* Your assessment is very important for improving the workof artificial intelligence, which forms the content of this project
Download Dietary Natural Chemicals: Misunderstanding about Pesticide
Survey
Document related concepts
Transcript
Foods Food Ingredients J. Jpn., Vol. 214, No.3, 2009 Dietary Natural Chemicals: Misunderstanding about Pesticide Residues Hideaki Karaki Professor Emeritus of the University of Tokyo Vice President of the Science Council of Japan 3-5-6-301 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0021, Japan Summary In 1977, Dr. Bruce N. Ames and his colleagues published an important paper entitled "Dietary pesticides (99.99 % all natural)", in which they examined the toxicological significance of exposure to synthetic compounds in the context of intake of naturally occurring chemicals in vegetables and fruits. They calculated that 99.99 % (by weight) of the pesticides in the American diet are chemicals that plants produce to defend themselves. Only 52 natural pesticides have been tested in high-dose animal cancer tests, and about half (27) were found to be rodent carcinogens; these 27 are in fact present in many common foods. From these results, they concluded that natural and synthetic chemicals are equally likely to be positive in animal cancer tests and that at the low doses of most human exposures the comparative hazards of synthetic pesticide residues are insignificant. Their report also suggested the possibility that consumption of vegetables and fruits could increase the risk of cancer. Recently, the Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study Group (JPHC) conducted several studies to determine the effects of fruit and vegetable intake on risk of cancer. They found that, in the Japanese population, consumption of fruits and vegetables does not change the risk of total cancer, lung cancer, and colorectal cancer, although vegetables and fruits decreased the risk of gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, vegetables decreased the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma although fruits increased the risk. These results are in line with vegetables and fruits containing various types of endogenous chemical substances, some of which are carcinogenic. Given the fact that the amounts of these chemicals are 10,000 times larger than those of pesticide residues or food additives, a new perspective is needed. Vegetables and fruits also have compounds with antioxidant activities, vitamins and minerals and, therefore, consumption may change the risk of cancer depending on their actions in particular tissues under particular biological conditions.