* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download The debate over deeper integration.
Development economics wikipedia , lookup
International factor movements wikipedia , lookup
Internationalization wikipedia , lookup
Anti-globalization movement wikipedia , lookup
Balance of trade wikipedia , lookup
Investor-state dispute settlement wikipedia , lookup
Economic globalization wikipedia , lookup
Labour standards in the World Trade Organization wikipedia , lookup
ITF 225 /EC1400 FUTURE OF TRADE POLICY Professor Robert Lawrence September 24, 2015 Outline 1. Where do we stand? 2. The debate over deeper integration. 3. Impasse at Doha 4. The proliferation of regional agreements 5. Towards the future: Three challenges. Over Time…Integration has Increased on Many Fronts • Policies • Lower tariffs. • Deeper international trade agreements. • Liberalization of investment. • Technological change • • Reduced transportation costs (jets, containerization). Costless and instant communication (internet). ITF 225 /EC1400 World Average Applied Tariffs: Falling. Source: World Bank Indeed some now claim: The World is Flat. Bestsellers • “The World is Flat” • “Borderless World” • “The End of Geography” • “Has Globalization gone too far?” But have distance and borders really become less important? But Borders Do Still Matter! Taking account of size and distance British Columbia trades far more with Ontario than it does with Texas. 2.5 2.1 Billions 2 1.5 Ontario, Canada 1.4 Texas 1 0.5 0.155 Predicted BC exports to Texas without a border 0 British Columbia's exports to: Source: McCallum (1995) AER And the world is not flat There are big hills separating even the liberalized countries— prices are not equalized Mean percentage difference in producer price 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Source: Bradford and Lawrence, 2004 Canada-USA Germany-USA UK-USA Japan-USA Why do borders matter? • Tariffs and quotas. • Customs. • Regulations / Taxes • Permits. • Currencies • Legal systems. • Language. • Media/Information markets. ITF 225 /EC1400 More integration – or preserving differences? • These facts suggest that there are additional benefits from “deeper integration.” • However, we need to distinguish between differences that exist for different reasons: • Some differences in standards are protectionist: should be eliminated. • Some differences are equivalent. Can use either and have mutual recognition. • Some differences are valuable in their own right and should be preserved. Outline 1. Where do we stand? 2. The debate over deeper integration. 3.The impasse at Doha 4.The proliferation of regional Agreements 5. Towards the future ITF 225 /EC1400 Companies want to reduce the costs of operating global supply chains: • Common standards • Investor protection. • Regulatory coherence. • Intellectual property protection. • Efficient customs. • Reliable contract enforcement. • Rules for e-commerce • Fair competition limits on state-owned enterprises ITF 225 /EC1400 And many in Advanced countries want higher social standards in trade agreements • President Obama Defends the TPP • https://vimeo.com/132727614 • (NO PASSWORD) ITF 225 /EC1400 And some developing countries are willing to supply deeper integration • New strategies: import substitution versus export-led • Attracting Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) • Trade policy and domestic reforms. • Credibility and lock-in ITF 225 /EC1400 But others resist these demands for deeper integration • History of previous globalizations • Desire for autonomy in policy space. • Belief in state-led strategies, infant industry policies • Some differences are obstacles but some are valuable in their own right! ITF 225 /EC1400 And some of them are too big to ignore Rise of China & India… ..and also Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, Turkey, Nigeria The WTO: No consensus for going deeper at Ministerial Meetings • Marrakech (1994): Labor standards rejected as issue • Seattle (1999): Many complain about implementation challenges of Uruguay Round: too complicated and expensive for poor countries • Cancun (2003): No consensus on competition policy, investment and transparency in government procurement. Dropped from Doha Round Agenda. • Need to end Doha Round now used by some to prevent WTO introducing new issues. Outline 1. Where do we stand? 2. Controversies over deeper integration. 3. Impasse at Doha 4. The proliferation of regional agreements 5. Towards the future: Three challenges. ITF 225 /EC1400 Doha: 2001 Views • Developed countries have done well under globalization • Trading system must prioritize developing country interests • Big problem: farm subsidies hurt farmers in poor countries • China, a newly acceding member, does not need to do more ITF 225 /EC1400 Doha Round: an ambitious agenda • A single undertaking. • Reduce barriers and subsidies in agriculture • Reduce remaining tariff peaks in developed countries • Further reduce services barriers • Provide “Aid for Trade” and help trade facilitation • Perhaps add new issues. (at Cancun in 2003) • Investment • Competition policy • Transparency in government procurement ITF 225 /EC1400 Doha Round • Some progress on formulas and approaches (called modalities) but not real agreements. • Almost every deadline missed. • Investment, Competition Policies and Transparency in Government Procurement dropped from Cancun Agenda. ITF 225 /EC1400 Conditions have changed: no big agreement seems possible • In 2001, developing countries needed support • China was a newly acceding member that needed time to adjust • Many developing countries had experienced two decades of slow growth • But as of 2015, many are thriving • China is the world’s largest exporting nation • Many developing countries have had a decade of unprecedented growth • Developed countries have prioritized concessions • Market-opening concessions from large emerging economies • But many developing countries unwilling to Make Them. • To the US, the bargain on the table looks small and uncertain (Schwab 2011) ITF 225 /EC1400 Bound Versus Applied Rates: Water, Water Everywhere! Bound European Union United States of America Canada Japan Korea, Republic of Australia Singapore Brazil China India Indonesia Mexico Nigeria MFN applied 5.2 3.5 6.8 4.7 5.5 3.4 4.2 4.9 16.6 10.0 9.9 13.3 2.7 0.2 31.4 10.0 48.6 37.1 36.2 118.3 13.5 9.9 13.5 6.9 7.9 11.7 ITF 225 /EC1400 With approaches (modalities) agreed in 2008: developing countries: no change in applied rates in agriculture! ITF 225 /EC1400 Recent Agreements • Bali WTO Agreement approved in December 2013: main achievement trade facilitation to improve operation of customs • Information Technology Agreement reached by 54 WTO members in July 2015, eliminating tariffs on 201 IT products representing 7% of global trade • Hope for Nairobi Ministerial Conference in December 2015? ITF 225 /EC1400 Outline 1. Where do we stand. 2. The debate over deeper integration. 3. The dilemma’s of Doha. 4. Regionalism: Is it the answer? 5. Can the WTO be revitalized? ITF 225 /EC1400 Coalitions of the Willing: Outside the WTO • Plurilaterals: Trade in Services Agreement (TISA) • Currently being negotiated with 51 participants, representing 70% of world trade in services • Last major services agreement, GATS, was in 1995 • Bilaterals & • Mega-regionals: TPP, TTIP, RCEP, Pacific Alliance • Many with deeper agendas Number of preferential trade agreements (PTAs) has exploded in past 2 decades According to the WTO, there are over 300 Regional Trade Agreements in force at present Regional agreements are becoming more complex, as indicated by the increase in average number of RTA partners per agreement over time. Source: Caroline Freund and Emanuel Ornelas, “Regional Trade Agreements,” World Bank Working Policy Research Working Paper 5314, May 2010, p. 59. ITF 225 /EC1400 Proposed Mega-Regional Arrangements • Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) is an initiative to link the ten ASEAN member states and the group’s Free Trade Agreement partners, Australia, China, India, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. • Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a trade agreement under negotiation between Australia, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the United States, and Vietnam. • Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is a trade agreement under negotiation between the United States and the European Union. • Pacific Alliance: Latin American trade bloc, current member states are Chile, Columbia, Mexico, and Peru. Costa Rica began the process of joining in February 2014. TPP: Extensive Coverage Goes Deeper than agreements in ASEAN on Many Issues Source: Petri at al. Outline 1. Where do we stand? 2. Controversies over deeper integration. 3. Impasse at Doha 4. The proliferation of regional agreements 5. Towards the future: Big Questions ITF 225 /EC1400 Big Questions • What to do about revitalizing the WTO? • Can regional arrangements become building blocks for integration? • Who will lead the global trading system? ITF 225 /EC1400 1) WTO losing centrality IMPASSE FLOURISHING Multilateral negotiations stalled; vocal opposition to global rules Number of Regional Trade Agreements has increased dramatically ITF 225 /EC1400 SOLUTION?: End Doha and move towards a Variable Geometry for a more inclusive WTO Competition Investment Core Agreements Labor rules ITF 225 /EC1400 Example: Investment • What happens if some countries want to decrease barriers to international investment, Competition but others don’t? Investment • Are we better off if those countries form a separate regional agreement? Core Agreements • Or are we better off if they negotiate the agreement at the WTO with all the other members – but only they choose to participate in it? Labor rules ITF 225 /EC1400 WTO as a “club of clubs”? • “Plurilateral” agreement protocol was added after WTO established • All members negotiate agreements, but participation is voluntary • Allows members choice to have deeper integration under the WTO • Preserves policy space for members not yet ready to participate • One way to revitalize the WTO as the center of the global trading system 2) Three Scenarios with mega-regionals • Building Blocks. The strategy works to create a reinvigorated system. • Stumbling Blocks. Creates a fragmented system because some cannot join • Crumbling Blocks. Agreements either fail to be concluded or are rejected when they are ITF 225 /EC1400 Building Blocks? Mega-regionals: • Facilitate trade and investment for insiders • Generate positive spillovers for outsiders. • E.g. harmonized standards, more efficient customs, more transparent regulatory systems reduce costs for both members and non-members. • Eliminating barriers within sectors in mega-regionals facilitates sectoral agreements at the WTO. • Innovations within regionals set precedents = a process of competitive liberalization ITF 225 /EC1400 Stumbling Blocks? • System fragmented into standard-setters and standard- takers. • Standards set at levels that present non-tariff barriers to outsiders. • • • Restrictive rules of origin Insiders given preferential treatment Rules on issues like labor, environment, human rights exclude many participants. = Frictions, tensions. Gradual erosion of WTO as center of system. ITF 225 /EC1400 Crumbling Blocks? • Parties are unable to complete negotiations: mega- regionals difficult, Doha stalled. • Agreements are often concluded but then rejected by US Congress and other Parliaments. Result: • Deep disenchantment with trading system. • Failure at both multilateral and regional level. ITF 225 /EC1400 3) Leadership challenge • Leadership in the new global system must come from both the advanced and major emerging economies – particularly China • How can China reconcile its desire to lead the global effort to maintain an open and free trading system with its need to promote its domestic development? Chinese market is fairly open But measures to promote development increase friction with trading partners • Tariffs average 10% • Undervalued currencey • Hospitable to • Subsidies (e.g. energy) foreign investment • Strategic use of state-owned enterprises • Some investment restrictions • Technology transfer requirements • Frequent infringements of intellectual property rights ITF 225 /EC1400 The Question? • Are we witnessing the end of US (and EU) leadership – and the emergence of a multipolar system that has weak leadership and eventually deglobalizes and fragments? • Or, are we witnessing the beginning of a new more effective multilateral system that can be more inclusive, and provides alternative and differentiated ways for countries to integrate with the rest of the world?