Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
TACO BELL/KFC Absolute Net Lease 2,163 square feet on 33,227 square feet of land 20-year primary term 561 East 3rd Street at Covington Street Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) DIRECT ALL INQUIRIES TO RYAN M. BYRNE and [email protected] BYRNE COMPANY 8525 Ferndale Road Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75238 214.343.6996 www.byrnecompany.com SEAN M. BYRNE [email protected] Georgia Broker of Record Byrne License 356483 TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) TABLE OF CONTENTS I Investment Highlights II Aerial Photographs Property Photographs III Property Information IV Sales Data V Lease Summary VI Survey Location Maps VII Demographics Information on Atlanta (MSA), Georgia VIII Information on KBP Foods (franchisee) Information on Yum! Brands Inc. X Byrne Company Disclaimer TREC Agency Disclosure TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS National representation Major national retailers in the immediate area include McDonalds, CVS Pharmacy, Family Dollar, Piggly Wiggly, Subway, Auto Zone, Advance Auto Parts, and Days Inn. Absolute net The Lease is absolute net with a 20-year primary lease term and ten years in extension options. Sixteen years remain on the primary term, with ten percent (10%) rent escalations every five years. Next escalation is March 2017. Stability The Franchisee is one of the largest Taco Bell/KFC franchises in the U.S. and operates nearly 250 quickserve restaurants in ten states. International brands Taco Bell Corp., a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc., (NYSE: YUM), is the nation's leading Mexican-inspired quick service restaurant. Taco Bell and its more than 350 franchise organizations have nearly 6,000 restaurants across the United States that proudly serve more than 40million customers every week. KFC is the world’s most popular chicken restaurant chain, with over 17,000 restaurants in the United States alone. KFC serves more than 12 million customers each day in over 115 countries and territories around the world. TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) AERIAL PHOTO TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS Front view of Subject Property For additional views of this property, please CLICK HERE Side view of Subject Property looking Northwest Property Photographs – Page Two Side view of Subject Property looking Northeast TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) PROPERTY INFORMATION PROPERTY The Property offered for sale is a 33,227 square foot tract of land with 2,163 square feet of improvements net leased to FQSR, LLC (franchisee) for the operation of a Taco Bell & KFC restaurant. The 20-year lease term commenced February 2, 2012 and expires February 29, 2032. Taco Bell/KFC has 10 additional years in lease extension options (in 5-year increments), as set forth in the Lease Summary within this presentation. The lease is absolute net; Tenant pays for all real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance on the Property. Please refer to the Lease Summary for further details. TACO BELL Taco Bell Corp., a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, Inc., (NYSE: YUM), is the nation's leading Mexican-inspired quick service restaurant. Taco Bell serves made to order and customizable tacos, burritos, and specialties. Taco Bell and its more than 350 franchise organizations have nearly 6,000 restaurants across the United States that proudly serve more than 40 million customers every week. KFC Based in Louisville, Kentucky, KFC Corporation is the franchisor of the world's most popular chicken restaurant chain, specializing in Original Recipe®, Extra Crispy™, Kentucky Grilled Chicken® and Extra Crispy™ Strips with home-style sides, Hot Wings™ and freshly made chicken sandwiches. KFC has been serving customers complete, freshly prepared, family meals since Colonel Harland Sanders founded the concept in 1952. Famous for its Original Recipe® fried chicken, which is made with the same secret blend of 11 herbs and spices Colonel Sanders perfected more than a half century ago, it is estimated that, on average, more than 185 million people see a KFC commercial at least once a week – that's more than half the U.S. population. The KFC system serves more than 12 million customers each day in more than 115 countries and territories around the world. KFC operates more than 17,000 restaurants in the Unites States and internationally. KFC's parent company is Yum! Brands, Inc., the world's largest restaurant company in terms of system restaurants, with more than 40,000 locations in more than 130 countries and territories and employing more than one million associates. Yum! is ranked number 201 on the Fortune 500 List, with revenues exceeding $13 billion in 2012. Property Information – Page Two FRANCHISEE INFORMATION The franchisee is FQSR, LLC d/b/a KBP Foods, LLC. KBP Foods is one of the largest Taco Bell/KFC franchisees in the U.S. Originally named Zancanelli Management Corp. with ties to the very first KFC franchisee, Zancanelli was bought out by KBP Foods in 2010. The company currently operates almost 250 KFC, Taco Bell, Pizza Hut, and Long John Silver’s restaurants in 10 states including Georgia, Kansas, Missouri, Florida, and Virginia. KBP Foods has been named one of the “Ten Fastest Growing Restaurant Chains” and one of the “Top 100 Fastest Growing Businesses in North America” by Chain Store Guide’s Database of Chain Operations. The company expects to end the 2015 year with at least 278 store units. MUNICIPAL ADDRESS 561 E. 3rd Street, Jackson, GA 30233 LOCATION The Subject Property is located on East 3rd Street, just east of the signalized intersection of East 3rd and Covington Streets, in Jackson, Georgia. East 3rd Street is one of the primary arterials in Jackson. The city of Jackson is located southeast of Atlanta, and is included in the Atlanta MSA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that tract or parcel of land lying and being in City of Jackson, Land Lot 89, 1st District, Butts County, Georgia. LAND AREA Approximately 33,227 square feet BUILDING AREA 2,163 square feet 0.763 acre BUILDING CONSTRUCTION Steel-frame construction with stucco and concrete walls CONSTRUCTION DATE 1992 PARKING LOT 18 regular and 1 handicapped parking spaces. Asphalt paved parking area ZONING C – 1 – Downtown Commercial ADDITIONAL KFC OPPORTUNITY At the time of this offering, for investors looking for a larger acquisition, Byrne Company has additional KFC properties for sale. Contact Byrne Company for further details. KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) SALES DATA PURCHASE PRICE TERMS $1,818,182.00 ALL CASH -- or -Purchaser may obtain third party financing * OPERATING INCOME CURRENT through February 28, 2017 Future March 2017 rent increase March 2022 rent increase March 2027 rent increase $100,000.00 $110,000.04 $121,000.08 $133,100.04 FREE & CLEAR RETURN CURRENT through February 2017 Future March 2017 rent increase March 2022 rent increase March 2027 rent increase 6.05% 6.66% 7.32% Average Primary Term 6.38% REMAINING YEARS ON PRIMARY LEASE TERM Tenant has an additional 10 years in lease extension options. See Lease Summary for details. * All taxes, insurance, and maintenance are the responsibility of Tenant. 5.50% 16 years KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) LEASE SUMMARY LEASE DATE February 2, 2012 TENANT FQSR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company FRANCHISOR KFC Corporation, a Delaware corporation PREMISES 561 E. 3rd Street LEASE TERM 20 years COMMENCEMENT February 2, 2012 EXPIRATION February 29, 2032 OPTION TO RENEW Two (2) additional successive periods of five (5) years each TERM EXPIRATION DATE IF FULLY EXTENDED RENT DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES TAXES, INSURANCE & MAINTENANCE February 28, 2042 1st – 5th lease years Feb 2, 2012 – Feb 28, 2017 $100,000.00 per yr $8,333.33 per mo Commencing on the first day of the 6th lease year and on each 5-year anniversary date thereafter during the term, Annual Rent shall increase by 10% over the immediately preceding year. 6th – 10th lease years Mar 1, 2017 – Feb 28, 2022 $110,000.04 per yr $9,166.67 per mo 11th – 15th lease years Mar 1, 2022 – Feb 28, 2027 $121,000.08 per yr $10,083.34 per mo 16th – 20th lease years Mar 1, 2027 – Feb 29, 2032 $133,100.04 per yr $11,091.67 per mo Extension 1 Mar 1, 2032 – Feb 28, 2037 $146,410.08 per yr $12,200.84 per mo Extension 2 Mar 1, 2037 – Feb 28, 2042 $161,051.04 per yr $13,420.92 per mo Should the Premises or a material portion thereof be damaged or destroyed within the last 36 months of the original term or of any extended or renewed term of this Lease, or should any changed in code or building regulations prevent Tenant from restoring, repairing or rebuilding the Premises so it is reasonably usable as a YUM!-branded quick service restaurant, either Landlord or Tenant shall have the right to terminate this lease effective upon the date of such damage or destruction. Payable by Tenant. USE Tenant shall use the Premises solely for the operation of a YUM!-branded quick service restaurant, unless otherwise approved by Landlord. Tenant shall at all times maintain the Premises in material compliance with all applicable regulations and requirements of all county, municipal, state, federal and other governmental authorities, and instruments of record affecting the Premises which are now in force or which are enacted during the term of this Lease. NET LEASE It is the intention of the parties hereto that this lease is and shall be treated as an absolute triple net lease, and that any and all costs, expenses, or charges with respect to the Premises shall be the sole responsibility of Tenant. TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY TACO BELL/KFC Jackson, Georgia (Atlanta MSA) LOCATION MAP SUBJECT PROPERTY Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 1 mile radius Summary Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Census 2010 2015 2020 Population 3,479 3,427 3,386 Households 1,312 1,288 1,272 841 814 797 2.51 2.50 2.50 Families Average Household Size Owner Occupied Housing Units 592 537 533 Renter Occupied Housing Units 720 751 739 Median Age 38.6 39.9 41.0 Area State National Population Households -0.24% -0.25% 0.90% 0.93% 0.75% 0.77% Families Owner HHs -0.42% -0.15% 0.80% 0.90% 0.69% 0.70% Trends: 2015 - 2020 Annual Rate Median Household Income 1.70% 2.80% 2.66% 2015 Households by Income 2020 Number Percent Number <$15,000 361 28.0% 354 27.8% $15,000 - $24,999 172 13.4% 135 10.6% $25,000 - $34,999 235 18.2% 207 16.3% $35,000 - $49,999 146 11.3% 143 11.2% $50,000 - $74,999 146 11.3% 144 11.3% $75,000 - $99,999 94 7.3% 124 9.7% $100,000 - $149,999 120 9.3% 148 11.6% $150,000 - $199,999 6 0.5% 7 0.6% $200,000+ 8 0.6% 10 0.8% Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income $28,857 $42,233 $16,403 Census 2010 Population by Age Percent $31,398 $48,115 $18,638 2015 2020 Number Percent Number Percent Number 0-4 241 6.9% 225 6.6% 215 Percent 6.3% 5-9 238 6.8% 215 6.3% 205 6.1% 10 - 14 223 6.4% 216 6.3% 209 6.2% 15 - 19 226 6.5% 195 5.7% 204 6.0% 20 - 24 228 6.6% 227 6.6% 193 5.7% 25 - 34 431 12.4% 451 13.2% 424 12.5% 35 - 44 406 11.7% 375 10.9% 378 11.2% 45 - 54 459 13.2% 429 12.5% 400 11.8% 55 - 64 375 10.8% 405 11.8% 422 12.5% 65 - 74 279 8.0% 301 8.8% 333 9.8% 75 - 84 221 6.4% 231 6.7% 242 7.1% 151 4.3% 158 4.6% 161 4.8% Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 1,911 54.9% 1,837 53.6% 1,779 52.5% Black Alone 1,423 40.9% 1,428 41.7% 1,424 42.0% 7 0.2% 9 0.3% 10 0.3% 29 0.8% 37 1.1% 46 1.4% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 35 1.0% 43 1.3% 53 1.6% Two or More Races 73 2.1% 72 2.1% 75 2.2% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 97 2.8% 121 3.5% 150 4.4% 85+ Census 2010 Race and Ethnicity American Indian Alone Asian Alone Pacific Islander Alone 2015 2020 Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 1 of 6 Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 1 mile radius Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Annual Rate (in percent) Trends 2015-2020 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 Area State USA 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 12 Percent 10 8 6 4 2015 2020 2 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 2015 Household Income 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2015 Population by Race 50 $15K - $24K 13.4% <$15K 28.0% 45 40 $200K+ 0.6% $25K - $34K 18.2% $150K - $199K 0.5% $100K - $149K 9.3% $35K - $49K 11.3% $75K - $99K 7.3% $50K - $74K 11.3% Percent 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 White Black Am. Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2015 Percent Hispanic Origin: 3.5% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 2 of 6 Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 3 mile radius Summary Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Census 2010 2015 2020 Population 7,480 7,411 7,354 Households 2,773 2,752 2,736 Families 1,903 1,868 1,844 Average Household Size 2.58 2.57 2.56 Owner Occupied Housing Units 1,549 1,446 1,444 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,224 1,306 1,291 37.8 38.9 40.1 Area State National Population Households -0.15% -0.12% 0.90% 0.93% 0.75% 0.77% Families Owner HHs -0.26% -0.03% 0.80% 0.90% 0.69% 0.70% Median Age Trends: 2015 - 2020 Annual Rate Median Household Income 2.83% 2.80% 2.66% 2015 Households by Income 2020 Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 618 22.5% 598 21.9% $15,000 - $24,999 331 12.0% 256 9.4% $25,000 - $34,999 441 16.0% 392 14.3% $35,000 - $49,999 321 11.7% 318 11.6% $50,000 - $74,999 414 15.0% 408 14.9% $75,000 - $99,999 268 9.7% 351 12.8% $100,000 - $149,999 324 11.8% 370 13.5% $150,000 - $199,999 19 0.7% 24 0.9% $200,000+ 14 0.5% 18 0.7% Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income $34,543 $48,337 $18,137 Census 2010 Population by Age $39,715 $54,630 $20,497 2015 2020 Number Percent Number Percent Number 0-4 505 6.8% 474 6.4% 458 Percent 6.2% 5-9 526 7.0% 474 6.4% 451 6.1% 10 - 14 517 6.9% 490 6.6% 476 6.5% 15 - 19 506 6.8% 451 6.1% 468 6.4% 20 - 24 475 6.3% 481 6.5% 417 5.7% 25 - 34 947 12.7% 1,002 13.5% 916 12.5% 35 - 44 912 12.2% 865 11.7% 882 12.0% 45 - 54 1,040 13.9% 969 13.1% 899 12.2% 55 - 64 822 11.0% 891 12.0% 964 13.1% 65 - 74 592 7.9% 659 8.9% 715 9.7% 75 - 84 393 5.3% 408 5.5% 458 6.2% 246 3.3% 248 3.3% 251 3.4% Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 4,451 59.5% 4,315 58.2% 4,203 57.2% Black Alone 2,763 36.9% 2,798 37.7% 2,810 38.2% American Indian Alone 13 0.2% 17 0.2% 19 0.3% Asian Alone 52 0.7% 67 0.9% 85 1.2% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 58 0.8% 71 1.0% 86 1.2% Two or More Races 143 1.9% 144 1.9% 150 2.0% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 202 2.7% 255 3.4% 318 4.3% 85+ Census 2010 Race and Ethnicity Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone 2015 2020 Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 3 of 6 Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 3 mile radius Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Annual Rate (in percent) Trends 2015-2020 2.5 2 1.5 1 Area State USA 0.5 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 12 Percent 10 8 6 4 2015 2020 2 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 2015 Household Income 35-44 75-84 85+ 50 <$15K 22.5% 45 $100K - $149K 11.8% $75K - $99K 9.7% Percent 40 $150K - $199K 0.7% $50K - $74K 15.1% 65-74 55 $200K+ 0.5% $35K - $49K 11.7% 55-64 2015 Population by Race $15K - $24K 12.0% $25K - $34K 16.0% 45-54 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 White Black Am. Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2015 Percent Hispanic Origin: 3.4% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 4 of 6 Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 5 mile radius Summary Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Census 2010 2015 2020 12,176 12,061 11,967 Households 4,439 4,399 4,368 Families 3,173 3,112 3,070 Population Average Household Size 2.64 2.62 2.62 Owner Occupied Housing Units 2,891 2,724 2,705 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,548 1,675 1,663 38.4 39.6 41.2 Area State National Population Households -0.16% -0.14% 0.90% 0.93% 0.75% 0.77% Families Owner HHs -0.27% -0.14% 0.80% 0.90% 0.69% 0.70% Median Age Trends: 2015 - 2020 Annual Rate Median Household Income 3.71% 2.80% 2.66% 2015 Households by Income 2020 Number Percent Number <$15,000 790 18.0% 755 17.3% $15,000 - $24,999 576 13.1% 439 10.1% $25,000 - $34,999 651 14.8% 573 13.1% $35,000 - $49,999 492 11.2% 480 11.0% $50,000 - $74,999 706 16.0% 670 15.3% $75,000 - $99,999 554 12.6% 701 16.0% $100,000 - $149,999 581 13.2% 689 15.8% $150,000 - $199,999 29 0.7% 35 0.8% $200,000+ 22 0.5% 26 0.6% Median Household Income Average Household Income Per Capita Income $39,604 $52,186 $19,277 Census 2010 Population by Age Percent $47,506 $59,070 $21,799 2015 2020 Number Percent Number Percent Number 0-4 802 6.6% 749 6.2% 704 Percent 5.9% 5-9 821 6.7% 771 6.4% 725 6.1% 10 - 14 813 6.7% 770 6.4% 786 6.6% 15 - 19 830 6.8% 700 5.8% 740 6.2% 20 - 24 753 6.2% 766 6.4% 640 5.3% 25 - 34 1,535 12.6% 1,602 13.3% 1,442 12.0% 35 - 44 1,559 12.8% 1,465 12.1% 1,481 12.4% 45 - 54 1,778 14.6% 1,655 13.7% 1,524 12.7% 55 - 64 1,472 12.1% 1,571 13.0% 1,648 13.8% 65 - 74 976 8.0% 1,145 9.5% 1,267 10.6% 75 - 84 544 4.5% 572 4.7% 705 5.9% 291 2.4% 295 2.4% 305 2.5% Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 7,748 63.6% 7,518 62.3% 7,337 61.3% Black Alone 4,068 33.4% 4,141 34.3% 4,173 34.9% American Indian Alone 25 0.2% 32 0.3% 36 0.3% Asian Alone 65 0.5% 85 0.7% 107 0.9% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 1 0.0% 73 0.6% 90 0.7% 111 0.9% Two or More Races 196 1.6% 195 1.6% 202 1.7% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 285 2.3% 361 3.0% 449 3.8% 85+ Census 2010 Race and Ethnicity Pacific Islander Alone Some Other Race Alone 2015 2020 Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 5 of 6 Demographic and Income Profile KFC - Jackson GA 561 E 3rd St, Jackson, Georgia, 30233 Ring: 5 mile radius Prepared by Esri Latitude: 33.29451 Longitude: -83.96071 Trends 2015-2020 Annual Rate (in percent) 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 Area State USA 0.5 0 Population Households Families Owner HHs Median HH Income Population by Age 12 Percent 10 8 6 4 2015 2020 2 0 0-4 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 2015 Household Income 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ 2015 Population by Race 60 $15K - $24K 13.1% $25K - $34K 14.8% 55 50 <$15K 18.0% 45 $200K+ 0.5% $150K - $199K 0.7% $35K - $49K 11.2% $100K - $149K 13.2% $50K - $74K 16.0% $75K - $99K 12.6% Percent 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 White Black Am. Ind. Asian Pacific Other Two+ 2015 Percent Hispanic Origin: 3.0% Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2015 and 2020. January 07, 2016 ©2015 Esri Page 6 of 6 Subject Property KBP acquires 24 KFC units Page 1 of 1 print | close KBP acquires 24 KFC units Lisa Jennings Tue, 2015-06-30 16:44 Franchisee plans to expand with acquisitions KBP Foods LLC, one of the nation’s largest KFC franchisees, added 24 more locations to its portfolio as part of an ongoing plan to grow by acquisition, the company said Tuesday. The agreement brings KBP’s unit count to 247 locations. All of the restaurants are KFC units, with a large portion of dual-branded locations among them. The newly acquired restaurants are located in Kansas, Missouri and Florida. Overland Park, Kan.-based KBP said the acquisition is the first deal since the company was recapitalized in a management buyout of its private-equity owners in April. Related KFC launches brand overhaul KFC sues 3 companies in China over alleged rumors More restaurant finance news Terms of the deal were not disclosed. The 24 units were sold by D-Carr Investments and related entities, and all are base KFC units, with some as co-branded locations, including five KFC/Taco Bell locations, four KFC/Long John Silver’s units, and one KFC/Pizza Hut Express restaurant, said Monica Reinert, KBP director of communications. Barry Dubin, KBP chief development officer, said in a statement that growing by acquisition has been successful. “With our recent recapitalization, we are continuing to seek out opportunities for KBP to add 50 to 60 new units a year over the next five years,” Dubin said. Reinert said the company is in talks for another acquisition this year, although it will likely be outside Yum! Brands Inc. KBP first invested in KFC as the Louisville, Ky.-based company refranchised, Reinert said. With that refranchising effort now complete, KBP will look to expand with other brands, but the company is not yet ready to reveal the direction it’s headed, she said. Contact Lisa Jennings at [email protected]. Follow her on Twitter: @livetodineout Source URL: http://nrn.com/corporate-news/kbp-acquires-24-kfc-units http://nrn.com/print/corporate-news/kbp-acquires-24-kfc-units 9/2/2015 KBP Foods completes management buyout Page 1 of 2 print | close KBP Foods completes management buyout Jonathan Maze Tue, 2015-04-28 16:01 KBP Foods Inc., recently completed a management-led buyout of its private equity owners, Boyne Capital, in a deal that will enable the company to double the number of senior managers with ownership in the business. “For us it’s great,” Michael Kulp, CEO of the Overland Park, Kan-based KFC and Taco Bell franchisee, said this week. “We’re bringing key members of our management team involved in the equity side of the business. That helps create wealth for their futures and for their families.” Yet, just because management has bought out private equity doesn’t mean the company is about to slow its remarkable growth. Related Bennigan’s CEO buys out franchisor Good Times proposes $21M buyout of Bad Daddy's More restaurant franchising news KBP has quadrupled in size in i the four years under Boyne’s ownership, and now has 223 locations in the Midwest and Southeast. Most of those locations are KFC units, but the company also owns Taco Bell and Long John Silver’s locations. d expects to end the year with at least 278 units, Kulp said. He KBP already has deals in place for 54 locations, and expects growth to continue for the next few years. “Our goal is to double the size of the business in five years,” Kulp said. If the company continues buying 50 units a year for the next five years, he said, it would have about 550 locations and $600 million in revenue. With those growth projections and a strong recent track record, KBP did not have trouble finding potential investors for its buyout. Many private-equity firms and other investors are eager to fund large, growing franchisees. The operator initially had a dozen investors interested in the deal. That enabled KBP to be choosy about its investors. The company chose three investors, who each offered a small amount, to provide the franchisee with the ability to enable future growth. The investors are all Small Business Investment Companies — professionally managed investment funds that work with the U.S. Small Business Administration to fund small businesses. The deal illustrates a growing trend in the franchise business. At a time when private equity has been pumping dollars into large-scale franchisees, a few management teams at large operators have been looking for alternatives. For instance, the Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan invested $300 million in Flynn Restaurant Group last year. Such investors have longer time horizons, and they don’t charge management fees like many private-equity funds do. http://nrn.com/print/corporate-news/kbp-foods-completes-management-buyout?page=1 9/2/2015 KBP Foods completes management buyout Page 2 of 2 In KBP’s situation, the investors were only looking for minority investments, enabling management to regain control of the company. In addition, the low cost of debt enabled management to borrow at low rates to fund the deal. “It was the perfect storm, with the capital markets being right, our success at growing and the stability of the business,” Kulp said. “We were able to go out and find partners in a minority capacity and take over majority control of the business.” The company expects to be able to grow in part because 150 of its units are in the KFC system, which has largely avoided the consolidation wave that hit many franchised systems in recent years. KFC has a large number of legacy operators that may look to sell in future years, which could provide a springboard for KBP’s continued growth. “It’s a brand that’s ripe for some consolidation,” Kulp said. "A big three years" (Continued from page 1) Kulp joined KBP in 2000, when it was known as Zancanelli Management Corp. and had just 12 KFC locations in western Colorado. The company grew to 65 units by late 2009, when the original owners looked to sell their interest in the company. The next year, Boyne bought a controlling interest and Kulp remained. KBP then began acquiring KFC units. The chain’s sales struggled in the aftermath of the recession, and prices for many locations were relatively low. “There aren’t a lot of big, institutional, sophisticated operators in the system,” Kulp said. “It’s a challenging system to operate. It takes a grassroots, on-the-ground, hands-on restaurant approach to be good inside the business.” Kulp said many locations have gone too long without investment in assets and infrastructure. The company looks for acquisitions in which sales are strong, but where it only needs to make a few changes to improve profitability. “We’re seeing deals where we’re paying what the seller feels is a fair multiple,” Kulp said. But with reinvestment in assets, infrastructure and people using the company’s financial model, profits improve and the sale price looks better. Currently, KFC has a lot of momentum. The chain’s same-store sales have improved in recent quarters, including a 7-percent increase in the first quarter this year. In February, the franchisor pledged to invest $185 million in the brand over the next three years. “It’s going to be a big three years,” Kulp said. He noted that the addition of more advertising dollars behind the brand could radically change its image with the consumer. “This is my 14th year I’ve been involved with the brand,” Kulp said. “There’ve been some good years and some not-sogood years. KFC can be a difficult brand to operate. But when the brand is done right, there is a ton of opportunities for growth.” Contact Jonathan Maze at [email protected]. Follow him on Twitter: @jonathanmaze Source URL: http://nrn.com/corporate-news/kbp-foods-completes-management-buyout http://nrn.com/print/corporate-news/kbp-foods-completes-management-buyout?page=1 9/2/2015 KBP Foods CEO knows how to feed a fast-food beast - Kansas City Business Journal Page 1 of 2 From the Kansas City Business Journal :http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2015/04/06/kbp-foods-fast-food-franchiseegrowth.html KC-area fast-food exec knows how to feed the beast Apr 6, 2015, 1:40pm CDT Updated: Apr 6, 2015, 2:43pm CDT Rob Roberts Reporter- Kansas City Business Journal Email | Twitter | LinkedIn | Google+ Michael Kulp is enjoying life in the fast-food lane. As CEO of Overland Park-based KBP Foods LLC, Kulp leads one of the nation's 10 fastest-growing restaurant chains. Created with the 1999 purchase of five KFC restaurants in Colorado, the quick-service franchisee has grown to 227 KFC, Taco Bell and Long John Silver's locations in 10 states. In just the past four years, KBP Foods has quadrupled its holdings, Kulp said, and there's no slowing the fastfood juggernaut down now. See Also • Profits to go: Fast-food giant's holding firm makes investor millions "Our five-year proforma takes our business to around $600 million in revenue, which is right at double what we'll end this year at," Kulp said. "We'll open 50 to 60 new units a year over the next five years, which is what we've done the past four years. "We're fully capitalized, locked and loaded, and ready to do that." KBP Foods was originally named Zancanelli Management Corp. by founders Gary Zancanelli and his son Gary Jr., who had worked for Harman Management Corp., the very first Kentucky Fried Chicken franchisee. Kulp began working with the Zancanellis shortly after they purchased their first five KFCs. And when the father and son wanted to cash out in 2010, Kulp brought in several equity investors to help him buy the founders' shares. Kulp renamed with business KPB Foods, with the "K" standing for Kulp; the "B" for Boyne Capital Partners LLC, the company's largest equity investor; and the "P" for Partners. But through a new recapitalization completed in March, KBP Foods bought out its previous equity providers, who on average netted a healthy cash-on-cash return of "just north of 6x," Kulp said. On the flip side, KPB brought in three new institutional investors in smaller capacities and allowed seven more senior managers of the company to buy in, increasing its total number of key employees with equity holdings to 15. The recapitalization also allowed Kulp to regain control of the firm's holding company board, which he now serves as chairman, and left enough powder dry for future acquisitions. http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2015/04/06/kbp-foods-fast-food-franchisee-growth.ht... 9/2/2015 KBP Foods CEO knows how to feed a fast-food beast - Kansas City Business Journal Page 2 of 2 "We've got about $60 million (in acquisitions) teed up that we'll be closing on before year-end," Kulp said. KBP's buying strategy begins with sticking to its three franchise brands, which were originally owned by Yum! Brands, though Long John Silver's has since been spun off. "Originally, there wasn't a lot of strategy; Yum! Brands was what (the Zancanellis) were familiar with," Kulp said. "And when Yum! started divesting a significant number of (company-owned) restaurants several years ago, we had already built up a strong record of performance, so they came to us with a lot of initial divestitures. For example, the 21-store Kansas City acquisition that brought us to Overland Park was a Yum! corporate divestiture." Six years later, in 2009, Yum! offered KPB another large group of restaurants, in Florida. "Those were really our two large clumps of growth," Kulp said, "and then we built franchise markets around them through smaller acquisitions. We've never left that (KFC, Taco Bell and Long John Silver's) space because we know it and we've been successful with it." KBP prefers to buy existing restaurants rather than opening new ones, Kulp said, "because you can buy four or five restaurants for the price of building one." As for its selection strategy, KBP likes to buy dense clusters of restaurants with high revenue but low profitability. "The reason we look for (low profitability) is that, in our business, you buy based on multiples of existing cash flow," he said. "So I can come to you and offer a very fair market multiple. But by the the time I've integrated the business, I've paid a third of that on an effective basis. Over the past 150 stores we've done, we've paid something like 5x (cash flow), but we've integrated them to 1.7x." KBP is able to improve new store performance quickly through a highly regimented management system "that allow us to spell out what happens every 15 minutes in our restaurants," Kulp said. The company's management structure is another part of KBP's secret sauce, he said. Most quick-service chains sandwich two or three levels of middle management between the store and vice president levels, Kulp explained. "We make every one of our vice presidents an equity holder, which gives us the ability to attract top talent to those positions," he said, "and then we put those guys two levels away from the restaurant. So in our infrastructure, it goes from restaurant to an area manager, who reports directly to a vice president that has a stake and lives in his restaurants." KBP's headquarters location also helps the company find top talent, Kulp said. Over the past couple of years, he said, the company has hired a CFO who was previously CFO for Lockton Cos. for 13 years and a human resources director who was the top HR executive for U.S. Bank. "If we were in Chicago or New York or Atlanta, individuals like that would never sniff a business like this," Kulp said. "They'd be looking at Coca-Cola or businesses like that for career progression — not a $250 million to $300 million fast-food franchisee." A total of 15 people now work in KBP's Overland Park office. But it takes many more than that to feed a ravenous fast-foot beast. From store level through C-level, Kulp said, the company now employs nearly 5,000. Rob reports on real estate and development. http://www.bizjournals.com/kansascity/news/2015/04/06/kbp-foods-fast-food-franchisee-growth.ht... 9/2/2015 Stock Report | January 16, 2016 | NYS Symbol: YUM | YUM is in the S&P 500 YUM! Brands Inc. ★★★★★ S&P Capital IQ HOLD Recommendation S&P Capital IQ Equity Analyst T. Amobi, CPA, CFA Price 12-Mo. Target Price $67.09 (as of Jan 15, 2016 4:00 PM ET) $75.00 Report Currency USD Investment Style Large-Cap Growth UPDATE: PLEASE SEE THE ANALYST'S LATEST RESEARCH NOTE IN THE COMPANY NEWS SECTION GICS Sector Consumer Discretionary Sub-Industry Restaurants Summary This company operates, franchises or licenses the largest number of fast food restaurants in the world, with more than 41,000 units in over 125 countries, including the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell chains. Key Stock Statistics (Source S&P Capital IQ, Vickers, company reports) 52-Wk Range $95.90– 66.35 Trailing 12-Month EPS $2.09 Trailing 12-Month P/E 32.1 $10K Invested 5 Yrs Ago $15,539 S&P Oper. EPS 2015E S&P Oper. EPS 2016E P/E on S&P Oper. EPS 2015E Common Shares Outstg. (M) 3.32 3.90 20.2 431.2 Market Capitalization(B) Yield (%) Dividend Rate/Share Institutional Ownership (%) Price Performance 10-Week Mov. Avg. 12-Mo. Target Price Relative Strength GAAP Earnings vs. Previous Year Up Down Volume No Change Above Avg. STARS Below Avg. Share Price 80 60 50 Volume(Mil.) 0.79 11 A+ 75 63 30 20 10 0 4 3 3 1 FMAM J J A SOND J FMAM J J A SOND J FMAM J J A SOND J FMAM J J A SOND J FMAM J J A SOND J FM 2012 2013 2014 LOW MEDIUM HIGH YUM competes primarily in the fast food industry, in which its concepts possess a very strong brand name presence domestically, and in certain foreign markets. However, operating margins can vary widely due to fluctuations in food costs. Further, YUM's profits can be affected by changing currency exchange rates given its large and fast-growing international business. 100 2011 Beta S&P 3-Yr. Proj. EPS CAGR(%) S&P Quality Ranking Analyst's Risk Assessment 30-Week Mov. Avg. 5 3 $28.930 2.74 $1.84 78 2015 Revenue/Earnings Data Revenue (Million U.S. $) 1Q 2Q 2015 2,622 3,105 2014 2,724 3,204 2013 2,535 2,904 2012 2,743 3,168 2011 2,425 2,816 2010 2,345 2,574 3Q 3,427 3,354 3,466 3,569 3,274 2,862 4Q -3,997 4,179 4,153 4,111 3,562 Year -13,279 13,084 13,633 12,626 11,343 0.95 0.89 0.33 1.00 0.80 0.74 E0.83 -0.20 0.70 0.72 0.75 0.56 E3.32 2.32 2.36 3.38 2.74 2.38 Past performance is not an indication of future performance and should not be relied upon as such. Analysis prepared by Equity Analyst T. Amobi, CPA, CFA on Oct 07, 2015 04:31 PM, when the stock traded at $67.97. Highlights ➤ ➤ ➤ We expect revenues to edge up 1.5% in 2015, on international unit growth (new restaurant openings) and low- to mid-single digit samestore sales growth led by the Taco Bell and KFC divisions, versus relatively stagnant growth at Pizza Hut and a notable decline in China (51% of 2014 sales). We see the strongest gains from international emerging markets (ex-China), versus relatively modest to moderate to stagnant growth in international developed markets and the US. YUM plans to open more than 1,400 new international units in 2015, not including 700 planned in China, and additional units in India. Sales will likely rise 8.5% in 2016. Improved same-store sales should aid restaurant margins, while overall results should also benefit from a partial recovery in China, with the additional benefit of productivity and efficiency improvements, partly offset by some foreign currency headwinds. Refinancing activity in 2014 should reduce 2015 interest costs. We forecast EPS of $3.32 for 2015 and $3.90 in 2016, versus a normalized $3.09 in 2014. In early October, YUM saw its 2015 EPS "well below" its previous goal of at least 10% growth. Investment Rationale/Risk ➤ ➤ ➤ After relatively mixed results for the first nine months of 2015 and management's downwardly revised full year EPS growth target, our nearterm outlook is still tempered by some lingering impact of the supplier food handling issue in China, where we nonetheless see a significant potential for long-term growth. Elsewhere, we see continued traction for Taco Bell, and to some extent the KFC division as well, while also encouraged by some recent signs of some stabilizatio at Pizza Hut. Risks to our recommendation and target price include protracted turnaround challenges in China, intensifying cost pressures (energy, food and labor costs), a sharp pullback in global consumer spending and potentially severe foreign currency headwinds. In May, activist hedge fund Third Point disclosed its stake in YUM. Our 12-month target price of $75, which implies a relatively ample P/ E of 19.2x our 2016 EPS estimate, a notable discount to restaurant peers, and versus the 10-year historic average of 24.0x. The stock recently offered an implied yield of 2.6%, after a 12% dividend hike in October. Earnings Per Share (U.S. $) 2015 0.81 0.53 2014 0.87 0.73 2013 0.72 0.61 2012 0.96 0.69 2011 0.54 0.65 2010 0.50 0.59 Fiscal year ended Dec. 31. Next earnings report expected: Early February. EPS Estimates based on S&P Capital IQ Operating Earnings; historical GAAP earnings are as reported in Company reports. Dividend Data Amount ($) 0.410 0.410 0.460 0.460 Date Decl. Ex-Div. Date Stk. of Record Mar 25 May 1 Oct 6 Nov 19 Apr 8 Jul 15 Oct 14 Jan 13 Apr 10 Jul 17 Oct 16 Jan 15 Payment Date May 1 Aug 7 Nov 6 Feb 5 '15 '15 '15 '16 Dividends have been paid since 2004. Source: Company reports. Past performance is not an indication of future performance and should not be relied upon as such. Please read the Required Disclosures and Analyst Certification on the last page of this report. Redistribution or reproduction is prohibited without written permission. This document is not intended to provide personal investment advice and it does not take into account the specific investment objectives, financial situation and the particular needs of any specific person who may receive this report. Investors should seek independent financial advice regarding the suitability and/or appropriateness of making an investment or implementing the investment strategies discussed in this document and should understand that statements regarding future prospects may not be realized. Investors should note that income from such investments, if any, may fluctuate and that the value of such investments may rise or fall. Accordingly, investors may receive back less than they originally invested. Investors should seek advice concerning any impact this investment may have on their personal tax position from their own tax advisor. Please note the publication date of this document. It may contain specific information that is no longer current and should not be used to make an investment decision. Unless otherwise indicated, there is no intention to update this document. Stock Report | January 16, 2016 | NYS Symbol: YUM YUM! Brands Inc. Business Summary October 07, 2015 CORPORATE PROFILE. Yum! Brands (YUM) has the world's largest quick service restaurant (QSR) system, with over 41,000 restaurants, including licensee units, in more than 125 countries and territories. The company operates and franchises restaurants under the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell concepts. In February 2012, YUM acquired a controlling interest in Little Sheep, a leading casual dining concept in China. Starting with 2014, YUM's business consists of five reporting segments: YUM China (the China division), and YUM Restaurants India (the India division). The KFC and Pizza Hut division include all their respective concept operations outside of the China and India divisions. The Taco Bell division includes all operations of the Taco Bell concept outside of the India division. The China division, which is comprised of about 6,715 restaurants in mainland China, generated revenues of $6.9 billion and operating profit of $713 million in 2014. Meanwhile, the India division has 833 units, and recorded revenues of approximately $141 million, and an operating loss of $9 million. KFC (originally Kentucky Fried Chicken) is the leader in the U.S. chicken QSR segment, according to NPD Group CREST. As of year-end 2014, KFC had 14,197 stores operating outside China and India. It recorded revenues of about $3.2 billion, and operating profit of $708 million in 2014. Pizza Hut is the largest restaurant chain specializing in ready-to-eat pizza products, with about a 16% market share of the U.S. pizza QSR segment. As of year-end 2014, Pizza Hut had 13,602 units outside China and India. It reported $1.1 billion in revenues, and $295 million in operating profit in 2014.. Taco Bell is the leader in the U.S. Mexican food QSR segment. As of year-end 2014, there were 6,199 Taco Bell units outside China and India. It recorded $1.9 billion in revenues, and operating profit of $480 million in 2014. CORPORATE STRATEGY. YUM sees greater growth opportunity outside the U.S., particularly in China, which has a population of 1.3 billion and a rapidly growing economy. The company plans to increase the number of units in China at a double-digit rate with same-store sales growth of at least 5%. For YRI, YUM's long-term targets are unit growth of 3%-4% and same-store sales growth of at least 2%. For its U.S. business, YUM plans to grow its operating profit at a rate of 5% per year by improving its brand position through differentiated products. The company is also focused on returning substantial cash flows to its shareholders via dividends and share repurchases. YUM is targeting an annual dividend payout ratio of 35% to 40% of net income, and has increased the quarterly dividend at a double-digit rate each year since inception in 2004. IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS. In July 2014, an undercover report was televised in China showing improper food handling practices by a local food supplier in China. As a result, many customers shied away for YUM's locations. The company terminated its relationship with the supplier globally, with minimal inrestaurant disruption. Even though the violator was a small supplier, sales at KFC and Pizza Hut were disproportionately impacted. Since then, China Division has experienced a significant, negative impact to sales and profits at both KFC and Pizza Hut. FINANCIAL TRENDS. We think the company remains committed to repurchasing shares and paying dividends to shareholders. At year-end 2014, the company had shares repurchases authorization to buyback up to $1.1 billion of common stock. Corporate Information Investor Contact S. Schmitt (888-298-6986) Office 1441 Gardiner Lane, Louisville, KY 40213. Telephone 502-874-8300. Fax 502-874-8323. Email [email protected] Website http://www.yum.com Officers CEO G. Creed Vice Chrmn J.S. Su CFO P.J. Grismer COO R.G. Eaton Board Members M. J. Cavanagh G. Creed M. Ferragamo J. S. Linen T. C. Nelson E. B. Stock R. D. Walter B. C. Cornell D. W. Dorman M. M. Graddick-Weir K. A. Meister T. M. Ryan J. S. Su Domicile North Carolina Auditor KPMG Founded 1997 Employees 537,000 Stockholders 58,368 Redistribution or reproduction is prohibited without written permission. SVP, Secy & General Counsel C.L. Campbell Stock Report | January 16, 2016 | NYS Symbol: YUM YUM! Brands Inc. Quantitative Evaluations S&P Capital IQ Fair Value Rank Fair Value Calculation Expanded Ratio Analysis 1+ 1 3 4 5 HIGHEST Based on S&P Capital IQ's proprietary quantitative model, stocks are ranked from most overvalued (1) to most undervalued (5). $54.10 Investability Quotient Percentile Analysis of the stock's current worth, based on S&P Capital IQ's proprietary quantitative model suggests that YUM is overvalued by $12.99 or 19.4%. 99 LOWEST = 1 LOW BEARISH AVERAGE 2014 2.49 11.87 23.13 31.40 453.0 2013 2.66 12.67 22.47 31.95 461.0 2012 2.30 10.94 14.64 19.67 473.0 2011 2.25 10.82 17.11 21.52 481.0 Figures based on calendar year-end price Key Growth Rates and Averages UNFAVORABLE NEUTRAL Past Growth Rate (%) Sales Net Income 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 9 Years 1.49 -3.67 1.11 -10.08 4.44 -0.23 4.39 5.41 7.91 62.11 56.61 9.32 57.81 NA 9.72 58.40 68.48 9.38 66.50 102.99 HIGH Since January, 2016, the technical indicators for YUM have been BEARISH. Insider Activity Price/Sales Price/EBITDA Price/Pretax Income P/E Ratio Avg. Diluted Shares Outstg (M) HIGHEST = 100 YUM scored higher than 99% of all companies for which an S&P Capital IQ Report is available. Volatility Technical Evaluation 2 LOWEST Ratio Analysis (Annual Avg.) Net Margin (%) % LT Debt to Capitalization Return on Equity (%) FAVORABLE For further clarification on the terms used in this report, please visit www.spcapitaliq.com/stockreportguide Company Financials Fiscal Year Ended Dec. 31 Per Share Data (U.S. $) Tangible Book Value Cash Flow Earnings S&P Capital IQ Core Earnings Dividends Payout Ratio Prices:High Prices:Low P/E Ratio:High P/E Ratio:Low 2014 1.22 3.95 2.32 NA 1.52 66% 83.58 65.81 36 28 2013 1.44 3.93 2.36 2.70 1.38 58% 78.68 59.68 33 25 2012 0.95 4.74 3.38 3.19 1.19 35% 74.75 58.40 22 17 2011 1.83 4.05 2.74 2.76 1.04 38% 59.79 46.27 22 17 2010 0.94 3.59 2.38 2.40 0.88 37% 52.47 32.49 22 14 2009 NM 3.42 2.22 2.16 0.78 35% 36.96 23.37 17 11 2008 NM 3.10 1.96 1.76 0.68 35% 41.73 21.50 21 11 2007 0.27 2.67 1.68 1.69 0.52 31% 40.60 27.51 24 16 2006 0.81 2.46 1.46 1.51 0.26 18% 31.84 22.11 22 15 2005 1.04 2.07 1.28 1.26 0.22 17% 26.90 22.37 21 18 13,279 2,781 739 130 1,427 28.5% 1,051 NA 13,084 2,751 721 152 1,551 31.4% 1,091 1,248 13,633 2,872 645 169 2,145 25.0% 1,597 1,505 12,626 2,624 628 156 1,659 19.5% 1,319 1,330 11,343 2,435 589 175 1,594 26.1% 1,158 1,170 10,836 2,185 580 212 1,396 22.4% 1,071 1,041 11,279 1,971 560 253 1,280 24.7% 964 863 10,416 1,808 533 199 1,191 23.7% 909 913 9,561 1,724 479 154 1,108 25.6% 824 849 9,349 1,538 469 127 1,026 25.7% 762 754 Balance Sheet & Other Financial Data (Million U.S. $) Cash 578 Current Assets 1,646 Total Assets 8,345 Current Liabilities 2,411 Long Term Debt 3,077 Common Equity 1,547 Total Capital 4,954 Capital Expenditures 1,033 Cash Flow 1,790 Current Ratio 0.7 % Long Term Debt of Capitalization 62.1 % Net Income of Revenue 7.9 % Return on Assets 12.3 % Return on Equity 56.6 573 1,691 8,695 2,265 2,918 2,166 5,257 1,049 1,812 0.8 55.5 8.3 12.3 50.5 776 1,909 9,011 2,188 2,932 2,154 5,254 1,099 2,242 0.9 55.8 11.7 NA NA 1,198 2,321 8,834 2,450 2,997 1,823 5,326 940 1,947 1.0 56.3 10.4 15.4 77.8 1,426 2,313 8,316 2,448 2,915 1,576 4,677 796 1,747 0.9 62.3 10.2 15.0 89.0 353 1,208 7,148 1,653 3,207 1,025 4,321 797 1,651 0.7 74.2 9.9 15.7 NM 164 951 6,506 1,722 3,564 -112 3,509 935 1,524 0.6 101.6 8.6 14.0 NM 789 1,481 7,242 2,062 2,924 1,139 4,063 742 1,442 0.7 71.9 8.7 13.4 70.6 319 901 6,353 1,724 2,045 1,437 3,482 614 1,303 0.5 58.7 8.6 13.6 57.1 158 837 5,698 1,605 1,649 1,449 3,098 609 1,231 0.5 53.2 8.2 13.4 50.1 Income Statement Analysis (Million U.S. $) Revenue Operating Income Depreciation Interest Expense Pretax Income Effective Tax Rate Net Income S&P Capital IQ Core Earnings Data as originally reported in Company reports.; bef. results of disc opers/spec. items. Per share data adj. for stk. divs.; EPS diluted. E-Estimated. NA-Not Available. NM-Not Meaningful. NR-Not Ranked. UR-Under Review. Redistribution or reproduction is prohibited without written permission. Stock Report | January 16, 2016 | NYS Symbol: YUM YUM! Brands Inc. Sub-Industry Outlook Industry Performance Our fundamental outlook for the restaurants sub-industry is positive. We project low single digit same-store sales growth in 2015. We think the U.S. economy will expand at a moderate pace. Nonfarm payroll employment has been rising, attaining the 200,000 per month that we think is needed to keep up with the population increase. Consumers have been cautious, and have been trading down or dining out less often, in particular during the weekdays. We project slower traffic for casual dining restaurants, while we think fast food and fast-casual dining restaurants will be less affected. GICS Sector: Consumer Discretionary Sub-Industry: Restaurants margins, as restaurants absorbed most of the higher input costs due to a weak economy. We think the impact of higher input costs will lessen in the next few quarters, as commodity price inflation has slowed down recently. Still, we think restaurants will have difficulty raising their prices. We also see higher labor costs from minimum wage legislation, and regional labor shortages, and higher healthcare costs due to Obamacare. Based on S&P 1500 Indexes Five-Year market price performance through Jan 16, 2016 S&P 1500 Year to date through August 14, the S&P Restaurants Index rose 16.3%, versus a 1.7% higher S&P 1500 Index. In 2014, the sub-industry index rose 4.3%, versus a 10.9% increase for the S&P 1500. Sub-Industry 160% % Change For the full-service restaurant segment, we project same-store sales growth of lower single-digits for the year. We think traffic will rise up to 1.0% as more people dine out. We also think they will likely purchase lower-priced menu items instead of higher-priced fare. However, we believe this will be more than offset by overall higher prices. Thus, we expect the average ticket price to increase slightly. We believe this segment of the restaurant industry will benefit less from faster growth in emerging countries. In our coverage universe, full-service restaurant companies have a higher percentage of their restaurants located in the U.S. Sector 210% --Tuna N. Amobi, CFA, CPA 110% 60% 10% -40% For the quick-service restaurant segment, we expect same-store sales to rise 2%-3% for the year, as we believe consumers will trade down from eating out at full-service outfits. We see incremental growth, as some quick-service restaurants are adding breakfast food to their menus. We see further growth opportunities in international markets, in particular China, with Yum! Brands, McDonald's and Starbucks opening more stores in that country. -90% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 NOTE: All Sector & Sub-Industry information is based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) Past performance is not an indication of future performance and should not be relied upon as such. The restaurant industry has been hit by higher food costs in the past year, resulting in lower operating Sub-Industry : Restaurants Peer Group*: Fast-food - Larger Peer Group Stock Symbol Stk.Mkt. Cap. (Mil. $) Recent Stock Price($) Yum Brands YUM 28,930 Biglari Holdings Domino's Pizza Jack in the Box McDonald's Corp Papa John's Intl Starbucks Corp BH DPZ JACK MCD PZZA SBUX 424 5,692 3,176 105,762 1,879 86,118 52 Week High/Low($) 67.09 95.90/66.35 336.06 104.16 72.00 115.18 48.16 58.00 459.43/321.00 119.73/96.76 99.99/63.94 120.23/87.50 79.40/47.49 64.00/40.16 Beta Yield (%) P/E Ratio Fair Value Calc.($) 0.79 2.7 32 54.10 A+ 99 7.9 62.1 1.07 0.97 0.64 0.36 0.47 0.77 Nil 1.2 1.7 3.1 1.5 1.4 2 33 25 25 27 32 NA 69.50 73.60 89.00 50.20 52.60 BB+ B A B+ B+ 25 94 90 99 92 99 3.6 8.2 7.3 17.3 4.6 14.4 25.2 500.1 94.6 53.9 68.2 28.7 NA-Not Available NM-Not Meaningful NR-Not Rated. *For Peer Groups with more than 15 companies or stocks, selection of issues is based on market capitalization. Redistribution or reproduction is prohibited without written permission. S&P Return on Quality IQ Revenue Ranking %ile (%) LTD to Cap (%) BYRNE COMPANY DISCLAIMER BYRNE COMPANY and/or Seller make no representations or warranties as to the truth, accuracy or completeness of this presentation package and any other materials, data or other information supplied in connection with the property, including, without limitation, the summaries of various legal documents relevant to this property. It is the parties’ express understanding and agreement that such materials are provided only for the parties’ convenience. In making their own examination and determination as to whether they wish to purchase the property, the parties shall rely exclusively on their own independent investigation and evaluation of every aspect of the property and their own analysis of all legal documentation relevant to the property and not on any materials supplied by BYRNE COMPANY and/or Seller. The parties expressly disclaim any reliance on any such materials provided to it by BYRNE COMPANY and/or Seller in connection with their inspection and agree that they shall rely solely on their own independently developed or verified information, investigation or analysis. BYRNE COMPANY and/or Seller reserve the right at any time to alter, amend or modify the information contained in such materials or to remove the property from the marketplace without notice. No copies of this presentation may be made in whole or part without the prior written consent of BYRNE COMPANY. Information disclosed in this presentation package shall be held in “strict confidence”. The person executing this Disclaimer has full authority to do so and to bind the party they represent to the agreements contained herein. Agreed and Accepted: Name: ____________________ By: ____________________ Printed Name: ____________________ Its ____________________ and Authorized Agent 8525 Ferndale Road Suite 100 Dallas, Texas 75238-4423 214-343-6996 Fax: 214-343-6998 www.byrnecompany.com 11-2-2015 Information About Brokerage Services Texas law requires all real estate license holders to give the following informaƟon about brokerage services to prospecƟve buyers, tenants, sellers and landlords. TYPES OF REAL ESTATE LICENSE HOLDERS: . • A BROKER is responsible for all brokerage acƟviƟes, including acts performed by sales agents sponsored by the broker. • A SALES AGENT must be sponsored by a broker and works with clients on behalf of the broker. A BROKER’S MINIMUM DUTIES REQUIRED BY LAW (A client is the person or party that the broker represents): • Put the interests of the client above all others, including the broker’s own interests; • Inform the client of any material informaƟon about the property or transacƟon received by the broker; • Answer the client’s quesƟons and present any oīer to or counter-oīer from the client; and • Treat all parƟes to a real estate transacƟon honestly and fairly. A LICENSE HOLDER CAN REPRESENT A PARTY IN A REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION: AS AGENT FOR OWNER (SELLER/LANDLORD): The broker becomes the property owner's agent through an agreement with the owner, usually in a wriƩen lisƟng to sell or property management agreement. An owner's agent must perform the broker’s minimum duƟes above and must inform the owner of any material informaƟon about the property or transacƟon known by the agent, including informaƟon disclosed to the agent or subagent by the buyer or buyer’s agent. AS AGENT FOR BUYER/TENANT: The broker becomes the buyer/tenant's agent by agreeing to represent the buyer, usually through a wriƩen representaƟon agreement. A buyer's agent must perform the broker’s minimum duƟes above and must inform the buyer of any material informaƟon about the property or transacƟon known by the agent, including informaƟon disclosed to the agent by the seller or seller’s agent. AS AGENT FOR BOTH - INTERMEDIARY: To act as an intermediary between the parƟes the broker must Įrst obtain the wriƩen agreement of each party to the transacƟon. The wriƩen agreement must state who will pay the broker and, in conspicuous bold or underlined print, set forth the broker's obligaƟons as an intermediary. A broker who acts as an intermediary: • Must treat all parƟes to the transacƟon imparƟally and fairly; • May, with the parƟes' wriƩen consent, appoint a diīerent license holder associated with the broker to each party (owner and buyer) to communicate with, provide opinions and advice to, and carry out the instrucƟons of each party to the transacƟon. • Must not, unless speciĮcally authorized in wriƟng to do so by the party, disclose: େ that the owner will accept a price less than the wriƩen asking price; େ that the buyer/tenant will pay a price greater than the price submiƩed in a wriƩen oīer; and େ any conĮdenƟal informaƟon or any other informaƟon that a party speciĮcally instructs the broker in wriƟng not to disclose, unless required to do so by law. AS SUBAGENT: A license holder acts as a subagent when aiding a buyer in a transacƟon without an agreement to represent the buyer. A subagent can assist the buyer but does not represent the buyer and must place the interests of the owner Įrst. TO AVOID DISPUTES, ALL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN YOU AND A BROKER SHOULD BE IN WRITING AND CLEARLY ESTABLISH: • The broker’s duƟes and responsibiliƟes to you, and your obligaƟons under the representaƟon agreement. • Who will pay the broker for services provided to you, when payment will be made and how the payment will be calculated. LICENSE HOLDER CONTACT INFORMATION: This noƟce is being provided for informaƟon purposes. It does not create an obligaƟon for you to use the broker’s services. Please acknowledge receipt of this noƟce below and retain a copy for your records. 9004602 [email protected] & [email protected] 214.343.6996 Licensed Broker /Broker Firm Name or Primary Assumed Business Name License No. Email Phone Designated Broker of Firm License No. Email Phone Licensed Supervisor of Sales Agent/ Associate License No. Email Phone Sales Agent/Associate’s Name License No. Email Phone Byrne Investment Company PLLC Buyer/Tenant/Seller/Landlord Initials Regulated by the Texas Real Estate Commission Date InformaƟon available at www.trec.texas.gov IABS 1-0