* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Physiological Adaptation of the Cardiovascular System
Cardiac contractility modulation wikipedia , lookup
Cardiovascular disease wikipedia , lookup
Heart failure wikipedia , lookup
Electrocardiography wikipedia , lookup
Antihypertensive drug wikipedia , lookup
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia wikipedia , lookup
Cardiac surgery wikipedia , lookup
Management of acute coronary syndrome wikipedia , lookup
Mitral insufficiency wikipedia , lookup
Coronary artery disease wikipedia , lookup
Myocardial infarction wikipedia , lookup
Dextro-Transposition of the great arteries wikipedia , lookup
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456 – 466 www.onlinepcd.com Physiological Adaptation of the Cardiovascular System to High Altitude Robert Naeije⁎ Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium Abstract Altitude exposure is associated with major changes in cardiovascular function. The initial cardiovascular response to altitude is characterized by an increase in cardiac output with tachycardia, no change in stroke volume, whereas blood pressure may temporarily be slightly increased. After a few days of acclimatization, cardiac output returns to normal, but heart rate remains increased, so that stroke volume is decreased. Pulmonary artery pressure increases without change in pulmonary artery wedge pressure. This pattern is essentially unchanged with prolonged or lifelong altitude sojourns. Ventricular function is maintained, with initially increased, then preserved or slightly depressed indices of systolic function, and an altered diastolic filling pattern. Filling pressures of the heart remain unchanged. Exercise in acute as well as in chronic high-altitude exposure is associated with a brisk increase in pulmonary artery pressure. The relationships between workload, cardiac output, and oxygen uptake are preserved in all circumstances, but there is a decrease in maximal oxygen consumption, which is accompanied by a decrease in maximal cardiac output. The decrease in maximal cardiac output is minimal in acute hypoxia but becomes more pronounced with acclimatization. This is not explained by hypovolemia, acid-bases status, increased viscosity on polycythemia, autonomic nervous system changes, or depressed systolic function. Maximal oxygen uptake at high altitudes has been modeled to be determined by the matching of convective and diffusional oxygen transport systems at a lower maximal cardiac output. However, there has been recent suggestion that 10% to 25% of the loss in aerobic exercise capacity at high altitudes can be restored by specific pulmonary vasodilating interventions. Whether this is explained by an improved maximum flow output by an unloaded right ventricle remains to be confirmed. Altitude exposure carries no identified risk of myocardial ischemia in healthy subjects but has to be considered as a potential stress in patients with previous cardiovascular conditions. (Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52:456-466) © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: High altitude; Physiologic adaptation; Cardiovascular system; Cardiac failure; Exercise; Pulmonary hypertension; Hypoxia You cannot fool Mother Nature. Jack Reeves, 1976 High-altitude exposure has long been recognized as a cardiac stress. Early accounts of alpine climbs include Statement of Conflict of Interest: see page 465. ⁎ Address reprint requests to Robert Naeije, Laboratory of Physiology, Erasme Campus, CP 604, Lennik road, 808, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail address: [email protected]. 0033-0620/$ – see front matter © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pcad.2010.03.004 mention of tachycardia, palpitations, and shortness of breath as a symptoms of “cardiac fatigue.”1 Heart failure syndromes have been reported at high altitudes, including “brisket disease” in cattle brought to high-altitude pastures in Utah and Colorado,2 “Monge's disease” in the inhabitants of the South American altiplano,3 “subacute mountain sickness” or “chronic mountain sickness” in the Himalayas,4,5 and “high-altitude right heart failure” in occasional high-altitude travelers.6 On the other hand, there is the notion that the myocardium has a good tolerance to hypoxia and that the prevalence of cardiovascular 456 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 diseases is lower in highaltitude dwellers than in IVRT = isovolumic sea level inhabitants. 7 relaxation time Hypoxia induces an increase in pulmonary vasLV = left ventricular cular resistance, but PAP = pulmonary artery resulting pulmonary hypressure pertension is most often RV = right ventricular moderate. 8 However, TAPSE = tricuspid annular there has been recent sugplane systolic excursion gestion that specific pulmonary vasodilating TDI = tissue Doppler imaging interventions to unload the right ventricle might improve aerobic exercise capacity at altitude.9 457 Abbreviations and Acronyms Stroke volume and heart rate at rest Immediately after exposure to hypoxia, normobaric or hypobaric, the resting cardiac output increases. A typical response in 24 subjects acutely breathing a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.12 to decrease arterial PO2 to 40 ± 1 mm Hg is illustrated in Fig 1.10 Cardiac output increased by 22%, and this was entirely explained by an 18% increase in heart rate. Stroke volume did not change. It is remarkable that the increase in cardiac output exactly matched the decrease in arterial oxygen content, so that the product of both, or the oxygen delivery to the tissues, remained unchanged. This observation has been repeatedly confirmed and suggests that oxygen delivery to the tissues is tightly matched by immediate cardiac output changes to peripheral demand in normal subjects at rest. However, this cardiovascular response to hypoxia is transient, as cardiac output returns to normoxic baseline Fig 2. Mean heart rate (HR), cardiac output (Q), and stroke volume during the first days of acclimatization to the altitude of 3800 m in 8 healthy volunteers. Both Q and HR increased initially. After 8 days of altitude exposure, Q was back to prehypoxic normal, but stroke volume remained decreased and heart rate increased. After study by Klausen.11 or slightly below in a few days.11,12 Heart rate remains increased, so that stroke volume is decreased. This is illustrated in Fig 2 that depicts the evolution of cardiac output, stroke volume, and heart rate in 5 subjects during the first 8 days of exposure to an altitude of 3800 m.11 This situation then remains stable over time. Resting cardiac output in long-term sojourners and high-altitude natives is not different from that of sea level controls but with somewhat higher heart rate and lower stroke volume.13-15 Interestingly, there seems to be no relation between the altitude and cardiac output. Because cardiac output returns to baseline a few days of hypoxic exposure before the onset of polycythemia, there has to be an increased oxygen extraction. Why it takes a few days for the body to select increased extraction over increased delivery to preserve the oxygen uptake is not exactly known. Maintenance of cardiac output with decreased stroke volume and increased heart rate may be related to the development of respiratory alkalosis with progression of the hypoxic ventilatory response during acclimatization, although this would decrease over the years.16 Another possible explanation is that increased heart rate and decreased stroke volume allow for an improved coupling of the right ventricle to the pulmonary circulation in the presence of even mild hypoxic pulmonary hypertension, through an adaptive decrease in the oscillatory component of pulmonary arterial hydraulic load.17 Effects of exercise Fig 1. Mean ± SE percent (%) changes in cardiac output (Q), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SVI), arterial PO2 (PaO2), and oxygen delivery (TO2) in 24 subjects submitted to a brief period of normobaric hypoxic breathing with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 12.5% (FIO2)—full columns in normoxia, empty columns in hypoxia. Arterial PO2 decreased to 40 mm Hg, but the decrease in arterial O2 saturation was limited to 79%. Cardiac output increased because of an increased heart rate. Oxygen delivery to the tissues was maintained. Redrawn from Naeije et al.10 Altitude exposure is associated with a decrease in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) that parallels the decrease in barometric pressure or the inspired partial pressure of oxygen (PO2) and is thus essentially explained by a decreased oxygenation of the blood.18 However, both maximal stroke volume and heart rate are decreased. Initially, there is a higher cardiac output at any workload, so that maximum cardiac output and heart 458 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 Fig 3. Cardiac output (Q) as a function of workload (W) or oxygen uptake (VO2) in 4 healthy volunteers at the altitude of 5800 m and at sea level. The relationships between Q, W, and VO2 were preserved at high altitude but reaches a peak at lower maximal VO2 (after study by Pugh23). rate are either maintained or only slightly reduced.19-22 With acclimatization, the relationship between cardiac output, workload, and oxygen uptake is not different from that measured at sea level, but it reaches a peak at lower VO2max, workload, cardiac output, and heart rate.13-15,23-26 This is illustrated in Fig 3, which represents cardiac output, workload, and oxygen uptake measurements in 4 subjects at sea level and again after acclimatization at the altitude of 5800 m,23 and in Fig 4, which shows the increased resting but decreased maximal heart rate as a function of increased altitude.24 Typical changes were reported by Alexander et al20 in normal subjects exposed for 3 weeks at 3100 m. Maximal oxygen uptake decreased by 25% during the first days of altitude exposure with no subsequent improvement. There was a fall in arterial oxygen saturation at maximal exercise but minimally so. Heart rate increased at all levels of exercise, but maximal heart rate was unchanged. Stroke volume was decreased at rest and at all levels of exercise. Maximal cardiac output was decreased. The authors discussed possible contributions of increased pulmonary vascular resistance, sympathetic nervous system activity, decreased plasma volume, and alluded to a possible depressant effect of alkalosis but favored the idea of a myocardial depressant effect of moderate hypoxia.20 This is intriguing because stroke volume was decreased with hardly any change in arterial oxygen saturation. Furthermore, supplemental oxygen to correct hypoxemia at higher altitudes does not immediately correct the fall in stroke volume.13,23,24 Mechanisms of decreased maximal cardiac output at high altitudes Sympathetic nervous system activation The pattern of change in cardiac output on acute highaltitude exposure is at least in part related to an activation of the sympathetic nervous system. This is reflected by an increase in plasma and urine catecholamines27,28 and has been confirmed by microneurographic recordings.29,30 Sympathetic nervous system activation is also responsible for an increased metabolic rate.11 On the other hand, there has been evidence of diminished heart rate responses to isoproterenol31 together with reduced β-adrenergic receptor activity32 and of increased muscarinic receptor activity.33 Although none of these changes explains an increase in heart rate at rest, each of them could contribute to decrease maximal heart rate at altitude. However, the immediate reversibility of maximal heart rate with pure oxygen breathing, and similar effects of infused isoproterenol in acute and chronic hypoxia, while heart rates are different, argue against autonomic nervous system changes playing a role in reduced maximal cardiac output at altitude. A parasympathetic block with atropine or glycopyrrolate restores maximum heart rate but not maximal cardiac output or VO2max.28,34,35 β-Adrenergic blockade with propranolol decreases maximal heart rate without any effect on maximal cardiac output or VO2max.28,36 Therefore, how a sympathetic-parasympathetic nervous system imbalance could account for tachycardia at rest, but decreased maximal heart rate at exercise remains difficult to understand. On the other hand, the absence of changes in VO2max by pharmacologic manipulations of the autonomic nervous system indirectly suggest that a decreased chronotropic reserve does not contribute to decreased exercise capacity at altitude. Myocardial depressant effects of hypoxia It has long been thought that the myocardium may selflimit its pump function because of decreased oxygen availability, thereby, preventing potentially fatal hypoxiainduced arrhythmia or failure.20,37 Hypoxia has been reported to exert negative inotropic effects in intact animal preparations38 and in isolated myocardial fibers. 39 Fig 4. Mean cardiac output (Q) as a function of oxygen uptake (VO2) or heart rate (HR) in 8 subjects at progressively increased simulated altitudes with barometric pressures (PB) of 760 mm Hg (full circles, n = 8), 380 mm Hg (empty triangles, n = 6), and 282 mm Hg (full triangles, n = 4). The relationships between Q and VO2 are preserved but interrupted at a maximal VO2 decreased in proportion to decreased PB. There is an increase in resting HR and a decrease in maximal HR with altitude (after study by Reeves et al24). R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 459 Hypovolemia Fig 5. Increased ratio of maximal LV systolic pressure to end-systolic volume at rest and at exercise at altitude. Abbreviation: PB, barometric pressure (after study by Suarez et al40). Possible effects of hypoxia would require several days to become manifest and are not immediately reversible because oxygen breathing in acclimatized subjects does not rapidly modify the relation of heart rate to stroke volume.13,23,24 However, stroke volume as a function of right or left heart filling pressures have been reported to be well maintained at extremely high simulated altitudes, indicating preserved contractility.24 This has been confirmed by measurements of left ventricular (LV) peak systolic vs end-systolic volume relationships, as illustrated in Fig 5.40 Hypocapnia More than a century ago, Angelo Mosso hypothesized that much of the symptoms of high altitude intolerance could be accounted for by hypocapnia instead of hypoxia.1 Accordingly, stroke volume could be depressed as a consequence of alkalosis because of altitude-induced increased ventilation and associated fall in arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2). This was actually tested by Grover et al,41 who exposed 8 normal subjects to hypobaric conditions, with a barometric pressure of 440 mm Hg and with 3.7% inspired carbon dioxide in 5 of them. The results of these experiments are shown in Fig 6. Supplemental carbon dioxide allowed for the arterial pH and PCO2 to remain unchanged and stroke volume to be preserved. However, VO2max decreased by 32% instead of 29% in subjects without supplemental carbon dioxide, and this was explained by a lower arterial PO2 as predicted by the alveolar gas equation, decreasing oxygen delivery to the tissues. Supplemental carbon dioxide prevented the usual acute hypoxia-related increase in hematocrit, suggesting maintained plasma volume. The authors thought that maintained stroke volume by supplemental carbon dioxide in hypoxic subjects at exercise could be explained by the combined effects of increased plasma volume and sympathetic nervous system activation. These experiments have not been repeated, even though the results reported by Grover et al41 were obtained in a limited number of subjects, with perhaps insufficient matching in baseline conditions. Plasma volume decreases with exposure to high altitudes.13,42-44 Hypoxia acutely increases hemoglobin concentration, implying an escape of water out of the vascular space.45 Further decrease of plasma volume is explained by loss of water by increased ventilation, perspiration, and urine output, this at least in part related to increased bicarbonate and sodium diuresis, and decreased intake by hypoxia-induced adypsia but also a loss of plasma protein.44,46 The decrease in plasma volume accounts for weight loss, increased hematocrit, and decreased filling pressures of the heart at high altitudes.13,23,24 However, a closer analysis of invasively measured stroke volume and filling pressures shows that hypovolemia-induced decrease in preload is unlikely to account for the decreased maximal cardiac output.24 Further evidence against this mechanism is provided by the observations that plasma volume expansion does not consistently increase maximal cardiac output and VO2max20,47 and that correction of hypoxemia by supplemental oxygen rapidly increases maximal cardiac output.13,23,24 There is a report of a 9% increase in VO2max with the administration of 300 mL of 6% hydroxyethyl starch in 8 subjects at the simulated altitude of 6000 m.44 This could not be confirmed in another study in 8 normal subjects acclimatized at the altitude of 5260 m and given 1 L of 6% dextran.47 The apparent contradiction between these 2 studies is probably related to different severities of hypovolemia, and thus, different preloadrecruitable stroke volume. Blood viscosity Hematocrit increases at altitude, initially because of hemoconcentration, then because of increased erythropoiesis after approximately 2 weeks.28,42,43 Increased hematocrit at high altitude increases the viscosity of the blood. This could theoretically decrease cardiac output.48 However, isovolumic hemodilution does not increase Fig 6. Mean values of stroke volume (SV) as a function of oxygen uptake (VO2) at sea level (barometric pressure [PB], 760 mm Hg) and at altitude (PB, 450 mm Hg) with supplemental carbon dioxide (CO2) in 4 healthy subjects (left) and without supplemental CO2 in 3 healthy subjects (right). Altitude exposure was associated with a decreased SV at rest and at exercise and a decrease in maximal VO2. Supplemental CO2 increased stroke volume at rest and at exercise (after Grover et al41). 460 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 49,50 VO2max and increases only slightly maximal cardiac output and stroke volume at high altitude.50 The observation that supplemental oxygen improves maximal exercise capacity and cardiac output at altitude13,23,24 strongly argues against a possible limiting effect of blood viscosity in normal subjects at a high altitude. Pulmonary hypertension Hypoxia induces pulmonary vasoconstriction, but the resulting hypoxic pulmonary hypertension is usually mild, with mean pulmonary artery pressures usually around 25 mm Hg, a bit more in acclimatized lowlanders, a bit less in native high-altitude inhabitants.8 It is nevertheless possible that mild hypoxic pulmonary hypertension contributes to altitude-related limitation in exercise capacity. Ghofrani et al9 showed that the intake of the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor sildenafil to decrease pulmonary vascular resistance in healthy subjects either acutely exposed to normobaric hypoxia at sea level, or acclimatized to more chronic hypobaric hypoxia at the base camp of Mount Everest, around 5200 m, decreased systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and increased maximal cardiac output (measured noninvasively) and workload. In that study, sildenafil also improved arterial oxygenation, so that improved maximal exercise capacity could have been accounted for, at least in part, by an increased arterial oxygen content. This was shown in a similar design subsequent study on healthy volunteer studies at 5000 m on the slopes of Mount Chimborazo (Ecuador).51 Furthermore, the efficacy of sildenafil to improve hypoxic exercise capacity appeared to decrease over time.9,51 However, repetition of these experiments in acute normobaric hypoxia with inhibition of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction by the endothelin receptor antagonist bosentan, consistently showed a 20% to 25% inhibition of hypoxia-related decrease in exercise capacity as measured by maximal workload or VO2max.52 Partial restoration of VO2max in that study was tightly correlated to decreased Fig 7. Relationship between bosentan-induced changes in maximal oxygen uptake (ΔVO2max) and resting systolic pulmonary artery pressure (ΔsPpa) in 11 volunteers breathing a fraction of inspired O2 of 0.12. Acute hypoxia had increased sPpa from 24 ± 1 to 35 ± 1 mm Hg (mean ± SE) and decreased VO2max from 47 ± 6 to 35 ± 5 mL/kg per minute. Bosentan intake decreased sPpa to 30 ± 2 mm Hg and restored VO2max to 39 ± 7 mL/kg per minute. Fig 8. Oxygen uptake (VO2) as a function of venous PO2 (PvO2) according to the equations of convectional O2 transport (Fick principle, VO2 = cardiac output × arteriovenous O2 content difference = Q × [CaO2 − CvO2]) and diffusional O2 transport (Fick law of diffusion, VO2 = D × PvO2, mitochondrial PO2 around 1-2 mm Hg, neglected, and capillary PO2 assumed equal to PvO2). The coupling between the 2 O2 transport systems can be modeled to occur at a lower Q (from A to B) because of reduction in convectional oxygen transport in hypoxia. An adaptational increase in the diffusional oxygen transport (increased D, or slope of VO2 vs PvO2) could theoretically occur in hypoxia (from B to C), but this has not been demonstrated (after study by Wagner54). systolic PAP (echocardiography) without change in oxygen saturation (Fig 7). Preventive intake of dexamethasone or tadalafil also decreased systolic PAP (echocardiography) and improved VO2max in subjects with a previous high-altitude lung edema and a strong pulmonary vasoconstrictor response to hypoxia, who rapidly ascended to the altitude of 4559 m in the Italian Alps.53 Decreased peripheral demand Because most of the decrease in maximal cardiac output at high altitude cannot be explained by changes in blood volume, viscosity, contractility, increased pulmonary vascular resistance, or autonomic nervous system tone, Wagner hypothesized that hypoxic exposure would be associated with a decreased peripheral demand resulting from the matching between diffusive and convective oxygen transport systems at a lower arterial oxygenation.54 This “passive hypothesis” is illustrated in Fig 8. Thus, VO2 is determined not only by the product of cardiac output (Q) and the arteriovenous oxygen content difference (CaO2 − CvO2) but also by the product of a diffusion constant D and venous PO2 (an acceptable estimation of capillary PO2, whereas mitochondrial PO2 neglected as being close to zero). Because an increase in PvO2 increases VO2 by an increased diffusional transport of oxygen but decreases VO2 by a decreased convectional transport of oxygen, a graphical analysis shows that the 2 oxygen transport systems must be coupled at a unique value of VO2 and PvO2. A decrease in arterial oxygen content in hypoxia is necessarily associated with a coupling of the oxygen transport system at a lower VO2—or a lower cardiac output. Oxygen uptake could theoretically be at least partly restored by a series of adaptive changes to increase the diffusional transport of oxygen (the slope of the VO2 − R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 PvO2 relationship). These could include a decreased muscle fiber diameter and or an increased capillarity, to decrease the distance of diffusion, an increase in myoglobin content, or decreased capillary red blood cell velocity (because of increased viscosity). None of the adaptive changes in diffusional oxygen transport have been demonstrated to occur with chronic hypoxic exposure. There has been no report of any pharmacologic intervention to increase the diffusional transport of oxygen. Conclusion Thus, maximal cardiac output in hypoxia is difficult to manipulate. The only interventions reported to increase maximal cardiac output in hypoxia are supplemental carbon dioxide, plasma volume expansion, hemodilution, and a pharmacologic decrease in pulmonary vascular resistance.9,41,49,51-53 The associated improvement in VO2max is variable. The only interventions reported to increase both maximal cardiac output and VO2max are plasma volume expansion (in case of severe hypovolemia) and specific pharmacologic pulmonary vasodilator interventions. Cardiac function Invasive hemodynamic studies in hypoxic healthy volunteers have understandably been limited to right heart catheterizations. This approach has provided valid cardiac output and pulmonary vascular pressure measurements at rest and at exercise but cannot provide a full assessment of ventricular pump function. Further insight has been provided by progress in echocardiographic evaluations. Echocardiography was used in 8 volunteers progressively decompressed in 40 days to the simulated altitude of Mount Everest (Operation Everest II), for measurements of LV volumes and evaluation of systolic function by peak systolic (brachial artery sphygmomanometry) vs end-systolic volume (echocardiography) relationships. This is a surrogate for completely invasive end-systolic elastance measurements as a gold standard of loadindependent contractility. The results showed a decrease in the volumes of both the left ventricle and the right ventricle, compatible with hypovolemia, but a normal ejection fraction that increased adequately at exercise. As shown in Fig 5, the ratio of peak systolic pressure to endsystolic volume at rest and at exercise increased at all altitudes, indicating enhanced contractility, up to the simulated altitude of approximately 8400 m.40 Thus, contractility appeared to be remarkably preserved in healthy subjects at high altitudes, indicating excellent tolerance of the normal myocardium to extremes possible environmental oxygen deprivation. 461 Additional resting echocardiographic measurements were reported in a similar series of experiments in 8 healthy volunteers at simulated altitudes of 5000 m to 8000 m (Operation Everest III).55 Heart rate increased at all altitudes accompanied by a decrease in stroke volume, and cardiac output remained unchanged. Mitral flow peak E velocity decreased, peak A velocity increased, and the E/A ratio decreased, suggesting an alteration in diastolic function. The isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) tended to increase, but this did not achieve significance. There was no increase in estimated LV filling pressure. Pulmonary artery pressure increased, with a peak transtricuspid gradient calculated from the maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation to an average of 40 mm Hg at 8000 m. Assuming a right atrial pressure of 5 mm Hg, this allows for a calculation of a systolic PAP of 45 mm Hg, and a mean PAP of 30 mm Hg. Left ventricular endsystolic and end-diastolic volumes decreased, and there was also a decrease in end-diastolic right ventricular (RV) volume. The ratio of RV to LV end-diastolic volumes tended to increase, but this was not significant. The LV ejection fraction and percentage of fractional shortening tended to increase, but this was not significant. Altogether, these measurements confirmed previously reported mild pulmonary hypertension, preserved LV contractility, and decreased preload of both ventricles but showed an abnormal LV filling pattern with decreased early filling and greater contribution of atrial contraction, without elevation of LV end-diastolic pressure. The authors thought that these LV diastolic changes could be explained by the combined effects of tachycardia and reduced preload, with possibly also effects of ventricular interdependence or hypoxia. Left ventricular diastolic function was further explored with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) in 41 healthy volunteers who ascended in 24 hours to the altitude of 4559 m in the Italian Alps.56 The transtricuspid gradient increased from 16 to 44 mm Hg, allowing for the calculation of a mean PAP of 32 mm Hg. The transmitral E/A decreased from 1.4 to 1.1, due to a significant increase in the A wave. The E/A ratio and the transtricuspid gradient were inversely correlated. The diastolic mitral annular motion pattern measured by TDI showed similar changes. The authors speculated that the observed mitral E/A changes would reflect an adaptive increase in atrial contraction rather than an alteration in diastolic function. A complete evaluation RV and LV function by Doppler echocardiography with TDI was reported in 25 healthy volunteers acutely breathing a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.12.57 For a better understanding of the contribution of hypoxia-induced sympathetic nervous system activation, the authors also evaluated in normoxia the effects of lowdose dobutamine titrated to reproduce the same increase in heart rate. Hypoxia and dobutamine increased the 462 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 transtricuspid gradient to the same extent, from 17 to, respectively, 36 and 33 mm Hg (P nonsignificant, hypoxia vs dobutamine), showing the flow dependency of systolic PAP. The acceleration time of pulmonary arterial flow, corrected for the ejection time, decreased from 0.52 to 0.37 in hypoxia and remained unchanged at 0.53 with dobutamine, underscoring the validity of this measurement as an internal control for the diagnosis of increased PAP at increased flow. Both hypoxia and dobutamine increased LV ejection fraction, isovolumic contraction velocity, acceleration, and systolic wave velocity (S) at the mitral annulus, indicating enhanced systolic function. Dobutamine had similar effects on RV indices of systolic function. Hypoxia did not change RV area shortening fraction, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), isovolumic contraction velocity, isovolumic contraction acceleration, and S wave at the tricuspid annulus. Regional longitudinal wall motion analysis revealed that S, systolic strain, and strain rate were not affected by hypoxia and increased by dobutamine on the RV free wall and interventricular septum but increased by both dobutamine and hypoxia on the LV lateral wall. Hypoxia increased IVRT corrected for the RR interval at both annuli, delayed the onset of the E wave at the tricuspid annulus, and decreased mitral and tricuspid inflow and annuli E/A. Dobutamine shortened the tricuspid annulus IVRT corrected for RR and decreased tricuspid but not mitral E/A (Fig 9). Altogether, these results suggested that short-term hypoxic exposure is associated with a preserved RV systolic function, either sympathetically mediated or homeometric adaptation to mild pulmonary hypertension. Early RV diastolic changes probably reflected an increased afterload. Changes in diastolic filling patterns of both ventricles and increased LV contractility would be essentially explained by acute hypoxia-induced activation of the sympathetic nervous system. These measurements were most recently repeated in 15 healthy high-altitude inhabitants of the Bolivian altiplano, at approximately 4000 m, as compared to age and body surface area-matched acclimatized lowlanders.58 Acute exposure to high altitude in lowlanders caused an increase in mean PAP, to 20 to 25 mm Hg, decreased RV and LV E/A with a prolonged IVRT of the RV, an increased RV performance (Tei) index, and maintained RV systolic function as estimated by TAPSE and tricuspid annulus S wave. This profile was essentially unchanged after acclimatization and ascending to 4850 m, except for a higher PAP. The natives presented with relatively lower PAP and higher oxygen saturation (pulse oximetry) but more pronounced alteration in indices of diastolic function of both ventricles, a decreased LV ejection fraction, decreased TAPSE and tricuspid annulus S wave, and increased RV Tei index. The estimated LV filling pressure Fig 9. Mean pulsed-TDI isovolumic contraction velocity (ICV), systolic ejection (S), IVRT, early (E) and late (A) diastolic waves, recorded at the tricuspid annulus in 19 subjects in normoxia, in acute hypoxia, or with a dobutamine infusion in normoxia. *P b .05 compared to normoxic baseline. The increase in heart rate was similar during hypoxia test or dobutamine infusion. Hypoxia did not change ICV, S, and E and increased A and IVRT. Dobutamine increased ICV, S, and A; did not change E; and decreased IVRT. Sample recordings in a 25-year-old woman (right). After study by Huez et al.57 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 was somewhat lower in high-altitude natives. Thus, the cardiac adaptation to high altitude appeared qualitatively similar, with however slight but significant deterioration of indices of both systolic and diastolic function in highaltitude natives, in spite of less marked pulmonary hypertension and better oxygenation. The authors explained these results by combined effects of a lesser degree of sympathetic nervous system activation, relative hypovolemia, and may be some negative inotropic effects of a long lasting hypoxic exposure. The Bolivian subjects live in less favored economic conditions, and this is known to be associated with an increased prevalence of cardiovascular diseases. However, none of the Bolivian subjects included in the aforementioned study was a smoker or presented with cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, or obesity. The prevalence of cardiovascular conditions has been reported repeatedly to be lower in the South American altiplanos than in North America or Western Europe.7 Echocardiographic measurements have also been reported in a study on high-altitude Peruvian dwellers with a diagnosis of Monge's disease.59 This form of chronic mountain sickness, predominantly reported in South America, is defined by the combination of excessive polycythemia, fluid retention, and relative hypoventilation, accompanied by an increase in PAP in proportion to decreased arterial oxygenation.8 The patients with 463 Monge's disease presented with transtricuspid gradients at an average of 34 mm Hg, which is in the range reported in acclimatized lowlanders, and an RV dilatation with an increased Tei index to an average of 0.54, higher than reported in both acclimatized lowlanders and healthy highaltitude inhabitants. The authors excluded the diagnosis of heart failure clinically and on the basis of preserved indices of RV and LV systolic function. However, a higher RV Tei index in patients with Monge's disease may reflect a more important alteration of RV function. A small percentage of otherwise normal subjects present with a constitutively increased pulmonary vascular reactivity to hypoxia and are prone to the development of lung edema when rapidly taken to high altitudes.60 Recent progress in portable Doppler echocardiography has revealed that these subjects may present with severe hypoxic pulmonary hypertension inducing high-altitude acute right heart failure, characterized by a dilatation of right heart chambers with a septal shift, dilatation of the inferior vena cava with loss of inspiratory collapse, indicating increased right atrial pressure, and RV TDI disclosing an apically prominent “postsystolic shortening” wave (Fig 10). This specific TDI aspect of RV postsystolic shortening reflects asynchronic contraction the RV, much like recently reported by magnetic resonance imaging studies in severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.61 Fig 10. High-altitude right heart failure in previously healthy subject after arrival in La Paz, 3600 m, and touring on the Bolivian altiplano at altitudes around 4000 m. Maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (A) is suggestive of severe pulmonary hypertension, with pressures around 40 mm Hg; there is dilation of the right ventricle with abnormal eccentricity index (B); RV apex postsystolic shortening; and dilatation of the inferior vena cava with loss of inspiratory collapsibility. These aspects indicate right heart failure on hypoxic pulmonary hypertension (after study by Heath and Williams7). 464 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 In summary, acute hypoxic exposure is generally associated with mild pulmonary hypertension, increased heart rate, decreased stroke volume, increased indices of LV systolic function, maintained indices of RV systolic function, and altered diastolic filling patterns of both ventricles without increased filling pressures. These changes are explained by the combined effects of increased PAP, sympathetic nervous system activation, and homeometric adaptation of RV function to afterload and hypovolemia. Cardiac function adaptation to even milder pulmonary hypertension in high-altitude natives is qualitatively similar, even though indices of both systolic and diastolic function of both ventricles appear to be somewhat depressed. These differences are explained by a different level of sympathetic nervous tone, decreased preload, and possibly direct cardiac effects of lifelong oxygen deprivation. The coronary circulation The coronary oxygen extraction is normally very high, with resulting coronary sinus venous PO2 being one of the lowest in the body. Thus, the hypoxic myocardium must rely on an increased oxygen delivery, as extraction cannot much increase. Accordingly, acute hypoxic exposure has long ago been shown to be associated with an increased coronary blood flow.62 This observation has been recently confirmed.63 Acute low oxygen breathing to simulate an altitude of 4500 m in healthy subjects increased coronary blood flow so that coronary oxygen delivery was maintained. In these same experiments, there was an exercise-induced hyperemia by approximately 40%, suggesting preserved coronary flow reserve. However, more prolonged stays at altitude have been shown to decrease coronary blood flow, in high-altitude inhabitants as well as in recently acclimatized lowlanders.64,65 Corresponding coronary flow reserve measurements have not yet been reported. However, epidemiologic data and clinical experience on the South American altiplanos indirectly suggest that coronary flow reserve would be maintained in more chronic hypoxic conditions as well, even though oxygen delivery becomes probably more dependent on arterial oxygen content, which is increased with polycythemia, than on coronary flow. These observations are in keeping with preserved contractility40,57-59 and absence of symptoms or electrocardiographic changes suggestive of myocardial ischemia in healthy volunteers exposed to simulated high altitudes.66,67 Altogether, the data support the notion that the tolerance of the normal myocardium to hypoxic exposure is generally excellent. However, altitude exposure may be an unwelcome stress in patients with preexisting cardiac conditions. Exposure to moderate hypoxia to simulate an altitude of 2500 m has been shown to be associated with a decrease in coronary flow reserve by 18% in patients with coronary heart disease as compared to an increase of 10% in healthy controls.63 Altitude exposes the coronary circulation to the combined effects of ambient hypoxia, exercise, cold, hypocapnia because of hyperventilation, and increased sympathetic nervous system tone as possible causes of myocardial ischemia.60 Therefore, patients with coronary artery disease are advised to avoid physical exercise or uncomfortable traveling at altitude and to avoid rapid ascents to altitudes higher than 2000 to 2500 m. Coronary artery disease appears to be less common in high-altitude inhabitants as compared to sea level controls, but this may be related to a lower prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors.7 Epidemiologic studies in New Mexico at altitudes ranging from 900 to 2100 m indicate an altitude-related decreased mortality rate for coronary heart disease, which the authors attributed to healthier lifestyle with relatively more physical exercise at altitude.68 Blood pressure Blood pressure either does not change or increases slightly in response a short-term hypoxic exposure.10,30,51-53,55-57,69 Increased blood pressure during altitude acclimatization is entirely explained by sympathetic nervous system activation.69 Permanent residence at high altitudes is associated with a decrease in both systolic and diastolic blood pressures.70,71 There is some evidence that mild systemic hypertension improves with prolonged altitude stays and that the prevalence of hypertension is lower in high-altitude inhabitants as compared to sea level controls.71 Syncope occasionally occurs at high altitudes in otherwise healthy individuals.72 This has been reported in young adults, often within 24 hours of arrival at altitude, and tentatively explained by a sympathetic-parasympathetic imbalance. High altitude-induced syncope tends to recur, and in the author's experience, may be prevented by drugs effective in the treatment of acute mountain sickness such as acetazolamide or corticosteroids. The electrocardiogram The electrocardiogram at altitude shows variably increased amplitude of P wave, right QRS axis deviation, and signs of RV overload and hypertrophy.65,66 Sometimes, an electrocardiogram may remain unchanged up to extreme altitudes, as illustrated by the normal tracing taken on Mrs Phantog, the deputy leader of the successful 1975 Chinese ascent of Mount Everest.73 Altitude and exercise may be associated with supraventricular and ventricular premature beats, but the limited data available R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 do not show evidence of an increased incidence of lifethreatening arrhythmias in either normal subjects or patients with heart disease.60 Conclusions The adaptation of the cardiovascular system to altitude is variable, depending on individual predisposition and rate of ascent, but follows a rather reproducible pattern, characterized by a normal cardiac output at rest but a decreased maximal cardiac output, and a decreased stroke volume in all circumstances. Much of the individual variability is dependent upon the severity of associated pulmonary hypertension, which is most often mild but may be severe in a proportion of cases. Maximal aerobic exercise capacity is essentially explained by the adaptive matching of convectional and diffusional oxygen transport systems but may be modulated by pulmonary vascular resistance. Attempts at disturbing any of the determinants of the cardiovascular adaptation to altitude is met by little success, which shows, as Jack Reeves liked to say, how difficult it is to fool Mother Nature.74 Acknowledgments Pascale Jespers and Amira Khouiled helped in the preparation of this report. Massimiliano Mulè translated Angelo Mosso's work on the cardiac adaptation to altitude. Critical comments of Peter Wagner were greatly appreciated. Statement of Conflict of Interest The author declares that there no conflicts of interest. References 1. Moso A: La stanchezza del cuore. Fisiologia dell'uomo sulle Alpi. Molano: Fraztelli Treves, Editori; 1897. 2. Hecht HH, Kuida H, Lange RL, et al: Clinical features and hemodynamic observations in altitude-dependent right heart failure of cattle. Am J Med 1962;32:171-183. 3. Monge M: La Enfermedad de Los Andes. Sindromes eritremicos. Lima, Peru: Annales de la Facultad de Medicina; 1928. 4. Anand IS, Malhotra R, Chandershekhar Y, et al: Adultsubacute mountain sickness: a syndrome of congestive heart failure in man at very high altitude. Lancet 1990;335:561-565. 5. Pei SX, Chen XJ, Si Ren BZ, et al: Chronic mountain sickness in Tibet. Q J Med 1989;266:555-574. 6. Huez S, Faoro V, Vachiery JL, et al: Images in cardiovascular medicine. High-altitude-induced right-heart failure. Circulation 2007;115:308-309. 7. Heath D, Williams DR: Heart and coronary circulation. HighAltitude Medicine and Pathology. 2nd ed. London: Butterworths; 1989. p. 186-195. 465 8. Penaloza D, Arias-Stella J: The heart and pulmonary circulation at high altitudes. Healthy highlanders and chronic mountain sickness. Circulation 2007;115:1132-1146. 9. Ghofrani HA, Reichenberger F, Kohstall MG, et al: Sildenafil increased exercise capacity during hypoxia at low altitudes and at mount Everest base camp: a randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled crossover trial. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:169-177. 10. Naeije R, Mélot C, Mols P, et al: Effects of vasodilators on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in normal man. Chest 1982;82: 404-410. 11. Klausen K: Cardiac output in man at rest and work during and after acclimatization to 3,800 m. J Appl Physiol 1966;21:609-616. 12. Vogel JA, Harris CW: Cardiopulmonary responses of resting man during early exposure to high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1967;22: 1124-1128. 13. Hartley LH, Alexander JK, Modelski M, et al: Subnormal cardiac output at rest and during exercise in residents at 3100 m altitude. J Appl Physiol 1967;23:839-848. 14. Banchero N, Sime F, Penaloza D, et al: Pulmonary pressure, cardiac output, and arterial oxygen saturation during exercise at high altitude and at sea level. Circulation 1968;33:249-262. 15. Vogel JA, Hartley H, Cruz JC: Cardiac output during exercise in altitude natives at sea level and high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1974;36: 173-176. 16. Rahn H, Otis AB: Man's respiratory response during and after acclimatization to high altitude. Am J Physiol 1949;157:445-462. 17. Milnor WR, Bergel DH, Bargainer JD: Hydraulic power associated with pulmonary flow and its relation to heart rate. Circ Res 1966;19: 467-480. 18. Cerritelli P: Gas exchange at high altitude. In: West JB, editor. Pulmonary gas exchange, vol II. New York: Academic Press; 1980. p. 97-147. 19. Ekblom B, Hout R, Stein EM, et al: Effect of changes in arterial O2 content on circulation and physical performance. J Appl Physiol 1975;39:71-75. 20. Alexander JK, Hartley LH, Modelski M, et al: Reduction of stroke volume during exercise in man following ascent to 3100 m altitude. J Appl Physiol 1967;23:849-858. 21. Wagner PD, Gale GE, Moon RE, et al: Pulmonary gas exchange in humans exercising at sea level and simulated altitude. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:260-270. 22. Naeije R, Mélot C, Niset G, et al: Improved arterial oxygenation by a pharmacological increase in chemosensitivity during hypoxic exercise in normal subjects. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:1666-1671. 23. Pugh IGCE: Cardiac output in muscular exercise at 5800 m (19,000 ft). J Appl Physiol 1964;19:441-447. 24. Reeves JT, Groves BM, Sutton JR, et al: Operation Everest II: preservation of cardiac function at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1987; 63:531-539. 25. Calbet JA, Boushel R, Radegran G, et al: Determinants of maximal oxygen uptake in severe acute hypoxia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003;284:R291-R303. 26. Calbet JA, Boushel R, Radegran G, et al: Why is VO2 max after altitude acclimatization still reduced despite normalization of arterial O2 content? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2003;284: R304-R316. 27. Cunningham WL, Becker EJ, Kreuzer F: Catecholamines in plasma and urine at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1965;20:607-610. 28. Bogaard HJ, Hopkins SR, Yamaya Y, et al: Role of autonomic nervous system in the reduced maximal cardiac output at altitude. J Appl Physiol 2002;93:271-279. 29. Mazzeo BS, Brooks GA, Butterfield GE, et al: Acclimatization to high altitude increases muscle sympathetic activity both at rest and during exercise. Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol 1995;269:R201-R207. 466 R. Naeije / Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 52 (2010) 456–466 30. Hansen J, Sander M: Sympathetic neural overactivity in healthy humans after prolonged exposure to hypobaric hypoxia. J Physiol 2003;546: 921-929. 31. Richalet JP, Larmignat P, Rathat C, et al: Decreased human cardiac response to isoproterenol infusion in acute and chronic hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 1988;65:1957-1961. 32. Kacimi R, Richalet JP, Corsin A, et al: Hypoxia-induced downregulation of β-adrenergic responses in rat heart. J Appl Physiol 1992;73:1377-1382. 33. Kacemi R, Richalet JP, Crozatier B: Hypoxia-induced differential modulation of adenosinergic and muscarinic receptors in the rat heart. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:1123-1138. 34. Hartley RH, Alexander JK, Modelski M, et al: Reduction in maximal heart rate at altitude and its reversal with atropine. J Appl Physiol 1974;36:362-365. 35. Boushel R, Calbet JA, Radegran G, et al: Parasympathetic neural activity accounts for the lowering of exercise heart rate at high altitude. Circulation 2001;104:1785-1791. 36. Moore LG, Cymerman A, Shao-Yung H, et al: Propranolol does not impair exercise oxygen uptake in normal man at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1986;61:1935-1941. 37. Noakes TD: Physiological models to understand exercise fatigue and the adaptations that predict or enhance athletic performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2000;10:119-123. 38. Tucker CE, James WE, Berry MA, et al: Depressed myocardial function in the goat at high altitude. J Appl Physiol 1976;41:356-361. 39. Silverman HS, Wei S, Haigney MC, et al: Myocyte adaptation to chronic hypoxia and development of tolerance to subsequent acute severe hypoxia. Circ Res 1997;80:699-707. 40. Suarez J, Alexander JK, Houston CS: Enhanced left ventricular systolic performance at high altitude during Operation Everest II. Am J Cardiol 1987;60:137-142. 41. Grover RF, Reeves JT, Maher JT, et al: Maintained stroke volume but impaired arterial oxygenation in man at high altitude with supplemental CO2. Circ Res 1978;38:391-396. 42. Pugh LGCE: Blood volume and hemoglobin concentration at altitudes above 18,000 ft (5,500 m). J Physiol 1964;170:344-354. 43. Grover RF, Selland MA, McCullough RG, et al: Beta-adrenergic blockade does not prevent polycythemia or decrease plasma volume in men at 4300 m altitude. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998;77:264-270. 44. Robach P, Déchaux M, Jarrot S, et al: Operation Everest III: role of plasma volume expansion on VO2max during prolonged altitude exposure. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:29-37. 45. Poulsen TD, Klausen K, Richalet JP, et al: Plasma volume in acute hypoxia: comparison of a carbon monoxide rebreathing method and dye dilution with Evan's blue. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998;77:457-461. 46. Sawka MN, Young AJ, Rock PB, et al: Altitude acclimatization and blood volume: effects of exogenous erythrocyte volume expansion. J Appl Physiol 1996;81:636-642. 47. Calbet JAL, Rädegrän G, Boushel R, et al: Plasma volume expansion does not increase cardiac output or VO2max in lowlanders acclimatized to altitude. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004; 287:H1214-H1224. 48. Richardson TQ, Guyton AC: Effects of polycythemia andanemia on cardiac output and other circulatory factors. Am J Physiol 1959;197: 1667-1670. 49. Horstman D, Weiskoff R, Jackson RE: Work capacity during 3-week sojourn at 4300 m.: effects of relative polycythemia. J Appl Physiol 1980;49:311-318. 50. Sarnquist F, Scoene R, Hackett P, et al: Hemodilution of polycythemic mountaineers; effects of relative polycythemia. Aviat Space Environm Med 1986;57:313-317. 51. Faoro V, Lamotte M, Deboeck G, et al: Effects of sildenafil on exercise capacity in hypoxic normal subjects. High Alt Med Biol 2007;8:155-163. 52. Faoro V, Boldingh S, Moreels M, et al: Naeije. Bosentan decreases pulmonary vascular resistance and increases exercise capacity in hypoxia. Chest 2009;135:1215-1222. 53. Fischler M, Maggiorini M, Dorschner L, et al: Dexamethasone but not tadalafil improves exercise capacity in adults prone to high altitude pulmonary edema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009;180:346-352. 54. Wagner PD: Gas exchange and peripheral diffusion limitation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992;24:54-58. 55. Boussuges A, Molenat F, Burnet H, et al: Operation Everest III (Comex '97): Modifications of cardiac function secondary to altitudeinduced hypoxia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:264-270. 56. Allemann Y, Rotter M, Hutter D, et al: Impact of acute hypoxic pulmonary hypertension on LV diastolic function in healthy mountaineers at high altitude. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2004;286:H856-862. 57. Huez S, Retailleau K, Unger P, et al: Right and left ventricular adaptation to hypoxia: a tissue Doppler imaging study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2005;289:H1391-H1398. 58. Huez S, Faoro V, Guénard H, et al: Echocardiographic and tissue Doppler imaging of cardiac adaptation to high altitude in native highlanders versus acclimatized lowlanders. Am J Cardiol 2009;103: 1605-1609. 59. Maignan M, Privat C, Leon-Velarde F, et al: Pulmonary pressure and cardiac function in chronic mountain sickness patients. Chest 2008; 135:499-504. 60. Bärtsch P, Gibbs S: Effect of altitude on the heart and the lungs. Circulation 2007;116:2191-2202. 61. Marcus JT, Gan CT, Zwanenburg JJ, et al: Interventricular mechanical asynchrony in pulmonary arterial hypertension: left-toright delay in peak shortening is related to right ventricular overload and left ventricular underfilling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51: 750-757. 62. Hilton R, Eichholtz F: The influence of some chemical factors on the coronary circulation. J Physiol 1925;9:413-425. 63. Wyss CA, Koepfli P, Fretz G, et al: Influence of altitude exposure on coronary flow reserve. Circulation 2003;108:1202-1207. 64. Grover RF, Lufschanowski R, Alexander JK: Alterations in the coronary circulation of man following ascent to 3100 m altitude. J Appl Physiol 1976;41:832-838. 65. Moret PR: Coronary blood flow and myocardial metabolism in man at high altitude. High altitude physiology: cardiac and respiratory aspects. Ciba; 1971. p. 131. 66. Karliner JS, Sarnquist FF, Graber DJ, et al: The electrocardiogram at extreme altitude: experience on Mt Everest. Am Heart J 1985;109: 505-513. 67. Malconian M, Rock P, Hutgren H, et al: The electrocardiogram at rest and exercise during a simulated ascent of Mt Everest (Operation Everest II). Am J Cardiol 1990;65:1475-1480. 68. Mortimer EA, Monson RR, MacMahon B: Reduction in mortality from coronary heart disease in men residing at high altitude. N Engl J Med 1977;296:581-585. 69. Wolfel E, Selland M, Mazzeo R, et al: Sympathetic hypertension at 4300 m is related to sympathoadrenal activity. J Appl Physiol 1994; 76:1643-1650. 70. Hultgren HN: Effect of high altitude on cardiovascular diseases. J Wilderness Med 1992;3:301-308. 71. Ruiz L, Penaloza D: Altitude and hypertension. Mayo Clin Proc 1977;52:442-445. 72. Westendorp RG, Blauw GJ, Frolich M, et al: Hypoxic syncope. Aviat Space Environ Med 1997;68:410-414. 73. Zhongyuan S, Xuehan N, Pengguo H, et al: Comparison of physiological responses to hypoxia at high altitudes between highlanders and lowlanders. Sci Sin 1979;22:1455-1469. 74. Moore LG, Grover RF: Jack Reeves and his science. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2006;151:96-108.