Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
HSP 3M: Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology, Sociology Introductory iMovie Presentation Project Created by K. Uhre Project Objectives: 1. Demonstrate an understanding of the social forces that influence and shape behaviour as described by anthropologists, psychologists, and sociologists 2. Highlight key theories and major theorists who have influenced each discipline 3. Address key questions that scientists in each discipline strive to address Instructions: 1. You will work with the group that you were assigned to when completing your annotation assignment. 2. As a group, create a google doc and invite Ms. Uhre to access your doc. 3. Go through your annotations and include the most IMPORTANT information under the following headings: a) Fields of Study: include features and goals of each b) Major Theorists: brief bios of major theorists from your annotations c) Topics: 3 topics that are of interest to the discipline. 4. After Ms. Uhre has checked your completed document, you must design a brief 2-4 minute imovie presentation of your information. 5. Presentations must include the following: **Use imovie to create** a) info from your google doc b) photos c) 1 short video clip d) music e) voiceover f) highlight issues that the discipline focuses on **You will receive an INDIVIDUAL grade for the project. Keep track of your work on the attached checklist and submit it on the day your project is due** TIMELINE: Fri. Sept. 16: Work period. Googledoc must be complete by the end of class. Tues. Sept. 20: Work period: imovie must be complete by the end of class. Thurs. Sept. 22: Present iMovies HSP3M Googledoc Rubric Category Below Expectations: <50% Level 1: 5059% Level 2: 6069% Level 3: 7079% Level 4: 80100% Knowledge /5 Did not include info about fields of study or major theorists, and questions. Gaps in information Insufficient information in at least one of: fields of study, theorists, questions Satisfactory information in all categories: fields of study, theorists, questions Thorough, detailed information in all categories: fields of study, theorists, questions Application Information was not sequenced correctly Information lacked cohesion. Thinking /10 Information was not logically sequenced on the document Information was logically sequenced with good visual flow of information. Information was creatively and logically sequenced. Excellent visual flow of information. Communication /5 More than 5 errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Information was not consistently or logically sequenced on the document (subtitles, bullet points, font size inappropriate) 4-5 errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Information was appropriate, but some points were lacking synchronicity Information was satisfactorily sequenced on the document. Subtitles were present, font size appropriate. 3-4 errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Good, detailed information in all categories: fields of study, theorists, questions Information was good, and all points were synchronized 2-3 errors in spelling, grammar and/or punctuation Free of errors Level 3: Level 4: 80- /5 TOTAL: Information was thorough and synchronized. 25 Comments: iMovie Presentation Rubric Category Below Level 1: 50- Level 2: 60- Knowledge /10 Application /5 Thinking/ Inquiry /10 Communication /5 Expectations 59% <50% 69% 70-79% 100% Did not convey adequate information about the selected discipline Satisfactory information about the discipline, but some key points from the googledoc were missing Instructions were followed, but some elements may have been lacking: music, voicover, photos, clips did not match information. Editing was inconsistent Satisfactory level of creativity was employed, although there may have been elements that were uninformative 3-4 errors in spelling, grammar and or punctuation Most elements were audible and visible Good information about the discipline. Most important points were included. Excellent, thorough information about the discipline. Most important points were included Instructions were followed. All elements were expertly included. Editing was excellent. Instructions were not followed. Two or more elements were missing: music, voiceover, photos, clips. Editing was incomplete Vague information about the discipline. Some information may not have been necessary Some instructions were followed. May have been missing one of: music, voiceover, photos, clips. Editing was poor. Limited creative thinking was employed. Movie was not informative. Some creative thinking was employed, but elements of the movie were vague and not informative. More than 5 errors in spelling, grammar and or punctuation. Some elements could not be seen or heard. 4-5 errors in spelling, grammar and or punctuation. Some elements could not be seen or heard. Instructions were followed. All elements were included and were appropriate to the presentation. Editing was consistent Good level of creativity was employed. Movie was informative. Excellent level of creativity was employed. Movie was dynamic and informative. 1-2 errors in spelling, grammar and or punctuation. All elements could be seen and heard. Free of errors. All elements could be seen and heard. Total: /30 iMovie Presentation Personal Group work Contribution Check list HSP 3M NAME: DATE: List specific contributions that you made to the project