* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download god hermes as the messenger archetype
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies International Journal of Social Science Doi number:http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3091 Number: 39 , p. 337-346, Autumn III 2015 Yayın Süreci Yayın Geliş Tarihi 09.09.2015 Yayınlanma Tarihi 25.10.2015 GOD HERMES AS THE MESSENGER ARCHETYPE HABERCİ ARKETİPİ OLARAK TANRI HERMES Asst Prof. Dr. Ömer ALANKA Atatürk University Faculty of Communication Department of Journalism General Abstract This study reviews Hermes, the messenger of gods in the Ancient Greek Mythology as the messenger archetype. In addition to the messenger image, the Hermes persona contains commerce, robbery, and hermeneutics. Being a reflection of the mythical thought, the myth of Hermes is an important figure in mapping the mental patterns and an archetypal symbol in investigating the news and messenger typology. The myth of Hermes reveals the general view regarding the ancient period in understanding the meaning of the communication phenomenon in the Archaic period and the communication processes. Another focus point of the study is also the connection between the news and discourse in the Hellenistic period, where communication was also transformed into a part of the metaphysical process. While the collective unconscious and temporal bonds break off and form similar images and ways of thinking, Hermes becomes one of this collective unconscious samples as the messenger symbol. The concepts of news, discourse, and logos find the least common denominator with communication in the Ancient Greek culture. In this context, this study carries out a literature review regarding the communication in the ancient period and examines how the concept of messenger has been transformed into the collective unconscious in the example of God Hermes with an archetypal approach. Keywords: Hermes, Persona, Archetype, Messenger, Collective Unconscious Özet Bu çalışmada haberci arketipi olarak Antik Yunan Mitolojisinde tanrıların habercisi olan Hermes incelenmektedir. Hermes personası haberci imgesinin yanı sıra bünyesinde ticareti, hırsızlığı, hermenötiği barındırmaktadır. Mitik düşüncenin bir yansıması olarak Hermes mitosu, zihinsel kalıpların haritalanmasında önemli bir figür olurken, haber ve haberci tipolojisinin araştırılmasında arketipal bir semboldür. Arkaik dönem iletişim olgusunun anlamı ve haberleşme süreçlerinin anlaşılmasında Hermes miti, antik döneme ilişkin genel manzarayı ortaya koymaktadır. Haberleşmenin aynı zamanda metafiziksel bir sürecin parçasına dönüştüğü Helenik dönemde haber ve söz arasındaki bağlantı çalışmanın bir diğer odak noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Kolektif bilinçdışı ile zamansal bağlar kopup benzer imgeler ve düşünme biçimleri oluşurken, haberci sembolü olarak Hermes bu kolektif bilinçdışının örneklerinden biri haline 338 Ömer ALANKA gelmektedir. Haber, söz ve logos kavramları antik çağda Yunan kültüründe haberleşme ile aynı paydada buluşmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada antik dönem iletişimine ilişkin literatür taraması yapılmakta ve haberci kavramının kolektif bilinçdışında nasıl dönüştüğü Tanrı Hermes örneğinde incelenmektedir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Hermes, Persona, Arketip, Haberci, Kolektif Bilinçdışı INTRODUCTION Mythological thought is trivialized by modern science as it is irrational and is based on mythos and legends. However, the connection of mythology with dreams and psyche (spirit) has made it an interesting area worth of being investigated in every periods. Mythology has usually answered the questions of ontology. The mythos that have a function of explaining the meaning of the source of existence, as well as death and life involve psychological, ideological, sociological, cultural and historical cores in their lower texts and thus, they have universal qualifications. Mythology has always endeavored to explain the origin, the inception and the archetypes (initial examples) with allegorical discourses and remove the obscurity fears in human beings. Answers have been developed for phenomena like birth and death. In the dichotomic conflict of nature and culture, the mythos have strengthened the hand of culture and reversed the weakness of human beings in the face of nature. Even though the mythos has an irrational quality, they have fulfilled important functions as they constitute and sustain the political, cultural, and ideological structure of the period. Mythos have filled both political and sociological gap in terms of the establishment and the infinite sustainment of the masculine society. In this context, God Hermes not only becomes the archaic state of his messenger identity, but also presents the universe of meaning concerning news. This character also answers the phenomenon of messenger. This answer offers opportunity to compare today’s culture with the culture in the archaic period, and God Hermes has a central importance in this comparison. Thus, trying to understand Hermes as a mythological symbol also answers the archaic period of the messenger typology. In order to understand the symbol of Hermes, this study uses Jung’s concept of archetype and considers the characteristics of a mythological god. Reviewing the persona of Hermes, this study focuses on the qualifications of the concepts of news and messenger in the ancient period. Hermes Archetype The concept of archetype is one of the most important concepts of the analytic psychology that has multilayer associations in understanding the psychological states of people and communities. Jung argues that the mental structure of human beings is separated into three parts as ego, personal unconscious and collective unconscious, and that the collective unconscious constitutes the hereditary basis of mental life and personality. Jung states that the collective unconscious is inherited from ancestors and this part is always expressed symbolically in legends such as myth in an unconscious way. Mythology has become effective upon shaping the collective unconscious of human beings. In Jung’s psychology, the archetypes originate from the collective unconscious and become known in all imaginary products of the healthy or neurotic subject in fairy tales and legends (Cevizci, 2000, p.83). Mythos determines and shapes the collective unconscious of human beings with archetypal structures. Archetypes are the remnants of the psychic characteristics of past people. In the general sense, the archetypes that are the summation of God Hermes As The Messenger Archetype experiences of organic life being repeated for millions of times and intensified in patterns represent all the experiences that have existed on earth since the primary times (Jung, 1987, p.71). It is possible to observe the relation of mythos with psychology in the Freudian psychology, as well. Freud eminently uses mythological characters in the symptoms and names of diseases and shapes his own psychological thought in this way (for instance, Oedipus Complex, Electra Complex etc). Jung defines the archetypes as primary images that naturally exist in human psyche and asserts that they form an accumulation in every human psyche by showing continuity in the course of time as from the beginning of humanity. Jung mentions presence of an immanent modeler power in human psyche (psychological structure) and states that this power spontaneously appears in unassociated individuals with similar fantasies in various times and places. Additionally, Jung also emphasizes that the archetypes frequently appear in dreams and fantasies by means of psychoanalysis and the repeated archetypes depend on a number of typical phenomena just like our innate tendencies or predetermined evaluation styles. Figures or images are considered as personalization of our innate tendencies and are associated with mythos all around the world, which enables us to prove the universality of the collective unconscious (Campbell, 1974, pp.12-13). The mythos and fairy tales produced by different communities on different geographies of the world bear similar features and numerous cultures have common cores, which all form an important evidence for the existence of the collective unconscious. The thinkers asserting that the mind is not a tabula rasa (blank slate) think that the mind/memory has a structure that originates from the past 339 and is innately determined by various categories and schemes. In their models aimed at understanding the human mind, Freud and Jung accept that human mind has inherited certain things in perceiving and organizing the world around us. These acceptances could be considered as a serious breakup for that period because the mind used to be considered as a tabula rasa in the first half of the nineteenth century. Mind did not have any innate content, process or structure and it was shaped by environmental effects. According to the behaviorists, the inner structure of mind such as perceptions, memory, and feelings could not be a subject of psychology (Knox, 2003, p.11). Contrary to the behaviorist psychologists, the analytic psychologists argued that human beings innately brought certain mindscapes in every period of history. In the archaic period, individuals trying to explain the meaning of life applied to certain patterns of mind. Seeking after the ontological answers, the mankind has made ontological explanations through various myths and stories. Mythical thought describes the gods and metaphysical powers as humans and associates the movement of nature with the power of anthropomorphic gods. Anthropomorphic structure of gods caused gods to share the natural events. For instance, Apollo is the god of sun and Poseidon is the god of wind. Hermes, on the other hand, is the god of communication, trade, thieves, the stranded and they are under the control of Hermes. Besides, Hermes is the source of hermeneutics as the archetype –or the first example. He is the symbolic equivalent of trade, communication, correspondence, and travel. Being a messenger, Hermes provides the communication and correspondence between gods and human beings and freely 340 Ömer ALANKA wanders in the sky and underground. The rich and unique persona of Hermes has also materialized a number of abstract concepts in the historical process. The Hermes figure is used by diplomats and preachers due to his verbal mastership; journalists and postmen due to his procurement of communication; and by merchants as he is the god of trade. Being among the most colorful and unique gods of Olympos, Hermes could be seen as a messenger, an interpreter and a thief from time to time. When he is symbolically separated into three parts, his head represents interpretation and journalism; his body represents the body of news, as well as his heretically mentioned heresy and esoterism; and his feet represent bringing news, mailing and conveying the communication. Yet another characteristic of Hermes is that he is a cheater archetype. According to Doty, the characteristics of this cheater archetype are as follows. 1- He is marginal and has a contradictory temperament. 2- He is erotic and has features of erotism. 3- He has creative and innovative aspects. 4- He is a tricky thief. 5He has a funny and humorous temperament. 6- Hermeneutics, which is the art of interpretation, is named after him and he plays roles in hermeneutics. Qualifications of Hermes are among his important personality traits in addition to being a messenger and a herald (Doty, 1993, p.4). Considering the birth of God Hermes, he was born as a result of the intercourse between Zeus and Maia, the daughter of the Titan Atlas and Pleione. Being the messenger of gods and especially Zeus, Hermes was born as follows; Zeus met Maia in a cave of the mount Cyllene in the south of Arcadia and a child was born as a result of this intercourse. The child was swaddled and laid in a crib. On the day he was born, Hermes undertook works proving he was superior than most of the gods in terms of intelligence and skills. Hermes refused to stay in his crib for so long, unfastened his swaddle in the evening, and hit the road on his feet. He saw a turtle in front of the cave, killed the animal, unstuffed its shell and made a guitar by stretching seven strings made from lamb bowel. And then he had fun hearing the pleasant music out of it. He found the cow herds of the sun god on the Pieria plains and stole fifty animals from them. He took the cows to Cyllene, but then decided to put them back in order for his theft not be noticed. Hermes used to hide his footprints by making bizarre sandals out of faggot (Erhat, 1996, pp.140-141). This creative aspect of Hermes is also reflected on his persona. Some of his duties are as follows: Being the messenger of gods and especially of Zeus, guiding the travelers and the stranded, taking the shadows of the dead underground, assisting the thieves and merchants, and carrying out researches and observations. In this context, God Hermes has dual contradictions and his duties do vary. Considering the fact that communication has broken off from the human body and become a part of technology today, it is possible to assert that each organ of body had a function for archaic humans. In the classical period, the communication was dependent on only one place and was realized symbolically. For instance, ears and mouth were the most important means of communication. In today’s communication age, the communication ways that are mediated with technology – such as telephone, television- minimize the necessity of human body in terms of ontological aspect. Thus, ears, eyes, mind, and memory have been replaced by electronic instruments today; which weakens the physical interaction and the necessity of our existence. Our communicational experiences symbolically break off from the human physicalism and God Hermes As The Messenger Archetype transform into a sort of bodiless communication, the ears, tongue and memory has terminated and exported, and communication started to function independently from existence (Bettini, 2011, p.4). In contrast with the present day where the effect of the ontological existence of human beings is almost minimized with the help of technological devices, the ancient or classical period considered the body the center of universe and meaning. Being considered as a miniature version of universe, the body became the source of communication in the classical period. Ears and tongue of Hermes are instruments enabling the metaphysical communication. Hermes hears the gods with his ears and conveys these messages through his tongue. On the other hand, he uses his tongue in order to convey the messages of gods, which are simplified with his mind, to the mankind. Thus, the body and its organs are symbolically the micro version of universe and Hermes as a god is the symbol of the metaphoric expression of these symbolic versions in the archaic period. It is possible to describe the content of the symbol of Hermes as follows: Hermes, in short, was the god of circulation and everything circulated around him: coins, prophetic signs, merchandise, encounters, klēdones. In Greek religious thought, Hermes might be said to represent what today we might define more prosaically by the term “communication”: He was the herald (kērux) and messenger (angelos), functioning as a 341 kind of channel for communication between the transmitter and addressee of a certain message. (Bettini, 2011, p.6). Hermes is one of the equivalents of wise man, who exists in every culture, in Greek mythology. Wise man that appears in different ways in every culture in the ancient world tries to help people and is considered as divine. The archetypes of wise people could be observed as bodhisattvas, yogis or gurus in Asia, wizard physicians in some parts of Africa, natives in America and shamans in Asian nomad tribes. In the Bible, the prophets are depicted as wise men. While elderly people such as ‘grandmother’, ‘grandfather’ are the symbols of wisdom in many cultures, the wise men are generally male in the west. Even today, wise man is accepted as a hermit and weird person with white beard and a long gown in caricatures (Soccio, 2007, p.5). One of the most important aspects of the symbol of wise men is logos. The Ancient Greek philosophy pays a great attention to logos. The term of logos has been transformed into an extensive discourse mentioning the law, order and god. Hermes takes the logos from gods and conveys it to human beings in a comprehensible way. In this sense, Hermes is the transporter and the interpreter of logos. From the archetypal aspect, Hermes is in the intersection of mythology, religion, philosophy, and esoteric (potential-internal) knowledge. Wise figures such as Toth in the Ancient Egypt, Idris in Islam culture, and Buddha in the Indian culture are depicted as the examples of this ancient archetype. Being another variation of the Hermes symbol, the Hermes Trismegistus (Hermes sanctified 342 Ömer ALANKA three times) has been the symbol of wisdom and the transporter of potential knowledge throughout history. Kılıç stated that there are three basic qualifications that have been effective upon Hermes to become a universal figure, and listed these qualifications as follows: a-) He is mentioned with the Flood in some way; in other words, he had lived either before or after it. b-) He has a prominent, profound, prophet or a protector personality. c-) The most remarkable of all these is that he has a supreme position in all traditions and he never dies (Kılıç, 2013). The ability of God Hermes to communicate with gods gives him the capacity of reaching the metaphysical information and the alchemists of the first age and the medieval age associate their esoteric knowledge with the power of Hermes. Thus, the potential knowledge, alchemy, and initiation (pubescence) are attributed to Hermes and he has been accepted as a guide in this metaphysical universe. Hereby, Hermes has maintained his importance by being exposed to change and transformation in the formation of his image as a god, prophet, saint and messenger from the first age until today. Hermes is a god in the beginning and a prophet afterwards, a transporter of archaic knowledge in the medieval age, a mercantilist making transoceanic trade in the new age (the term mercantilist is derived from mercury, which is the equivalent of Hermes in the Roman mythology) and finally the traveler and flaneur exploring the world in modern days. According to the analytic psychology, archetypes leave a mark in the collective unconscious of human beings in the course of time and they rise from the subconscious through dreams. Accordingly, various archetypal objects, symbols, numbers and figures go beyond time and become effective for people from every period, which enables these archetypal elements to become visible in various ways. In this context, the phenomena regarding communication and transportation are objectified with metaphors like birds, wings in the collective unconscious of individuals. The fact that the figures of Hermes, which are symbolized with Mercury in the ancient period and then in the Roman mythology, are archetypally full of communicational and transportational associations is important to show this situation. Being a mythical figure, God Hermes is described with a winged walking stick in his hand, a winged hat called petasus and a winged sandal called alipes. The Hermes' iconography initially had a white tape on the walking stick, but then the tape has been transformed into a curved snake due to his connection with Hades, the god of death. The walking stick is pointed to the eyes of the dead and associated with death. Besides, Hermes enters the Roman pantheon using the name of Mercury and caduceus remains as a snake curved on the stick. Hermes and Mercury carry the Asclepios. Asclepios is the god of medicine and this symbol has also been used as the emblem of modern medicine in the course of time (Kennedy, 1998, p.72). While the ability of Hermes to talk to gods enables him to maturate in the hermeneutic field, his divine secrets develop his heretic and esoteric aspect. This heretic or hermetic aspect of Hermes is associated with the fact that he keeps the potential information. Especially the discipline of esoteric that used to deal with the art of alchemy in the medieval age mainly consists of belief systems that are developed by referring to the esoteric knowledge of Hermes. On the other hand, Hermes is a resident of Olympos where the principal gods live and a messenger taking the dead to the underground (hades). This God Hermes As The Messenger Archetype connection of Hermes with death symbolizes his connection with potential belief systems. Anubis (a black jackal) who takes the dead to the underground in Egypt has actually become the equivalent of Hermes in the Egyptian mythology. The Persona of Hermes and Its Importance for Journalism The term persona which means character or personality has a universal meaning for gods by comprising all the ontological qualifications such as personality, task. Just like human beings, personalities of the gods have a broad and eclectic structure. In this sense, the persona of Hermes, who is the messenger of Zeus, consists of different layers. Hermes is the god of hermeneutics on one hand, and trade and communication on the other. What associates Hermes with discourse and news is the language, in other words the logos. Bettini expresses the relation of Hermes with logos as follows: As the god of communication, a specific and—from our point of view— significant part of the body was sacred to Hermes in antiquity: the tongue. As the philosopher Cornutus (Comp. p. 21) says, Hermes “is called the Messenger (diaktoros) because . . . he leads (diagein) our thoughts to the souls (psuchai) of those near us: for this reason, they consecrate the tongue to him.”14 This unambiguously religious association of Hermes with the organ of vocal articulation places the god squarely in 343 the camp of one of the most fundamental aspects of human interaction: linguistic communication. Plato sustains that Hermes “has to do with language (logos)” and that for this reason he should be called “Eiremes,” from eirein (“to say”).15 In Hesiod, we find the story of how Hermes endowed Pandora with “lies, devious speech, a mischievous nature” and above all “a voice.”16 The Roman scholar Macrobius described Mercury as “in control of the voice and, indeed, of speech” (vocis et sermonis potentem) (Bettini, 2011, p.6). Hermes is also considered as the archetypal form of using and explaining the language in the archaic period. Aelian also asserts that Hermes is the father of languages. Furthermore, while studying on the nature of animals in his work, he states that the lingual function of Hermes is primarily represented by ibis (in Egypt) in animals. Aelian depicts that this bird apparently resembles the “nature of language (eidos)” for gods. Aelian associates the black feathers of this bird with the silence of language that manages the feelings and the white feathers with the external part of language that is heard by others. It resembles the serving parts of language and the internal existence of messenger. Just like Hermes, language is a messenger: its functions cause internal and external communication that exists in communication. However, the feathers of ibis do not only fairly characterize the 344 Ömer ALANKA language, but also symbolize the communicational skill that carries what are hidden in the inner world of human beings. Black and white feathers in this image symbolize the black and white aspects of communication – silence and introversion display the many dimensions of language as a clear speech (Bettini, 2011, p.6). The capacity of Hermes to control logos has become the origin point in the development of hermeneutics afterwards. It should not be forgotten that hermeneutics, in other words the knowledge of interpretation is actually the process of translating or interpreting the divine discourse to human beings, which is commonly observed in all prophets. Derrida’s logoscentric criticism of western metaphysics is actually based on this. Logos is a concept that means not only discourse, but also tradition, law and god. The history of logoscentric western thought regards the discourse to be simultaneous and synonymous with god, law and tradition. Derrida discusses the primary position of discourse in the face of script, which takes root in the western metaphysics. He believes that the metaphysics of presence is a product of the dominance and oppression of logos over script. In this context, logos, in other words discourse has transformed into the manifestation of divinity. Discourse is depicted before God’s action of creation in holy books, as well. The verse in the Bible, “There was first of all the discourse, the discourse was god” and another verse in Koran, “He said be and it is” depict the complex relation of discourse with god. In this context, Hermes wanders around the source where esoteric and exoteric knowledge arise due to his mission as a messenger conveying the discourse and the divine discourse. Considering from this perspective, Hermes literally originates from the "discourse" (logos) and his fundamental character is shaped by logos. As a type of the linguistic vector, Hermes’ function is diactoros. His impressive and brilliant nature being emphasized is the rapid form of this smooth-clear-brilliant expression and this condition has been the same with the character of the effective lingual communication. In Cornutus' interpretation, the lingual translation constitutes another dominant role of Hermes. Hermes is a messenger (kerux), because he enables all the lingual indicators to reach the ear by making a sound; in other words, he becomes a “messenger” by using the language (Bettini, 2011, p.6). In the ancient period, one of the most important aspects of the nature of communication is rhetoric, in other words using the language effectively. Another aspect of language that is as effective as rhetoric is interpreting the language, in other words hermeneutics and in this respect, hermeneutics enables us to go down deep the mysteries of language. In the perception of communication in the ancient period, the dimension of metaphysics involves communicating with gods. Thus individuals reach the information about the future through Hermes. Hermes provides communication with the help of his invisibility and speed. The walking stick that was made by Hephiastos for Zeus enables the god Hermes to become invisible and dominate the sleep. Regarding this subject, the following are expressed in Iliad: Thus he spoke and Mercury, guide and guardian, slayer of Argus, did as he was told. Forthwith he bound on his glittering golden sandals with which he could fly like the wind over land and sea; he took the wand with which he seals men’s eyes in sleep, or wakes them just as he pleases, and flew holding it in his hand till he came to Troy and to God Hermes As The Messenger Archetype the Hellespont. To look at, he was like a young man of noble birth in the hey-day of his youth and beauty with the down just coming upon his face.(Homer, 1998, p.481) Hermes is the divine father of discourse and works as a messenger and preacher in expressing the metaphysical universe. Hermes plays a principal role in the phase of transmitting the sound and lingual indicators to ears, in other words to the mind. As well as the lingual indicators, this god is observed in the negative end of language. Hermes is the god taking the dead to the underground, in other words to the land of the dead. The jackal Annubis in the Ancient Egyptian mythology takes the souls to the next world as another example of the Hermes archetype. This connection of Hermes with death symbolizes his relationship with the potential belief systems. Taking the dead to the underground in Egypt, Anubis (a black jackal) is actually the ancestor of Hermes in the Egyptian mythology. Since Hermes, the mentor of discourse and silence, works as a messenger between the metaphysical and the physical worlds, he bears the divine knowledge. Hermes is the messenger of Zeus and Zeus obtains all his information through him. In this sense, Hermes is the messenger god of the ancient period and he symbolizes the archaic form of today’s communication. Conclusion The archetype of Hermes has been transformed into an image presenting the nature and the meaning of communication in the archaic period. This study which investigates the messenger archetype in the ancient period scrutinizes the messenger symbol imaged by the collective unconscious of communities. Being the messenger of gods, Hermes is not only a 345 mythological figure, but also an example showing the general lines of news and communication in the archaic era. In the mythological era where the process of communication is realized on the axis of god-human, God Hermes acts like a messenger realizing the process of communication. The modern intellect excludes the metaphysical world on one hand and restricts the communication phenomenon in the rational area on the other. However, as the Hermes archetype includes the silence, obscurity and irrational elements in the process of communication, it is different from today’s modern science and the definition of communication. Another aspect of the news is its connection with trade. During the mercantilist period, one of the most vital aspects of trade was the procurement of the communication flow. Considering the fact that trade and media have developed simultaneously, the importance of Hermes archetype becomes even greater. The unification of trade with communication in the Hermes persona and the development of the industrial age in the denominator of communication and trade also indicate an anachronic similarity. It is possible to see the effect of collective unconscious being asserted by the archetypal approach in this example. The element of speed that is involved by the typology of the messenger Hermes, on the other hand, is one of the basic characteristics of today’s media. In the media where the speed advances with a vengeance, it is required to access everything in an instant. In this context, it is possible to assert that there are both similarities and differences between today’s communication phenomenon and the sense of communication in the ancient period. Today’s sense of journalism is in harmony with the Hermes archetype in line with speed, circulation, and meaning. Similarly, 346 Ömer ALANKA the connection of the Hermes persona with thieves resembles the ethical violations in today’s journalism and the relationship between the market and the media. Thus, being a mythological example, Hermes remains as an important archetype in understanding today’s phenomenon of news, journalism and communication. REFERENCES Bettini, M. (2011). The Ears of Hermes Communication, Images, and Identity in the Classical World. Trans.William Michael Short. USA: The Ohio State University Press. Campbell, J. (1974). The Portable Jung. London: Penguin Books Ltd. Cevizci, A. (2000). Felsefe Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları. Dixon-Kennedy, M. (1998). Encyclopedia of Greco-Roman Mythology. USA: Santa Barbara. Doty, W. G. (1993). A Lifetime of Trouble- Making: Hermes As Trickster. Ed. Hynes,W.J., Doty, W.G, Mythical Trickster Figures, Contours, Contexts, and Criticisms. USA: The University of Alabama Press, 46-66. Erhat, A. (1996). Mitoloji Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Remzi Kitapevi. Homer. (1998). The Iliad. Trans. Samuel Butler. USA: Orange Street Press. Jung, C. G. (1987). Dictionary of Analytical Psychology. London: Routledge. Kılıç, M. E. “Ebu’l Hukemâ”: Hikmetin Atası Hermetik felsefenin İslâm düşünce tarihinden görünümü”. http://www.hermetics.org/hermetik .html, Erişim Tarihi: 24.10.2013. Knox, J.(2003). Archetype, Attachment, Analysis Jungian Psychology And The Emergent Mind. New York: Brunner-Routledge. Soccio, D.J. (2007). Archetypes of Wisdom An Introduction To Philosophy. USA:Wadsworth.