Download Slides - My E-town

Survey
yes no Was this document useful for you?
   Thank you for your participation!

* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project

Document related concepts

Theorem wikipedia , lookup

Bra–ket notation wikipedia , lookup

Abuse of notation wikipedia , lookup

List of first-order theories wikipedia , lookup

Addition wikipedia , lookup

Peano axioms wikipedia , lookup

Mathematical proof wikipedia , lookup

Brouwer–Hilbert controversy wikipedia , lookup

Proofs of Fermat's little theorem wikipedia , lookup

Transcript
Week 5 - Friday




What did we talk about last time?
Sequences
Summation and product notation
Proof by induction




Consider six straight silver chains made up of
five links each
What if you want to make one large circular
chain?
The jeweler will charge $1 for every link that
he must cut open and then weld close
What is the cheapest price possible to make
the six chains into one chain?


It is often possible to use a formula to
describe the relationship between the value
of a subscript and the value of the
corresponding term
Example: ai = i2, for integers i  1

Summation notation is used to describe a
summation of some part of a series
n
a
k m

k
 am  am 1  am 2  ...  an
Expanded form is the summation written
without the sigma

Product notation is used to describe a
product of
some
part
of
a
series
n
a
k m

k
 am  am 1  am 2 ...  an
Expanded form is the product written
without the pi

To prove a statement of the following form:
 n  Z, where n a, property P(n) is true

Use the following steps:
1. Basis Step: Show that the property is true for
P(a)
2. Induction Step:
▪ Suppose that the property is true for some n = k, where
k  Z, k a
▪ Now, show that, with that assumption, the property is
also true for k + 1




Prove that, for all integers n  8, n = 3a + 5b,
where a,b are integers greater than or equal
to zero
Hint: Use induction and cases
This is the example given in the book
Another way to write it is that any amount of
change above 8 cents can be made using only
3 cent and 5 cent coins

Prove that, for all real numbers r  1
n 1
r
1
i
r 

r 1
i 0
n




Hint: Use induction
This is the sum of a geometric sequence, also
known as a geometric series
This result generalizes our example with the
sum of powers of 2
There is a small issue for r = 0, but Epp
ignores it


Prove that, for all integers n ≥ 1, 22n – 1 is
divisible by 3
Hint: Use induction


Prove that, for all real number n ≥ 3, 2n + 1 <
2n
Hint: Use induction


The Fibonacci sequence is 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, …
We can define it (recursively) as follows:
 F1 = F2 = 1
 Fn = Fn-1 + Fn-2, n ≥ 2


Prove that, for all integers n ≥ 1, F4n is
divisible by 3
Hint: Use induction
Strong Induction



There are situations where we need more
than the fact that the kth element maintains
some property to prove the k + 1st element
has the same property
Strong induction allows us to use the kth
element, the k-1st, element, the k-2nd
element, and so on
This is usually most helpful when the
subterms you are doing induction on are of
unknown size

To prove a statement of the following form:
 n  Z, where n a, property P(n) is true

Use the following steps:
1. Basis Step: Show that the property is true for
P(a), P(a+1), … P(b-1) , P(b), where a ≤ b, bZ
2. Induction Step:
▪ Suppose that the property is true for some a ≤ i ≤ k,
where k  Z and k  b
▪ Now, show that, with that assumption, the property is
also true for k + 1
Theorem: For all integers n  2, n is divisible by a prime
Proof:
 Basis step: (n = 2) The property is true for n = 2 because 2 is divisible by 2
 Induction step: Assume that all numbers i where 2 ≤ i ≤ k are divisible by
a prime, where k  Z
 Case 1: k + 1 is prime
 If k + 1 is prime, k + 1= (k + 1)∙1, therefore k + 1 is divisible by a prime, namely
itself

Case 2: k + 1 is composite
 If k + 1 is composite, k + 1 = a∙b, where a,b  Z and 2 ≤ a < k + 1 and 2 ≤ b < k +
1
 By the induction hypothesis, a is divisible by some prime p
 Thus, k + 1 = p∙c∙b = p∙d and k + 1 is divisible by prime p
Since we have shown the basis step and induction step of strong
mathematical induction, the claim is true
QED

Theorem: It takes exactly n-1 steps to assemble a jigsaw puzzle with
n pieces
Proof:
 Basis step: (n = 1) A puzzle with 1 piece takes 0 steps to put
together
 Induction step: Assume it takes i – 1 steps to put together puzzles
of size i where 1 ≤ i ≤ k, where k  Z
 The last step in a puzzle of size k + 1 is putting together a subpuzzle of
size j and a subpuzzle of size k + 1 – j where j  Z and 1 ≤ j ≤ k and 1 ≤ k
+1-j≤k
 By the induction hypothesis, it took j – 1 steps to put together one
subpuzzle and k – j steps to put together the other
 Thus, the total number of steps is (j – 1) + (k – j) + 1 = k steps
Since we have shown the basis step and induction step of strong
mathematical induction, the claim is true
QED



It turns out that the concept of truth through
mathematical induction is equivalent to
another principle
Well-Ordering Principle for the Integers:
 Let S be a set containing one or more integers all
of which are greater than some fixed integer.
Then S has a least element.


Recursion
Second-order linear homogeneous
recurrence relations with constant
coefficients


Homework 3 is due on Monday
Keep reading Chapter 5