Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Age of the Earth wikipedia , lookup
Water pollution wikipedia , lookup
Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products wikipedia , lookup
Surface runoff wikipedia , lookup
Soil governance wikipedia , lookup
Soil salinity control wikipedia , lookup
DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT TO BE UNDERTAKEN Topic: Remediation and Bioremediation of Uranium contaminated soils of Andhra Pradesh, India ORIGIN OF PROPOSAL: Uranium is a naturally occurring element that can be found in low levels within all rock, soil, and water. Uranium is also the highest-numbered element to be found naturally in significant quantities on earth and is always found combined with other elements. Along with all elements having atomic weights higher than that of iron, it is only naturally formed in supernovas. The decay of uranium, thorium, and potassium-40 in the Earth's mantle is thought to be the main source of heat that keeps the outer core liquid and drives mantle convection, which in turn drives plate tectonics. Uranium's average concentration in the Earth's crust is (depending on the reference) 2 to 4 parts per million, or about 40 times as abundant as silver. The Earth's crust from the surface to 25 km (15 mi) down is calculated to contain 1017 kg (2×1017 lb) of uranium while the oceans may contain 1013 kg (2×1013 lb). The concentration of uranium in soil ranges from 0.7 to 11 parts per million (up to 15 parts per million in farmland soil due to use of phosphate fertilizers), and its concentration in sea water is 3 parts per billion. Uranium is a silvery-white metallic chemical element in the actinide series of the periodic table, with atomic number 92. In nature, uranium is found as uranium-238 (99.2742%), uranium-235 (0.7204%), and a very small amount of uranium-234 (0.0054%). Uranium decays slowly by emitting an alpha particle. The half-life of uranium-238 is about 4.47 billion years and that of uranium-235 is 704 million years, making them useful in dating the age of the Earth. The potential risk of uranium soil contamination is a global problem. Depleted, enriched and natural uranium contamination in soil and water has been identified at many sites worldwide, so that measures for preventing should be considered as a preliminary step towards the remediation of contaminated areas. Contamination of the environment can occur from a variety of different sources of radionuclides, including • military tests; • radiation accidents; • various nuclear fuel cycle activities (uranium mining, processing of ore, fuel fabrication and reprocessing of nuclear fuel); • electricity generation; • mining and • processing of some other natural resources such as gas, oil, tin and phosphate; • application of radionuclides in industry, • research and medicine; and • loss of nuclear weapons. Radioactive contamination of the environment can cover surface regions of hundreds of square kilometers, including agricultural areas, forested or other semi-natural regions. Contamination of the soil can occur either from deposition of uranium originally discharged into the atmosphere, or from waste products discharged directly into or on the ground (e.g., water containing uranium from either underground or open-pit mines). Some specific characteristics of uranium contamination of the environment determine the need for restoration measures. The physicochemical forms of uranium, which depend on the release scenario and the density of radioactive fallout during dispersion and deposition, may influence the behaviour and availability of this radionuclide in its transfer along food chains. The mobility of uranium along the agricultural food chain, and initially within the soil, depends mainly on two factors, the soil properties and the physical and chemical properties of uranium compounds. The impacts on ecosystems and potential land use depend on the vulnerability of the ecosystem in question and the specific features governing radionuclide transfer in these environments. Contaminated sites can be classified according to different criteria. Assuming that similar environmental behaviour and contamination patterns of radionuclides can be expected for similar contamination scenarios, the origin and contamination scenarios can be utilised to classify such sites. On the other hand, contaminated sites can also be classified based on the preliminary assessed potential radiation risk to the population. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT: The main objective of this project proposal is to assess the recent advances in uranium removal from contaminated soils, using either Chemical and/or biological techniques (such as hyperaccumulator plants, or high biomass crop species after soil treatment with chelating compounds).And screening of the technologies applicable to a contaminated site which is depend on the cleanup goals, the form of pollutants present and the volume and physical/chemical properties of the polluted soils and the concentration of pollutants. Review of R & D in the proposed area (National & International Status, Importance, patents etc.): Clean up of contaminated aquifers is a difficult and expensive problem because of the inaccessibility of the subsurface and the volume of soil requiring treatment. Current approaches in India and other countries to bioremediation of uranium are based upon the complexation, oxidation-reduction (redox), and alkylation reactions introduction. Microdial leaching, microbial surfactants (biosurfactants), volatilization, and bioaccumulation/complexation are all strategies that have been suggested for removal of uranium from contaminated environments. Unfortunately, the number of accompanying fieldbased studies has, thus far, been small. STUDY AREA: • Scientists have found massive uranium deposits at the mines in Tummalapalle in Andhra Pradesh, a site that has the potential to emerge as the largest reserve of the key nuclear fuel in the world. • Cuddapah basin, Andhra Pradesh, endowed with rich mineral wealth, is one of the important and fairly well studied geological units in peninsular India. Uranium exploration in the Cuddapah basin was initiated in the late 1950’s to search the quartzpebble-conglomerate type uranium mineralisation which had dominated the world uranium supply at that time. • Lambapur-Peddagattu region, 130km south-west of Hyderabad where uranium project in progress and a uranium processing plant at Seripalli, 54 km from mine site. WORK PLAN (INCLUDING DETAILED METHODOLOGY AND TIME SCHEDULE) I Year: Soil washing and in situ flushing involve the addition of water with or without additives including organic and inorganic acids, sodium hydroxide which can dissolve soil organic matter, water soluble solvents such as methanol, nontoxic cations complexing agents such as ethylene-diamine-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), acids in combination with complexation agents or oxidizing/reducing agents(1). Bio-surfactants, biologically produced surfactants may be promising agents for enhancing removal of metals from contaminated soils and sediments. Virtually all soil-washing or soil-flushing systems are designed to treat soils where the majority of the contaminants are concentrated in the finer-grained materials or on the surfaces of the larger soil particles(1). Many soil-washing processes are simply screening processes that separate the fine, contaminated particles from the bulk of the soil. The large particle fraction, which constitutes the bulk of many soils, is then clean and does not need further treatment before it can be placed back onsite. II Year: CHARACTERIZATION: Characterization and solubility measurements of uraniumcontaminated soils to support risk assessment is to be assessed as per the method described by Elless et al (2) (1997) SOLIDIFICATION/STABILIZATION: The purpose of solidification and stabilization is to treat contaminated soils so that the contaminants are suitably immobilized from potential leaching into the environment. Solidification is the binding of a waste/soil into a solid mass to reduce its contaminant leaching potential, whereas stabilization is the reduction of the solubility and/or chemical reactivity of a waste/soil. These technologies are applicable to a wide range of wastes / soils, but are particularly well suited for metals and are typically limited to soils containing less than 1% organics(3). IN SITU IMMOBILIZATION: Contaminated soils can be treated in situ or ex situ to immobilize the pollutants. In situ treatment has the advantage of minimizing the exposure of site works and local residents to airborne pollutants. It is also has the potential for minimizing disruption to or demolition of existing structures. Mobility is strongly related to the physicochemical state and the location of pollutants(2,3). CHEMICAL REDUCTION TREATMENTS: As with immobilization, contaminated soils can be treated in situ or ex situ to reduce the pollutants and thereby their toxicity and mobility. The redox potential (Eh) depends on the availability of oxygen in soils, water and sediments, and upon biochemical reactions by which microorganisms extract oxygen for respiration. Redox conditions influence the mobility of metals in two different ways. Firstly, the valence of certain metals changes. For instance, under reducing conditions, Fe3+ is transformed to Fe2+ and, similarly, the valence of manganese and arsenic is subject to direct changes. Since the reduced ions are more soluble, increased concentrations of these metals have been observed in reducing environments such as groundwaters and sediment solutions. Under reducing conditions, sulfate reduction will take place: for example, in sediments, lead sulfide with a low solubility if formed. On the other hand, an increase in the redox potential will cause lead sulfide to become unstable, with a subsequent rise in dissolved lead concentrations (3). III Year BIOREMEDIATION: The objective of bioremediation is to exploit the naturally occurring biodegradative processes to clean up contaminated sites. There are several types of bioremediation: in situ bioremediation is the in-place treatment of a contaminated site; ex situ bioremediation is the treatment of contaminated soil or water that is removed from a contaminated site; and intrinsic bioremediation is the indigenous level of condition biodegradation that occurs without any stimulation or treatment. The following three methods will be screened and assessed. (1) Enzymatic dissimilatory metal bioreduction of soluble U(VI) in sparingly soluble U(IV)(4,5), (2) Chemical reduction by microbially-generated by-products (6), and (3) Biosorption on cell surface, biopolymers or dead organisms(6) Finally aim is to assess the advantages and disadvantages with above remediation technologies and to measures the applicability and the circumstances of applicability uranium remediation technologies. Potential Impacts of the Proposed Studies: The results of these data will be useful to determine the initial need for site remediation, plans for further remediation and implementation of remedial actions as well as to ensure that there is compliance regarding the residual concentrations of radionuclides in the environment post-remediation. ¾ Assists mining communities in making scientifically sound and environmentally informed decisions about extracting Uranium resources. ¾ Provides new data about speciation, partitioning to common soil phases, and toxicity of uranium that will assist regulatory agencies in determining appropriate bonds for mining these elements. ¾ Places MRP at the forefront of proactive research assessing potential environmental impacts of uranium, thereby raising the visibility of the program within the organization and broader scientific community. References: 1. Martyushov-VV; Bazylev-VV. (1992) Behavior of heavy natural radionuclides in irrigated soils. Soviet-Journal-of-Ecology. 23: 1, 12-16; translated from Ekologia 1: 16-20. 2. Elless MP, Armstrong AQ, Lee SY. (1997) Characterization and solubility measurements of uranium-contaminated soils to support risk assessment. Health Phys. 72(5):716-26. 3. Hazardous Waste Consultant “HWC” (1996): Remediating Soil and Sediment contaminated with Heavy Metals, 14 (6): 41 - 47. New York, Elsevier Science. 4. Freethey G. F., Naftz D. L., Rowland R. C., and Davis J. A. (2002) Deep Aquifer Remediation Tools: Theory, Design, and Performance Modeling. In Handbook of Groundwater Remediation Using Permeable Reactive Barriers (ed. D. L. Naftz, S. J. Morrison, J. A. Davis, and C. C. Fuller), pp. 133-163. Academic Press. 5. Al Kaddissi S, Legeay A, Gonzalez P, Floriani M, Camilleri V, Gilbin R, Simon O. (2011) Effects of uranium uptake on transcriptional responses, histological structures and survival rate of the crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. (In press) 6. Grégoire Seyrig (2010) uranium bioremediation: current knowledge and trends. Basic Biotech eJournal 3:3.