Download HSP 3M: Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology, Sociology

HSP 3M: Introduction to Anthropology, Psychology, Sociology
Introductory iMovie Presentation Project
Created by K. Uhre
Project Objectives:
1. Demonstrate an understanding of the social forces that influence and shape
behaviour as described by anthropologists, psychologists, and sociologists
2. Highlight key theories and major theorists who have influenced each
discipline
3. Address key questions that scientists in each discipline strive to address
Instructions:
1. You will work with the group that you were assigned to when completing
your annotation assignment.
2. As a group, create a google doc and invite Ms. Uhre to access your doc.
3. Go through your annotations and include the most IMPORTANT
information under the following headings:
a) Fields of Study: include features and goals of each
b) Major Theorists: brief bios of major theorists from your annotations
c) Topics: 3 topics that are of interest to the discipline.
4. After Ms. Uhre has checked your completed document, you must design a
brief 2-4 minute imovie presentation of your information.
5. Presentations must include the following: **Use imovie to create**
a) info from your google doc
b) photos
c) 1 short video clip
d) music
e) voiceover
f) highlight issues that the discipline focuses on
**You will receive an INDIVIDUAL grade for the project. Keep track of your
work on the attached checklist and submit it on the day your project is
due**
TIMELINE:
Fri. Sept. 16: Work period. Googledoc must be complete by the end of class.
Tues. Sept. 20: Work period: imovie must be complete by the end of class.
Thurs. Sept. 22: Present iMovies
HSP3M Googledoc Rubric
Category
Below
Expectations:
<50%
Level 1: 5059%
Level 2: 6069%
Level 3: 7079%
Level 4: 80100%
Knowledge
/5
Did not include
info about
fields of study
or major
theorists, and
questions.
Gaps in
information
Insufficient
information in
at least one
of: fields of
study,
theorists,
questions
Satisfactory
information
in all
categories:
fields of
study,
theorists,
questions
Thorough,
detailed
information in
all categories:
fields of
study,
theorists,
questions
Application
Information
was not
sequenced
correctly
Information
lacked
cohesion.
Thinking
/10
Information
was not
logically
sequenced on
the document
Information
was logically
sequenced
with good
visual flow of
information.
Information
was
creatively and
logically
sequenced.
Excellent
visual flow of
information.
Communication
/5
More than 5
errors in
spelling,
grammar
and/or
punctuation
Information
was not
consistently
or logically
sequenced
on the
document
(subtitles,
bullet points,
font size
inappropriate)
4-5 errors in
spelling,
grammar
and/or
punctuation
Information
was
appropriate,
but some
points were
lacking
synchronicity
Information
was
satisfactorily
sequenced
on the
document.
Subtitles
were
present, font
size
appropriate.
3-4 errors in
spelling,
grammar
and/or
punctuation
Good,
detailed
information
in all
categories:
fields of
study,
theorists,
questions
Information
was good,
and all points
were
synchronized
2-3 errors in
spelling,
grammar
and/or
punctuation
Free of errors
Level 3:
Level 4: 80-
/5
TOTAL:
Information
was thorough
and
synchronized.
25
Comments:
iMovie Presentation Rubric
Category
Below
Level 1: 50-
Level 2: 60-
Knowledge
/10
Application
/5
Thinking/
Inquiry
/10
Communication
/5
Expectations 59%
<50%
69%
70-79%
100%
Did not
convey
adequate
information
about the
selected
discipline
Satisfactory
information
about the
discipline, but
some key
points from
the
googledoc
were missing
Instructions
were
followed, but
some
elements may
have been
lacking:
music,
voicover,
photos, clips
did not match
information.
Editing was
inconsistent
Satisfactory
level of
creativity was
employed,
although
there may
have been
elements that
were
uninformative
3-4 errors in
spelling,
grammar and
or
punctuation
Most
elements
were audible
and visible
Good
information
about the
discipline.
Most
important
points were
included.
Excellent,
thorough
information
about the
discipline.
Most
important
points were
included
Instructions
were
followed. All
elements
were expertly
included.
Editing was
excellent.
Instructions
were not
followed.
Two or more
elements
were missing:
music,
voiceover,
photos, clips.
Editing was
incomplete
Vague
information
about the
discipline.
Some
information
may not have
been
necessary
Some
instructions
were
followed.
May have
been missing
one of:
music,
voiceover,
photos, clips.
Editing was
poor.
Limited
creative
thinking was
employed.
Movie was
not
informative.
Some
creative
thinking was
employed,
but elements
of the movie
were vague
and not
informative.
More than 5
errors in
spelling,
grammar and
or
punctuation.
Some
elements
could not be
seen or
heard.
4-5 errors in
spelling,
grammar and
or
punctuation.
Some
elements
could not be
seen or
heard.
Instructions
were
followed. All
elements
were included
and were
appropriate to
the
presentation.
Editing was
consistent
Good level of
creativity was
employed.
Movie was
informative.
Excellent
level of
creativity was
employed.
Movie was
dynamic and
informative.
1-2 errors in
spelling,
grammar and
or
punctuation.
All elements
could be
seen and
heard.
Free of
errors. All
elements
could be
seen and
heard.
Total: /30
iMovie Presentation Personal Group work Contribution Check list
HSP 3M
NAME:
DATE:
List specific contributions that you made to the project