Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Colorectal Cancer: The Past, Present, and Future of Cancer Medicine Christopher Lieu, MD Director, Colorectal Medical Oncology University of Colorado Cancer Center Disclosures • Consulting – Merrimack Pharmaceuticals – Merck Pharmaceuticals • Data Safety Monitoring Board – Immune Concepts What You Need To Know • Colorectal Cancer 101 • Where have we been? • Where are we now? • Where are we going? Colorectal Cancer 101 Why is Cancer Important? • 1 in 3 people will GET cancer • More than 30% of cancer could be prevented mainly by not using tobacco, having a healthy diet, being physically active and preventing infections that may cause cancer (World Health Organization) • Less than 10% of all cancer is inherited • The annual cost of treating cancer is $110 billion per year *Source: American Cancer Society Diagnosis/Staging • Labs – CBC, CMP, CEA • Procedures – Colonoscopy with biopsy – Flexible sigmoidoscopy with biopsy • Radiology – – – – CT scan Chest/Abdomen/Pelvis (Chest is controversial) PET/CT (?) Liver MRI (?) http://www.uptodate.com/contents/image?imageKey=GAST%2F83618&topicKey=ON C%2F2496&rank=1~150&source=see_link&search=colorectal+cancer&utdPopup=true Factors Influencing Treatment Selection Tumor • Resectability • Biology • Symptoms Patient • • • • Age General Health Other Diseases Preference Treatment • Efficacy • Toxicity • Availability Surgical Resection: Treatment of choice for early-stage colorectal cancer Radiation Therapy: Used prior to surgery or sometimes to treat metastases Who First Described Cancer? The first description of cancer? • 2625 BC • Egyptian Edwin Smith Papyrus The Edwin Smith Papyrus • Egyptian physician, Imhotep, described a “bulging mass on the breast, large, spreading, and hard” • Total of 8 cases described • Treated with cauterization with a tool known as the “fire drill” • Therapy: “There is none” Early descriptions of cancer • Hippocrates (460 BC – 370 BC) described several kinds of cancer, referring to them with the Greek word carcinos (crab) – The appearance of the cut surface of a solid tumor with “the veins stretched on all sides as the animal the crab has its feet” What causes cancer? Hippocrates – humoral theory • 4 humors affected health – – – – Blood Phlegm Yellow bile Black bile • Suggested that an imbalance of these humors with an excess of black bile could cause cancer Causes of cancer • Zacutus Lusitani (1575-1642) and Nicholas Tulp (1593-1674), doctors in Holland, concluded that cancer was contagious – Based on breast cancer in members of the same household • Scottish surgeon John Hunter (1728-1793) suggested that some cancers might be cured by surgery – Nearly a century later, development of anesthesia prompted regular surgery for “movable” cancers that had not spread to other organs • Virchow (1821-1902) hypothesized that growth could occur in only two ways: either by increasing cell numbers or by increasing cell size – Hyperplasia and hypertrophy – Cancer was a disease of pathological hyperplasia Internal Factors (Genetics, Hormones, Decreased Immunity) External Factors (Tobacco, Chemical, Radiation, Viruses) Initiation Normal Cells Promotion DNA Repair Progression Apoptosis / Cell Death CANCER OVERVIEW History of Chemotherapy Where did cancer drugs come from? German bombing at Bari, Italy December 2, 1943 • Fisherman and residents began to complain of the whiff of burnt garlic and horseradishes in the breeze • Thousands of servicemen and Italian civilians lost their lives in the weeks following the bombing • One of the ships that was bombed was the US Liberty ship John Harvey, which was carrying a secret load of 2,000 M47A1 mustard gas bombs The Bari Incident • Autopsies revealed that white blood cells had vanished in the blood of men and women who initially survived the bombing • The Chemical Warfare Service was created to study war gases • Two scientists, Louis Goodman and Alfred Gilman were contracted to study nitrogen mustard Goodman and Gilman • Animal studies – Injected nitrogen mustard intravenously into rabbits and mice – Normal WBCs and bone marrow disappeared without the toxic vesicant actions • In 1942, they persuaded a thoracic surgeon, Gustaf Lindskog, to treat a 48-year-old male with lymphoma with ten doses of IV mustard, causing a remission • Goodman and Gilman published their findings in 1946 Sidney Farber • Born in 1903 (the 3rd of 14 children) • Pediatric pathologist • The 1940s saw an explosion of therapeutics to treat illnesses with the advent of penicillin • Interested in developing an anti-leukemic drug to treat children with leukemia Sidney Farber • Lucy Wills observed that folic acid could restore the normal genesis of blood in nutrient-deprived patients • Farber’s 1st clinical trial was to inject folic acid into children with leukemia • Farber found that folic acid actually accelerated the progression of leukemia Sidney Farber • In September 6, 1947, Farber began to inject pteroylaspartic acid (PAA – anti-folate) into a twoyear-old male with leukemia – No effect was noted, and the patient continued to worsen • On December 28, Farber received a newer version of the anti-folate called aminopterin • WBC began to drop to nearly 1/6th of its peak value • The patient began walking again and his spleen and liver returned to normal size • Ten of sixteen patients had responded to aminopterin • Five children remained alive 4-6 months after diagnosis Sidney Farber Early Cancer Therapy • When cancer was confined to a local site, it was understood that a cancer could potentially be cured • William Halsted at Johns Hopkins pioneered the radical mastectomy in the 1890s • The discovery of x-rays in the early 1900s lead to radiation being used to kill tumor cells at local sites – Emil Grubbe (21-year-old medical student) gave an elderly woman with breast cancer radiation using an improvised x-ray tube Case Presentation – Colorectal Cancer • 62-year-old male presents with rectal bleeding • Colonoscopy reveals a malignant appearing mass in the sigmoid colon • Staging CT reveals hypodensities in the liver concerning for metastases Case Presentation – Colorectal Cancer Standard of Care Treatment until 2000 • Treatment: 5-fluorouracil • Response rate = 10-15% • Overall survival = 8-12 months Where are we now? The current state of Colorectal Cancer Therapy Childhood ALL: Improvements in Survival 100 1996-2000 (n=3421) % 1989-1995 (n=5121) 80 S u r v i v a l 1983-1988 (n=3711) 60 1978-1983 (n=2984) 1975-1977 (n=1313) 40 1972-1975 (n=936) 20 1970-1972 (n=499) 1968-1970 (n=402) 0 0 2 4 6 8 Years from Study Entry 10 12 Slide courtesy of Lia Gore, MD General Themes of Treatment - Some patients with stage IV disease are cured using multi-disciplinary approaches - surgery, chemo, ablation, radiation - Combination therapy is generally well-tolerated - Biologics have added incremental (and somewhat disappointing) benefit - Era of personalized therapy began with KRAS Surgical Resection of Liver Tumors Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) High frequency alternating current Ionic vibration & heat generation 45°C: Protein denaturation 70°C: Thermal coagulation 100°C: Tissue desiccation Adapted from Minami Y, Kudo M. Int J Hepatol. 2011;doi:10.4061/2011/104685. Laparoscopic RFA of Liver mCRC Outcomes Have Improved With the Evolution of Treatment Options Months 30 25 Median OS 20 15 10 5 0 1980s 1990s 2000s BSC 5-FU Irinotecan1 Capecitabine2 Oxaliplatin3 Bevacizumab4 Cetuximab5,6 Panitumumab7 Aflibercept8 Regorafenib9 1. Cunningham D, et al. Lancet. 1998;352(9138):1413-1418. 2. Van Cutsem E, et al. Br J Cancer. 2004;90(6):1190-1197. 3. Rothenberg M, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(11):2059-2069. 4. Hurwitz H, et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(23):2335-2342. 5. Cunningham D, et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(4):337-345. 6. Van Cutsem E, et al. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1408-1417. 7. Van Cutsem E, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(13):1658-6164. 8. Van Cutsem E et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(28):34993506. 9. Grothey A, et al. Lancet. 2013;381(9863):303-312. Overview of EGFR and VEGFR Growth Signaling Pathways Tumor Cell Endothelial Cell VEGF EGFR Targeted by cetuximab and panitumumab KIT PDGFR-β VEGFR Targeted by bevacizumab and aflibercept* Targeted by ramucirumab RAS Pl3K RAF BRAF AKT MEK mTOR ERK ONCOGENESIS ANGIOGENESIS TUMOR MICROENVIRONMENT *aflibercept also targets PIGF EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; PDGFR, platelet-derived growth factor receptor; VEGFR, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor. Krasinskas et al, 2011; Sitohy et al, 2012; Bendardaf et al, 2008; Kitadai et al, 2006; Jayson et al, 2005; FDA News Release. 11 FDA Approved Drugs for Colorectal Cancer “Cytotoxics” 1. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) 2. capecitabine 3. TAS-102 4. irinotecan 5. oxaliplatin Mechanism -> pyrimidine analog -> oral 5-FU pro-drug -> 5-FU drug with metabolism inhibitor -> topoisomerase I inhibitor -> 3rd generation platinum “Biologics/Targeted” 1. cetuximab 2. panitumumab 3. bevacizumab 4. ziv-aflibercept 5. regorafenib 6. ramucirumab Mechanism -> antibody against EGFR -> antibody against EGFR -> antibody against VEGF -> VEGF trap -> tyrosine kinase inhibitor -> antibody against VEGFR2 VEGF= Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor EGFR= Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Colorectal Cancer is Expensive • • • • • • • • • • 5-FU (500 mg/m2) Leucovorin (500 mg/m2) Capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day) Irinotecan (180 mg/m2) / generic Oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) / generic Bevacizumab (5 mg/kg) Cetuximab (250 mg/m2) Panitumumab (6 mg/kg) Aflibercept (4 mg/kg) Regorafenib (160 mg, 3/1) $6 $85 $3,250 $2,300 / $480 $4,190 / $590 $2,560 $5,120 $4,360 $5,380 $5,650 1997: 6 months of 5-FU/LV costs ~$500 2016: 35 months of therapy with combinations costs >$425,000 Recent “progress” in colorectal cancer Progression-Free Survival 1.9 vs. 1.7 months Grothey et al. 2012 GI Cancers Symposium (LBA385) Current Cancer Treatment Strategy: One-size-fits-all Where are we going? The future of Colorectal Cancer Therapy BRAF inhibition in Melanoma BRAF Inhibition in Melanoma Wagle et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011. BRAF Inhibition in Melanoma Wagle et al. J Clin Oncol. 2011. Cancer signaling is complex! Vigil etet al.al.Nature 2010. Vigil NatureRev Rev Cancer Cancer 2010. Advances in Understanding the Genetic Landscape of Cancer • On average, there are ~70 genes mutated per cancer • However, < 20 pathways will actually drive cancer development • Most mutations are harmless Wood et al. Science 2007. Roadmap of Precision Oncology Wnt is upregulated in MEK-resistant CRC cell lines Spreafico et al. Clin Can Res 2013. Targeting MEK and WNT Inhibits Growth in a KRAS Mutant CRC PDX Spreafico et al. Clin Can Res 2013. Immunotherapy 101 Hallmarks of Cancer http://www.researchcancerimmunotherapy.com/images/overview/ evading-immune-destruction/hallmark-cancer.png Types of Immune Therapy Cytokine Therapy eg. IL-2, IFN Immune Checkpoint Blockade eg. CTLA-4, PD1 Vaccine Therapies eg. sipuleucel-T PD-1 and PD-L1 Function as Immune Checkpoints: Prevents Activation http://directorsblog.nih.gov/2015/06/09/a-surprisingmatch-cancer-immunotherapy-and-mismatch-repair/ Number of mutations vary by cancer Alexandrov et al. Nature 2013; 500(1). Clinical Activity of Anti-PD-1 Therapy: Melanoma Baseline: April 13, 2012 April 9, 2013 72-yr-old male with symptomatic progression after bio-chemotherapy, HD IL-2, and ipilimumab UCLA Health. Reproduced with permission. Clinical Activity of Anti-PD-1 Therapy: Lung Cancer http://www.cancerresearch.org/CRI/media/Content/Strategy%20a nd%20Impact/Timeline/2012-anti-PD-1-lung-cancerresponse.jpg?width=697&height=402&ext=.jpg Microsatellite Unstable CRC MSI-high CRC The Importance of Mismatch Repair Wakamatsu et al. J Bio Chem 2010;285: 9762-9769 MSI-high tumors have more mutations What about immunotherapy for microsatellite stable colorectal cancer? Clinical activity and safety of cobimetinib and atezolizumab in colorectal cancer Johanna Bendell,1 Tae Won Kim,2 Boon Cher Goh,3 Jeffrey Wallin,4 Do-Youn Oh,5 Sae-Won Han,5 Carrie Lee,6 Matthew D. Hellmann,7 Jayesh Desai,8 Jeremy Lewin,9 Benjamin J. Solomon,10 Laura Q. Chow,11 Wilson H. Miller Jr,12 Justin Gainor,13 Keith Flaherty,13 Jeffrey Infante,1 Meghna Das Thakur,4 Paul Foster,4 Edward Cha,4 Yung-Jue Bang5 1Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN; 2Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea; 3Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore; 4Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA; 5Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; 6UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill, North Carolina; 7Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; 8Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 9Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada; 10Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; 11University of Washington, Seattle, WA; 12Segal Cancer Center and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada; 13Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA Bendell J, et al. Cobimetinib and atezolizumab in CRC. ASCO 2016 PD-L1 and MEK Inhibition: A Rational Combination • MEK inhibition alone can result in intratumoral T-cell accumulation and MHC I upregulation, and synergizes with an anti-PDL1 agent to promote durable tumor regression1 Class I MHC CD8+ T cell per tumor cell Tumor volume (mm3) P = 0.0024 Control Anti-PDL1 MEKi (38963) MEKi + anti-PDL1 ND MEKi ND MEKi Day • To examine the possible benefits of MEK inhibition with an anti-PDL1 agent, we evaluated cobimetinib + atezolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors MHC, major histocompatibility complex; ND, no drug (vehicle alone). CT26 (KRASmt) CRC models. 1. Ebert et al. Immunity 2016. 65 Bendell J, et al. Cobimetinib and atezolizumab in CRC. ASCO 2016 Maximum SLD Reduction From Baseline, % Efficacy: Change in Tumor Burden 50 40 PD PD PD PD 20 0 -20 TC3 PD PD PD PD-L1 IC status PD NA PD IC0 PD PD SD SD SD PD SD SD PR PR PR PR IC1 IC2 IC3 -40 TC TC TC TC 0 0 NA 0 -60 -80 • • 4 patients had partial responses (confirmed per RECIST v1.1) • Tumor volume reduction was not associated with PD-L1 status: TC3 (n = 1; PD), TC0 (n = 18), NA (n = 4) MSI status of CRC patients was examined by NGS-based scoring: 3 of 4 responders were mismatch-repair proficient (not MSI-H); 1 responder had unknown MSI status and was not evaluable PD-L1 IHC status on tumor cells (TC) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (IC) defined as: TC3 = TC ≥ 50% PD-L1+ cells; IC3 = IC ≥ 10% PD-L1+ cells; TC2 = TC ≥ 5% and < 50% PD-L1+ cells; IC2 = IC ≥ 5% and < 10% PD-L1+ cells; TC1 = TC ≥ 1% and < 5% PD-L1+ cells; IC1 = IC ≥ 1% and < 5% PD-L1+ cells; TC0 = TC < 1% PD-L1+ cells; IC0 = IC < 1% PD-L1+ cells. NA, not available; NGS, next generation sequencing. Efficacy-evaluable patients. 2 patients missing or unevaluable are not included. Data cut-off February 12, 2016. 66 Bendell J, et al. Cobimetinib and atezolizumab in CRC. ASCO 2016 Efficacy: Change in Tumor Burden Over Time Change in Sum of Longest Diameters from Baseline, % PD SD PR/CRa Discontinued atezolizumab New lesion • Median duration of response was not reached (range: 5.4 to 11.1+ mo) • Responses are ongoing in 2 of 4 responding patients Time on Study (mo) aConfirmed per RECIST v1.1. CR, complete response; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. Efficacy-evaluable patients. 2 patients missing or unevaluable are not included. Data cut-off February 12, 2016. 67 Bendell J, et al. Cobimetinib and atezolizumab in CRC. ASCO 2016 There are many checkpoints that regulate immune responses! Pardoll DM. Nat Rev Can 2012;12. Wrap-Up • Treatment for colorectal cancer has improved dramatically – Unprecedented progress in the last decade • Targeted therapies and immunotherapies will change the way we treat colorectal cancer in the future – Finding targets to give the right drugs to the right patients • Research being performed across the world will change the way we think about and treat colorectal cancer Questions