Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Indian Journal of Chemical Technology Vol. 13, March 2006, pp. 135-138 Acetic acid leaching of magnesia from magnesite via calcination Ayhan Demirbas Department of Chemical Engineering, Selcuk University, Campus, 42031 Konya, Turkey Email: [email protected] Received 2 November 2004; revised received 20 November 2005; accepted 16 December 2005 In this study, magnesite mineral was first calcinated between 800-1100 K for an hour and dissolved in acetic acid solutions. The effects of temperature, solid-to-liquid ratio, reaction time, stirring speed and acid concentration on the dissolution rate of magnesia in acetic acid were investigated. It was observed that the dissolution of magnesia increased with increasing temperature, stirring speed, reaction time and acid concentration and decreased with increase in solid-to-liquid ratio. The dissolution process is controlled by pseudo first-order reaction rate. Activation energy for the reaction was calculated as 8.78 (kJ/mol). Keywords: Magnesite, Magnesia, Magnesium acetate, Calcination, Dissolution IPC Code: C04B2/00 Magnesium is the eighth most abundant element and constitutes about 2 percent of the Earth’s crust. It is the third most plentiful element dissolved in seawater, with a concentration averaging 0.13 percent. Although magnesium is found in over 60 minerals, only dolomite, magnesite, brucite, carnallite, and olivine are of commercial importance. Of these minerals, magnesite and dolomite are the largest sources of magnesium and magnesium compounds. Magnesium and magnesium compounds are produced from seawater, well and lake brines and bitterns, as well as from the minerals. Magnesium alloys are used to develope creep-resistant to produce components such as cylinder blocks, engine covers, oil pans, and transmission cases. Magnesia (MgO) is mostly produced by calcinations of magnesite (MgCO3). Magnesite is the main source material for magnesia and magnesium metal. Traditionally, these ores have been treated by pyrometallurgical methods. Magnesite is separated from impurity silica and iron by crushing, grinding, scrubbing, screening and heavy media separation or flotation. Caustic magnesia is a comparatively more porous and reactive material obtained at relatively low temperatures. Magnesite is basic raw material of alkaline refracters and is used in iron-steel industry and other industries such as cement, glass, sugar, lime and paper. In addition, it is used in paint and ink industry, medicine industry as antacid, and in the production of many magnesium chemicals as raw material1. Depending on the thermal condition, caustic magnesia or dead-burned magnesia can be obtained. Dead-burned magnesia, produced at high temperatures, is a basic refractory, whereas causticcalcined magnesia, formed from cryptocrystalline magnesite is an active alkali used in water treatment, mineral processing, and in specialized cement products. Magnesia can be formed by calcinations of magnesium chloride (a precursor of metal) produced by direct acid leaching, filtration, impurity removal and crystallization. Information about the leaching of magnesia with acetic acid is important for the development of industrial process to produce Mg(CH3COO)2 and pure MgO2. In this study, the production of magnesia via calcination of magnesite and the dissolution kinetics of magnesia in acetic acid solutions has been investigated to produce magnesium acetate. Experimental Procedure The magnesite mineral samples used in the study were supplied from Turkish mine sources. The chemical analysis of ore sample was carried out by standard gravimetric and volumetric methods3. The analytical results are given in Table 1. The average density of used magnesite ore was determined as 2.978 gcm−3. In all experiments magnesite minerals of the particle size, −0.31 +0.23 mm were used. The magnesite was calcinated between 850-1125 K for an hour to obtain magnesia. The calcinator consisted of a 100 mL stainless steel INDIAN J. CHEM. TECHNOL., MARCH 2006 136 Table 1—Chemical composition of magnesite mineral Component: MgO CaO Fe2O3 SiO2 Ignition loss Weight, % : 46.36 1.06 0.41 0.71 51.46 reactor, externally heated by an electric ring furnace. A similar calcinatory apparatus was used in the earlier study4. The maximum temperature and the heating procedure including the heating rate, isothermal time, were controlled automatically. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the magnesite was done by using a TG analyzer described earlier5. The samples were heated, under a nitrogen purge, at heating rate of 10 K/min to a final calcination temperature of 1125 K. The TGA provides the continue measurements of the sample weight as a functions of time and temperature. After the calcination, the magnesia was dissolved in acetic acid solutions. The dissolution processes were carried out in a 250 mL 3-necked roundbottomed glass reactor equipped with a mechanical stirrer, at atmospheric pressure and constant temperature. At the beginning of each experiment, a 100 mL acetic acid solution with a known concentration was put into the reactor and heated to desired temperature. Then, a given amount of magnesia was added to the reactor while stirring the reaction mixture at a constant rate. After the end of reaction, the reaction mixture was filtered and the amount of Mg2+ was determined complexometrically. Results and Discussion The magnesite mineral was calcinated for an hour at 1125 K to obtain magnesia (MgO) according to Eq. (1). MgCO3 → MgO + CO2 …(1) The thermal decomposition curve (TGA) of magnesite to magnesia is shown in Fig. 1. The pure MgCO3 is obtained by a two-step process viz. the formation of magnesium bicarbonate solution and the precipitation of magnesium carbonate6-8. The magnesia obtained from calcination process on dissolution in acetic acid yields magnesium acetate according to Eq. (2). MgO+2CH3COOH→Mg(CH3COO)2+H2O …(2) Fig. 1—Thermal decomposition curve of magnesite (MgCO3) to magnesia (MgO). Particle size, 0.15-0.23 mm; Heating rate, 10 K/min Fig. 2—Effect of temperature on the dissolution. X = Degree of dissolution Effect of temperature The effect of the temperature on the dissolution process was determined in the temperature range of 285-325 K, maintaining the solid-to-liquid ratio at 1/100 (g/mL), stirring speed at 500 min−1, and acid concentration at 0.366 M. As evident from the plot of the experimental results shown in Fig. 2, the degree of dissolution increases regularly as the temperature increases. Effect of solid-to-liquid ratio The effect of the solid-to-liquid ratio on the dissolution process was studied using different ratios in the range of 0.5-10/100 (g/mL). For these experiments the value of other parameters, maintained constant during the reaction were: leaching temperature, 293 K; stirring speed, 500 min−1 and reaction time, 10 min. Figure 3 shows the DEMIRBAS: ACETIC ACID LEACHING OF MAGNESIA FROM MAGNESITE VIA CALCINATION Fig. 3—Effect of solid-to-liquid ratio on the dissolution X=Degree of dissolution; Acid conc., 0.366 M Stirring speed, 500 rpm 137 Fig. 4—Effect of acid concentration on the dissolution X=Degree of dissolution experimental results. The dissolution rate decreases substantially with increasing solid-to-liquid ratio. This can be attributed to the decrease in the fluid reactant per unit weight of solid. Effect of acid concentration The effect of acid concentration on dissolution process was studied using the acid concentration in the range of 0.336-3.666 M. For these experiments, the values of the other parameters viz. leaching temperature, 283 K; reaction period, 10 min; stirring speed, 500 min−1 and solid-to-liquid ratio of 1/100 (g/mL) were maintained constant during the reaction. The results obtained by these experiments are shown in Fig. 4. Effect of stirring speed The effect of stirring speed on the dissolution process was investigated in the range of 100-650 rpm at 283 K with solid-to-liquid ratio of 1/100 (g/mL), and reaction period of 10 min. Increase in stirring speed causes a decrease in thickness of film layer, therefore, dissolution rate increases (Fig. 5). Dissolution kinetics Since the fluid-solid heterogeneous reaction systems have significant applications and importance in chemical and metallurgical processes, a successful reactor design for such process depends essentially on kinetic data. The reactions occurring in the fluid-solid system generally have the following steps: (i) Diffusion of fluid reactant through the fluid layer to the surface of the solid, (ii) Reaction of the fluid reactant and solid on the surface of the solid, and (iii) Diffusion of the products through the film layer to the Fig. 5—Effect of stirring speed on the dissolution X=Degree of dissolution bulk fluid. The slowest of these sequenced steps is rate-determining step. Because the products are not solid, as seen in Eq. (2), there is no ash film resistance. The experimental data have been evaluated according to shrinking-core model. The experimental results were used to determine the kinetic parameters of pre-exponential factor (frequency factor) A and the activation energy E. The rate of mass loss for a decomposition reaction is generally described by the following equations, (dX/dt) = k f (W) …(3) X = (Wo – W)/Wo at any time ‘t’ …(4) where t is time, k is the reaction rate constant, X is the degree of dissolution or conversion, Wo is the initial weight and W is the weight of residue. 138 INDIAN J. CHEM. TECHNOL., MARCH 2006 Fig. 6—Plots of −ln(1−X) versus t at different temperatures k = A e−E/RT …(6) Lnk = lnA (−E/RT) ...(7) where A is the pre-exponential factor, E is apparent activation energy, T is the absolute temperature and R is universal gas constant. From a plot of lnk versus 1/T a straight line of (−E/RT) slope was obtained for different temperatures. The Arrhenius plot for the temperature range of 283-323 K is given in Fig. 7. The continuous recordings of the TGA of weight loss with time and temperature enables the determination of (dX/dt) and k, and consequently the activation energy E and the pre-exponential factor A are calculated. The value of activation energy has been found to be 8.78 in kJ.mol−1, as obtained from the slope of this line (Fig. 7). Conclusion The magnesite can be calcinated between 850-1125 K for an hour to obtain magnesia. The magnesia can be dissolved in acetic acid solutions. The leaching of magnesia with acetic acid produce pure Mg(CH3COO)2. It was observed that the dissolution of magnesia increased with increasing temperature, stirring speed, reaction time and acid concentration and decreasing with solid-to-liquid ratio. Fig. 7—Arrhenius plot for the temperature range of 283-323 K An evaluation was done bearing in mind the equilibrium for first-order reactions: t = (−1/k) [ln (1−X)] …(5) The plots drawn between [-ln (1-X)] and t, in the range of 1-20 min for reaction period gave straight lines (Fig. 6). In addition, the application of Eq. (6) gave a value of regression coefficient as 0.9998 (approximately). The rate constant, k, has been calculated from slope of these lines for different temperatures. The reaction rate constant k is also defined by the Arrhenius equation (Eq. 6), Acknowledgement This study has been supported by Scientific Research Project of Selcuk University. References 1 Ekmekyapar A, Dissolution of Magnesite in H2SO4 Solutions, Ph.D. Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey, 1989. 2 Abalı Y, Energy Edu Sci Tecnol, 1 (1998) 67. 3 Furman N H, Scott's Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis, Vol. 1, 6th edn (Van Nostrand, New York), 1963, 798. 4 Demirbas A, Chem Eng Process, 41 (2002) 215. 5 Demirbas A, Akdeniz F, Erdoğan Y & Pamuk V, Fuel Sci Technol Int, 14 (1996) 405. 6 Evans R L & St Claire H W, Ind Eng Chem, 41 (1949) 2814. 7 Smithson G L & Bakhshi N N, Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev, 12 (1973) 91. 8 Wyllie P J, Huang W L, Jens O & Byrnes A P, Tectonophysics, 100 (1983) 359.