Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Saturn upper atmosphere structure D. Shemansky & X. Liu SET/PSSD 06/26/11 Occultation results • The fuv spectrum exclusively provides hydrocarbon vertical structure. • The euv spectrum exclusively obtains the properties of H2 and HI. At the altitude of the hydrocarbon homopause the H2 opacity removes measureable flux from the stellar or solar source. cor50_sat_h2vj25_17b_dm_vs_bcru 10 08 6 4 3 2 cor50_sat_h2vj25_17b Cru_2009_003_265r2 lat -3.6o 10 -18 [H2 X(v)] 6 4 3 2 h = 2097 km [H2 ] = 3.8 X 10 16 -2 cm 10 -28 6 4 3 2 10 -38 6 4 3 2 10 -48 6 4 3 2 10 -5 0 2 4 6 8 v 10 12 14 Hydrocarbons and H2O Vertical distribution Mixing ratios on a pressure scale Summary • H2 vertical structure at low latitude in 2009 shows top of atmosphere temperature of 450 K. H2 X is non LTE with evidence of non LTE in rotation. Proximal S/C tumble density altitude has been provided to project. On basis of -3.6o latitude observation. • There is disagreement with CIRS hydrocarbon results partly stemming from their dependence on the Voyager CH4 UVS profile. Moses theory also uses the Voyager profile. The UVIS result shows a much more vertically confined CH4 distribution indicating probable seasonal change in vertical dynamics. • The UVIS upper limit on H2O falls below Moore etal 2006, and at the level of the Moses calculachtion which is based on the Fru chtgruber etal 1997 observation. H2O issues at Saturn • The Moore etal calculations assume precipitating H2O. This results in a constant vertical mixing ratio. Their nominal rate is ~4.5 X 1027 s-1. The UVIS result limits to ~1026 s-1, within the range of The Fruchtgruber etal observation. • Enceladus appears to be an unlikely source at a level of ~1026 s-1. Moses etal argue for meteoritic dust. Ionospheric Reaction Chemistry • Electron Sink: H H 2 X (v 4) H 2 H H 2 H 2 X ( v ) H 3 H 3 H e H 2 X (v ) H H 3 e H H H • Development of Activated H2 X (v): – Photoelectron excitation, energetic electron excitation, solar fluorescence, electron recombination with H3+, three-body recombination, proton charge-exchange with H2 X Summary • H3+ dominant ionospheres predicted for both forcing conditions • Energy deposition from Stevens et al. (1993) predicted for heterogeneous electron forcing, solar forcing falls short by 3 orders of magnitude • Observed H2 EUV band emissions predicted with heterogeneous electron forcing • Requirement: H* multi-scattering model to predict excitation of H2 X (v) • Requirement: H3+ fine-structure to predict Trafton et al. (1999) emissions