram of hydrogen… Finally, if the sun’s energy source was nuclear burning, how much of an energy reservoir would it have? Well, you can calculate that. One kilogram produces 6.3 × 1014 Joules, so the whole sun would produce E = 6.3 × 1014 J × 2 × 10 30 kg = 13 . × 10 45 J kg However, the sun has only 75% of hydrogen gas, so the total energy available would be: E = 13 . × 10 45 J × 0.75 = 9.5 × 10 44 J If a maximum of 9.5 × 1044 Joules are available and the sun emits energy at a constant rate of L = 4 ×1026 W (or 4 × 1026 J/sec) its life-time would be: t age −of − sun = E 9.5 × 1044 J = = 2.4 × 1018 sec = 7.5 × 1010 years J L 4 × 1026 sec This time-scale is certainly long enough. Our estimates show that the sun is probably about 5 billion years old at the present time and will probably last for another 5 billion years on the main sequence. During its main-sequence lifetime it will convert roughly 10% of its hydrogen into helium. Its initial main sequence luminosity was actually 30% less than its present one, so compensating for both effects, one gets an estimate of 10 billion years for the main sequence lifetime of the sun. This sounds about right.