Survey
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
G L O B A L P O P U L AT I O N T R E N D S : An immutable force. Table o f c ontents In this white paper: Introduction 1 •Population Pyramids 2 •A Closer Look at Key Countries 4 •Global Population Growth 7 •Labor Force and Economies 8 •The Aging Global Population 10 •Labor Force and Markets 12 •Population and GDP: A Novel Approach 13 •The Outlook for the United States 15 •Some Cautionary Notes 15 •Summary of Investment Implications 15 Written by: Reviewed by: Luis E. Torres Director, Asset Management Douglas W. Evans, CFA, CIMA Senior Managing Director, Asset Management Stephen A. Bobo Managing Director, Asset Management Thomas J. Raymond, Jr., CFA Vice President, Asset Management Jerome J. Paolini Regional Chief Investment Officer, Asset Management Global Global population trends: An immutable force forcei population trends: An immutable G L O B A L P O P U L AT I O N T R E N D S : A n i m m u t a b l e f o r c e Each year, Abbot Downing identifies broad secular themes to augment its investment decisions. Demographics play a major role in identifying these themes by providing insights into the potential demand for a wide-ranging group of goods, services and even investment choices. Population size and structural distribution directly impact the growth of the global emerging middle class covered in the firm’s Wealth of Nations theme and filters through to our focus on Natural Resources and Energy as well. In evaluating prospects for economic growth, practitioners often turn to a variety of indicators, such as employment, construction spending, inflation, durable goods, interest rates, inventories, currency exchange rates and a plethora of other data points. While many of these can be volatile and difficult to predict, demographics stand out as the one indicator that is relatively simple to forecast, especially for the long term. Major trends play out over decades and tend to be rather stable. In this paper, we will examine broad demographic trends that affect both U.S. and global economies, introduce a novel approach for relating these trends to future Gross National Product growth, and conclude with a summary of the investment implications presented throughout the paper. 1 Global population trends: An immutable force Population Pyramids Demographers consider a broad array of statistical data that describe the composition of a population to include age groups, gender, birth rate, migration and life expectancy. A population pyramid (a graphical illustration such as displayed in Figure 1) can provide an overview of the age characteristics of a group. Figure 1 Figure 1, for example, shows the age distribution for the United States in 1980. A cursory inspection reveals a fairly young population with a concentration in the 15-34 age groups and clearly identifies the “baby boom” generation born between 1946 and 1965. If one assumes a roughly 50/50 split between male and female births over time, the graph also confirms that women tend to outlive men. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base Figure 2 To assess the economic impact of these age-related statistics, it is useful to begin by broadly characterizing segments of the population in terms of their input to the general economy. For example, people up to 15 years of age and over 65 are typically in school or retired and not part of the workforce. The 45-54 subset is positioned in the maximum earnings years when assets are being accumulated (Figure 2). From an investment perspective, preferences change with age; the focus is on growth in early years before a transition to income generation later on. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Income Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2009 Global population trends: An immutable force 2 Figure 3 Figure 3 depicts the current U.S. population pyramid. Compared to the 1980 pyramid, “baby boomers” have aged 34 years and are reaching retirement. The 2014 pyramid also reveals another major group, labeled “echo boomers.” These are the children of “boomers” now reaching 20-35 years of age. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base Figure 4 3 Global population trends: An immutable force The graph in Figure 4 also makes clear that the nation’s labor force is beginning to change. According to United Nations data, the percentage of working age Americans peaked around 2005 and will decline rather dramatically for the next 20 years before beginning to level out after 2030. A Closer Look at Key Countries Obviously, each country has its own unique population profile. Figure 5 Japan, for example, has one of the oldest age distributions in the world (Figure 5). This looks similar to the U.S. pyramid, only aged 10-15 years. At the same time, Japan’s population growth has been slowing since the mid-1970s and is likely to turn negative in 2014. Coincidentally, that country’s 10-year compound Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate peaked in 1978 and has fallen in line with its population. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base Figure 6 Figure 6 shows the growth relationship between Japan’s GDP and labor force. An aging population is not categorically bad, although a higher proportion of retirees eventually has negative implications because it lowers productivity. Japan’s average age of 44 is irrelevant by itself. However, when compared to other countries, it looks like an aging dinosaur. Age may just be a number, but in Japan’s case, it is at the far end of the pendulum. Global population trends: An immutable force 4 Figure 7 gure 8 Figure 7 India, on the other hand, is the poster child for a young and expanding population; the largest number of its citizens is under 15 years old (Figure 7). Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base Figure 8 This is in sharp contrast to the profile of China, another population giant. The effects of its “one child” policy mandated in 1979 are revealed in the irregular age distribution pattern in Figure 8. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base 5 Global population trends: An immutable force The consequences of this Chinese policy are likely to be far more momentous than imagined when first implemented. Figure 9 shows the 2050 population pyramids for China, Japan, India, and the U.S. By that year, the bulge in China’s population age will have increased to over age 60. In many respects, that country’s population distribution will begin to look more like Japan’s, but the total population will be 12 times larger. Graphically, the U.S. will resemble India, although only 20 percent of the latter’s population will be older than 60 years of age. China, on the other hand, will have more than one-third of its population over 60, a total roughly equal to the entire U.S. population. The Chinese will indeed be faced with a formidable task to house, clothe and feed its multitudes. Figure 9 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, International Programs, International Data Base Global population trends: An immutable force 6 Global Population Growth Looking at the broader picture, global population will likely reach nine billion by 2050, notwithstanding a lower rate of growth. The majority of the gains will come from the developing world. Figure 10 Elsewhere, a declining projected population growth rate (Figure 10) is due to a reduction in the global birth rate. The world population grew by 1.8 percent annually from 1950 to 1990, about 1.4 times faster than the 1.3 percent experienced between 1991 and 2012. This slowdown in recent years is likely to persist as the projected growth rate drops even further to 0.8 percent. The main cause for this decline: birth rates in many countries have fallen below the current replacement rate of 2.1 children per woman. There are a number of reasons for shrinking birth rates. Innovations in farming technologies have abridged the need for more children to meet labor demands. The expanding education of women, advances in birth control methods and the sheer expense of raising children have also contributed to lower birth rates. 7 Global population trends: An immutable force Labor Force and Economies Figure 11 In the U.S., the growth of the labor force and GDP seem to be tied together historically (Figure 11). (As defined by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the labor force consists of “persons 16 years or older in the civilian non-institutional population,” whether employed or not.) This relationship, however, does not seem to apply in all countries. Figure 12 While holding true in the U.S. and Japan, it is a different story with China and India where neither total population nor labor force growth seems to coincide with GDP (Figures 12 at left and 13 on next page). Global population trends: An immutable force 8 Figure 13 Productivity essentially explains the difference in the labor force/ GDP equation between emerging and developed countries. By embracing new technologies and integrating into world markets, China and India have been able to leapfrog ahead of developed countries in this critical economic indicator. Figure 14 shows clearly that the trend in growth of output per worker in China and India has far surpassed that in the U.S. and Japan since 1990. Figure 14 9 Global population trends: An immutable force Increasing national productivity has the profound effect of increasing real income. Obviously, this is easier to achieve when starting from a lower base, but productivity expansion is not a given in these cases. A growing population and labor force is not enough. Success also depends on economic, market and political systems that can facilitate growth. Finally, the data can be misleading. A market-driven export-oriented economy may look numerically similar to a commodity-driven economy but have a dramatically different profile in terms of poverty, unemployment and household consumption patterns. The Aging Global Population As population growth slows, a populace ages. In 2014, the average global citizen is 31 years old, projected to increase by nearly seven years to 38 in 2050. For the first time, there will soon be more people on this planet over the age of 65 than under the age of five. Figure 15 Figure 15 compares the distribution of the global population in 2010 and 2050. An aging population has several implications that can tilt the economic scales of a country in a less desirable way: • Most people become more conservative as they age. There is an increasing tendency to shy away from investment risk and career risk. A premium is placed on the predictability of investment returns and on the certainty of a paycheck. Becoming more risk-sensitive over time is accepted as a sensible and prudent choice. However, there is a trade-off if this occurs for large segments of a population. On the one hand, wholesale aging can conceptually erode productive capacity. Aggregate capital is deployed more judiciously by increasingly risk-averse investors who lack the advantages of youth, notably the time to recover successfully from failure. On the other hand, the ability to take risks is higher at a young age, along with opportunities to enhance a country’s economic potential. Global population trends: An immutable force 10 • An aging population also poses a deflationary threat. Broad consumption patterns can moderate if a significant number of people migrate from higher income-producing jobs to minimal income resources during retirement. This ultimately leads to reduced demand for big ticket discretionary items such as homes and automobiles. In fact, there is a high degree of predictability to consumer patterns as asserted by economist and author Harry S. Dent, Jr. in his recent book, The Demographic Cliff: “People do predictable things as they age. The average family borrows the most when the parents are age 41, typically the time of their largest home purchase. They spend the most at age 46. People save the most at 54 and have the highest net worth at 64.” • Lower income also reduces tax revenues while social expenditures rise to support retirees. To address this paradox, governments are incented to engage in deficit-spending or printing money, to encourage economic growth. • Retirees are inclined to consume their savings as they age. Nest eggs are gradually liquidated to offset the absence of employment income. As savings accumulated for retirement are repurposed, downward pressure on asset prices can follow without the arrival of new marginal buyers. Globalization, however, can provide a helping hand. Capital is increasingly portable and foreign investors may be able to mitigate any financial supply-demand imbalances in the U.S. and elsewhere. Yet, additional deflationary risk must be recognized as it could well impact the valuation of assets and put a damper on long-term investment returns. • Aging can also greatly alter expenditure patterns at the government level. People now live longer due to advancements in biotechnology, nutrition and medicine. Longer life, however, comes along with a corresponding downside in the form of increasing reliance on government safety nets. Entitlements, particularly Social Security and Medicare in the U.S., take center stage. In 2011, these programs, along with Medicaid, accounted for 44 percent of the federal government’s $3.7 trillion in expenditures, up from 34 percent in 1990, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. In 2010, the year 11 Global population trends: An immutable force before the first baby boomers reached retirement age, there were 40 million people age 65 and older in the U.S.; by 2020, that number will be 55 million. Ballooning entitlements precipitated by an aging population will reroute government spending away from growthenhancing areas such as education, research and development, and infrastructure into entitlements, probably curtailing economic potential. Tax increases or a reduction in benefits theoretically provide at least a partial offset to these government funding obligations, but both are politically toxic and unlikely to garner any serious attention from the political establishment. • The most likely financial tool to fund entitlements is debt issuance, but the resultant leverage is a double-edged sword. Debt is already a monumental problem in many countries with aging populations. As noted earlier, Japan is home to the oldest population in the world. Its average age of 44 is anticipated to reach 53 by 2050 and government debt is already three times that of GDP. The U.S. is not in a much better place, claiming the number one position among global creditors. Its average age of 38 will rise to 41 by 2050. Should debt supply begin to dwarf demand, pricing will come under pressure and yields will spike. By process of elimination, debt on top of debt may be the only viable answer to fund entitlements and it would likely come at a time of higher interest rates and economic fragility. In that environment, bond owners beware. Increasing population growth helps limit the consequences associated with an aging population. Simply put, more people equals more economic potential. Yet, at the same time, declining birth rates have advantages as well. A shrinking global population pie would be less taxing on the environment and finite global resources … but that is a topic for a future Abbot Downing white paper. Labor Force and Markets Equity market valuations may also be related to demographics. Figure 16 Figure 16 shows the S&P 500 price/ earnings ratio plotted against the ratio of maximum earners to retirees. We can easily observe the apparent correlation between the portion of the population in their maximum earnings years and the valuation multiple afforded the S&P 500. Maximum earners are more likely than retirees to accumulate assets and invest in growth instruments like equities. The elderly, on the other hand, are expected to favor income-producing investments. As the proportions allocated to the two alternatives have changed over time, stock valuations have been impacted. As shown in Figure 16, the trend of this demographic factor portends declining valuations for equities for decades to come. Figure 17 Bond yields show a similar connection. Figure 17 shows the relationship of the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield to labor force growth in the U.S. The rate of growth increased dramatically between 1948 and the late-1970s as labor force participants swelled from 60 million to 100 million. During the same period, the interest rate on the 10-year U.S. Treasury rose from below 3 percent to a peak of over 15 percent in 1981. Since 1980, the labor force has continued to grow, reaching 150 million in 2006 and 155 million today. However, the growth rate has decelerated from over 10 percent to less than 2 percent over that time span. Coincidentally, bond yields have dropped from their peak to today’s historic lows. Global population trends: An immutable force 12 Population and GDP: A Novel Approach The framework for thinking about demographics and how it can impact a country’s economic growth is contained in this white paper. There are a host of potential inputs and nuances to consider. However, as suggested earlier, demographics can provide insight into a population’s behavior, but economic, market and political systems have a greater impact on economy prosperity and must be carefully examined alongside demographics. consideration. A number of surveys (published by the World Bank, the Heritage Foundation and others) provide the basis for a better understanding of detrimental government policies, such as the controlled access to foreign exchange and restrictions on payments, transfers, capital transactions and foreign investments. Additionally, insights into labor regulations, corruption, red tape, weak infrastructure and political security conditions prove valuable in determining the economic health of individual countries. Government policies, for example, play an important role in enhancing or impeding economic growth and their effect on behavior must be taken into Table 1: Influential Factors for Economic Growth Variable Description Source for Table 1 & 2 Real per capita GDP Inflation adjusted Gross Domestic Product divided by midyear population World Bank Productivity Average education Average number of years spent in education World Bank Exports ex-oil Weighted average of 10-year export growth (80%) and 3-year export growth (20%) Energy Information Agency Rule of law The property rights assessment of the ability of individuals to accumulate private property, secured by clear laws that are fully enforced by the state Heritage Foundation Government stability Evaluates price stability and government expenditure including consumption and transfers Heritage Foundation Population between 40 and 55 Average percentage for 2012 and 2025 projections U.S. Census Bureau Population over 65 Average percentage for 2012 and 2025 projections U.S. Census Bureau Population between 15 and 64 Average percentage for 2012 and 2025 projections U.S. Census Bureau Life expectancy Life expectancy of total population World Bank Unemployment Average unemployment rate from 1990 – 2011 World Bank Freedom from corruption Derived primarily from Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (2013 less the average of 1996 - 2012) Heritage Foundation Investment freedom Measures the constraints on investment capital movement both internally and externally (2013 less the average of 1996 – 2012) Heritage Foundation Giving Charitable behavior – giving money, giving time, and helping a stranger – according to the World Giving Index Gallup’s World View Poll; Charities Aid Foundation Fiscal freedom Tax burden imposed by government (2013 less the average of 1996 – 2012) Heritage Foundation Voter turnout Average voter turnout in parliamentary elections from 1996 to 2013 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance Labor Force Behavior 13 Global population trends: An immutable force at least in part the result of their higher education level. As for emerging and frontier countries, labor conditions are not ideal despite having younger populations. Less developed countries also have lower life expectancies and high unemployment rates which make their labor forces less attractive. To address this broad array of information and data, we developed a proprietary formula that ranks countries based on their demographic appeal. Thirty factors were evaluated, testing their correlations with real GDP in the 77 countries included in the MSCI AllCountry World Index and the MSCI Frontier Markets Index. Only 15 factors had a correlation coefficient that was statistically significant. As shown in Table 1, the factors fall into three broad groups: Productivity, Labor Force and Behavior. Most of these rankings make sense but some are a bit counter-intuitive. Bosnia and Herzegovina, for example, are nowhere near the top of the corruption rankings on an absolute basis. In fact, they are below the middle of the pack, just ahead of Greece. They have, however, shown the most improvement over the last seven years. Table 2 shows the rankings of China, India, and the U.S. and also includes the best and worst ranked countries. The numbers suggest that developed countries have superior demographic characteristics over their emerging and frontier counterparts, mainly because they are far more productive. Developed countries are also good collaborators as they have infrastructures that allow for trust and innovation, Comparing the U.S. to China and India shows just how much of a head start the U.S. has in terms of measures of productivity. While all three are top-tier exporters, the U.S. ranks in the top 20 percent of all countries in output per man-hour with China and India far behind in the bottom one-third. Table 2: Comparative Factor Rankings Variable China India U.S. Highest Ranked Lowest Ranked Real per capita GDP 60 69 8 Norway Nigeria Average education 55 73 1 United States Nigeria Exports ex-oil 1 13 4 China Philippines Rule of law 75 46 20 New Zealand Zimbabwe Government stability 6 27 33 Singapore Zimbabwe Population between 40 and 55 10 60 49 South Korea Zimbabwe Population over 65 35 18 46 Qatar Japan Productivity Labor Force Population between 15 and 64 9 18 64 Qatar Nigeria Life expectancy 53 69 27 Hong Kong Nigeria Unemployment 7 5 22 Qatar Mauritania Freedom from corruption 16 21 61 Bosnia Herzegovina Oman Investment freedom 66 62 60 Serbia Argentina Giving 73 65 6 Australia Ukraine Fiscal freedom 58 44 53 Bulgaria Brazil Voter turnout 76 53 59 Vietnam Saudi Arabia 36 52 16 Australia Zimbabwe Behavior Total Rank (lower number is better) Global population trends: An immutable force 14 The Outlook for the United States Some Cautionary Notes The demographic factors suggest that over the next 10 to 20 years, the U.S. has the potential to increase real GDP per person to a level that would put it in the top quartile of countries evaluated. The key demographic drivers of this relatively favorable outlook for the U.S. are: The model also suggests that a cautionary stance with regard to investments in emerging and frontier markets is appropriate. Emerging markets have been confronted with a host of challenges in recent years, calling into question whether their rates of economic growth can be sustained. Frontier markets are appropriately named and carry substantial risks. In many cases, they were colonized by Western Europeans who installed infrastructures and institutions designed to extract resources and subjugate populations. Political institutions are still lacking, military coups are common, property rights and the rule of law are nonexistent or limited, and corruption runs rampant, Botswana being the exception. 1. The U.S. is the most educated country in the world and hence the leader in technology, a key driver of economic growth. 2.Excluding oil, exports from the U.S. are among the highest in the world, proving its ability to produce competitive products. 3. Property rights and the rule of law in the U.S. are among the best in the world. Unlike most countries, natural resources and mineral rights can be privately held. Tempering this favorable outlook, the U.S. is faced with demographic challenges as well. Over the next 10 to 20 years, the number of people in the labor force (ages 15-64) relative to the overall population will be one of the lowest in the world. Furthermore, while the levels of corruption and investment in the U.S. are at reasonable levels, corruption has substantially increased in the last three years and barriers to entry into new markets are becoming more formidable. To quote the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom report from the Heritage Foundation regarding the U.S., “The expansive use of government regulatory agencies to manage economic activity, particularly in the financial, healthcare and energy sectors, has opened the door to increased perceptions of cronyism and corruption. Although property rights are guaranteed and the judiciary functions independently and predictably, protection of property rights has been uneven, raising charges of favoritism.” As noted earlier, the U.S. is among the most productive nations. The model suggests that only a few countries possess the demographic profile that could generate economic growth approaching that of the U.S. over the next 10 to 20 years. Some of the candidates include Australia, South Korea, Singapore, Ireland, Switzerland, Chile and Germany. 15 Global population trends: An immutable force Summary of Investment Implications We expect worldwide economic growth to continue (although coupled with high volatility) despite two strong headwinds: a declining population growth rate and a significant increase in the age of the population. Individual countries will feel the effects of an aging population and slowing growth in different ways. Most notably, developed markets are much further down that road and will need to deal with the massive societal and financial demands that come with rising average age levels. Emerging markets, while they appear to have attractive demographic profiles, also face challenges, particularly with allocating resources effectively and encouraging innovation. As suggested throughout this paper, demographic trends play out over very long-term timeframes and the following list of investment implications likewise extend into the future: • From an investment perspective, the natural progression of aging (and ultimately, retirement) will be accompanied by a shift to a more conservative strategy. Over time, investors tend to reduce risk by increasing allocations to incomeoriented alternatives, shortening investment time horizons and materially slowing the consumption of goods. Taken to its extreme, this type of environment would likely suppress the appetite for risky upstart enterprises and perhaps even foreshadow a general disinterest in equities and other asset classes such as real estate. Falling asset prices pose a deflationary risk which can lead to sustained periods of economic malaise, as witnessed in Japan over the last 20+ years. • The implications for national governments are even more profound. Lower incomes lead directly to a reduction in tax revenues, usually when the access to social programs begins to accelerate. At the same time, a smaller proportion of the population contributes to entitlement pools, creating additional fiscal pressures on governments. The necessity to issue debt to pay government obligations then forces interest rates higher. Even more troublesome, in a deflationary environment, debtor nations need to repay obligations with more expensive money. • Developed markets have more than 10 times the productivity of the largest emerging markets. This advantage will continue because the political and economic institutions of developed countries have been in place for many decades. However, having an older demographic profile suggests that incremental growth will be more difficult to attain. Fortunately, there may be offsets to this seemingly insurmountable dilemma; for example, developments such as those occurring in the U.S. energy sector and other technological advances could overwhelm the effects of an aging population. Additionally, aging demographics will benefit healthcare businesses and numerous other industries that cater to the senior set such as leisure-time activities and investment management services. • Increasing demand for income-producing investments from senior citizens will by definition produce higher prices and lower yields for bonds. At the same time, escalating supply driven by deficit-related debt issuance will provide an offset over the long term. Unfortunately, today’s low interest rate environment penalizes savers and leaves little potential for long-term gains in most fixed income securities. High-yielding stocks of companies with solid balance sheets and earnings streams may well outperform other investment choices while Master Limited Partnerships should also benefit. • Emerging economies are typically younger demographically and larger in total than their developed counterparts. The relatively rapid development of the middle class can provide attractive supply/demand dynamics that favorably impact the entire global economy. Companies that serve emerging markets will continue to be attractive sources of growth both for the foreseeable future and over the long term, as will investments in global resources such as agriculture, farmland and water. However, while emerging and frontier markets will continue to generate growth opportunities, many of them lack the open, inclusive political and economic institutions that foster true innovation and risk-taking. Frontier markets, in particular, are high-risk propositions as reflected in our model, requiring extreme care and patience and, importantly, professionally managed investment products. • An underlying assumption in Abbot Downing’s forecasting model has been that stock market valuations for developed and emerging markets will converge over time. Based on our work revealed in this paper, we are convinced that the timeframe for convergence should be extended, thereby lowering somewhat the expected returns and hence the investment appeal of emerging markets relative to their developed peers. • Research from our Wells Fargo colleagues and others has consistently concluded that asset allocation is responsible for more than 85 percent of the variability of investment returns. Not surprisingly, demographics play a key role in formulating Abbot Downing’s asset allocation policy. Reflecting the observations and investment implications contained in this paper, our global economic outlook, which is incorporated into our current asset allocation model, anticipates lower than consensus growth. Global population trends: An immutable force 16 Investment Products: NOT FDIC Insured NO Bank Guarantee MAY Lose Value Abbot Downing, a Wells Fargo business, provides products and services through Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., and its various affiliates and subsidiaries. Asset allocation and diversification do not assure or guarantee better performance and cannot eliminate the risk of investment losses. Past performance does not indicate future results. The value or income associated with a security or an investment may fluctuate. There is always the potential for loss as well as gain. The information and opinions in this report were prepared by Abbot Downing and other sources within Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Information and opinions have been obtained or derived from information we consider reliable, but we cannot guarantee their accuracy or completeness. Opinions represent Abbot Downing’s opinion as of the date of this report and are for general information purposes only. Abbot Downing does not undertake to advise you of any change in its opinions or the information contained in this report. Wells Fargo & Company affiliates may issue reports or have opinions that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, this report. Additional information is available upon request. © 2014 Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. All rights reserved. Member FDIC. ECG-1214986 592445